Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1701020

	registered interest
	date	15/04/2024
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Ministry of Justice: Marketing
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of his Department’s (a) advertising and (b) marketing expenditure was on (i) local newspapers in print and online, (ii) national newspapers in print and online, (iii) social media, (iv) search engines, (v) broadcast and on-demand television and (vi) other channels in the most recent year for which data is available.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	21755
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/04/2024 answer text <p>Over financial year 2022/23, the Ministry of Justice’s communications team delivered highly cost-effective marketing campaigns to support operational and policy priorities, such as our Prison and Probation Service recruitment campaigns.</p><p> </p><p>As requested, we have outlined the proportion of the marketing and advertising budget that was spent on advertising broken down in percentages. The categories vary slightly due to the way the data is collected. It is worth noting that due to 2023/24 accounts still being in reconciliation, we are unable to provide data for year 2023/24.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Proportion</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Local Print (advertising)</p></td><td><p>0.04%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>National Print (advertising)</p></td><td><p>0.52%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Online job sites (advertising)</p></td><td><p>54.24%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Online Media Search advertising</p></td><td><p>15.69%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Broadcast and on-demand television (advertising)</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other</p></td><td><p>13.58%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Social media (advertising)</p></td><td><p>15.94%</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer question first answered 23/04/2024 14:12:21 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1699174

	registered interest
	date	26/03/2024
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Crown Court
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of the condition of crown court (a) buildings and (b) other infrastructure.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	20729
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/04/2024 answer text <p>The general condition of Crown Court buildings and other infrastructure is adequate, but I recognise that improvements are needed in some locations.</p><p>That is why we are investing £220 million in the two years to March 2025 for essential modernisation and repair work across the court and tribunal estate. This will minimise disruptions, retain the heritage of the estate, and ensure it is fit for the future.</p><p>We are working to ensure that those buildings most in need of investment are prioritised, providing a step forward in improving the quality of the court estate.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer question first answered 15/04/2024 11:31:52 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1652886

	registered interest
	date	13/07/2023
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Ministry of Justice: Artificial Intelligence
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what (a) algorithmic and (b) other automated decision making systems his Department uses; and for what purposes.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	194023
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/07/2023 answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice is still at the early stages of assessing where the uses of algorithmic models and automated decision-making tools might help drive greater efficiency and deliver maximum value for the taxpayer, as part of the Government’s digital transformation journey.</p><p> </p><p>Work done to date has primarily been around the use of Actuarial Risk Assessment Instruments (ARAIs) in HM Prisons &amp; Probation Service to assess the risks posed by, and needs of, an offender by combining actuarial methods of prediction with structured professional judgement.</p><p> </p><p>The Ministry of Justice recognises that the use of AI in the justice system raises important ethical considerations, such as bias in the data used to train algorithms and the potential for automated decision-making to perpetuate existing inequalities. Therefore, any implementation of AI in the UK Ministry of Justice must be done carefully and transparently, with appropriate safeguards in place.</p><p> </p><p>Any use of automated decision making will be done in compliance with provisions in GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018, including the right of individuals to request a new decision is made that is not based solely on automated processing.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer question first answered 21/07/2023 11:57:30 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1645950

	registered interest
	date	20/06/2023
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Ministry of Justice: Data Protection
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the oral contribution of the Minister for Data and Digital Infrastructure of 14 June 2023 at Topical Questions, T7, Official Report, column 286, what plans his Department has to (a) utilise the provisions in Part 3 of the Data Protection and Digital Information (No. 2) Bill and (b) use smart data in new sectors.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	190416
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/06/2023 answer text <p>There is exciting potential to explore Smart Data in further sectors, beyond Open Banking. Government, regulators and industry experts are working together via the Smart Data Council to ensure that the UK continues to be at the forefront of developments in this space.</p><p>Before committing to utilise the provisions in Part 3 of the Data Protection and Digital Information (No.2) Bill in any given sector, there is work to be done to understand how Smart Data can empower consumers and turbo charge competition, which is the case within my Department.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer question first answered 28/06/2023 13:52:22 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1600867

	registered interest
	date	02/03/2023
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Probate
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how long the average wait time was for probate to be granted in (a) 2021 and (b) 2022.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	156999
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/03/2023 answer text <p>The average wait for all grant types to be granted in 2021 was 6.9 weeks and 7.1 weeks for July to September 2022.</p><p>The longest wait time for Probate to be granted in 2021 was 87.3 weeks and 38.3 weeks in 2022. Cases can be delayed where more information is needed from the applicant, a caveat is in place or where cases are complex.</p><p>The shortest wait time for Probate to be granted is 0 days in 2021 and 2022 (i.e. applied for and granted in the same day).</p><p>Data provided are for grants issued up to the end of September as is published in the Family Court Statistics Quarterly National Statistics bulletin. This will be updated on 30 March 2022 with data to the end of 2022.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer grouped question UIN 157000 157001 question first answered 08/03/2023 19:23:05 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1600869

	registered interest
	date	02/03/2023
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Probate
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the longest wait time was for probate to be granted for applications made in (a) 2021 and (b) 2022.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	157000
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/03/2023 answer text <p>The average wait for all grant types to be granted in 2021 was 6.9 weeks and 7.1 weeks for July to September 2022.</p><p>The longest wait time for Probate to be granted in 2021 was 87.3 weeks and 38.3 weeks in 2022. Cases can be delayed where more information is needed from the applicant, a caveat is in place or where cases are complex.</p><p>The shortest wait time for Probate to be granted is 0 days in 2021 and 2022 (i.e. applied for and granted in the same day).</p><p>Data provided are for grants issued up to the end of September as is published in the Family Court Statistics Quarterly National Statistics bulletin. This will be updated on 30 March 2022 with data to the end of 2022.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer grouped question UIN 156999 157001 question first answered 08/03/2023 19:23:05 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1600870

	registered interest
	date	02/03/2023
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Probate
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the shortest wait time was for probate to be granted for applications made in (a) 2021 and (b) 2022.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	157001
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/03/2023 answer text <p>The average wait for all grant types to be granted in 2021 was 6.9 weeks and 7.1 weeks for July to September 2022.</p><p>The longest wait time for Probate to be granted in 2021 was 87.3 weeks and 38.3 weeks in 2022. Cases can be delayed where more information is needed from the applicant, a caveat is in place or where cases are complex.</p><p>The shortest wait time for Probate to be granted is 0 days in 2021 and 2022 (i.e. applied for and granted in the same day).</p><p>Data provided are for grants issued up to the end of September as is published in the Family Court Statistics Quarterly National Statistics bulletin. This will be updated on 30 March 2022 with data to the end of 2022.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer grouped question UIN 156999 157000 question first answered 08/03/2023 19:23:05 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1469026

	registered interest
	date	09/06/2022
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Theft: Sentencing
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent assessment he has made of the adequacy of the length of sentences for theft of items which are essential to a person’s livelihood.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	15339
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 17/06/2022 answer text <p>An assessment of the adequacy of the length of sentences for theft of items which are essential to a person’s livelihood has not been carried out. Data on items stolen when a theft offence has been committed is not centrally held.</p><p>Sentencing is entirely a matter for our independent courts. When deciding what sentence to impose the courts take into account the circumstances of the offence, the offender and any aggravating and mitigating factors, in line with any relevant sentencing guidelines – which are issued by the independent Sentencing Council. The sentencing guideline for theft makes it clear that the value of items stolen to the loser, regardless of monetary worth, and any consequential financial harm to victims or others must be considered when determining the sentence.</p> answering member constituency South Suffolk answering member printed James Cartlidge question first answered 17/06/2022 08:52:59 answering member 4519 label Biography information for James Cartlidge
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1455518

	registered interest
	date	29/03/2022
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Veterans: Prison Officers
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether the fast track scheme for service leavers and veterans to become prison officers has begun; and what steps are being taken to promote that scheme, including through active outreach with veterans.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	149320
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/04/2022 answer text <p>'Advance into Justice,’ the Ministry of Justice fast-track scheme to support service leavers and veterans to become prison officers, was launched on 24 January 2022. The campaign closed on 14 February 2022 and candidates were assessed in March 2022. Those successful at assessment centre are currently progressing through the offer and hire process.</p><p> </p><p>The scheme was promoted in several ways including proactive social media communications in advance of the launch; dedicated candidate webinars to provide information on the role and the assessment process; active outreach at ex-Armed Forces’ recruitment fairs; and working collaboratively with the Career Transition Partnership (CTP) to engage service leavers as they transition from the military into civilian life.</p><p> </p><p>The campaign has received dedicated support from Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS). A specific funding line to deliver campaign marketing, candidate outreach and assessment delivery was not needed as we were able to meet the costs as part of the broader Prison Officer recruitment budget. HMPPS provided operational resources to deliver the assessment centres and funding to support successful applicants with relocation or home to work travel costs is being met from existing budgets up to the advertised thresholds of £12,000 per candidate. The total cost of the campaign will be dependent upon the number of successful candidates who take up post and their agreed individual resettlement needs.</p><p> </p><p>A thorough evaluation review and lessons learnt exercise with key stakeholders will be completed to identify successes and challenges, as well as analysing feedback collected from candidates. In addition, analysis will be conducted to identify any differences in terms of selection performance by those on the scheme, compared to the national prison officer recruitment process, alongside evaluating fairness towards protected characteristic groups. This will be supported by our Occupational Psychology Team.</p><p> </p><p>In the short-term, success will be measured by the number of applications and those who progress to an assessment centre and the number of hires in our target prisons. In the longer-term, we will monitor the retention levels of those appointed via this route as well as their performance in role.</p> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse grouped question UIN 149324 149327 question first answered 06/04/2022 15:10:09 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1455523

	registered interest
	date	29/03/2022
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Veterans: Prison Officers
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what funding has been allocated to developing a fast-track recruitment scheme for service leavers and veterans to become prison officers.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	149324
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/04/2022 answer text <p>'Advance into Justice,’ the Ministry of Justice fast-track scheme to support service leavers and veterans to become prison officers, was launched on 24 January 2022. The campaign closed on 14 February 2022 and candidates were assessed in March 2022. Those successful at assessment centre are currently progressing through the offer and hire process.</p><p> </p><p>The scheme was promoted in several ways including proactive social media communications in advance of the launch; dedicated candidate webinars to provide information on the role and the assessment process; active outreach at ex-Armed Forces’ recruitment fairs; and working collaboratively with the Career Transition Partnership (CTP) to engage service leavers as they transition from the military into civilian life.</p><p> </p><p>The campaign has received dedicated support from Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS). A specific funding line to deliver campaign marketing, candidate outreach and assessment delivery was not needed as we were able to meet the costs as part of the broader Prison Officer recruitment budget. HMPPS provided operational resources to deliver the assessment centres and funding to support successful applicants with relocation or home to work travel costs is being met from existing budgets up to the advertised thresholds of £12,000 per candidate. The total cost of the campaign will be dependent upon the number of successful candidates who take up post and their agreed individual resettlement needs.</p><p> </p><p>A thorough evaluation review and lessons learnt exercise with key stakeholders will be completed to identify successes and challenges, as well as analysing feedback collected from candidates. In addition, analysis will be conducted to identify any differences in terms of selection performance by those on the scheme, compared to the national prison officer recruitment process, alongside evaluating fairness towards protected characteristic groups. This will be supported by our Occupational Psychology Team.</p><p> </p><p>In the short-term, success will be measured by the number of applications and those who progress to an assessment centre and the number of hires in our target prisons. In the longer-term, we will monitor the retention levels of those appointed via this route as well as their performance in role.</p> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse grouped question UIN 149320 149327 question first answered 06/04/2022 15:10:09 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1455526

	registered interest
	date	29/03/2022
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Veterans: Prison Officers
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to plans outlined in the Veterans’ Strategy Action Plan 2022-24 to develop a fast-track recruitment scheme for service leavers and veterans to become prison officers, how his Department plans to measure and evaluate the success of those plans.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	149327
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/04/2022 answer text <p>'Advance into Justice,’ the Ministry of Justice fast-track scheme to support service leavers and veterans to become prison officers, was launched on 24 January 2022. The campaign closed on 14 February 2022 and candidates were assessed in March 2022. Those successful at assessment centre are currently progressing through the offer and hire process.</p><p> </p><p>The scheme was promoted in several ways including proactive social media communications in advance of the launch; dedicated candidate webinars to provide information on the role and the assessment process; active outreach at ex-Armed Forces’ recruitment fairs; and working collaboratively with the Career Transition Partnership (CTP) to engage service leavers as they transition from the military into civilian life.</p><p> </p><p>The campaign has received dedicated support from Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS). A specific funding line to deliver campaign marketing, candidate outreach and assessment delivery was not needed as we were able to meet the costs as part of the broader Prison Officer recruitment budget. HMPPS provided operational resources to deliver the assessment centres and funding to support successful applicants with relocation or home to work travel costs is being met from existing budgets up to the advertised thresholds of £12,000 per candidate. The total cost of the campaign will be dependent upon the number of successful candidates who take up post and their agreed individual resettlement needs.</p><p> </p><p>A thorough evaluation review and lessons learnt exercise with key stakeholders will be completed to identify successes and challenges, as well as analysing feedback collected from candidates. In addition, analysis will be conducted to identify any differences in terms of selection performance by those on the scheme, compared to the national prison officer recruitment process, alongside evaluating fairness towards protected characteristic groups. This will be supported by our Occupational Psychology Team.</p><p> </p><p>In the short-term, success will be measured by the number of applications and those who progress to an assessment centre and the number of hires in our target prisons. In the longer-term, we will monitor the retention levels of those appointed via this route as well as their performance in role.</p> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse grouped question UIN 149320 149324 question first answered 06/04/2022 15:10:09 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1419498

	registered interest
	date	03/02/2022
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Prison Sentences: Veterans
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many female veterans are serving custodial sentences.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	117869
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/02/2022 answer text <p>As of 30 June 2021, there were 13 females serving a custodial sentence in England and Wales who had declared former military service.</p><p> </p><p>Information on previous service does not distinguish between those who have served in the British Armed Forces or those of another nation. Those who choose to declare previous service may be referring to time spent with the UK forces or with those of another country.</p> answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle answering member printed Victoria Atkins question first answered 08/02/2022 14:02:48 answering member 4399 label Biography information for Victoria Atkins
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1419499

	registered interest
	date	03/02/2022
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Community Service Orders and Probation: Veterans
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many female veterans are subject to (a) community based court orders and (b) probation supervision.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	117870
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/02/2022 answer text <p>As of 30 September 2021, the number of female veterans<sup>1</sup> subject to community based court orders<sup>2</sup> and probation supervision was as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Sentence type</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>All court orders<sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>All probation supervision</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p>1. Veteran status can include individuals who have served in foreign Armed Forces as well as UK Armed Service Personnel and those who were in the Territorial Army/reserve.</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p>2. Court orders includes all community sentences, deferred sentences and suspended sentence orders with requirements.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>There is anecdotal evidence that some offenders may be reluctant to disclose having served in the Armed Forces. Note that we rely on them self-declaring previous military service, either here or abroad, for our data.</p> answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle answering member printed Victoria Atkins question first answered 08/02/2022 16:24:16 answering member 4399 label Biography information for Victoria Atkins
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1418240

	registered interest
	date	31/01/2022
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Ministry of Justice: Veterans
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many veterans applied to his Department using the civil service great place to work scheme over the nine month pilot; and how many of those applicants (a) received an interview, (b) were offered a job and (c) went on to accept a role and begin work.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	114874
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/02/2022 answer text <p>During the pilot of the Great Place to Work for Veterans scheme the department received:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>Number of applicants</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Applicants to the scheme</p></td><td><p>926</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(a) received an interview</p></td><td><p>276</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(b) were offered a job</p></td><td><p>113</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(c) went on to accept a role</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(d) began work with the Ministry of Justice</p></td><td><p>Not Available</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The pilot demonstrated that the initiative was successful in providing greater opportunities to veterans to pursue a career in the Civil Service and will now be rolled out across all Departments. This is one of a number of schemes to support veterans into public sector employment, including specific plans to get more veterans into teaching, the prison service and uniformed services.</p> answering member constituency South Suffolk answering member printed James Cartlidge question first answered 08/02/2022 13:58:04 answering member 4519 label Biography information for James Cartlidge
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1418241

	registered interest
	date	31/01/2022
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Ministry of Justice: Veterans
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many armed forces veterans have been employed by the civil service in his Department in each year since 2010.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	114875
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/02/2022 answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice has employed 4655 Armed Forces veterans since 2017, the point at which data on their recruitment is first available. The annual breakdown of recruits since 2010 is:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of Armed Forces veterans by year the offer was accepted</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>Not available</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>Not available</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>Not available</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>Not available</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>Not available</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>Not available</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>Not available</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>810</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>1286</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>857</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>727</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>975</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Information prior to 2017 is unavailable for reporting purposes due to a change in applicant tracking system in late 2016 where previous recruitment data was not retained.</p> answering member constituency South Suffolk answering member printed James Cartlidge question first answered 08/02/2022 17:19:08 answering member 4519 label Biography information for James Cartlidge
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1303540

	registered interest
	date	17/03/2021
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Road Traffic Offences: Fixed Penalties
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how the Government spends income generated through fixed penalty notices issued for speeding offences.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	170699
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 26/03/2021 answer text <p>Receipts from fixed penalty notices (FPNs) including those issued for speeding offences and penalty notices for disorder (PNDs) are collected by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) and accounted for in the annual HMCTS Trust Statement. By statute these receipts are due to the Consolidated Fund, however, HM Treasury have agreed that annually £30m of the receipts from paid FPNs plus an additional £10 per paid PND should be ring fenced for use by victim services. The remaining receipts, under the latest HM Treasury spending review, are to be retained by MoJ and form part of their overall funding settlement.</p><p> </p><p>In 2019-20 HMCTS collected £105.2m from FPNs and PNDs of which £30.088m was ring fenced to victim services and the remaining £75m was retained by MoJ. The ring-fenced victim services receipts from FPNs and PNDs form part of the overall MoJ budget for victims and witnesses, and thus it is not possible to quantify funding arising from fixed penalty notices relation to speeding or by region.</p><p> </p><p>In 2019-20, the overall victims and witnesses budget was £96m, including the provision of annual victims service grants to 42 Police and Crime Commissioners across England and Wales and funding to commission emotional and practical support to help victims cope and recover from the effects of crime.</p> answering member constituency Croydon South answering member printed Chris Philp grouped question UIN 170701 question first answered 26/03/2021 12:21:33 answering member 4503 label Biography information for Chris Philp
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1303542

	registered interest
	date	17/03/2021
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Fixed Penalties
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much was spent in each region of the UK from income generated through fixed penalty notices in the most recent period for which figures are available.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	170701
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 26/03/2021 answer text <p>Receipts from fixed penalty notices (FPNs) including those issued for speeding offences and penalty notices for disorder (PNDs) are collected by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) and accounted for in the annual HMCTS Trust Statement. By statute these receipts are due to the Consolidated Fund, however, HM Treasury have agreed that annually £30m of the receipts from paid FPNs plus an additional £10 per paid PND should be ring fenced for use by victim services. The remaining receipts, under the latest HM Treasury spending review, are to be retained by MoJ and form part of their overall funding settlement.</p><p> </p><p>In 2019-20 HMCTS collected £105.2m from FPNs and PNDs of which £30.088m was ring fenced to victim services and the remaining £75m was retained by MoJ. The ring-fenced victim services receipts from FPNs and PNDs form part of the overall MoJ budget for victims and witnesses, and thus it is not possible to quantify funding arising from fixed penalty notices relation to speeding or by region.</p><p> </p><p>In 2019-20, the overall victims and witnesses budget was £96m, including the provision of annual victims service grants to 42 Police and Crime Commissioners across England and Wales and funding to commission emotional and practical support to help victims cope and recover from the effects of crime.</p> answering member constituency Croydon South answering member printed Chris Philp grouped question UIN 170699 question first answered 26/03/2021 12:21:33 answering member 4503 label Biography information for Chris Philp
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1145459

	registered interest
	date	24/09/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Fines: Surcharges
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 17 May 2019 to Question 252551, Answer of 10 July 2019 to Question 273770 and Answer of 29 July 2019 to Question 280263, on fines: surcharges, for what reason there was a £1 million difference between the raised and allocated amounts in the 2016-17 financial year; and where that money has been allocated.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	290445
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 30/09/2019 answer text <p>I am sorry to have to inform you that a rounding error was made in our response to PQ252551 and 252552. In checking that figure, we have also noted several other rounding errors. I therefore set out corrected figures relating to the Victim Surcharge provided in response to these PQs and PQ280263.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Financial Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Victim Surcharge (VS) Collected* </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>VS contribution to the Victim and Witness Budget* </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>VS contribution to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme*</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>£10.5m</p></td><td><p>£10.5m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>£10.2m</p></td><td><p>£10.2m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>£10.5m</p></td><td><p>£10.5m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>£19.5m</p></td><td><p>£19.5m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>£24.6m</p></td><td><p>£24.6m</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>£28.3m</p></td><td><p>£18.3m</p></td><td><p>£10.0m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>£31.0m</p></td><td><p>£27.0m</p></td><td><p>£4.0m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>£35.0m</p></td><td><p>£31.0m</p></td><td><p>£4.0m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018/19</p></td><td><p>£33.5m</p></td><td><p>£30.5m</p></td><td><p>£3.0m</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>* Rounded to one decimal place</p> answering member constituency Aldridge-Brownhills answering member printed Wendy Morton question first answered 30/09/2019 16:20:03 answering member 4358 label Biography information for Wendy Morton
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1144734

	registered interest
	date	04/09/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Dangerous Driving: Sentencing
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he plans to (a) create an offence of causing serious injury by careless driving and (b) increase the maximum penalties for causing death by dangerous driving.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	286821
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/09/2019 answer text <p>I refer the honourable member to my response of 3 September to Question 282465.</p> answering member constituency Charnwood answering member printed Edward Argar question first answered 09/09/2019 15:46:43 answering member 4362 label Biography information for Edward Argar
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1144748

	registered interest
	date	04/09/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Fines: Surcharges
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 17 May 2019 to Question 252551, Answer of 10 July 2019 to Question 273770 and Answer of 29 July 2019 to Question 280263, on fines: surcharges, for what reason there was a £1 million difference between the raised and allocated amounts in the 2016-17 financial year; and where that money has been allocated.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	286833
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/09/2019 answer text <p>It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.</p> answering member constituency Charnwood answering member printed Edward Argar question first answered 09/09/2019 16:23:19 answering member 4362 label Biography information for Edward Argar
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1142136

	registered interest
	date	25/07/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Dangerous Driving: Sentencing
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the oral contribution of the Leader of the House of Commons of 25 July 2019, when he plans to bring forward legislative proposals to increase the maximum penalty for causing death by dangerous driving.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	282465
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/09/2019 answer text <p>We are focused on getting the law right, to ensure the changes we make are comprehensive, proportionate and, crucially, practical.</p><p> </p><p>We will bring forward proposals for changes in the law to increase the maximum penalties for causing death by dangerous driving and careless driving under the influence of drink or drugs to life imprisonment, and create a new offence of causing serious injury by careless driving as soon as possible. These proposals will take account of other government proposals for safer roads.</p> answering member constituency Charnwood answering member printed Edward Argar question first answered 03/09/2019 15:15:15 answering member 4362 label Biography information for Edward Argar
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1142312

	registered interest
	date	25/07/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Debt Collection: Regulation
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when he plans to publish his response to the submissions received in his Department's Call for Evidence on the regulation of enforcement agents, which closed in February 2019.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	282564
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/09/2019 answer text <p>As set out in the Secretary of State for Justice’s Written Statement on bailiff reform made on 22 July, we will respond to the Call for Evidence following further engagement with stakeholders over the summer.</p> answering member constituency Charnwood answering member printed Edward Argar question first answered 03/09/2019 15:17:20 answering member 4362 label Biography information for Edward Argar
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1122318

	registered interest
	date	23/04/2019
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Probation: Private Sector
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	What assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the private probation system.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	910447
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/04/2019 answer text <p>Transforming Rehabilitation opened up probation to a diverse range of providers and extended support and supervision to an additional 40,000 offenders leaving prison.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS is performing well in supervising higher-risk offenders. But I have been clear that the performance of CRCs needs to improve.</p><p> </p><p>That is why we are ending contracts early, investing more money in Through the Gate services and continuing to consult partners and experts on how to achieve the right balance between public, private and voluntary delivery of services.</p> answering member constituency Penrith and The Border answering member printed Rory Stewart question first answered 23/04/2019 16:37:39 answering member 4137 label Biography information for Rory Stewart
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

1001952

	registered interest
	date	05/11/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Prisons: Private Sector
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether his Department plans to increase the number of private prisons.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	188131
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 16/11/2018 answer text <p>The Government is committed, as set out on the 26 June at the Justice Select Committee and in the 2017 manifesto, to building up to 10,000 modern and decent prison places to replace old, expensive and unsuitable accommodation. This was reaffirmed by the Chancellor in the 2018 Budget, committing the Government to delivering the first two new prisons at Wellingborough and Glen Parva through public capital. Funding routes will be explored, including through private investment, for the delivery of the remaining prison places. The financing models, timetable and costs for these will be dependent on the relevant value for money and affordability tests, planning permissions and commercial negotiations.</p><p> </p><p>We believe in a balanced approach to custodial services provision, which includes a mix of public, voluntary and private sector involvement. This approach has been shown to work, providing excellent services for the public and value for money for taxpayers.</p> answering member constituency Penrith and The Border answering member printed Rory Stewart question first answered 16/11/2018 14:51:39 answering member 4137 label Biography information for Rory Stewart
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

946945

	registered interest
	date	23/07/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Discrimination: Disability
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department is taking to ensure access to justice for people facing disability discrimination in (a) employment and (b) education.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	167347
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 07/09/2018 answer text <p>The Government has a responsibility to make sure that those in the greatest hardship and at the times of greatest need, can secure access to justice. This is a responsibility that we take very seriously.</p><p>There are a number of avenues of dispute resolution available to individuals facing disability discrimination to try and resolve issues by agreement. These include the use of Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS), judicial or other mediation.</p><p>Those facing disability discrimination in an employment or education setting may also seek redress through the tribunal system. Our £1bn court modernisation programme has already started improving the experience of those who use and need our courts and tribunals, by introducing 21st Century technology, online services and digital working, while making sure justice remains accessible. These reformed services will transform how people experience the justice system, with digital services making justice more accessible and straightforward.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 07/09/2018 14:02:34 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

904785

	registered interest
	date	15/05/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Employment and Support Allowance: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the success rate for appeals against decisions on employment and support allowance entitlement has been in Barnsley in the most recent 12-month period for which data is available.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	144383
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/05/2018 answer text <p>The table below contains the requested information.</p><p><strong>Clearances in Social Security and Child Support in Barnsley<sup>1</sup> for Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)<sup>2</sup> and Personal Independence Payment (PIP)</strong><sup> 3</sup></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Percentage found in favour of appellant (at hearing)<sup>4</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><p>January - December 2017<sup>5</sup></p></td><td><p>ESA</p></td><td><p>65%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>PIP</p></td><td><p>63%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><sup>1</sup> Social Security and Child Support data are attributed to hearing venue nearest to the appellant’s home address.</p><p><sup>2</sup> Includes Employment and Support Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Reassessments).</p><p><sup>3</sup> Personal Independence Payment (New Claim Appeals) replaced Disability Living Allowance on 8 April 2013, and also includes Personal Independence Payment Clams (Reassessments).</p><p><sup>4</sup> Percentage found in favour of appellant, this is based on the number found in favour as a percentage of the appeals cleared at hearing, in line with the published statistics.</p><p><sup>5</sup> Data April 2017 to December 2017 are provisional data and subject to change.</p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data available.</p><p>The data are a subset of official statistics extracted from the case management system on a different date.</p><p>A combination of reasons can lead to a decision being overturned on appeal. For example, a hearing may generate additional evidence, in particular oral evidence, provided by the appellant at the hearing.</p><p> </p><p>Latest figures indicate that since PIP was introduced, more than 3.1 million decisions have been made, and of these under 9% have been appealed and 4% have been overturned. For ESA the figure is only 8% of decisions made were appealed and 4% have been overturned at tribunals.</p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 23/05/2018 17:01:19 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

904786

	registered interest
	date	15/05/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the success rate for appeals against decisions on personal independence payment entitlement has been in Barnsley in the most recent 12-month period for which data is available.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	144384
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/05/2018 answer text <p>The table below contains the requested information.</p><p><strong>Clearances in Social Security and Child Support in Barnsley<sup>1</sup> for Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)<sup>2</sup> and Personal Independence Payment (PIP)</strong><sup> 3</sup></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Percentage found in favour of appellant (at hearing)<sup>4</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><p>January - December 2017<sup>5</sup></p></td><td><p>ESA</p></td><td><p>65%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>PIP</p></td><td><p>63%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><sup>1</sup> Social Security and Child Support data are attributed to hearing venue nearest to the appellant’s home address.</p><p><sup>2</sup> Includes Employment and Support Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Reassessments).</p><p><sup>3</sup> Personal Independence Payment (New Claim Appeals) replaced Disability Living Allowance on 8 April 2013, and also includes Personal Independence Payment Clams (Reassessments).</p><p><sup>4</sup> Percentage found in favour of appellant, this is based on the number found in favour as a percentage of the appeals cleared at hearing, in line with the published statistics.</p><p><sup>5</sup> Data April 2017 to December 2017 are provisional data and subject to change.</p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data available.</p><p>The data are a subset of official statistics extracted from the case management system on a different date.</p><p>A combination of reasons can lead to a decision being overturned on appeal. For example, a hearing may generate additional evidence, in particular oral evidence, provided by the appellant at the hearing.</p><p> </p><p>Latest figures indicate that since PIP was introduced, more than 3.1 million decisions have been made, and of these under 9% have been appealed and 4% have been overturned. For ESA the figure is only 8% of decisions made were appealed and 4% have been overturned at tribunals.</p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 23/05/2018 17:01:19 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

904789

	registered interest
	date	15/05/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Employment and Support Allowance: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average waiting time for an employment support allowance appeal hearing was in (a) Barnsley and (b) nationally in (i) each of the last 12 months and (ii) the last 12 months overall in the most recent period for which data is available.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	144385
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/05/2018 answer text <p>The information requested is set out in the table below:</p><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2"><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Barnsley</strong><sup>1</sup></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>United Kingdom</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Average Clearance Time in weeks</strong><sup>2</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Period</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>ESA</strong><sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p><strong>PIP</strong><sup>4</sup></p></td><td><p><strong>ESA</strong><sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p><strong>PIP</strong><sup>4</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2017</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2017</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2017</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2017 <sup>5</sup></p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>21</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan-Dec 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><sup>1</sup> Social Security and Child Support data are attributed to hearing venue nearest to the appellant’s home address, Barnsley data includes all cases attributed to the Barnsley Venue.</p><p> </p><p><sup>2</sup> Average Waiting Time is interpreted as the Average Clearance Time - the time taken for appeal receipt to outcome. Includes appeals</p><p>disposed of and is inclusive of both those cleared at hearing and those cleared without the need of a tribunal hearing.</p><p> </p><p><sup>3</sup> Includes Employment and Support Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Reassessments).</p><p> </p><p><sup>4</sup> Personal Independence Payment (New Claim Appeals) replaced Disability Living Allowance on 8 April 2013, and also includes Personal Independence Payment Clams (Reassessments).</p><p> </p><p><sup>5</sup> Provisional data subject to change.</p><p> </p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data available.</p><p> </p><p>The data may differ slightly to that of the published statistics as these data were run on a different date.</p><p> </p><p>Clearance times are dependent on several factors, such as hearing capacity at the venue closest to the appellant, or the local availability of Tribunal panel members. Other factors might include the availability of the appellant or their representative, or the provision of further evidence.</p><p> </p><p>Latest figures indicate that since PIP was introduced, more than 3.1 million decisions have been made, and of these under 9% have been appealed and 4% have been overturned. For ESA the figure is only 8% of decisions made were appealed and 4% have been overturned at tribunals.</p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 23/05/2018 17:02:38 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

904796

	registered interest
	date	15/05/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average waiting time for personal independence payment appeal hearing was in (a) Barnsley and (b) nationally in (a) Barnsley and (b) nationally in (i) each of the last 12 months and (ii) the last 12 months overall in the most recent period for which data is available.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	144386
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/05/2018 answer text <p>The information requested is set out in the table below:</p><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2"><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Barnsley</strong><sup>1</sup></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>United Kingdom</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Average Clearance Time in weeks</strong><sup>2</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Period</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>ESA</strong><sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p><strong>PIP</strong><sup>4</sup></p></td><td><p><strong>ESA</strong><sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p><strong>PIP</strong><sup>4</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>January 2017</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>February 2017</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>March 2017</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April 2017 <sup>5</sup></p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>June 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>July 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>21</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>August 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>September 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>October 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>November 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>December 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan-Dec 2017<sup> 5</sup></p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><sup>1</sup> Social Security and Child Support data are attributed to hearing venue nearest to the appellant’s home address, Barnsley data includes all cases attributed to the Barnsley Venue.</p><p> </p><p><sup>2</sup> Average Waiting Time is interpreted as the Average Clearance Time - the time taken for appeal receipt to outcome. Includes appeals</p><p>disposed of and is inclusive of both those cleared at hearing and those cleared without the need of a tribunal hearing.</p><p> </p><p><sup>3</sup> Includes Employment and Support Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Reassessments).</p><p> </p><p><sup>4</sup> Personal Independence Payment (New Claim Appeals) replaced Disability Living Allowance on 8 April 2013, and also includes Personal Independence Payment Clams (Reassessments).</p><p> </p><p><sup>5</sup> Provisional data subject to change.</p><p> </p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data available.</p><p> </p><p>The data may differ slightly to that of the published statistics as these data were run on a different date.</p><p> </p><p>Clearance times are dependent on several factors, such as hearing capacity at the venue closest to the appellant, or the local availability of Tribunal panel members. Other factors might include the availability of the appellant or their representative, or the provision of further evidence.</p><p> </p><p>Latest figures indicate that since PIP was introduced, more than 3.1 million decisions have been made, and of these under 9% have been appealed and 4% have been overturned. For ESA the figure is only 8% of decisions made were appealed and 4% have been overturned at tribunals.</p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 23/05/2018 17:02:38 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

835958

	registered interest
	date	02/02/2018
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Ministry of Justice: Childcare Vouchers
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many employees of his Department make use of the childcare vouchers scheme.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	126313
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 12/02/2018 answer text <p>As at January 2018, 2,868 employees across the Ministry of Justice make use of the departmental childcare voucher scheme.</p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 12/02/2018 15:54:55 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

758998

	registered interest
	date	08/09/2017
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Employment and Support Allowance: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average time between the commencement of an employment and support allowance appeal and a decision was in (a) Barnsley, (b) South Yorkshire and (c) the UK in the most recent 12-month period for which data is available.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	9646
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/09/2017 answer text <p>The table below contains the requested information.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>United Kingdom<sup>1</sup></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Barnsley <sup>2</sup></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>South Yorkshire <sup>3</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="6"><p>Average Clearance Time (Weeks)<sup> 4</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Year <sup>5</sup></p></td><td><p>PIP <sup>6</sup></p></td><td><p>ESA <sup>7</sup></p></td><td><p>PIP <sup>6</sup></p></td><td><p>ESA<sup>7</sup></p></td><td><p>PIP <sup>6</sup></p></td><td><p>ESA<sup>7</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-2017</p></td><td><p>15.6</p></td><td><p>14.4</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td><td><p>15.9</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes</p><p>1. HM Courts and Tribunals Service administers appeals for appellants living in England, Scotland and Wales. Data are therefore for those appellants only. The Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service administers ESA and PIP appeals for appellants living in Northern Ireland.</p><p>2 Barnsley data include all cases attributed to this venue.</p><p>3. South Yorkshire includes the venues: Barnsley, Sheffield and Doncaster. Data include all cases attributed to these venues.</p><p>4 Average Clearance Time - time taken for appeal receipt to outcome. This includes both those cleared at hearing and those cleared without the need of a tribunal hearing.</p><p>5. Financial year April to March.</p><p>6. Personal Independence Payment (New Claim Appeals), which replaced Disability Living Allowance on 8 April 2013, also includes Personal Independence Claims (Reassessments).</p><p>7. Includes Employment &amp; Support Allowance and Employment &amp; Support Allowance (Reassessments).</p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data available.</p><p>The data may differ slightly to those of the published stats as these data were run on a different date.</p> answering member constituency Bracknell answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee grouped question UIN 9647 question first answered 18/09/2017 13:05:40 answering member 3921 label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

758999

	registered interest
	date	08/09/2017
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average time between the commencement of a personal independence payment appeal and a decision was in (a) Barnsley, (b) South Yorkshire and (c) the UK in the most recent 12-month period for which data is available.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	9647
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/09/2017 answer text <p>The table below contains the requested information.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>United Kingdom<sup>1</sup></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Barnsley <sup>2</sup></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>South Yorkshire <sup>3</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="6"><p>Average Clearance Time (Weeks)<sup> 4</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Year <sup>5</sup></p></td><td><p>PIP <sup>6</sup></p></td><td><p>ESA <sup>7</sup></p></td><td><p>PIP <sup>6</sup></p></td><td><p>ESA<sup>7</sup></p></td><td><p>PIP <sup>6</sup></p></td><td><p>ESA<sup>7</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-2017</p></td><td><p>15.6</p></td><td><p>14.4</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td><td><p>15.9</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes</p><p>1. HM Courts and Tribunals Service administers appeals for appellants living in England, Scotland and Wales. Data are therefore for those appellants only. The Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service administers ESA and PIP appeals for appellants living in Northern Ireland.</p><p>2 Barnsley data include all cases attributed to this venue.</p><p>3. South Yorkshire includes the venues: Barnsley, Sheffield and Doncaster. Data include all cases attributed to these venues.</p><p>4 Average Clearance Time - time taken for appeal receipt to outcome. This includes both those cleared at hearing and those cleared without the need of a tribunal hearing.</p><p>5. Financial year April to March.</p><p>6. Personal Independence Payment (New Claim Appeals), which replaced Disability Living Allowance on 8 April 2013, also includes Personal Independence Claims (Reassessments).</p><p>7. Includes Employment &amp; Support Allowance and Employment &amp; Support Allowance (Reassessments).</p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data available.</p><p>The data may differ slightly to those of the published stats as these data were run on a different date.</p> answering member constituency Bracknell answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee grouped question UIN 9646 question first answered 18/09/2017 13:05:40 answering member 3921 label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

754189

	registered interest
	date	19/07/2017
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average waiting time for personal independence payment appeal hearing was in (a) Barnsley and (b) nationally in each year since 2010.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	6283
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 05/09/2017 answer text <p>The table below contains the requested information.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Average Clearance Time<sup>4</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><p>Year<strong><sup>1</sup></strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Personal Independence Payment<strong><sup>2</sup></strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Employment and Support Allowance<strong><sup>3</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>National</p></td><td><p>Barnsley<sup>5</sup></p></td><td><p>National</p></td><td><p>Barnsley<sup>5</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009 - 2010</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>12.6</p></td><td><p>11.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010 - 2011</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>19.4</p></td><td><p>16.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011 - 2012</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>22.8</p></td><td><p>22.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012 - 2013</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>17.2</p></td><td><p>16.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 - 2014</p></td><td><p>9.4</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>21.3</p></td><td><p>21.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 - 2015</p></td><td><p>14.2</p></td><td><p>20.0</p></td><td><p>26.8</p></td><td><p>22.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 - 2016</p></td><td><p>15.7</p></td><td><p>19.0</p></td><td><p>15.7</p></td><td><p>18.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 - 2017</p></td><td><p>15.6</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td><td><p>14.4</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong><sup>1 </sup></strong>Financial year April – March.</p><p><strong><sup>2</sup></strong> Personal Independence Payment (New Claim Appeals) , which replaced Disability Living Allowance introduced on 8 and was April 2013, also includes Personal Independence Claims (Reassessments).</p><p><strong><sup>3</sup></strong> Includes Employment and Support Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Reassessments).</p><p><sup>4</sup> Average Clearance Time – time taken for appeal receipt to appeal outcome. Includes appeals disposed of with and without the need of a tribunal hearing.</p><p><sup>5 </sup>Social Security and Child Support data are attributed to the hearing venue nearest to the appellants’ home address, as such these data are based on the Barnsley venue.</p><p> </p><p>~ Indicates the population where the decision was in favour with five appeals or fewer.</p><p> </p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data available. The data may differ slightly to that of the published statistics as these data were run on a different date.</p> answering member constituency Bracknell answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee grouped question UIN 6284 question first answered 05/09/2017 12:12:53 answering member 3921 label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

754190

	registered interest
	date	19/07/2017
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Employment and Support Allowance: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average waiting time for an employment support allowance appeal hearing was in (a) Barnsley and (b) nationally in each year since 2010.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	6284
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 05/09/2017 answer text <p>The table below contains the requested information.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Average Clearance Time<sup>4</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><p>Year<strong><sup>1</sup></strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Personal Independence Payment<strong><sup>2</sup></strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Employment and Support Allowance<strong><sup>3</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>National</p></td><td><p>Barnsley<sup>5</sup></p></td><td><p>National</p></td><td><p>Barnsley<sup>5</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009 - 2010</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>12.6</p></td><td><p>11.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010 - 2011</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>19.4</p></td><td><p>16.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011 - 2012</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>22.8</p></td><td><p>22.4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012 - 2013</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>17.2</p></td><td><p>16.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013 - 2014</p></td><td><p>9.4</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>21.3</p></td><td><p>21.9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014 - 2015</p></td><td><p>14.2</p></td><td><p>20.0</p></td><td><p>26.8</p></td><td><p>22.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015 - 2016</p></td><td><p>15.7</p></td><td><p>19.0</p></td><td><p>15.7</p></td><td><p>18.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016 - 2017</p></td><td><p>15.6</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td><td><p>14.4</p></td><td><p>15.2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong><sup>1 </sup></strong>Financial year April – March.</p><p><strong><sup>2</sup></strong> Personal Independence Payment (New Claim Appeals) , which replaced Disability Living Allowance introduced on 8 and was April 2013, also includes Personal Independence Claims (Reassessments).</p><p><strong><sup>3</sup></strong> Includes Employment and Support Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Reassessments).</p><p><sup>4</sup> Average Clearance Time – time taken for appeal receipt to appeal outcome. Includes appeals disposed of with and without the need of a tribunal hearing.</p><p><sup>5 </sup>Social Security and Child Support data are attributed to the hearing venue nearest to the appellants’ home address, as such these data are based on the Barnsley venue.</p><p> </p><p>~ Indicates the population where the decision was in favour with five appeals or fewer.</p><p> </p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data available. The data may differ slightly to that of the published statistics as these data were run on a different date.</p> answering member constituency Bracknell answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee grouped question UIN 6283 question first answered 05/09/2017 12:12:53 answering member 3921 label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock

747466

	registered interest
	date	03/07/2017
	answering body	Ministry of Justice
	answering dept id	54
	answering dept short name	Justice
	answering dept sort name	Justice
	hansard heading	Social Security Benefits: Appeals
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the success rate for appeals against decisions on (a) employment and support allowance and (b) personal independence payment entitlement in Barnsley has been in the most recent 12-month period for which data is available.
	tabling member constituency	Barnsley East
	tabling member printed	Stephanie Peacock
	uin	2653
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/07/2017 answer text <p>The table below contains the requested information.</p><p><strong>Clearances in Social Security and Child Support (SSCS) in Barnsley<sup>1</sup> for Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)<sup>2</sup> and Personal Independence Payment (PIP)</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><p>Percentage found in favour of Appellant (at hearing)<sup>3</sup> in 2016-17<sup>4</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>ESA</p></td><td><p><em>68%</em></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>PIP</p></td><td><p><em>63%</em></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><ol><li><em> SSCS data are attributed to hearing venue nearest to the appellant’s home address, in this case Wellington House in Barnsley.</em></li><li><em> Includes ESA and ESA (Reassessments).</em></li><li><em> This is based on the number found in favour as a percentage of the appeals cleared at hearing, in line with published statistics.</em></li><li><em> 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017.</em></li></ol><p><em>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and is the best data that is available.</em></p><p><em>The data are a subset of official statistics extracted from the case management system on a different date.</em></p><p> </p><p><em>This a further breakdown of data published on gov.uk. </em></p> answering member constituency Esher and Walton answering member printed Dominic Raab question first answered 06/07/2017 15:20:52 answering member 4007 label Biography information for Dominic Raab
	tabling member	4607 label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock