Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

147352
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2014-11-10more like thismore than 2014-11-10
star this property answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
star this property answering dept id 26 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
star this property hansard heading Copyright remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
unstar this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what are their reasons for proposing an extended three-year transition period from April 2015 for the implementation of section 74 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, in the light of the current extent of counterfeiting. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Clement-Jones more like this
unstar this property uin HL2756 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-11-21more like thisremove minimum value filter
star this property answer text The Government’s reasons for proposing a three-year transition period for implementing s74 Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 are set out in its recent consultation which concluded on 27 October 2014 (https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/transitional-provisions-for-the-repeal-of-section-52-of-the-cdpa). This does not represent an extended transition period but the Government’s provisional judgement as to the shortest reasonable period, taking into account the needs of both right owners and those using the current law to trade lawfully. The Government is considering the evidence it received and will make its decision on transitional provisions in the light of this. Current items made under the aegis of s52 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 would not be considered counterfeits. Counterfeit products (i.e. goods which falsely carry the trade mark of a genuine brand without permission) are already subject to legal sanction under separate trade mark legislation. more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Neville-Rolfe remove filter
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-11-21T13:06:54.63Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-21T13:06:54.63Z
star this property answering member
4284
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
star this property tabling member
3396
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Clement-Jones more like this
386135
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-06-29more like thismore than 2015-06-29
star this property answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
star this property answering dept id 26 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
star this property hansard heading Copyright remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
unstar this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their assessment of the draft own-initiative report of proposal to the European Parliament that commercial use of photographs or video footage, or other images of works which are permanently located in physical public places, should always be subject to prior consent from the authors or any proxy acting for them. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Stoddart of Swindon more like this
unstar this property uin HL934 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-07-06more like thismore than 2015-07-06
star this property answer text <p>Section 62 of the Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act (1988) permits the photographing and filming of certain artistic works and buildings permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public, without prior consent from the owners of copyright in those works. This exception to copyright protection has existed in UK law for over a hundred years, and represents an important freedom for photographers and film-makers, whether amateur or professional.</p><p> </p><p>The Government does not support any restriction to this exception, such as a requirement that prohibits commercial use without prior consent. The Government recognises the diversity of EU Member States’ laws in this area and strongly believes Member States should retain their current discretion in this area of law.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Neville-Rolfe remove filter
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-07-06T10:52:24.47Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-06T10:52:24.47Z
star this property answering member
4284
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
star this property tabling member
950
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Stoddart of Swindon more like this
387736
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date less than 2015-07-06more like thismore than 2015-07-06
star this property answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
star this property answering dept id 26 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
star this property hansard heading Copyright remove filter
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
unstar this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Neville-Rolfe on 6 July (HL934) concerning the proposal by the European Parliament for restrictions on photographs or video footage of public buildings, whether they have the power of veto over such draft legislation; and if so, whether they plan to use their veto in this instance. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Stoddart of Swindon more like this
unstar this property uin HL1113 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
star this property answer text <p>On the 9<sup>th</sup> July, the EU Parliament considered a non-legislative own initiative report from the Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) on EU copyright reform, and voted against proposals to restrict individuals’ freedom to photograph or film buildings or statues located in public places.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Neville-Rolfe remove filter
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T12:23:08.727Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T12:23:08.727Z
star this property answering member
4284
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
star this property tabling member
950
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Stoddart of Swindon more like this