|
answer text |
<p>Information on the number of cases of staff dismissed for having had an inappropriate
relationship with a prisoner/ ex-prisoner are set out in the table below. Information
on conduct and discipline cases is published in the Ministry of Justice Diversity
Report on a financial year basis and to maintain consistency with these figures the
table is presented in the same way.</p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Table: Number
of staff dismissed for having had an inappropriate relationship with a prisoner/ ex-prisoner,
2009/10 to 2014/15</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number
of Cases</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009/10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><br
/><p>No individual establishment had more than 5 cases in each year so only total
numbers are provided in the table.</p><br /><p>All figures are rounded to the nearest
10, with numbers ending in5 rounded to the nearest multiple of 20 to prevent systematic
bias. As with all HR databases, extracts are taken at a fixed point in time, to ensure
consistency of reporting. However the database itself is dynamic, and where updates
to the database are made late, subsequent to the taking of the extract, these updates
will not be reflected in figures produced by the extract. For this reason, HR data
are unlikely to be precisely accurate, and to present unrounded figures would be to
overstate the accuracy of the figures. Rounding to 10 accurately depicts the level
of certainty that is held with these figures.</p><br /><p>~ denotes suppressed values
of 5 or fewer. Low numbers are suppressed, in conjunction with the rounding policy
to prevent disclosure in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 1998.</p>
|
|