Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

451132
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2016-02-08more like thismore than 2016-02-08
star this property answering body
Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept id 88 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
star this property hansard heading Mark Pearson more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will discuss with the Director of Public Prosecutions the decision by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to take Mark Pearson to trial for sexual assault, and the claim by the defence solicitor in that case that the CPS initially provided amended and misleading video evidence to the court. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Blencathra more like this
star this property uin HL5998 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer remove filter
star this property answer text <p>The CPS's function is not to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges for the criminal court to consider.</p><p> </p><p>The CPS assessment of any case is not in any sense a finding of, or implication of, any guilt or criminal conduct. It is not a finding of fact, as this can only be made by a court, but rather an assessment of whether there is a realistic prospect of conviction and, if so, whether the public interest lies in prosecuting.</p><p> </p><p>It is open to the defence in any crown court case to argue, after the prosecution has closed its case, that the evidence is too weak for the decision to be left to the jury. In this particular case the judge clearly considered that the decision was properly a matter for the jury.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2016-02-19T12:46:53.397Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-19T12:46:53.397Z
unstar this property answering member
4538
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
star this property tabling member
497
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Blencathra remove filter