Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

106156
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>The process for tabling oral questions was considered in detail in the 2012-13 session. In response to concerns raised about the current “first-come-first-served” system - including a concern about the requirement to queue raised by my Noble Friend, Lady Sharples - the Procedure Committee proposed the introduction of a ballot in its place (Procedure Committee, 3rd Report, Session 2012-13). The House remitted the issue back to the Procedure Committee for further consideration (HL Deb 9 Jan 2013, cols 145-172). <br><br>That further review did not identify a clear consensus as to whether a ballot was preferred to the “first-come-first-served” system (see Procedure Committee, 5th Report, Session 2012-13; see also HL Deb 24 April 2013, cols 1406-1417). <br><br>I know that strong views persist on both sides of the argument about this issue. I will write to the Chairman of the Procedure Committee on my Noble Friend’s behalf to suggest that the matter might be discussed at a future meeting of the Procedure Committee.</p><p> </p>
star this property question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-11-18T14:34:08.47Z
unstar this property answering member 4205
star this property tabling member
1665
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Avebury more like this
78966
star this property type
WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property answer text <p>I refer the noble Lord to the reply I gave to Lord Stoddart of Swindon on 29 July (WA 304).</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-08-04T11:24:36.5291815Zmore like thismore than 2014-08-04T11:24:36.5291815Z
unstar this property answering member 4205
star this property tabling member
121
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Mawhinney more like this