Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

776033
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2017-10-23more like thismore than 2017-10-23
star this property answering body
Department for Transport more like this
star this property answering dept id 27 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Transport more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Transport more like this
star this property hansard heading Transport: Per Capita Costs more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the oral contribution by the Secretary of State for Transport of 19 October 2017, Official Report, column 975, what evidence there is that per-head transport investment in London is not 10 times greater than in Yorkshire and the Humber; and if he will publish per-head transport investment for each NUTS 1 region of England. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Kingston upon Hull North more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Diana Johnson remove filter
star this property uin 108962 more like this
unstar this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
unstar this property date of answer remove filter
star this property answer text <p>Historic per-head transport investment for each NUTS 1 region of England is already published in Her Majesty Treasury’s Country and Regional Analysis data.</p><p> </p><p>Analysis using the most recent Country and Regional Analysis (November 2016) shows that in 2015-16 transport investment per head by the Department for Transport in London was less than double that in Yorkshire and the Humber, at £285 in London and £168 in Yorkshire and the Humber.</p><p> </p><p>A number of factors make precise analysis and comparisons difficult. It is not always possible to allocate spending accurately on a project that crosses many regions, such as HS2. Projects of national significance such as Crossrail, which is the largest infrastructure project in Europe, can alone distort these figures significantly. An analysis of regional spend per head of resident population would not necessarily take into account the pressure that large numbers of commuters and visitors from outside of a region can add to a region’s transport networks.</p><p> </p><p>In addition, larger and more densely built-up areas tend to make greater use of mass public transport systems. For example, in 2015/16 there were 537 million rail journeys within the London area compared to 142 million in the North. Investment by the Department is made based on a fair and rigorous process designed to ensure that spending goes where it is most needed.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2017-10-26T15:12:15.523Zmore like thismore than 2017-10-26T15:12:15.523Z
star this property answering member
3991
star this property label Biography information for Jesse Norman remove filter
star this property tabling member
1533
unstar this property label Biography information for Dame Diana Johnson more like this