Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1125083
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-07T21:18:40.033Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-07T21:18:40.033Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-07T21:27:30.052Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-07T21:27:30.052Z
less than 2019-05-15T16:43:02.165Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:43:02.165Z
star this property hansard heading Prisons: Contracts more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 251407 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:11:20.777Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:11:20.777Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 18 April 2019 to Question 243526 on Prisons: Contracts, if the criteria for the qualitative evaluation of operational resources will include minimum staffing levels. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 251407 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 251407 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>One of the key aims of the competition is to secure high quality, value for money bids. We expect providers to adequately resource their respective establishments to deliver a safe, decent and secure regime but also want to encourage innovation in service delivery. We believe setting a mandatory minimum threshold for staffing would not fully deliver the aims of the competition and could stifle the ability to innovate, both now and in the future.</p><p>However, we will robustly evaluate bidder responses, for both quality and cost in consultation with subject matter experts across the organisation. It provides a full resourcing model based on the design of the prison, operating capacity, security category, the vision for the regime and the type of services that would best meet the needs of the cohort within.</p><p>The PSC will enable us to rigorously evaluate the operational and financial aspects of the bids and provide assurance that bidders have the resources required to ensure a safe, decent, secure and rehabilitative regime that delivers quality, value for money and affordability.</p><p>Recognition rights for trade unions are a matter for individual bidders and therefore are not mandated in the contract.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:11:20.777Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:11:20.777Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1125095
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-07T21:19:24.230Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-07T21:19:24.230Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-07T21:28:02.617Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-07T21:28:02.617Z
less than 2019-05-15T17:33:01.901Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:33:01.901Z
star this property hansard heading Prisons: Contracts more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 251418 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T17:01:57.49Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:01:57.49Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to page 11 of the House Commons Library Deposited Paper, DEP2019-0490, Prison Operator Competition Contract Summary, what steps are taken to hold private prison contractors to account. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 251418 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 251418 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The private sector has an important role to play, and currently runs some high-performing prisons, as part of a safe, decent and secure prison estate.</p><p>Privately managed prison performance is closely monitored by robust contract management processes. Each privately managed prison has an on-site controller, employed by HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS). Controllers, together with regional contract managers review performance against performance indicators set out in the contract. Any improvement action identified may include a requirement for urgent improvement and/or financial deductions.</p><p>As well as contractual performance indicators, key statistics across public protection; safety and order; and offender reform are published annually for both the private and public estate.</p><p>Privately-managed prisons are subject to the same external inspection procedures as those in the public sector. Prisons are inspected at least once every five years by HM Inspectorate of Prisons, and face regular scrutiny by their local Independent Monitoring Board. Additionally, HMPPS internal audit and assurance scrutinises private prisons to ensure they are meeting their responsibilities.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T17:01:57.49Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:01:57.49Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1125240
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:54:21.427Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:54:21.427Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-08T17:55:31.377Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:55:31.377Z
less than 2019-06-12T15:06:05.668Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T15:06:05.668Z
star this property hansard heading Joseph McCann more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252002 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.653Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.653Z
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2019-06-12T14:34:20.463Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T14:34:20.463Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when the decision was taken to release Joseph McCann. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252002 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252002 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 January 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.653Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.653Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1125241
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:54:24.110Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:54:24.110Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-08T17:55:34.102Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:55:34.102Z
less than 2019-06-12T15:06:04.247Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T15:06:04.247Z
star this property hansard heading Joseph McCann more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252003 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.73Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.73Z
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2019-06-12T14:34:30.427Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T14:34:30.427Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, who took the decision not to refer the question of Joseph McCann's release to the Parole Board. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252003 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252003 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 January 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.73Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.73Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1125243
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:54:29.380Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:54:29.380Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-08T17:55:40.508Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:55:40.508Z
less than 2019-06-12T15:06:02.800Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T15:06:02.800Z
star this property hansard heading Joseph McCann more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252005 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.767Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.767Z
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2019-06-12T14:34:40.8Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T14:34:40.8Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the (a) scope, (b) timescale and (c) remit is of the urgent review into the reported mistaken release of Joseph McCann. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252005 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252005 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 Jarnuary 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.767Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.767Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1125313
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:57:59.617Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:57:59.617Z
star this property answering body
Home Office more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 1 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-09T15:25:18.442Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T15:25:18.442Z
less than 2019-05-15T17:26:25.753Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:26:25.753Z
star this property hansard heading Immigrants: Employment more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 251952 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:55:57.66Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:55:57.66Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recourse is available to people who have a right to work in the UK when they have lost their job as a result of an employer failing to use the Employer Checking Service; and what guidance his Department has issued to employers on their responsibilities in relation to that service. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Newport East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Jessica Morden more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 251952 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 251952 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The Home Office issued guidance to employers on 28 January 2019 on how they can use the on-line digital service in complying with their responsibilities under the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 on the prevention of illegal working. The online service provides an alternative digital means for individuals to evidence their right to work if they hold a biometric residence permit or biometric residence card or status under the EU Settlement Scheme. The Home Office guidance clearly stipulates that employers should provide individuals with every opportunity to demonstrate their right to work. They should not discriminate on the basis of whether or not an individual is able or willing to demonstrate their right to work using the online checking service, as opposed to using physical documents specified in Home Office regulations which continue to be acceptable. The guidance makes clear that employers who do so risk breaching the Equality Act 2010. Where employees have an outstanding immigration application or appeal, the Home Office provides a separate employer checking service which provides emailed confirmation to the employer of the person’s continuing right to work in these circumstances. The Home Office has issued a statutory code of practice for employers on how to avoid unlawful discrimination whilst conducting right to work checks.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:55:57.66Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:55:57.66Z
unstar this property answering member
4048
star this property label Biography information for Caroline Nokes more like this
star this property creator
1548
star this property label Biography information for Jessica Morden more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
1548
unstar this property label Biography information for Jessica Morden more like this
1125328
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:58:39.517Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:58:39.517Z
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-08T18:08:37.973Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T18:08:37.973Z
less than 2019-05-20T14:53:01.344Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-20T14:53:01.344Z
star this property hansard heading Pupil Exclusions more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252041 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2019-05-20T14:21:46.41Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent assessment he has made of the relationship between (a) disparities in funding for schools and local authorities and (b) rates of pupil exclusion. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Ashton-under-Lyne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Angela Rayner more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252041 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252041 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>There is no known correlation at area level between rates of exclusion and levels of funding<em>.</em></p><p> </p><p>This Government has prioritised funds for the most disadvantaged pupils, including through the Pupil Premium and Pupil Premium Plus, which supports looked after children. For children and young people with more complex needs, the Department has also confirmed an additional £250 million in high needs funding over 2018-19 and 2019-20, included in the £6.3 billion total for high needs funding this year.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-20T14:21:46.41Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-20T14:21:46.41Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property creator
4356
star this property label Biography information for Angela Rayner more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4356
unstar this property label Biography information for Angela Rayner more like this
1125330
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:58:44.680Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:58:44.680Z
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-08T18:08:46.522Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T18:08:46.522Z
less than 2019-05-15T17:11:02.026Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:11:02.026Z
star this property hansard heading Ofsted: Finance more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252043 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:39:16.52Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:39:16.52Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what funding his Department has provided to Ofsted in each financial year since 2010. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Ashton-under-Lyne more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Angela Rayner more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252043 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252043 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Ofsted’s budget is set by HM Treasury at the Spending Review. Other government departments can provide extra funding to Ofsted to provide programmes on their behalf or due to changes in departmental policy.</p><p> </p><p>The table below gives an overview of Ofsted’s net budget and income from 2010.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017-18</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018-19</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019-20</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Net Budgets (£ millions)</p></td><td><p>189</p></td><td><p>171</p></td><td><p>168</p></td><td><p>168.5</p></td><td><p>162.5</p></td><td><p>155</p></td><td><p>145</p></td><td><p>135.7</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>124</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Income (£ millions)</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:39:16.52Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:39:16.52Z
unstar this property answering member
111
star this property label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
star this property creator
4356
star this property label Biography information for Angela Rayner more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4356
unstar this property label Biography information for Angela Rayner more like this
1125349
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest true more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:59:35.790Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:59:35.790Z
star this property answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 201 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-09T14:15:09.433Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-09T14:15:09.433Z
less than 2019-05-16T14:11:03.551Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T14:11:03.551Z
star this property hansard heading Living Wage and Minimum Wage: Non-payment more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252048 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-16T13:39:20.757Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T13:39:20.757Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, pursuant to the Answer of 7 May 2019 to Question 248059, when the review of the NMW Naming Scheme began; and whether it his policy to suspend naming non-compliant employers until that review has concluded. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Barnsley East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Stephanie Peacock more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252048 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252048 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>As announced in the Government response of December 2018, the review of the National Minimum Wage and National Living Wage (NMW) Naming Scheme commenced in response to recommendations made by the Director of Labour Market Enforcement in his 2018/2019 Labour Market Enforcement Strategy. No further naming of employers for NMW breaches will take place until the review has been completed.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-16T13:39:20.757Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T13:39:20.757Z
unstar this property answering member
4487
star this property label Biography information for Kelly Tolhurst more like this
star this property creator
4607
star this property label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4607
unstar this property label Biography information for Stephanie Peacock more like this
1125475
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T18:05:20.883Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T18:05:20.883Z
star this property answering body
Home Office more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 1 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-08T18:15:22.301Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T18:15:22.301Z
less than 2019-05-15T17:30:03.210Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:30:03.210Z
star this property hansard heading Religious Buildings: Security more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252122 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:58:39.757Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:58:39.757Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the effect of his Department's funding of the protection of places of worship. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Slough more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252122 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252122 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The Places of Worship Protective Security Funding Scheme has been in place since 2016. Over the first three years, in total the scheme has approved grants worth approximately £1.5 million with 63 to churches, 49 to mosques, 5 to Hindu temples and 17 to Gurdwaras.</p><p><br>We continuously listen to feedback to make the scheme as effective as possible, and places of worship which successfully bid for funding have described feeling an increased sense of safety. As part of our ongoing assessment of the success of the scheme, we monitor the scheme’s application rates and other related management information, seek regular feedback from faith communities and security experts, and undertake site visits at places of worship which have received funding. We have also heard that some places of worship found it cumbersome to gather multiple quotes for all measures, which is why we have removed the requirement under the 2019-20 scheme.</p><p><br>More widely, the Home Secretary has committed to consulting with faith communities to understand what more could and should be done to help protect faith communities at their places of worship. This upcoming consultation will also be an opportunity to assess the impact of the Places of Worship Protective Security Funding Scheme further and to identify any potential improvements, which will make the scheme even more effective.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:58:39.757Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:58:39.757Z
unstar this property answering member
4399
star this property label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
star this property creator
4638
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4638
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this