Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

723776
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-04-24more like thismore than 2017-04-24
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Domestic Abuse more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in the light of figures released following a freedom of information request showing that more than 160,000 victims of domestic violence in England withdrew their support for charges against their abusers in 2016, what percentage rise this represents compared with the previous 12 months; and what assessment they have made of the factors which led to those withdrawals. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Ouseley remove filter
uin HL6818 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-26more like thismore than 2017-04-26
answer text <p>The Home Office first published information on police outcomes for domestic abuse-related offences in ‘Crime outcomes in England and Wales: year ending March 2016’, available here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/crime-outcomes-in-england-and-wales-2015-to-2016" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/crime-outcomes-in-england-and-wales-2015-to-2016</a>.</p><p> </p><p>As this was the first time police forces were required to collect figures in this way it is not possible to compare them to earlier years.</p><p> </p><p>The Office of National Statistics has been clear that recent rises in recorded crime reflect improved processes and a greater willingness of victims to come forward there are too many instances where victims are unwilling to testify against their abuser. The Government expects police forces and Crown Prosecutors to use the available data, alongside local knowledge, to review performance in relation to domestic abuse in order to identify areas for improvement.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-26T16:08:19.56Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-26T16:08:19.56Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
2170
label Biography information for Lord Ouseley more like this
723777
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-04-24more like thismore than 2017-04-24
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Channel Four Television: Public Appointments more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Ashton of Hyde on 20 April (HL6668) concerning the female candidate who was not approved for appointment by the Secretary of State to the Board of Channel 4, whether they intend to ask the Equalities and Human Rights Commission to examine the appointments process, with respect to the question of whether race or gender discrimination were factors in the decision made. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Ouseley remove filter
uin HL6819 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-26more like thismore than 2017-04-26
answer text <p>As an independent statutory body responsible for enforcing the Equality Act 2010, the EHRC is able to make its own decisions to intervene if it suspects that an unlawful act has been committed. It has the power to take enforcement action in relation to a breach of the Act’s provisions, including the provisions that cover appointment to public office.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-26T16:06:54.49Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-26T16:06:54.49Z
answering member
4270
label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
tabling member
2170
label Biography information for Lord Ouseley more like this
723778
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-04-24more like thismore than 2017-04-24
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Truancy more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many parents were prosecuted in relation to truancy by their children in (1) 2014, (2) 2015, and (3) 2016; and what measures they are proposing to take to reduce the levels of school absence. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Ouseley remove filter
uin HL6820 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-26more like thismore than 2017-04-26
answer text <p>Statistics on truancy for 2014 and 2015 (latest currently available) are published by the Ministry of Justice in the “Criminal justice statistics outcomes by offence data tool”, available at: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2015" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2015</a>. Figures for 2016 are not yet available.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Criminal Justice Statistics outcome for truancy offences, 2014 to 2015</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of defendants proceeded against</p></td><td><p>17,013</p></td><td><p>20,808</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The Government has been clear that children’s attendance at school is non-negotiable. It is for schools to determine how they address poor attendance using the range of measures available to them, such as parenting contracts and parenting orders, or penalty notice for unauthorised absence. These measures are used to reinforce parents’ responsibilities and to support them in improving their child’s attendance at school.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-26T16:09:29.237Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-26T16:09:29.237Z
answering member
4270
label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
tabling member
2170
label Biography information for Lord Ouseley more like this
723779
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-04-24more like thismore than 2017-04-24
answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept id 7 more like this
answering dept short name Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept sort name Communities and Local Government more like this
hansard heading Homelessness more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress they are making in reducing the levels of homelessness among single young people and families living in temporary accommodation; and what assessment they have made of the need to increase the provision of (1) affordable accommodation, and (2) private rented accommodation at rent levels proportionate to household incomes. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Ouseley remove filter
uin HL6821 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-26more like thismore than 2017-04-26
answer text <p>It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. Ministers will correspond directly with the Member.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-26T11:17:59.157Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-26T11:17:59.157Z
answering member
4282
label Biography information for Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth more like this
tabling member
2170
label Biography information for Lord Ouseley more like this
723780
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-04-24more like thismore than 2017-04-24
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Playgrounds more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the closure of children’s playgrounds on the health, security, safety and education of children. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Ouseley remove filter
uin HL6822 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-26more like thismore than 2017-04-26
answer text <p>Local authorities and schools seek consent from the Secretary of State to dispose of playing field land that is surplus or unused. The department has a strong policy presumption against the disposal of school playing fields and has a set of criteria used to assess applications for consent. These include assessing whether the school can continue to meet its curriculum needs. The department gives consent only if the criteria are met, and where the proceeds from sales are to be reinvested in sports and education facilities.</p><p>PE remains a compulsory subject at all four key stages in the national curriculum, ensuring that all children and young people continue to engage in sport and physical activity as they progress through education and beyond. Schools are free to organise and deliver a diverse and challenging PE curriculum, but through the primary PE and sport premium. The government has invested over £600m of ring-fenced funding to primary schools to improve PE and sport since 2013, and will double the primary PE and sport premium to £320 million a year from September 2017. We also recently announced the creation of the Healthy Pupils Capital Programme, committing £415m of additional funding from the Soft Drinks Industry Levy for primary, secondary, and sixth form colleges to support PE, after school activities, healthy eating, and young people suffering with mental health issues.</p>
answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-26T16:12:06.877Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-26T16:12:06.877Z
answering member
4270
label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
tabling member
2170
label Biography information for Lord Ouseley more like this