To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many allegations of (a) sexual assault,
(b) exposure, (c) voyeurism, (d) sexual activity in a public lavatory, (e) rape and
(f) other forms of sexual misconduct have been recorded by the Crime Statistics and
Analysis Cell in each month since April 2014 relating to the (i) Army, (ii) Navy,
(iii) RAF and (iv) reservists; and if he will make a statement.
<p>The table shows the number of allegations of rape, sexual assault, exposure, voyeurism,
and other forms of sexual misconduct, recorded by the Service police in each month
since April 2014 up to 24 October 2014, broken down by Service.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>
</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April 2014</p></td><td><p>May
2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August 2014</p></td><td><p>September
2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><p><strong>Number
Of Rape Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British Army</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Navy</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Air Force</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number Of Sexual Assault (By Penetration) Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April
2014</p></td><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August
2014</p></td><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number Of Sexual Assault (No Penetration) Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April
2014</p></td><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August
2014</p></td><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Navy</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Air Force</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number of Exposure Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number Of Voyeurism Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April
2014</p></td><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August
2014</p></td><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Royal
Air Force</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="8"><p><strong>Number Of Other Sexual Offences Under The Sexual Offences Act
2003 Allegations</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Month/Service</p></td><td><p>April
2014</p></td><td><p>May 2014</p></td><td><p>June 2014</p></td><td><p>July 2014</p></td><td><p>August
2014</p></td><td><p>September 2014</p></td><td><p>October 2014</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>British
Army</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes:
The table only details investigations where the appropriate Service police have jurisdiction
and investigative lead.</p><p>The allegation recorded against each Service is that
of the victim.</p><p> </p><p>No such allegations have been reported to the Service
police in respect of sexual activity in public lavatory or from any of the Reserve
Forces for the period detailed in the above tables.</p><p> </p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress his Department has made in
assessing the systems used by (a) his Department, (b) the Army, (c) the Navy and (d)
the RAF for recording service complaints; and if he will make a statement.
<p>Accurate data is clearly important for assessing the efficiency and effectiveness
of the complaints process. Service complaints data is captured by all three Services
on the Joint Personnel Administration (JPA) system. The system and the supporting
guidance for users have been refined following internal audits of JPA's effectiveness
and extent of its use in 2008 and 2012.</p><p>A third audit is being carried out to
review the adequacy and effectiveness of actions taken in response to the audit in
2012. The Service Complaints Commissioner is fully involved in the audit.</p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many reports of allegations of (a)
sexual assault, (b) exposure, (c) voyeurism, (d) sexual activity in a public lavatory
and (e) other forms of sexual misconduct were made by commanding officers to each
of the service police forces in (i) 2013 and (ii) 2014 to date; and if he will make
a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many administrative actions under AGAI67
have been considered to have been illegal punishments in each year since 2008 in each
branch of the armed forces; and if he will make a statement.
<p>It is assumed that the hon. Member is referring to cases where administrative action
was taken, under AGAI Chapter 67 or the equivalent regulations in the Naval Service
and RAF, against Service personnel who had been in receipt of a simple police caution,
after the amendment to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 made by section 49
the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act which came into force on 19 December 2008.
<br><br>The range of administrative sanctions which could have been applied in such
circumstances is extremely wide, ranging from a formal warning to termination of service.
A full analysis by year would require the examination of individual records and could
only be obtained at disproportionate cost.</p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many service complaints have been received
following armed forces personnel being disciplined after receiving a police caution;
and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps he has taken to contact members
of the armed forces wrongly disciplined in addition to receiving a police caution;
and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many senior members of each branch
of the armed forces missed a promotion following the receipt of a police caution in
(a) 2011, (b) 2012 and (c) 2013; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 1 April 2014,
Official Report, columns 619-20W, on army: disciplinary proceedings, how many of the
individuals discharged in (a) 2010 and (b) 2011 under AGA167 (i) were discharged as
a result of cautions and (ii) have been notified that they were wrongly discharged;
and if he will make a statement.
<p> </p><p>The information requested can only be gained through a manual search of
personnel records and therefore could only be provided at disproportionate cost.</p><p>
</p><p>No steps have been taken to notify individuals.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the his reply 192877, how many
service complaints taken to an employment tribunal were settled (a) by out of court
or other payments and (b) at Army Board CO Level 2 complaints appeal; what the total
of those payments was; and if he will make a statement.
<p>The following table sets out details of Employment Tribunal (ET) cases brought
by Service personnel since 2008 which were subject to an out of court settlement.
I am unable to answer the second part of this question as the internal appeal process
does not include any separate complaints appeal stage which is distinct from the Superior
Officer or Defence Council levels.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Calendar year</p></td><td><p>No
of ET cases settled out of court (of those lodged in each year)</p></td><td><p>Total
settlement monies (paid against ET claims lodged in each year)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2008</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>£393,584</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>£131,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>£28,075</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>£37,243</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>Withheld</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>£0</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>
</p><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p> </p><p>1. Data refer to the date of submission of the
ET claim. ET settlements and monies paid may have occurred in different years, but
are presented in this format to show the outcomes of the claims which were lodged
in each calendar year.</p><p> </p><p>2. Settlement payments made are covered by Compromise
Agreements which contain a confidentiality clause. For this reason the figure for
the single case settled out of court in 2012 is withheld.</p><p> </p><p>3. The figure
for 2008 includes the Royal Irish class action Industrial Tribunal cases in which
21 of the 22 complainants received a settlement.</p><p> </p><p>4. Not all cases lodged
in 2013 have reached their conclusion.</p><p> </p>
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what comparative assessment he has made
of the long-term effects on the level of war pensions and Armed Forces Compensation
Scheme payments being uprated annually in line with (a) price inflation, (b) average
earnings and (c) whichever is the higher of consumer price index price inflation,
average earnings or 2.5 per cent; and if he will make a statement.
<p>No comparative assessment of the kind suggested has been made. The aim of uprating
is to protect War Pension and Armed Forces Compensation Scheme payments against rising
prices. In line with other public sector schemes, payments through the Armed Forces
pensions and compensation schemes have increased with reference to the Consumer Price
Index.</p>