Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1537360

	registered interest
	date	31/10/2022
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Bees: North Staffordshire
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if she will make an estimate of the trend in the population level of bees in North Staffordshire over the last 10 years.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	74982
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/11/2022 answer text <p>While the Department does not hold comprehensive historic data on the population level of honey bees, the National Bee Unit does hold some county data, including for Staffordshire as a whole, on its BeeBase website. This data relates to honey bees managed by beekeepers and indicates a rise in the honey bee population in Staffordshire, from around 2,300 colonies in 2012 to around 3,200 colonies in 2022.</p><p> </p><p>It is important to note that the overall number of beekeepers registering on BeeBase has risen dramatically over the last 10 years, and this may account for the apparent rise in the honey bee population suggested by the colony numbers.</p><p> </p><p>We do not hold information specific to the population level of wild bees in North Staffordshire over the last 10 years. More generally, Defra’s indicator recording the distribution of pollinating insects in England between 1980 and 2017 shows long term decline for the majority of the 377 species of hoverflies and bees. In the short term, however, around 40% of these species have become less well distributed, and around 40% have become more well distributed. In the short term, more recorded bee species are becoming more widespread in England than are becoming less widespread. We cannot provide information on which species are declining and which are increasing. We are keeping these trends under review.</p> answering member constituency Copeland answering member printed Trudy Harrison question first answered 09/11/2022 14:59:26 answering member 4593 label Biography information for Trudy Harrison
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell

1307730

	registered interest
	date	12/04/2021
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Landfill: Odour Pollution
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many odour complaints have been received about each site regulated by the Environment Agency in March 2021.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	179680
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 15/04/2021 answer text <p>We provide below the number of unsubstantiated odour reports that have been received about each site regulated by the Environment Agency (EA) for March 2021. The reports have not yet been verified and therefore may not be accurately attributed. The EA seeks to quality-check attributions each month for sites which attract 20 or more reports. This has not yet been done for this data set due to the short timescale involved. To prevent inaccurate attributions, we have anonymised the names of the sites associated with the reports, specifying only the class of activity undertaken. The total number of reports of odour pollution received by the EA in March 2021 was 7516.</p><p> </p><p>The table below provides the full list of the odour reports associated with each of the EA permitted sites for March 2021.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Reports In March 2021</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Class</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>6347</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>122</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>87</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>64</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>Waste Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>Waste Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>Other</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>Waste Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>Manufacturing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>Chemicals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>Chemicals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>Waste Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>Waste Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Incineration</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Incineration</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Waste Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Waste Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Waste Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>Waste Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Chemicals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Food Processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Intensive Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Manufacturing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Other</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Minerals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Food</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Food</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Food</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Food</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Food</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Food</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Incineration</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Farming</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Incineration</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Chemicals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Biowaste</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Landfill</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Treatment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Spreading</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Unknown</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency Taunton Deane answering member printed Rebecca Pow question first answered 15/04/2021 16:13:44 answering member 4522 label Biography information for Rebecca Pow
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell

1537358

	registered interest
	date	31/10/2022
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Plastics: Pollution Control
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of introducing a specific plastic reduction target for local authorities under the Environment Act 2021.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	74981
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/11/2022 answer text <p>We have not assessed the merits of introducing a specific plastic reduction target for local authorities under the Environment Act 2021. We consulted earlier this year on a target for reducing all residual waste excluding major mineral waste. Our consultation set out the rationale for the Government’s proposed choice.</p> answering member constituency Taunton Deane answering member printed Rebecca Pow question first answered 08/11/2022 16:17:08 answering member 4522 label Biography information for Rebecca Pow
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell

1519833

	registered interest
	date	10/10/2022
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Dogs: Animal Welfare
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps his Department is taking to prevent healthy dogs from being euthanised in the UK.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	60172
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/10/2022 answer text <p>We committed in the Action Plan for Animal Welfare to seek greater assurance that alternatives to euthanasia are explored before a healthy dog is put down.</p><p>In 2021, we worked closely with the veterinary profession to develop an approach that works for all parties. Following these discussions, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RVCS) agreed to incorporate the principle of microchip scanning before euthanasia into the guidance that underpins their Code of Professional Conduct. This applies to all veterinary surgeons practising in the United Kingdom.</p><p>The Code requires veterinary surgeons to scan for a microchip in dogs prior to euthanasia where, in their professional judgement, it is not necessary to put the dog down on animal health or welfare grounds. Checking the details on the relevant microchip database reveals who the animal's registered keepers are and can also alert the veterinary surgeon to anyone else who may have an interest in the animal. This may include rescue centres which have entered support back-up information on the microchip record. This information can help inform consideration about alternatives to euthanasia. We continue to engage with the RCVS about how these changes are working in practice.</p><p>In addition, we recently held a consultation to seek views on changes to current microchipping legislation which, if adopted, may make it easier and simpler for veterinary surgeons when they apply this RCVS guidance.</p> answering member constituency North Cornwall answering member printed Scott Mann question first answered 18/10/2022 16:45:19 answering member 4496 label Biography information for Scott Mann
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell

1543137

	registered interest
	date	17/11/2022
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Walley's Quarry Landfill: Regulation
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what recent assessment she has made of the adequacy of the regulation of the operators of Walley's Quarry landfill site in Newcastle-under-Lyme.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	902213
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 17/11/2022 answer text <p>Walley’s Quarry has been the source of unacceptable levels of odour for the local community, who have my sympathy. The Environment Agency is using the regulatory framework to drive improvement and continues to make announced and unannounced site inspections. In the five months to the end of September 2022, monitoring data indicates a monthly average hydrogen sulphide concentration close to or below the long-term health-based guidance value.</p> answering member constituency Taunton Deane answering member printed Rebecca Pow question first answered 17/11/2022 13:18:15 answering member 4522 label Biography information for Rebecca Pow
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell

1361150

	registered interest
	date	19/10/2021
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Landfill: Hydrogen Sulphide
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the World Health Organization air quality guidelines on (a) odorous annoyance and (b) health in respect of hydrogen sulphide emissions from landfill sites.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	59111
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2021 answer text <p>The World Health Organization (WHO) air quality guidelines are internationally recognised guidelines. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has adopted the WHO air quality guidelines with respect to hydrogen sulphide for assessing odour and short-term exposure in their risk assessment for Walleys Quarry Landfill, available here: <a href="https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/west-midlands/walleys-quarry-landfill-sliverdale/user_uploads/walley-s-ea-aq-monitoring-health-risk--assessment-august-final.pdf" target="_blank">https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/west-midlands/walleys-quarry-landfill-sliverdale/user_uploads/walley-s-ea-aq-monitoring-health-risk--assessment-august-final.pdf</a>.</p><p> </p><p>The WHO guideline value of 7 µg/m3 (5 ppb) over a 30-minute averaging period is protective of odour annoyance. The WHO guideline value of 150 μg/m3 (107 ppb) as a 24-hour (average) to protect against eye irritation.</p> answering member constituency Bury St Edmunds answering member printed Jo Churchill question first answered 22/10/2021 13:48:04 answering member 4380 label Biography information for Jo Churchill
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell

1359408

	registered interest
	date	15/10/2021
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Walley's Quarry Landfill: Hydrogen Sulphide
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the Regulation of Walleys Quarry landfill site, Plan to reduce hydrogen sulphide emissions, published by the Environment Agency in October 2021; and if he will make a statement.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	56443
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2021 answer text <p>The Environment Agency's plan to reduce hydrogen sulphide emissions arising from Walleys Quarry builds on the work it has done to require the operator to contain, capture, and destroy increasing volumes of hydrogen sulphide. This strategy has seen concentrations decrease at all monitoring stations over recent months, although I recognise there remains significant concern in the local community. In due course, the new capping material installed at the site, and the extra gas wells being dug should further improve the situation.</p> answering member constituency Bury St Edmunds answering member printed Jo Churchill question first answered 22/10/2021 13:37:25 answering member 4380 label Biography information for Jo Churchill
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell

1360468

	registered interest
	date	15/10/2021
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Landfill
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what comparative assessment his Department has made of the cost to the Environment Agency of regulating (a) Walley’s Quarry landfill and (b) all other landfill sites regulated by the Environment Agency in 2021.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	57456
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2021 answer text <p>The Environment Agency charges an annual subsistence charge to landfill sites to fund their regulation. Landfill sites of the same type as Walleys Quarry are charged £18,221.00.</p><p> </p><p>Poorly performing sites pay higher charges and this year Walleys Quarry was charged £22,776.25 – an additional 25%. The current performance of Walleys Quarry would lead to an additional charge of 50% in 2022.</p><p> </p><p>The Environment Agency can also charge the operators for time and materials to recover the costs of additional regulation. Up to 13 August 2021, the operator of Walleys Quarry has been charged £98,622.20 for the additional costs of regulation and communications. The Environment Agency will continue to charge Walleys Quarry the recoverable costs of additional regulation and expects further recharges to be made throughout the rest of the year.</p> answering member constituency Bury St Edmunds answering member printed Jo Churchill question first answered 22/10/2021 14:26:05 answering member 4380 label Biography information for Jo Churchill
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell

1519834

	registered interest
	date	10/10/2022
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Litter
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps his Department is taking to tackle littering in (a) city centres, (b) town centres, (c) the UK and (d) the Newcastle-under-Lyme constituency.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	60173
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/10/2022 answer text <p>Litter policy is a devolved matter. Defra is the lead department for litter policy in England.</p><p>In 2017 Defra published the Litter Strategy for England which sets out our aim to deliver a substantial reduction in litter and littering within a generation. Since publishing the Litter Strategy, we have bolstered councils' enforcement powers, such as by almost doubling the maximum fixed penalty for littering, published guidance on the provision of litter bins and provided nearly £1 million across 44 councils to help councils purchase new bins.</p><p>We have also brought together chewing gum producers as part of a voluntary producer responsibility scheme that has recently announced funding of £1.25 million to help more than 40 councils across the United Kingdom clean gum off pavements. It is the first project of the five-year programme through which gum producers will invest up to £10 million to help tackle chewing gum littering.</p><p>We are also actively exploring options for tackling cigarette butt littering. Our current proposals for extended producer responsibility for packaging will place the financial costs of managing street bin litter on producers and we have consulted on introducing a deposit return scheme for drinks containers which we estimate can reduce drinks containers being littered by 85%. Further details for when a deposit return scheme will be introduced will be set out in HM Government response to last year's consultation. We are working towards publication in late 2022.</p> answering member constituency Copeland answering member printed Trudy Harrison question first answered 18/10/2022 16:48:21 answering member 4593 label Biography information for Trudy Harrison
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell

1439543

	registered interest
	date	10/03/2022
	answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept id	13
	answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
	hansard heading	Walley's Quarry Landfill: Odour Pollution
	house id	1
	legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what recent assessment he has made of the effect on the local community of the odorous emissions from the site operation of Walley's Quarry in Newcastle-under-Lyme.
	tabling member constituency	Newcastle-under-Lyme
	tabling member printed	Aaron Bell
	uin	905999
	answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/03/2022 answer text <p>I commend the hon. Member's tireless commitment to his constituents on this issue. I have seen for myself the issues at Walleys Quarry, and I share his concerns.</p><p> </p><p>We are taking action through emissions monitoring and sharing our data with the UK Health Security Agency, which is providing expert public health advice. We are firmly holding the operator to account in delivering continuous improvements for the local community.</p> answering member constituency Bury St Edmunds answering member printed Jo Churchill question first answered 10/03/2022 14:53:28 answering member 4380 label Biography information for Jo Churchill
	tabling member	4837 label Biography information for Aaron Bell