Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

818718
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2018-01-08more like thismore than 2018-01-08
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading National Productivity Investment Fund more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to page 130 of the Industrial Strategy, published in November 2017, how much has funding has been allocated to (a) transport, (b) housing, (c) digital and (d) research & development in each NUTS 1 region by the National Productivity Investment Fund. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 121482 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2018-01-11more like thismore than 2018-01-11
star this property answer text <p>A large proportion of funding from the NPIF – established at Autumn Statement 2016 and expanded to £31bn at Autumn Budget 2017 – has already been allocated to its four target sectors: transport, housing, digital communications and R&amp;D. Breakdowns within these sectors can be found on page 44 of the 2017 Autumn Budget document. Specific projects are selected through a variety of mechanisms that are tailored to achieve programme goals and ensure high value for money.</p><p> </p><p>Funding allocations from the NPIF are not specifically made by region. However the NPIF is intended to fund projects that help to boost productivity and prosperity throughout the UK and across regions. For example, at the Autumn Budget 2017, the government made an allocation specifically benefitting the North East, announcing £337m of new funding from the NPIF to replace rolling stock on the Tyne &amp; Wear Metro. It also established a new £1.7bn Transforming Cities Fund. This funding will be widely distributed, with £840m of per capita funding to be transferred to the six Mayoral Combined Authorities with directly elected mayors, and £840m open for competition for transport projects in cities. These announcements and others demonstrate a commitment to invest to improve productivity in all UK regions.</p>
star this property answering member constituency South West Norfolk more like this
star this property answering member printed Elizabeth Truss more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2018-01-11T14:16:03.933Zmore like thismore than 2018-01-11T14:16:03.933Z
star this property answering member
4097
star this property label Biography information for Elizabeth Truss more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
712426
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-03-20more like thismore than 2017-03-20
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Apprentices: Taxation more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much funding each NUTS 1 region will receive from the Government's policy to top-up the apprenticeship levy in 2017-18. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 68618 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-03-28more like thismore than 2017-03-28
star this property answer text <p>The apprenticeship levy will apply across the UK and will be collected from employers on a UK wide basis.</p><p> </p><p>In England, levy paying employers will be able to access their funds through the apprenticeship service to pay for apprenticeship training and assessment. Employers will also benefit from a 10% top up to monthly funds entering an account.</p><p> </p><p>Regional forecasts of contribution to the apprenticeship levy have not been made, and it not possible to say how much each local area will benefit from the 10% top up. However, the expected yield for the apprenticeship levy is published in table B.5: ‘Current Receipts’, in the Spring Budget 2017 document available here:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/597467/spring_budget_2017_web.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/597467/spring_budget_2017_web.pdf</a></p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Battersea more like this
star this property answering member printed Jane Ellison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-03-28T15:55:27.067Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-28T15:55:27.067Z
star this property answering member
3918
star this property label Biography information for Jane Ellison more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
710454
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-03-13more like thismore than 2017-03-13
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Tax Collection more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 12 July 2016 to Question 42176, on tax collection, for what reason technical risks not subject to litigation do not form part of the tax gap; and what proportion of unpaid corporation tax identified as technical risks not subject to litigation was collected by the Exchequer in the last two fiscal years for which figures are available. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 67540 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-03-21more like thismore than 2017-03-21
star this property answer text <p>The large business corporation tax gap relates to those cases where it was not possible to reach agreement on the amount of tax to be paid. Tax on technical risks not subject to litigation are excluded from the tax gap because for these cases agreement is expected or has been reached between HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and the customer in line with the Litigation and Settlement Strategy. HMRC collects the tax due under the law in accordance with the published Litigation and Settlement Strategy.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Battersea more like this
star this property answering member printed Jane Ellison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-03-21T11:54:45.383Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-21T11:54:45.383Z
star this property answering member
3918
star this property label Biography information for Jane Ellison more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
694302
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-02-24more like thismore than 2017-02-24
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme: Females more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many and what proportion of the recipients of funding from the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme were (a) female entrepreneurs and (b) companies with at least one woman in a leadership position in each year since that scheme was established. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 65492 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2017-03-01more like thismore than 2017-03-01
star this property answer text <p>The Government does not hold this information. HM Revenue and Customs does not collect information on the number, role or gender of officers and directors of companies that apply to use the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Battersea more like this
star this property answering member printed Jane Ellison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-03-01T15:30:43.383Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-01T15:30:43.383Z
star this property answering member
3918
star this property label Biography information for Jane Ellison more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
657022
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-12-12more like thismore than 2016-12-12
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Government Contracts more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Written Statement of 14 November 2016, HCWS252, on off-payroll review 2014-15, how much was paid from the public purse to the 504 contractors who did not provide sufficient reassurance of their tax affairs; and how much has since been recovered by the Government. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 57164 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-12-20more like thismore than 2016-12-20
star this property answer text <p>The annex attached to the Written Statement of 14 November 2016 detailing the results of the off-payroll review provides a breakdown of which departments sought assurances on the tax affairs of their contractors earning more than £220 per day for more than six months, including how many such contractors had assurances sought about them and how many did not provide adequate assurance. The total number of off-payroll engagements across departments and their total value is outside the remit of the off-payroll review, and it not held by HM Treasury.</p><p> </p><p>A failure to provide assurance does not conclusively denote anything about the tax arrangements of the individuals concerned. For example, in some of the 504 instances the engagements came to a natural conclusion before assurance was received. Nevertheless, referrals to HMRC for further investigation occurred in all relevant cases across government. HMRC will investigate rule bending and breaking, including fraud investigation by both specialist civil and criminal teams where appropriate. HMRC are unable to provide details of individual cases due to taxpayer confidentiality so it is not possible to calculate the amount of tax recovered as a result of the referrals.</p><p> </p><p>The review found that not all relevant contracts contained the clause required to allow departments to seek assurance. However, assurance was requested and received from the majority of contractors regardless. As I set out in my Statement of 14 November 2016, I expect departments to have these clauses in place and departments can expect to be fined if breaches of this nature are found in the next review. The table below details contracts that, as part of this review, cannot be confirmed as containing the required clause:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Department</p></td><td><p>Number of new engagements, or those that reached six months in duration, between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2014</p></td><td><p>Number that cannot be confirmed as including contractual clauses giving the department the right to request assurance in relation to income tax and NICs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>BIS ALBs</p></td><td><p>110</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DCLG ALBs</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DEFRA</p></td><td><p>74</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DFE ALBs</p></td><td><p>109</p></td><td><p>44</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DFT ALBs</p></td><td><p>272</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DH ALBs</p></td><td><p>1217</p></td><td><p>313</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DWP</p></td><td><p>161</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DWP ALBs</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MOD</p></td><td><p>352</p></td><td><p>116</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>OFQUAL</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>OFWAT</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UKEF</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>22</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
57165 more like this
57166 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-12-20T10:54:41.83Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-20T10:54:41.83Z
star this property answering member
1529
star this property label Biography information for Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
657023
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-12-12more like thismore than 2016-12-12
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Government Contracts more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Written Statement of 14 November 2016, HCWS252, on off-payroll review 2014-15, which departments sought assurances on the tax affairs of 3,034 of their contractors; how many such contractors had assurances sought about them for each such Department; to which departments the 504 cases belonged; and what proportion of contracts by Department the 3,034 represents. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 57165 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-12-20more like thismore than 2016-12-20
star this property answer text <p>The annex attached to the Written Statement of 14 November 2016 detailing the results of the off-payroll review provides a breakdown of which departments sought assurances on the tax affairs of their contractors earning more than £220 per day for more than six months, including how many such contractors had assurances sought about them and how many did not provide adequate assurance. The total number of off-payroll engagements across departments and their total value is outside the remit of the off-payroll review, and it not held by HM Treasury.</p><p> </p><p>A failure to provide assurance does not conclusively denote anything about the tax arrangements of the individuals concerned. For example, in some of the 504 instances the engagements came to a natural conclusion before assurance was received. Nevertheless, referrals to HMRC for further investigation occurred in all relevant cases across government. HMRC will investigate rule bending and breaking, including fraud investigation by both specialist civil and criminal teams where appropriate. HMRC are unable to provide details of individual cases due to taxpayer confidentiality so it is not possible to calculate the amount of tax recovered as a result of the referrals.</p><p> </p><p>The review found that not all relevant contracts contained the clause required to allow departments to seek assurance. However, assurance was requested and received from the majority of contractors regardless. As I set out in my Statement of 14 November 2016, I expect departments to have these clauses in place and departments can expect to be fined if breaches of this nature are found in the next review. The table below details contracts that, as part of this review, cannot be confirmed as containing the required clause:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Department</p></td><td><p>Number of new engagements, or those that reached six months in duration, between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2014</p></td><td><p>Number that cannot be confirmed as including contractual clauses giving the department the right to request assurance in relation to income tax and NICs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>BIS ALBs</p></td><td><p>110</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DCLG ALBs</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DEFRA</p></td><td><p>74</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DFE ALBs</p></td><td><p>109</p></td><td><p>44</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DFT ALBs</p></td><td><p>272</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DH ALBs</p></td><td><p>1217</p></td><td><p>313</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DWP</p></td><td><p>161</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DWP ALBs</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MOD</p></td><td><p>352</p></td><td><p>116</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>OFQUAL</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>OFWAT</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UKEF</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>22</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
57164 more like this
57166 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-12-20T10:54:41.77Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-20T10:54:41.77Z
star this property answering member
1529
star this property label Biography information for Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
657024
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-12-12more like thismore than 2016-12-12
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Contracts more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Written Statement of 14 November 2016, HCWS252, on off-payroll review 2014-15, how many Government contracts which did not allow departments to seek assurance regarding contractors' tax affairs there were by Department; and what proportion of contracts issued in 2014-15 that number represents by Department. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 57166 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-12-20more like thismore than 2016-12-20
star this property answer text <p>The annex attached to the Written Statement of 14 November 2016 detailing the results of the off-payroll review provides a breakdown of which departments sought assurances on the tax affairs of their contractors earning more than £220 per day for more than six months, including how many such contractors had assurances sought about them and how many did not provide adequate assurance. The total number of off-payroll engagements across departments and their total value is outside the remit of the off-payroll review, and it not held by HM Treasury.</p><p> </p><p>A failure to provide assurance does not conclusively denote anything about the tax arrangements of the individuals concerned. For example, in some of the 504 instances the engagements came to a natural conclusion before assurance was received. Nevertheless, referrals to HMRC for further investigation occurred in all relevant cases across government. HMRC will investigate rule bending and breaking, including fraud investigation by both specialist civil and criminal teams where appropriate. HMRC are unable to provide details of individual cases due to taxpayer confidentiality so it is not possible to calculate the amount of tax recovered as a result of the referrals.</p><p> </p><p>The review found that not all relevant contracts contained the clause required to allow departments to seek assurance. However, assurance was requested and received from the majority of contractors regardless. As I set out in my Statement of 14 November 2016, I expect departments to have these clauses in place and departments can expect to be fined if breaches of this nature are found in the next review. The table below details contracts that, as part of this review, cannot be confirmed as containing the required clause:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Department</p></td><td><p>Number of new engagements, or those that reached six months in duration, between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2014</p></td><td><p>Number that cannot be confirmed as including contractual clauses giving the department the right to request assurance in relation to income tax and NICs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>BIS ALBs</p></td><td><p>110</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DCLG ALBs</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DEFRA</p></td><td><p>74</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DFE ALBs</p></td><td><p>109</p></td><td><p>44</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DFT ALBs</p></td><td><p>272</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DH ALBs</p></td><td><p>1217</p></td><td><p>313</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DWP</p></td><td><p>161</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>DWP ALBs</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MOD</p></td><td><p>352</p></td><td><p>116</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>OFQUAL</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>OFWAT</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>UKEF</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>22</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property grouped question UIN
57164 more like this
57165 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-12-20T10:54:41.91Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-20T10:54:41.91Z
star this property answering member
1529
star this property label Biography information for Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
657278
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-12-12more like thismore than 2016-12-12
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading Concentrix more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Written Statement of 14 November 2016, HCWS251, update on HM Revenue and Customs' contract with Concentrix, of those Mandatory Considerations against Concentrix tax credit decisions that are still outstanding, what the dates were on which the cases relating to those decisions were first lodged; and what the date was when the case longest awaiting consideration was lodged. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 57162 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-12-20more like thismore than 2016-12-20
star this property answer text <p>As at 18 December 2016 there are 1,302 Concentrix related Mandatory Reconsiderations outstanding.</p><p> </p><p>The oldest case still outstanding was received on 28 November 2016, all other outstanding Mandatory Reconsiderations were received after 28 November.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Battersea more like this
star this property answering member printed Jane Ellison more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-12-20T10:47:13.053Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-20T10:47:13.053Z
star this property answering member
3918
star this property label Biography information for Jane Ellison more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
647600
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-11-29more like thismore than 2016-11-29
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading National Productivity Investment Fund more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much of the National Productivity Investment Fund money will be spent in each NUTS 1 region. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 55307 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-12-02more like thismore than 2016-12-02
star this property answer text <p>The government has established a National Productivity Investment Fund (NPIF) to provide £23bn of additional spending between 2017/18 and 2021/22. Every penny spent by the UK government is explicitly earmarked for areas that are critical to boosting productivity: economic infrastructure (transport and digital communications), Research and Development (R&amp;D), and housing.</p><p> </p><p>Further details about specifically how and where this money will be invested will be set out by the relevant departments and agencies in due course.</p><p> </p><p>Where spending on measures within the NPIF does not extend to Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland, the devolved administrations will receive funding through the Barnett formula in the usual way.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-12-02T11:07:10.117Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-02T11:07:10.117Z
star this property answering member
1529
star this property label Biography information for Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this
647601
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-11-29more like thismore than 2016-11-29
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 remove filter
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
unstar this property hansard heading National Productivity Investment Fund more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many full-time equivalent staff will be employed in administering the National Productivity Investment Fund; and how many such staff will be employed in each NUTS 1 region. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 55308 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2016-12-02more like thismore than 2016-12-02
star this property answer text <p>The National Productivity Investment Fund will be administered by HM Treasury in collaboration with relevant departments and expert bodies, as set out in paragraph 3.9 of the Autumn Statement.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-12-02T11:09:24.197Zmore like thismore than 2016-12-02T11:09:24.197Z
star this property answering member
1529
star this property label Biography information for Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Diana Johnson more like this