|
answer text |
<p>HM Treasury’s Country and Regional Analysis (CRA) and the Infrastructure and Projects
Authority’s National Infrastructure and Construction Pipeline (NICP) are not directly
comparable.</p><p> </p><p>The CRA provides comprehensive historical analysis of public
sector spend on transport by region up to 2016, outlining spend on maintaining and
administering the transport network, such as maintaining the local road network. It
also includes the actual investment to build new infrastructure, such as investment
in a new bypass. CRA data are National Statistics.</p><p> </p><p>The NICP differs
from the CRA in that it is a forward-looking view focused on planned projects. It
is intended to provide industry with a strategic view of the planned investment in
projects to deliver new infrastructure and construction projects across the public
and private sectors, including the transport network, up to 2021 and beyond. The IPA
makes clear that the NICP is based on non-comprehensive, unaudited administrative
data and should not be considered as National Statistics or Official Statistics.</p><p>
</p><p>It is very difficult to offer a meaningful regional breakdown of infrastructure
investment based on the NICP. This is because only around 40% of the value of projects
in the pipeline to 2020/21 has been allocated to individual English regions.</p>
|
|