Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

445756
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2016-02-02more like thismore than 2016-02-02
star this property date less than 2016-01-19more like thismore than 2016-01-19
star this property date tabled less than 2016-01-19more like thismore than 2016-01-19
star this property ddp created less than 2016-01-19T22:19:23.557Zmore like thismore than 2016-01-19T22:19:23.557Z
star this property ddp modified less than 2016-02-02T22:15:35.067Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-02T22:15:35.067Z
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property hansard heading Police Interrogation more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property identifier HL5166 remove filter
star this property legislature
25277
star this property parliament number 56 more like this
unstar this property question first answered
less than 2016-02-02T14:51:25.69Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-02T14:51:25.69Z
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what are the implications of the police indicating to a person being interviewed under caution that no further action will be taken due to insufficient, or a lack of, evidence. more like this
star this property session
2015/16 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Earl Attlee remove filter
star this property title House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2015/16 HL5166 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin HL5166 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type Ordinary more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The implications in such circumstances are detailed in a written answer on 31 March 1993 by the then Attorney General (Sir Nicholas Lyell), as outlined below.</p><p><em>The fundamental consideration remains that individuals should be able to rely on decisions taken by the prosecuting authorities. The policy of the Director of Public Prosecutions is that a decision to terminate proceedings or not to prosecute should not, in the absence of special circumstances, be altered once it has been communicated to the defendant or prospective defendant unless it was taken and expressed to be taken because the evidence was insufficient. In such a case it would be appropriate to reconsider the decision if further significant evidence were to become available at a later date especially if the alleged offence is a serious one.</em></p><p><em>Special circumstances which might justify departure from this policy include: </em></p><p><em>(1) rare cases where reconsiderations of the original decision show that it was not justified and the maintenance of confidence in the criminal justice system requires that a prosecution be brought notwithstanding the earlier decision; and </em></p><p><em>(2) those cases where termination has been effected specifically with a view to the collection and preparation of the necessary evidence which is thought likely to become available in the fairly near future. In such circumstances the CPS will advise the defendant of the possibility that proceedings will be re-instituted. (Official Report, Col’s 200-201).</em></p><p>Following this written answer and further written ministerial statements, the Crown Prosecution Service has produced guidance for prosecutors to follow concerning the exercise of the CPS discretion to institute, reinstitute or continue proceedings after a suspect has been informed by the police or CPS of a decision not to prosecute. The above mentioned Written Statements are detailed below and are published in the Official Report.</p><p><strong>WMS – Crown Prosecutors Code - 22 February 2010. Column WS64, Baroness Scotland of Asthal. </strong></p><p><strong>WMS - Reconsidering a Prosecution Decision (CPS Guidance) - 31 October 2012, Col 15WS, Rt. Hon Dominic Grieve </strong></p><p><strong>WMS – Victim’s Right to Review - 5 June 2013, Col 99WS, Rt. Hon Dominic Grieve</strong></p>
star this property creator
3425
star this property label Biography information for Earl Attlee more like this
star this property publisher 25277
unstar this property tabling member
3425
unstar this property label Biography information for Earl Attlee more like this