Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1123665
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-02more like thismore than 2019-05-02
star this property date less than 2019-04-29more like thismore than 2019-04-29
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-29more like thismore than 2019-04-29
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-29T19:30:15.513Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
star this property answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 13 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-29T19:39:27.851Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-29T19:39:27.851Z
less than 2019-05-16T13:16:04.182Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T13:16:04.182Z
star this property hansard heading Birds: Pest Control more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 248559 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-16T12:44:51.747Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T12:44:51.747Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will establish an independent inquiry on the reasons his Department and Natural England decided on the proposal to revoke General Licences 04/05/06. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Mid Sussex more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Sir Nicholas Soames more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 248559 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 248559 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The decision to revoke the licences was made by Natural England (NE) as the licensing authority, not the government. We have not yet decided on a review of the recent situation.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-16T12:44:51.747Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T12:44:51.747Z
unstar this property answering member
4098
star this property label Biography information for Dr Thérèse Coffey more like this
star this property creator
116
star this property label Biography information for Sir Nicholas Soames more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
116
unstar this property label Biography information for Sir Nicholas Soames more like this
1123671
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-02more like thismore than 2019-05-02
star this property date less than 2019-04-29more like thismore than 2019-04-29
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-29more like thismore than 2019-04-29
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-29T19:30:29.253Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-29T19:30:29.253Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-29T19:39:40.322Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-29T19:39:40.322Z
less than 2019-05-16T16:58:02.028Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T16:58:02.028Z
star this property hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Appeals more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 248645 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-16T16:26:11.38Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T16:26:11.38Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many Social Security and Child Support Tribunal appeals have taken longer than 52 weeks for a determination, in each of the last five years. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Easington more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Grahame Morris more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 248645 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 248645 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The information requested is provided in the table below:</p><p>SOCIAL SECURITY &amp; CHILD SUPPORT CLEARANCES 1<br>Period Number of clearances that exceeded 52 weeks from receipt<br>1 April 2013 - 31 March 2014 16,161<br>1 April 2014 - 31 March 2015 12,350<br>1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016 3,100<br>1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017 4,084<br>1 April 2017 - 31 March 2018 7,330<br>1 April 2018 - 31 December 2018 2 13,162</p><p>1. Data include hearings cleared with and without a Tribunal hearing</p><p>2. The latest period for which data are available. Provisional data and subject to further change</p><p>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and are the best data that are available.</p><p> </p><p><br>It is important that appeals are heard as quickly as possible. Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) recognises there are delays in the system and it is in the process of recruiting more judicial office holders in order to increase capacity and help to reduce waiting times for appellants. This includes 250 judges across the First-tier Tribunal, 125 disability qualified members and up to 230 medical members.</p><p>In addition, we have recently launched a new digital service with a view to enabling speedier processing of appeals. Information on the new digital service can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/appeal-benefit-decision/submit-appeal</p><p>We are also working with the Department for Work and Pensions to understand what could be done to reduce the number of appeals being submitted to the Tribunal, through their focus on improving decision-making and the mandatory reconsideration process.</p><p>These measures will increase the capacity of the Tribunal. As a result, the number of appeals outstanding in the Tribunal is starting to fall as the number of cases heard by the Tribunal outweigh those sent to the Tribunal. If this continues, over time, we expect the time it takes for the Tribunal to hear, and the age of, appeals to reduce.</p><p>The time taken for the Tribunal to hear an appeal is mainly driven by the number of appeals sent to the Tribunal and the capacity of the Tribunal to deal with them. The number of appeals sent to the Tribunal is directly affected by changes in welfare policy.</p><p>The time it takes the Tribunal to hear an appeal is calculated from the time it is sent to the Tribunal to its final disposal. An appeal is not necessarily disposed of at its first hearing. The final disposal decision on the appeal may be reached after an earlier hearing has been adjourned (which may be directed by the judge for a variety of reasons, such as to seek further evidence), or after an earlier hearing date had been postponed (again, for a variety of reasons, often at the request of the appellant). An appeal may also have been decided at an earlier date by the First-tier Tribunal, only for the case to have gone on to the Upper Tribunal, to be returned once again to the First-tier for its final disposal.</p><p>HMCTS is very sensitive to the needs of people who may be affected by waiting times for Tribunal hearings. Tribunal staff and judicial office-holders, are trained accordingly, with HMCTS’s reasonable adjustments policy and practice applied where appropriate. Guidance on the policy is published on GOV.UK. If an expedited hearing is sought, or where the Tribunal identifies a case which might benefit from an expedited hearing, a judge or caseworker will make a decision on the issue, taking all the circumstances of the case into account.</p><p> </p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-16T16:26:11.38Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T16:26:11.38Z
unstar this property answering member
3926
star this property label Biography information for Paul Maynard more like this
star this property creator
3973
star this property label Biography information for Grahame Morris more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
3973
unstar this property label Biography information for Grahame Morris more like this
1123716
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-02more like thismore than 2019-05-02
star this property date less than 2019-04-29more like thismore than 2019-04-29
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-29more like thismore than 2019-04-29
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-29T19:32:20.683Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-29T19:32:20.683Z
star this property answering body
Home Office more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 1 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-29T19:41:21.616Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-29T19:41:21.616Z
less than 2019-09-09T14:21:01.988Zmore like thismore than 2019-09-09T14:21:01.988Z
star this property hansard heading Surveillance: Cameras more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 248657 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-09-09T13:49:33.02Zmore like thismore than 2019-09-09T13:49:33.02Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, by what date the updated guidelines for the Surveillance Camera Code of Conduct will be published. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Liverpool, Wavertree more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Luciana Berger more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 248657 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 248657 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The Government committed in the Home Office Biometrics Strategy 2018 to review the Surveillance Camera Code of Practice and it will be updated in due course.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-09-09T13:49:33.02Zmore like thismore than 2019-09-09T13:49:33.02Z
unstar this property answering member
4495
star this property label Biography information for Kit Malthouse more like this
star this property creator
4036
star this property label Biography information for Luciana Berger more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4036
unstar this property label Biography information for Luciana Berger more like this
1123872
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property date less than 2019-04-30more like thismore than 2019-04-30
star this property date tabled less than 2019-04-30more like thismore than 2019-04-30
star this property ddp created less than 2019-04-30T17:11:13.397Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-30T17:11:13.397Z
star this property answering body
Home Office more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 1 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-04-30T17:18:43.337Zmore like thismore than 2019-04-30T17:18:43.337Z
less than 2019-05-15T17:21:02.042Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:21:02.042Z
star this property hansard heading Migrant Workers: Domestic Service more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 249359 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:49:45.847Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:49:45.847Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 24 June 2015 to Question HL314 on Migrant Workers: Domestic Service, how many trafficking cases have been confirmed since 2015; and how many of those trafficking cases were linked to people who had previously been issued an overseas domestic worker visa. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Manchester, Gorton more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Afzal Khan more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 249359 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 249359 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Data on the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) is published regularly by the National Crime Agency, available via the following link:</p><p><a href="https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/component/finder/search?q=national+referral+mechanism&amp;Itemid=101&amp;Itemid=101" target="_blank">https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/component/finder/search?q=national+referral+mechanism&amp;Itemid=101&amp;Itemid=101</a></p><p><br>This includes data on how many conclusive grounds decisions are made year-on-year, confirming individuals as victims of modern slavery.</p><p><br>The Home Office does not publish information on the number of confirmed victims of modern slavery who have previously been issued an overseas domestic worker visa.</p><p><br>The Home Office is committed to improving data around victim identification and will continue to review the data it publishes in relation to NRM referrals and victim typology.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:49:45.847Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:49:45.847Z
unstar this property answering member
4399
star this property label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
star this property creator
4671
star this property label Biography information for Afzal Khan more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4671
unstar this property label Biography information for Afzal Khan more like this
1124136
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date less than 2019-05-01more like thismore than 2019-05-01
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-01more like thismore than 2019-05-01
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-01T18:09:18.443Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-01T18:09:18.443Z
star this property answering body
Women and Equalities more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 31 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Women and Equalities more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Women and Equalities more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-03T12:25:08.940Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-03T12:25:08.940Z
less than 2019-06-11T15:28:04.247Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-11T15:28:04.247Z
star this property hansard heading Employment: Equality more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 249918 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-11T14:56:14.73Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-11T14:56:14.73Z
star this property question text To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, whether she has plans to introduce further auditing and fines for employers who cannot prove their gender equality practices. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Slough more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 249918 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 249918 more like this
star this property version 2 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>Organisations with 250 or more employees are now required to publish specific gender pay gap data on an annual basis. We believe that this transparency is motivating employers to take action, but these regulations are new and we will be monitoring them closely.</p><p> </p><p>We continue to urge employers to go beyond the reporting requirements by publishing an action plan, setting out the steps they are taking to improve gender equality, just under half of employers did this in the first year. I intend to write to all public sector employers urging them to develop a plan, and will meet influential business leaders to press them to take action in their sectors.</p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-06-11T14:56:14.73Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-11T14:56:14.73Z
unstar this property answering member
4399
star this property label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
star this property creator
4638
star this property label Biography information for Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4638
unstar this property label Biography information for Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
1125083
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-07T21:18:40.033Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-07T21:18:40.033Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-07T21:27:30.052Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-07T21:27:30.052Z
less than 2019-05-15T16:43:02.165Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:43:02.165Z
star this property hansard heading Prisons: Contracts more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 251407 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:11:20.777Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:11:20.777Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 18 April 2019 to Question 243526 on Prisons: Contracts, if the criteria for the qualitative evaluation of operational resources will include minimum staffing levels. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 251407 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 251407 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>One of the key aims of the competition is to secure high quality, value for money bids. We expect providers to adequately resource their respective establishments to deliver a safe, decent and secure regime but also want to encourage innovation in service delivery. We believe setting a mandatory minimum threshold for staffing would not fully deliver the aims of the competition and could stifle the ability to innovate, both now and in the future.</p><p>However, we will robustly evaluate bidder responses, for both quality and cost in consultation with subject matter experts across the organisation. It provides a full resourcing model based on the design of the prison, operating capacity, security category, the vision for the regime and the type of services that would best meet the needs of the cohort within.</p><p>The PSC will enable us to rigorously evaluate the operational and financial aspects of the bids and provide assurance that bidders have the resources required to ensure a safe, decent, secure and rehabilitative regime that delivers quality, value for money and affordability.</p><p>Recognition rights for trade unions are a matter for individual bidders and therefore are not mandated in the contract.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T16:11:20.777Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T16:11:20.777Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1125095
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-07more like thismore than 2019-05-07
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-07T21:19:24.230Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-07T21:19:24.230Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-07T21:28:02.617Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-07T21:28:02.617Z
less than 2019-05-15T17:33:01.901Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:33:01.901Z
star this property hansard heading Prisons: Contracts more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 251418 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T17:01:57.49Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:01:57.49Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to page 11 of the House Commons Library Deposited Paper, DEP2019-0490, Prison Operator Competition Contract Summary, what steps are taken to hold private prison contractors to account. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 251418 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 251418 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The private sector has an important role to play, and currently runs some high-performing prisons, as part of a safe, decent and secure prison estate.</p><p>Privately managed prison performance is closely monitored by robust contract management processes. Each privately managed prison has an on-site controller, employed by HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS). Controllers, together with regional contract managers review performance against performance indicators set out in the contract. Any improvement action identified may include a requirement for urgent improvement and/or financial deductions.</p><p>As well as contractual performance indicators, key statistics across public protection; safety and order; and offender reform are published annually for both the private and public estate.</p><p>Privately-managed prisons are subject to the same external inspection procedures as those in the public sector. Prisons are inspected at least once every five years by HM Inspectorate of Prisons, and face regular scrutiny by their local Independent Monitoring Board. Additionally, HMPPS internal audit and assurance scrutinises private prisons to ensure they are meeting their responsibilities.</p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T17:01:57.49Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T17:01:57.49Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1125240
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:54:21.427Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:54:21.427Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-08T17:55:31.377Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:55:31.377Z
less than 2019-06-12T15:06:05.668Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T15:06:05.668Z
star this property hansard heading Joseph McCann more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252002 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.653Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.653Z
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2019-06-12T14:34:20.463Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T14:34:20.463Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when the decision was taken to release Joseph McCann. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252002 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252002 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 January 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.653Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.653Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1125241
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:54:24.110Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:54:24.110Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-08T17:55:34.102Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:55:34.102Z
less than 2019-06-12T15:06:04.247Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T15:06:04.247Z
star this property hansard heading Joseph McCann more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252003 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.73Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.73Z
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2019-06-12T14:34:30.427Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T14:34:30.427Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, who took the decision not to refer the question of Joseph McCann's release to the Parole Board. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252003 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252003 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 January 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.73Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.73Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1125243
star this property human indexable true more like this
star this property published true more like this
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property answer date less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
star this property date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property date tabled less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
star this property ddp created less than 2019-05-08T17:54:29.380Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:54:29.380Z
star this property answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
star this property question status Tabled more like this
star this property answering dept id 54 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Justice more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Justice more like this
star this property ddp modified
less than 2019-05-08T17:55:40.508Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-08T17:55:40.508Z
less than 2019-06-12T15:06:02.800Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T15:06:02.800Z
star this property hansard heading Joseph McCann more like this
star this property house id 1 more like this
star this property identifier 252005 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property parliament number 57 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.767Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.767Z
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2019-06-12T14:34:40.8Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-12T14:34:40.8Z
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the (a) scope, (b) timescale and (c) remit is of the urgent review into the reported mistaken release of Joseph McCann. more like this
star this property session
2017/19 more like this
star this property session number 1 more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Leeds East more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
star this property title House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 252005 more like this
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property uin 252005 more like this
star this property version 1 more like this
star this property written parliamentary question type NamedDay more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>In accordance with the sentence of the Court, Joseph McCann was released on 15 February 2019, after he had completed half (less time spent on remand) of a three-year determinate sentence for burglary imposed on 25 January 2018. On release, he was supervised by the National Probation Service (NPS)</p><p> </p><p>When charged with that offence and remanded into custody on 21 August 2017, he was being supervised on licence by the NPS as part of the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which he received on 26 September 2008. An offender on an IPP licence is not recalled automatically when he is charged with a further offence or offences. The probation officer will consider whether the alleged further offences, prior offending and the offender’s current behaviour show that his risk has escalated to the point where he needs to be recalled to protect the public. The decision on whether to recall an offender is to be based on a robust assessment of risk and to reflect the professional judgment of a trained probation officer.</p><p> </p><p>The NPS has undertaken an urgent review to establish why Mr McCann was not recalled to custody, either when remanded into custody on 21 August 2017 or when he was sentenced on <ins class="ministerial">25 Jarnuary 2018</ins> <del class="ministerial">15 February 2018</del>. Mr McCann has now been charged with a number of very serious offences committed on or after 21 April this year. This has triggered a mandatory serious further offence (SFO) review, under the Probation SFO Review Procedures. The SFO review will consider in greater depth than has thus far been possible, including by interviewing relevant members of staff, the question of whether Mr McCann should have been recalled to custody when charged with and subsequently convicted of the burglary offence. Typically, an SFO review is completed within three months of an offender being charged with an SFO.</p><p> </p>
star this property question first answered
less than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.767Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-17T13:45:21.767Z
unstar this property answering member
4106
star this property label Biography information for Robert Buckland more like this
star this property creator
4493
star this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
star this property publisher 25259
star this property tabling member
4493
unstar this property label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this