Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1002115
unstar this property date less than 2018-11-05more like thismore than 2018-11-05
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2018-11-14more like thismore than 2018-11-14
unstar this property answer text <p>The information requested is provided in the attached table. As per the answer to PQ 184996, please note that offenders may appear both within the caseload figures of court orders (including community orders and suspended sentence orders), and post-release supervision.</p><p> </p><p>The National Probation Service and Community Rehabilitation Companies work closely with other agencies to support offenders in the community. When an offender being supervised by Probation dies, the Probation provider must examine the circumstances of the death and identify areas to improve practice. While we work extremely closely with each offender before and after release to help them find the support they need, we do not have sole responsibility for caring for these offenders. We are clear, however, that they should receive the same level of care as other members of the public.</p> more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter
1043058
unstar this property date less than 2019-01-17more like thismore than 2019-01-17
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-01-24more like thismore than 2019-01-24
unstar this property answer text <p>The highest hourly rate paid for legal advice by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) was £<del class="ministerial">580.</del><ins class="ministerial">597.</ins></p><p> </p><p>The highest hourly rate paid for legal advice by the MOD’s arms length bodies is:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Name of Arms Length Body</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Highest Rate</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Defence Electronics and Components Agency</p></td><td><p>£295</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Defence Science and Technology Laboratory</p></td><td><p>£148</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>National Army Museum</p></td><td><p>£550</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>National Museum of the Royal Navy</p></td><td><p>£580</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oil and Pipelines</p></td><td><p>£250</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal Air Force Museum</p></td><td><p>£280</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal Hospital Chelsea</p></td><td><p>£530</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Single Source Regulations Office</p></td><td><p>£450</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>United Kingdom Hydrographic Office</p></td><td><p>£675</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter
1125240
unstar this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-05-17more like thismore than 2019-05-17
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 January 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter
1125241
unstar this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-05-17more like thismore than 2019-05-17
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 January 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter
1125243
unstar this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-05-17more like thismore than 2019-05-17
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 Jarnuary 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter
1125244
unstar this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-05-17more like thismore than 2019-05-17
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 January 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter
1137119
unstar this property date less than 2019-07-05more like thismore than 2019-07-05
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
unstar this property answer text <p><del class="ministerial">The number of people convicted for offences under s41 of the Dentistry Act 1984 (“Unregistered person carrying on the business of dentistry”) over the last 3 years was 2; 1 in each of 2016 and 2017. It is not possible to identify whether these offences were specific to teeth whitening in centrally held data on court proceedings. </del><ins class="ministerial">We launched the mini-competition for the operation of the first new Resettlement Prison at Wellingborough on Friday 12 July 2019 and anticipate making the award to the successful operator in July 2020.</ins></p> more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter
1151086
unstar this property date less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-24more like thismore than 2019-10-24
unstar this property answer text <p>Please see the accompanying document, which details the reactive repairs completed each month. Faults are reported on the facilities management system online, or via a telephone help desk.</p><p>Local maintenance teams then create a work order and assign an appropriate tradesperson to complete the work. Following completion, the work order is closed on the facilities management system. Contractor performance is monitored closely.</p> more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter
1151088
unstar this property date less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2019-10-24more like thismore than 2019-10-24
unstar this property answer text <p>Please see the accompanying document, which details the KPI regime for the facilities management contract HMPPS holds with Amey, as well as the recorded performance against these KPI’s averaged across the last 12 months for which this data is available (June 2017- May 2018). Contractor performance is robustly monitored and we will not hesitate to take action where standards fall short.</p> more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter
657221
unstar this property date less than 2016-12-12more like thismore than 2016-12-12
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property date of answer less than 2016-12-15more like thismore than 2016-12-15
unstar this property answer text <p>We want our prisons to be places of safety and reform, and so it is right that offenders who break prison rules are properly punished. Where this amounts to a criminal offence, prisoners should expect to be investigated by the police and face more serious sanctions.</p><p>We are committed to improving safety across the prison estate and are already taking action. This includes tackling the use of drugs, mobile phones and drones, while recruiting new staff and improving protection for staff.</p><p>Information on the number of additional days awarded to prisoners as a result of adjudications for assaults against staff and prisoners in each of the last five years can be found in the attached table.</p> more like this
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon remove filter