Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

347943
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department of Health more like this
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Health more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health more like this
star this property hansard heading Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, to date, how many adverse reactions to (1) Cervarix, (2) Gardasil and (3) generic human papilloma virus vaccines have been reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency; for each category, how many of those reports are of serious adverse reactions; and what age-specific rate those figures represent. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
star this property uin HL229 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction true more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-16more like thismore than 2015-06-16
star this property answer text <p>A total of 8,243 suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports with human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines have been reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), via the Yellow Card Scheme, up to 3 June 2015.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>To date, more than 8 million doses of HPV vaccine have been given across the United Kingdom as part of the routine immunisation programme. The MHRA does not hold data on age-specific vaccine usage, and therefore age-specific reporting rates cannot be calculated.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>It is important to note that a Yellow Card report is not proof of a side effect occurring, but a suspicion by the reporter that the vaccine may have been the cause. Yellow Card data cannot be used as a reliable indicator of the frequency of suspected ADRs to vaccines or medicines. The level of ADR reporting may fluctuate between given years due to a variety of reasons such as a medicine being new (reporting rates are generally higher when a product is first introduced), stimulated interest/publicity and variations in exposure to the medicine.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The possible known side effects, and the frequency, are listed in the product information which is provided with the vaccines. The vast majority of the 8,243 ADRs relate to the known risks of vaccination that are well-described in the available product information. The proportion of suspected ADRs for HPV vaccines that were reported as serious (32%) is less than the proportion reported as serious for other routinely used vaccines (68% overall) during the same time period. The expected benefits in protecting against HPV-related mortality and disease outweigh the known side effects of HPV vaccine.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The following table provides a breakdown of UK suspected spontaneous ADRs received via the Yellow Card Scheme in association with the HPV vaccine. The MHRA does not hold data on age-specific vaccine usage, and therefore age-specific reporting rates cannot be calculated.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Vaccine Brand</p></td><td><p>Total number of reports</p></td><td><p>Number of serious reports (% of total)</p></td><td><p>Reporting rate per 1000 doses (serious reporting rates per 1000)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cervarix</p></td><td><p>6,266</p></td><td><p>1,768 (28%)</p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">n/a **</ins><del class="ministerial">0.78 (0.22)</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gardasil</p></td><td><p>1,471</p></td><td><p>504 (34%)</p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">n/a **</ins><del class="ministerial">0.18 (0.06)</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>HPV Brand unspecified</p></td><td><p>507</p></td><td><p>326 (64%)</p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">n/a ** </ins><del class="ministerial">0.06 (0.04)</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total for Human Papilloma virus vaccines</p></td><td><p>*8,244</p></td><td><p>2,598 (32%)</p></td><td><p>1.03 (0.32)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><em>Source:</em> MHRA sentinel database for adverse reactions.</p><p> </p><p>* It should be noted that the total number of reports received will not be equal to the totals in the table above as some reports of suspected adverse reactions may have included more than one vaccine.</p><p><ins class="ministerial">**Updated UK-wide brand-specific usage data are not available to MHRA at the time of writing based on a minimum of 8 million combined doses of Cervarix and Gardasil administered across the UK to date.</ins></p><p> </p><p><ins class="ministerial"> <p> </p><p> </p><p> </p></ins></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The seriousness criteria for ADR reporting were determined by a working group of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) and are defined as 6 possible categories which are explained on the Yellow Card. The MHRA asks reporters to select one of the following criteria by ticking the appropriate box on the Yellow Card: (1) patient died due to reaction; (2) life threatening; (3) resulted in hospitalisation or prolonged inpatient hospitalisation; (4) congenital abnormality; and (5) involved persistent or significant disability or incapacity; or (6) if the reaction was deemed medically significant. In addition to this, seriousness of reaction terms has also been defined by the MHRA in its medical dictionary. Therefore an ADR report can be serious because the reporter considers the reaction to be serious or because the reaction term itself is considered serious in the MHRA medical dictionary.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-16T14:35:02.313Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-16T14:35:02.313Z
star this property question first ministerially corrected
less than 2015-07-03T14:01:13.16Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-03T14:01:13.16Z
star this property answering member
127
star this property label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property previous answer version
5462
star this property answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property answering member
127
star this property label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property tabling member
1861
star this property label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this
347888
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
star this property hansard heading Fuels: Excise Duties more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they plan to alter fuel duties to change the relative price difference paid by customers for petrol and diesel fuels. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Steel of Aikwood more like this
star this property uin HL174 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-12more like thismore than 2015-06-12
star this property answer text <p>The Government has no current plans to alter fuel duty to change the relative price difference paid by customers for petrol and diesel.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-12T13:18:46.167Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-12T13:18:46.167Z
star this property answering member
4536
star this property label Biography information for Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
star this property tabling member
949
star this property label Biography information for Lord Steel of Aikwood more like this
347889
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept id 1 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
star this property hansard heading Immigration more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their assessment of the report by the British Election Study, <i>Financial Literacy and Attitudes Towards Immigration</i>, that found that few people understand immigrants' role in the economic recovery of the United Kingdom. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
star this property uin HL175 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-08more like thismore than 2015-06-08
star this property answer text <p>The Government has made no such assessment.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Bates more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-08T14:18:41.157Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-08T14:18:41.157Z
star this property answering member
1091
star this property label Biography information for Lord Bates more like this
star this property tabling member
1796
star this property label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
347890
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Education: Standards more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to reduce inequality between those who are educated privately and those who are state-educated. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
star this property uin HL176 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-08more like thismore than 2015-06-08
star this property answer text <p>We are determined to ensure that every child, regardless of background is given an education which allows them to realise their potential. That is why our reforms place high expectations at the heart of our school system, with a rigorous new curriculum, world class exams and a new accountability system which rewards those schools that encourage every child to achieve their best. In addition, with the new Education and Adoption Bill, we will speed up the process for tackling failing schools and extend our powers into coasting schools. With these measures, we want all schools to be good or outstanding, certainly as good as the best in the independent sector.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-08T14:14:22.503Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-08T14:14:22.503Z
star this property answering member
4270
star this property label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
star this property tabling member
1796
star this property label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
347891
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department of Health more like this
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Health more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health more like this
star this property hansard heading Mental Illness: Children and Young People more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to address the reported rise in the number of children suffering from mental health issues. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
star this property uin HL177 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-15more like thismore than 2015-06-15
star this property answer text <p>This Government is committed to improving children and young people’s mental health and wellbeing.</p><p>The Department is working with NHS England and other partners to consider how best to drive forward transformation in children and young people’s mental health and wellbeing. The Children and Young People's Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (CYP IAPT) programme is already being expanded to cover additional areas of clinical practice, so that by 2018 children and young people across all of England will have access to evidence based psychotherapies. The Department is also commissioning a new national survey on the prevalence of mental health problems in children and young people, the first since 2004.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-15T11:34:24.54Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-15T11:34:24.54Z
star this property answering member
127
star this property label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property tabling member
1796
star this property label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
347892
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department of Health more like this
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Health more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health more like this
star this property hansard heading Maternity Services more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to improve access to healthcare for all mothers, regardless of their wealth or immigration status. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
star this property uin HL178 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-15more like thismore than 2015-06-15
star this property answer text <p>All women regardless of their wealth or immigration status are encouraged to contact their maternity services as soon as they know they are pregnant for a full assessment of their health, risk factors and choices so that a personalised plan of care can be prepared. The latest data shows that over 96% of pregnant women in England received their full health and risk assessment before 12 weeks and 6 days between April and June 2014. Early access to maternity services helps tackle the negative impact of health inequalities from the start of life and supports good health and well-being in mother and baby.</p><p> </p><p>Women with complex social factors do not always access maternity services early, or attend regularly for antenatal care and poorer outcomes are consequently reported for mother and baby. Maternity services need to be proactive in engaging all women. To support National Health Service maternity services engagement with pregnant women with complex social factors, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has published clinical guidelines on pregnancy and complex social factors, which describes how access to care can be improved and contact with antenatal care maintained.</p><p> </p><p>Maternity services feature prominently in the key objectives set out in the Mandate between the Government and NHS England. All women, regardless of their wealth or immigration status, should have a named midwife responsible for ensuring she receives personalised care throughout pregnancy, childbirth and during the postnatal period. To help reduce unwarranted variation in service delivery and encourage innovation, NHS England has established Maternity and Children Strategic Clinical Networks.<strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>Entitlement to free NHS hospital treatment in England is based on being ‘ordinarily resident’ in the United Kingdom. Except in rare circumstances, nationals of countries outside the European Economic Area must also have ‘indefinite leave to remain’ in the UK in order to be ordinarily resident here. Anyone not ordinarily resident here is subject to the NHS (Charges to Overseas Visitors) Regulations 2015, and will be charged for any treatment they receive unless an exemption from charge category applies.</p><p> </p><p>Chargeable treatment which is considered by clinicians to be immediately necessary, must never be withheld from an overseas visitor. Guidance to NHS trusts makes clear that all maternity services – including routine ante-natal treatment - should be regarded as immediately necessary. This means that no woman will be denied maternity services, even if she cannot pay in advance, although she will still be charged for treatment and expected to pay later.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-15T11:33:23.337Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-15T11:33:23.337Z
star this property answering member
127
star this property label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property tabling member
1796
star this property label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
347893
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept id 1 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
star this property hansard heading Refugees: North Korea more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by the Minister of State for Immigration, James Brokenshire, on 26 March (HC228701), and in the light of the ongoing practice of the United Kingdom of deporting North Korean asylum seekers to South Korea, what assessment they have made of the statement by the government of South Korea in a letter to the Secretary of State in 2010, cited in the judgment of the Upper Tribunal in <i>GP and others (South Korean Citizenship) North Korean CG </i>[2014] UKUT 391(IAC) that North Korean refugees must "desire to live in the Republic of Korea" before they can be considered South Korean nationals or be offered protection and settlement support. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
star this property uin HL179 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-08more like thismore than 2015-06-08
star this property answer text <p>The July 2010 letter written by the South Korean Embassy in London to the Home Office was fully considered by the Upper Tribunal in the case of GP and others.</p><p>In paragraph 104 of its determination the Upper Tribunal noted firstly that the subsequent United Kingdom-South Korea Readmission Agreement entered into between the two countries on 10 December 2011 provides a mechanism for the issue of travel documents which is not dependent on the genuineness of the individual’s wish to live in South Korea; and secondly, the question of refugee status is an objective test which requires the person to demonstrate that they have cooperated by seeking to establish whether they can avail themselves of protection from another State of which they may be a citizen.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Bates more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-08T14:22:52.32Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-08T14:22:52.32Z
star this property answering member
1091
star this property label Biography information for Lord Bates more like this
star this property tabling member
738
star this property label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
347894
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
star this property answering dept id 16 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
star this property hansard heading Syria more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of (1) the circumstances of the more than 230 Assyrian Christian hostages taken by Da'esh in the north of Syria in February; (2) the capture by Da'esh of around 35 predominantly Assyrian villages along the Khabur river in the Hassake Governorate; and (3) how many people remain unaccounted for following those captures. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
star this property uin HL180 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-09more like thismore than 2015-06-09
star this property answer text <p>We understand that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) are still holding more than 200 Assyrian Christians who were abducted in February from villages along the Khabour river in Hassakeh Province of North-East Syria. We believe that, in another act of appalling barbarity, ISIL executed at least 15 of the hostages, and that 23 Assyrian Christians have since been released following the payment of ransom money by the families, and another two freed when the area was liberated at the end of May. We remain concerned for the remaining hostages, most of whom are women, children and elderly people. We support the UN Security Council Statement condemning the abductions and demanding the Christians immediate release.</p><p>The UK is committed to defeating ISIL, an organisation that has no place in today’s world. We will continue to work with the Global Coalition of more than sixty countries to ensure that ISIL no longer poses a threat to the people of the region, to international stability or to our own national security.</p>
star this property answering member printed Baroness Anelay of St Johns more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-09T12:46:19.597Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-09T12:46:19.597Z
star this property answering member
3474
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Anelay of St Johns more like this
star this property tabling member
738
star this property label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
347895
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
star this property answering dept id 16 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
star this property hansard heading Syria more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in the light of the successful removal of Da'esh from the 35 villages along the Khabur river that had previously been captured, what steps they are taking to assist the clearing of mines and unexploded ordnance, to consolidate stability, and to create safe havens to enable the return of residents. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
star this property uin HL181 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-09more like thismore than 2015-06-09
star this property answer text <p>While the UK is not carrying out any mine clearance operations in Syria, we fully recognise the widespread and severe civilian suffering caused by the conflict. The UK has given over £800m to the humanitarian response, more than we have given to any previous humanitarian crisis. Some of this has been targeted to provide humanitarian support to the Hasakah Governorate as and where security constraints have allowed.</p><p>Although safe havens can be effective in some situations, they are not currently feasible in Syria. Without all parties agreeing on their establishment there would need to be sufficient military capability to guarantee the safety of individuals. That is not currently present in Syria.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Anelay of St Johns more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-09T12:46:48.017Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-09T12:46:48.017Z
star this property answering member
3474
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Anelay of St Johns more like this
star this property tabling member
738
star this property label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
347896
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department of Health more like this
star this property answering dept id 17 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Health more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Health more like this
star this property hansard heading IVF more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what discussions they have had with other governments regarding the decision of the United Kingdom to permit germline modifications for the purposes of preventing the transmission of mitochondrial disease; and what, if any, concerns were raised during those discussions. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
star this property uin HL182 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-06-16more like thismore than 2015-06-16
star this property answer text <p>The Government has had no discussions with other international governments about Parliament’s decision to pass the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015. Although a matter reserved to the Westminster Parliament, the Government has kept the Devolved Administrations informed about the development of these regulations. Information is not routinely collected by the Department about other countries’ approaches to addressing mitochondrial disease.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Government has made no formal assessment of the statement by Mr John Holdren, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, however we understand that his comments were not in relation to mitochondrial donation.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-06-16T14:12:57.263Zmore like thismore than 2015-06-16T14:12:57.263Z
star this property answering member
127
star this property label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
star this property tabling member
738
star this property label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this