Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

92994
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Typhoon Aircraft more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what reports he has received that holes in the rear section of Typhoon aircraft were not de-burred properly; what assessment he has made on the effect of this on aircraft lifespan; and whether he plans to halt delivery of new Typhoon aircraft. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 210204 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-23more like thismore than 2014-10-23
answer text <p>In June 2014, BAE Systems notified the Department of a manufacturing issue (de-burring) affecting Typhoon aircraft rear fuselages. Testing is currently under way to substantiate how this may affect the long-term fatigue life of the airframe, although we believe that there will be little impact on the lifespan of the aircraft. Deliveries of new aircraft will continue as planned.</p><p> </p><p>Typhoon remains safe and is continuing normal operations without any performance impact or limitations. It has a service life of six thousand hours per airframe.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-23T15:38:55.3524262Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-23T15:38:55.3524262Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
previous answer version
23158
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
92995
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Typhoon Aircraft more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the current service life in flight hours is of Typhoon aircraft. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 210205 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-05more like thismore than 2014-11-05
answer text <p>I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 23 October 2014 to Question 210204. This can be found at the following link;</p><p>http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-questions-answers/?page=1&amp;max=20&amp;questiontype=AllQuestions&amp;house=commons%2clords&amp;uin=210204</p> more like this
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-05T16:33:27.8370607Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-05T16:33:27.8370607Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
previous answer version
23156
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
92996
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Navy: Military Bases more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much will be spent in each location under the Maritime Support and Delivery Framework with Babcock in each of the next six years. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 210206 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-20more like thismore than 2014-10-20
answer text <p>The predicted spend profile (in £ millions) on the Maritime Support Delivery Framework contracts is shown in the table. The contracts provide flexibility within the overall totals to adjust the spend profiles to ensure the support provided is aligned with the needs of the Royal Navy.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>FINANCIAL YEARS </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017-18</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018-19</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019-20</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><p>BAE Systems</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portsmouth Naval Base</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>137</p></td><td><p>133</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>130</p></td><td><p>Note 1</p></td><td><p>601</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><p>Babcock</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Clyde Naval Base</p></td><td><p>55</p></td><td><p>113</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>116</p></td><td><p>117</p></td><td><p>119</p></td><td><p>632</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Devonport Naval Base</p></td><td><p>172</p></td><td><p>374</p></td><td><p>359</p></td><td><p>339</p></td><td><p>356</p></td><td><p>381</p></td><td><p>1,980</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>227</p></td><td><p>487</p></td><td><p>470</p></td><td><p>456</p></td><td><p>472</p></td><td><p>500</p></td><td><p>2,612</p></td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes</p><p> </p><p>1. The Ministry of Defence has an option to extend the contract with BAE Systems for a further year beyond 2018-19, but support for financial year 2019-20 was not contracted for at the point of contract award on 1 October 2014.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
grouped question UIN 210207 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-20T15:46:09.4981536Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-20T15:46:09.4981536Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
92997
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Navy: Military Bases more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much will be spent in each location in the Maritime Support and Delivery Framework with BAE Systems in each of the next five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 210207 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-20more like thismore than 2014-10-20
answer text <p>The predicted spend profile (in £ millions) on the Maritime Support Delivery Framework contracts is shown in the table. The contracts provide flexibility within the overall totals to adjust the spend profiles to ensure the support provided is aligned with the needs of the Royal Navy.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>FINANCIAL YEARS </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017-18</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018-19</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019-20</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><p>BAE Systems</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portsmouth Naval Base</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>137</p></td><td><p>133</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>130</p></td><td><p>Note 1</p></td><td><p>601</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><p>Babcock</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Clyde Naval Base</p></td><td><p>55</p></td><td><p>113</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>116</p></td><td><p>117</p></td><td><p>119</p></td><td><p>632</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Devonport Naval Base</p></td><td><p>172</p></td><td><p>374</p></td><td><p>359</p></td><td><p>339</p></td><td><p>356</p></td><td><p>381</p></td><td><p>1,980</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>227</p></td><td><p>487</p></td><td><p>470</p></td><td><p>456</p></td><td><p>472</p></td><td><p>500</p></td><td><p>2,612</p></td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes</p><p> </p><p>1. The Ministry of Defence has an option to extend the contract with BAE Systems for a further year beyond 2018-19, but support for financial year 2019-20 was not contracted for at the point of contract award on 1 October 2014.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
grouped question UIN 210206 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-20T15:46:09.4043873Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-20T15:46:09.4043873Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
92998
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Navy: Military Bases more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place a copy of the Maritime Support and Delivery Framework in the Library. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 210208 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-22more like thismore than 2014-10-22
answer text <p>To place copies of the contracts with BAE Systems and Babcock Marine in the Library would require a thorough review of both contracts, which together comprise thousands of pages. This review process could only be carried out at disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-22T16:18:15.4943234Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-22T16:18:15.4943234Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
previous answer version
23157
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
92999
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Navy: Military Bases more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what companies bid for a proportion of the Maritime Support and Delivery Framework. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 210209 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-23more like thismore than 2014-10-23
answer text <p>Companies were not required to bid for work under the Maritime Support and Delivery Framework (MDSF), which replaces three Warship Support Maintenance Initiative contracts, ship services contracts with BAES and Babcock, and contracts for a range of support activities. The contracts were awarded to our industrial partners at the UK’s naval bases to support the management of the bases and to maintain and repair the Royal Navy’s warships.</p><p> </p><p>The Ministry of Defence is able to deliver £350 million of savings under the MSDF over four and a half to five and a half years.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-23T15:38:16.314519Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-23T15:38:16.314519Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
previous answer version
23154
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
93000
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Navy: Military Bases more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what contracts the Maritime Support and Delivery Framework replaces; who previously held those contracts; and how much was spent in each such contract in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 210210 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-11-11more like thismore than 2014-11-11
answer text <p>The Maritime Support Delivery Framework (MSDF) contracts replace the three Warship Support Maintenance Initiative (WSMI) contracts with Babcock Marine and BAE Systems covering HM Naval Bases (HMNBs) Clyde, Devonport and Portsmouth. Under WSMI, industry was contracted to provide engineering support to Royal Navy ships and submarines, waterfront support services, logistics management, along with estates and facilities management and maintenance.</p><p> </p><p>The MSDF contracts also replace ship services contracts with Babcock Marine and BAE Systems and contracts for a range of other support activities.</p><p> </p><p>The expenditure incurred by the Ministry of Defence in each of the last five years (in £ million) is shown in the tables. The tables include only those contracts that are within the current scope of the MSDF contract.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1 – Expenditure on Contracts Replaced by the MSDF contract awarded to BAE Systems (figures are rounded to the nearest £ million).</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>FINANCIAL YEARS </strong></p><p><strong>(£ million)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>WSMI Contract – HMNB Portsmouth</p></td><td><p>96</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>102</p></td><td><p>108</p></td><td><p>113</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ship Services Contract</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>54</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Design Management Services</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p><p>See Note 1</p></td><td><p>0</p><p>See Note 1</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Contracts for Ship Refits and Upkeeps</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>91</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Enabling contract for Works Projects at HMNB Portsmouth</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Enabling contract for Enhancement and Urgent Operational work on HM Ships at HMNB Portsmouth</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2 - Expenditure on Contracts Replaced by the MSDF contract awarded to Babcock Marine (figures are rounded to the nearest £ million).</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>FINANCIAL YEARS </strong></p><p><strong>(£ million)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>WSMI Contract – HMNB Clyde</p></td><td><p>95</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>115</p></td><td><p>498</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>WSMI Contract – HMNB Devonport</p></td><td><p>135</p></td><td><p>141</p></td><td><p>157</p></td><td><p>164</p></td><td><p>189</p></td><td><p>786</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ship Services Contract</p></td><td><p>0</p><p>See Note 1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>83</p></td><td><p>126</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Design Management Services</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p><p>See Note 1</p></td><td><p>0</p><p>See Note 1</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ship Refits and Upkeeps</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>176</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fixed Cost Element of Contracts for Long Overhaul Periods (Refuelling) for HM Submarines Vengeance and Vigilant</p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td><p>68</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>229</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p> </p><p>1. Expenditure was incurred in the financial year but as it was below £0.5 million, it appears in the table as a zero when the rounding policy is applied.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-11-11T17:27:13.2467349Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-11T17:27:13.2467349Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
previous answer version
23155
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
93001
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Patrol Craft more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what (a) manned aircraft and (b) unmanned aerial vehicles will be able to land and operate on the Batch 2 Offshore Patrol Vessels. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 210211 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-20more like thismore than 2014-10-20
answer text <p>I believe that the 29 design requirements the Honourable Member refers to are the differences between the Batch 2 Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs) and those delivered to the Brazilian Navy, which were not the same design as the initial Batch. The new requirements were:<br><br>1 Watertight Integrity Modifications<br>2 Fire Safety Modifications<br>3 Enhanced firefighting facilities <br>4 Automatic Emergency Lights <br>5 Flight Deck Officer Position<br>6 Domestic refrigeration Modifications<br>7 Sewage Treatment Plant Modifications<br>8 Exhaust System Modifications – (No longer required)<br>9 Ballast Water Modifications<br>10 Merlin helicopter operation<br>11 Helicopter In-Flight Refuelling <br>12 Helicopter refuelling modifications<br>13 Changes to ship’s minimum operating temperature<br>14 Davit Modifications<br>15 Force Protection Weapon Modifications<br>16 Install WECDIS/WAIS<br>17 Install Combat Management System <br>18 Military communications modifications<br>19 Magazine Protection<br>20 Radio Equipment Room Modifications<br>21 Change lighting and domestic power voltage from 115v to 230v<br>22 Codification of equipment<br>23 Provision of life saving equipment<br>24 Replace navigation radars <br>25 Install Military GPS <br>26 Install flight deck landing grid<br>27 Fuel efficiency monitoring<br>28 Provide emergency communication equipment <br>29 Machinery Space Walkway <br><br><br><br>The manned aircraft able to use the Royal Navy’s new OPVs are Merlin and Wildcat helicopters. There are no current plans for the operation of unmanned vehicles from these vessels.</p>
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
grouped question UIN 210212 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-20T15:51:25.8362993Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-20T15:51:25.8362993Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
93002
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Patrol Craft more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what 29 design requirements were requested by the Royal Navy for the Batch 2 Offshore Patrol Vessels not in the design of the initial batch of vessels. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 210212 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-20more like thismore than 2014-10-20
answer text <p>I believe that the 29 design requirements the Honourable Member refers to are the differences between the Batch 2 Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs) and those delivered to the Brazilian Navy, which were not the same design as the initial Batch. The new requirements were:<br><br>1 Watertight Integrity Modifications<br>2 Fire Safety Modifications<br>3 Enhanced firefighting facilities <br>4 Automatic Emergency Lights <br>5 Flight Deck Officer Position<br>6 Domestic refrigeration Modifications<br>7 Sewage Treatment Plant Modifications<br>8 Exhaust System Modifications – (No longer required)<br>9 Ballast Water Modifications<br>10 Merlin helicopter operation<br>11 Helicopter In-Flight Refuelling <br>12 Helicopter refuelling modifications<br>13 Changes to ship’s minimum operating temperature<br>14 Davit Modifications<br>15 Force Protection Weapon Modifications<br>16 Install WECDIS/WAIS<br>17 Install Combat Management System <br>18 Military communications modifications<br>19 Magazine Protection<br>20 Radio Equipment Room Modifications<br>21 Change lighting and domestic power voltage from 115v to 230v<br>22 Codification of equipment<br>23 Provision of life saving equipment<br>24 Replace navigation radars <br>25 Install Military GPS <br>26 Install flight deck landing grid<br>27 Fuel efficiency monitoring<br>28 Provide emergency communication equipment <br>29 Machinery Space Walkway <br><br><br><br>The manned aircraft able to use the Royal Navy’s new OPVs are Merlin and Wildcat helicopters. There are no current plans for the operation of unmanned vehicles from these vessels.</p>
answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
grouped question UIN 210211 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-20T15:51:25.7043273Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-20T15:51:25.7043273Z
answering member
1542
label Biography information for Philip Dunne more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
92158
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-09-26more like thismore than 2014-09-26
answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept id 16 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
hansard heading USA more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will place in the Library a copy of (a) the current text of the 1958 UK-US Mutual Defence Agreement and its annexes, as subsequently amended since the Agreement originally entered into force and (b) any amendments to the Agreement and its annexes that the Government proposes for when they are renewed. more like this
tabling member constituency Moray remove filter
tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
uin 209761 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-17more like thismore than 2014-10-17
answer text <p>The 2014 Amendment to the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes 1958, otherwise known as the Amendment Agreement to the 1958 UK-US Mutual Defence Agreement (MDA), has been laid before Parliament in accordance with the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010. This Amendment Agreement is intended to renew and update certain provisions in the MDA to ensure their continuing relevance and validity for a further period of 10 years until 31 December 2024. The original MDA and its subsequent amendments are available in the libraries, as they were previously laid under the Ponsonby Rule. In line with long-established practice, and as accepted by Parliament during the 2004 renewal, the annexes of the MDA cannot be placed in the libraries because of the sensitivity of their contents.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-17T11:44:39.6529686Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-17T11:44:39.6529686Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1433
label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this