Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1182292
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-03more like thismore than 2020-03-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Police: Driving more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the potential effect on claims for compensation by police emergency drivers that are injured in the line of duty of the provisions of the Civil Liability Act 2018. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 24394 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-09more like thismore than 2020-03-09
answer text <p>The provisions in Part One of the Civil Liability Act (the Act) apply to the occupants of a motor vehicle whether or not they were injured in the course of their employment. An impact assessment was published following the completion of the Parliamentary passage of the Act, which can be found here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/civil-liability-bill" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/civil-liability-bill</a>.</p><p>Following implementation, the Government will monitor the management information produced by the new Official Injury Claims service, including data on the impact of the measures implemented through the Act and the supplementary measures to increase the small claims limit for road traffic accident related personal injury claims.</p><p>All claimants, will be able to access the new service which will enable the effective resolution of their claim pre-court proceedings. Claimants will also be able to utilise the low cost small claims track procedure, which is designed to be accessible and uncomplicated should they need to progress their claim through the courts.</p>
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-09T15:09:15.937Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-09T15:09:15.937Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1182357
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-03more like thismore than 2020-03-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Health and Safety more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 13 February 2020 to Question 1936, Prisons: Industrial Health and Safety, what the timeframe is for the completion of the configuration to enable online recording from remote locations. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 24395 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-10more like thismore than 2020-03-10
answer text <p>We are currently considering the possibility of allowing reporting via internet enabled mobile devices and any device with a web connection. If fully implemented this will mean that intranet connected hardware would not be required. In order to assess the viability of wider implementation remote/mobile reporting capability will be piloted in two probation divisions this Spring.</p><p> </p><p>Systems are already in place to enable non-directly employed workers access reporting and recording. The use of the proposed online system for this purpose will also be considered in the review of this pilot.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
24396 more like this
24397 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-10T16:48:00.89Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-10T16:48:00.89Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1182358
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-03more like thismore than 2020-03-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Health and Safety more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 13 February 2020 to Question 1936, Prisons: Industrial Health and Safety, at what remote locations an intranet connection is available. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 24396 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-10more like thismore than 2020-03-10
answer text <p>We are currently considering the possibility of allowing reporting via internet enabled mobile devices and any device with a web connection. If fully implemented this will mean that intranet connected hardware would not be required. In order to assess the viability of wider implementation remote/mobile reporting capability will be piloted in two probation divisions this Spring.</p><p> </p><p>Systems are already in place to enable non-directly employed workers access reporting and recording. The use of the proposed online system for this purpose will also be considered in the review of this pilot.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
24395 more like this
24397 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-10T16:48:00.937Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-10T16:48:00.937Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1182359
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-03more like thismore than 2020-03-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Health and Safety more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 13 February 2020 to Question 1936, Prisons: Industrial Health and Safety, whether non-directly employed workers will have access to online recording from remote locations. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 24397 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-10more like thismore than 2020-03-10
answer text <p>We are currently considering the possibility of allowing reporting via internet enabled mobile devices and any device with a web connection. If fully implemented this will mean that intranet connected hardware would not be required. In order to assess the viability of wider implementation remote/mobile reporting capability will be piloted in two probation divisions this Spring.</p><p> </p><p>Systems are already in place to enable non-directly employed workers access reporting and recording. The use of the proposed online system for this purpose will also be considered in the review of this pilot.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
24395 more like this
24396 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-10T16:48:00.99Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-10T16:48:00.99Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1182361
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-03more like thismore than 2020-03-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prison Officers: Resignations more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the resignation rate for (a) Band 3, (b) Band 4, and (c) Band 5 prison officers was at each prison in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 24398 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-10more like thismore than 2020-03-10
answer text <p>The attached table provides the nationally compiled resignation statistics for staff at Band 3, 4 and 5 since 2015.</p><p>Resignation rates by prison by individual grade is not published.</p><p>We have recruited a huge number of prison officers with some 4,200 more on the landings than three years ago.</p><p>Annual fluctuations are expected, but we work hard to retain our staff – giving them the biggest pay rise in a decade, additional training, tools like PAVA and body-worn cameras to make their jobs safer.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-10T16:40:53.293Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-10T16:40:53.293Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
attachment
1
file name Copy of Attachment to accompany PQ 24398.xlsx more like this
title Table more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1182362
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-03more like thismore than 2020-03-03
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Health and Safety more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, on how many occasions in the last (a) 12, (b) 24 and (c) 36 months Health and Safety Executive inspectors were denied full access to workplaces within prisons; and if she will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 24399 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-09more like thismore than 2020-03-09
answer text <p>There have not been any occasions in the last 12, 24 and 36 months where Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Inspectors have been denied full access to workplaces within prisons.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Mid Sussex more like this
answering member printed Mims Davies more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-09T16:29:22.003Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-09T16:29:22.003Z
answering member
4513
label Biography information for Mims Davies more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1181966
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many instances of a Serious Further Offence review of murder have resulted in the perpetrator being (a) charged and (b) convicted where the supervisory agency has been (i) the National Probation Service and (ii) a community rehabilitation company by each geographic area of those community rehabilitation companies in each year since 2014. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 23577 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-05more like thismore than 2020-03-05
answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases. As a proportion of the offenders managed by the NPS and CRCs respectively, there is no evidence of a difference between the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) when it comes to offenders committing murder.</p><p> </p><p>SFO reviews are initiated where the NPS or a CRC <em>notifies</em> HM Prison and Probation Service that an offender under supervision has been charged with an SFO. The number of SFO <em>notifications</em> is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year. About half of all SFO notifications do not result in SFO convictions. In other cases, after initial notification charges will be dropped or an offender acquitted or an offender convicted of a lesser offence.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below shows the number of SFO <em>notifications</em> – that is, cases of an offender under probation supervision <em>charged</em> with an SFO - received between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019, by SFO offence, where the offender was supervised by (a) the National Probation Service (NPS) and (b) Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC).</p><p> </p><p>Table 1<strong>.</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2014*</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SFO Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>56</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Female genital mutilation</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>127</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>391</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>310</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>238</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>350</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>425</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>315</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>338</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>224</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>329</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>215</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes for Table 1:</p><ol><li>*CRCs were created as part of Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) in June 2014. Therefore, data provided for NPS for 2014 include cases managed by former Probation Trusts prior to TR.</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete automatic reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Conditional reviews are completed when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence (NPS only) or where no risk assessment has been completed.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>Not all notifications result in the completion of a review as charges are reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Similarly, the number of SFO reviews completed is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year.</p><p> </p><p>The Honourable Member may be referring to the Freedom of Information Act response 200121016 on 11 February 2020. However, that response did <em>not</em> show the number of people murdered by offenders under supervision. Rather, it showed the number of SFO reviews completed in each calendar year for 2014 to 2019, where the offender had been <em>charged with</em> murder.</p><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows the total number of SFO reviews completed in 2014 as a whole, the number of reviews completed for those who were charged with murder, and the number of subsequent convictions for murder. Tables 3 and 4 below show the number of offenders being supervised by the NPS and CRC respectively who were charged with murder, where a review was completed in the years 2015, 2016, 2017, and the offender subsequently <em>convicted of murder. W</em>e have provided the number of SFO reviews in 2014 as a separate table (Table 2), as Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) created CRCs mid-year and prior to this, Probation Trusts managed the cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>404</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>49</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All NPS Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>362</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 4</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All CRC Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>202</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>273</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>39</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes for Tables 2, 3,4</p><ol><li>Conviction data are as at 27 January 2020</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a review as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represent SFO reviews conducted following charge and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>We have not included the three month data relating to 1 January-31 March 2018.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p>In October, the Ministry of Justice will publish annual reconviction data, including murder for 2018/19, with an accompanying narrative which also explains the correct interpretation of the figures. The current publication can be found at: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>Tables 2, 3 and 4 provide the number of reviews completed in respect of offenders supervised by the NPS or CRCs who were charged with and subsequently convicted of murder between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. We have not provided data specific to individual CRCs as the total figure in some cases amounts to five people or fewer. We consider that we would be in breach of our obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation and / or the Data Protection Act 2018 if we release information that would risk identification of the individuals concerned.</p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
23575 more like this
23576 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.627Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.627Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1181967
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Rehabilitation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 31 October 2019 to Question 6477 on Offenders: Rehabilitation, if he will update the information provided in that table with 2019 data. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 23575 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-05more like thismore than 2020-03-05
answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases. As a proportion of the offenders managed by the NPS and CRCs respectively, there is no evidence of a difference between the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) when it comes to offenders committing murder.</p><p> </p><p>SFO reviews are initiated where the NPS or a CRC <em>notifies</em> HM Prison and Probation Service that an offender under supervision has been charged with an SFO. The number of SFO <em>notifications</em> is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year. About half of all SFO notifications do not result in SFO convictions. In other cases, after initial notification charges will be dropped or an offender acquitted or an offender convicted of a lesser offence.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below shows the number of SFO <em>notifications</em> – that is, cases of an offender under probation supervision <em>charged</em> with an SFO - received between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019, by SFO offence, where the offender was supervised by (a) the National Probation Service (NPS) and (b) Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC).</p><p> </p><p>Table 1<strong>.</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2014*</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SFO Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>56</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Female genital mutilation</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>127</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>391</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>310</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>238</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>350</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>425</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>315</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>338</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>224</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>329</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>215</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes for Table 1:</p><ol><li>*CRCs were created as part of Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) in June 2014. Therefore, data provided for NPS for 2014 include cases managed by former Probation Trusts prior to TR.</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete automatic reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Conditional reviews are completed when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence (NPS only) or where no risk assessment has been completed.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>Not all notifications result in the completion of a review as charges are reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Similarly, the number of SFO reviews completed is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year.</p><p> </p><p>The Honourable Member may be referring to the Freedom of Information Act response 200121016 on 11 February 2020. However, that response did <em>not</em> show the number of people murdered by offenders under supervision. Rather, it showed the number of SFO reviews completed in each calendar year for 2014 to 2019, where the offender had been <em>charged with</em> murder.</p><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows the total number of SFO reviews completed in 2014 as a whole, the number of reviews completed for those who were charged with murder, and the number of subsequent convictions for murder. Tables 3 and 4 below show the number of offenders being supervised by the NPS and CRC respectively who were charged with murder, where a review was completed in the years 2015, 2016, 2017, and the offender subsequently <em>convicted of murder. W</em>e have provided the number of SFO reviews in 2014 as a separate table (Table 2), as Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) created CRCs mid-year and prior to this, Probation Trusts managed the cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>404</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>49</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All NPS Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>362</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 4</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All CRC Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>202</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>273</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>39</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes for Tables 2, 3,4</p><ol><li>Conviction data are as at 27 January 2020</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a review as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represent SFO reviews conducted following charge and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>We have not included the three month data relating to 1 January-31 March 2018.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p>In October, the Ministry of Justice will publish annual reconviction data, including murder for 2018/19, with an accompanying narrative which also explains the correct interpretation of the figures. The current publication can be found at: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>Tables 2, 3 and 4 provide the number of reviews completed in respect of offenders supervised by the NPS or CRCs who were charged with and subsequently convicted of murder between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. We have not provided data specific to individual CRCs as the total figure in some cases amounts to five people or fewer. We consider that we would be in breach of our obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation and / or the Data Protection Act 2018 if we release information that would risk identification of the individuals concerned.</p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
23576 more like this
23577 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.377Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.377Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1181968
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will publish his Department's recent Freedom of Information Act response showing the number of people murdered by reoffenders. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 23576 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-05more like thismore than 2020-03-05
answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases. As a proportion of the offenders managed by the NPS and CRCs respectively, there is no evidence of a difference between the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) when it comes to offenders committing murder.</p><p> </p><p>SFO reviews are initiated where the NPS or a CRC <em>notifies</em> HM Prison and Probation Service that an offender under supervision has been charged with an SFO. The number of SFO <em>notifications</em> is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year. About half of all SFO notifications do not result in SFO convictions. In other cases, after initial notification charges will be dropped or an offender acquitted or an offender convicted of a lesser offence.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below shows the number of SFO <em>notifications</em> – that is, cases of an offender under probation supervision <em>charged</em> with an SFO - received between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019, by SFO offence, where the offender was supervised by (a) the National Probation Service (NPS) and (b) Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC).</p><p> </p><p>Table 1<strong>.</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2014*</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SFO Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>56</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Female genital mutilation</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>127</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>391</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>310</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>238</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>350</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>425</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>315</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>338</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>224</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>329</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>215</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes for Table 1:</p><ol><li>*CRCs were created as part of Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) in June 2014. Therefore, data provided for NPS for 2014 include cases managed by former Probation Trusts prior to TR.</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete automatic reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Conditional reviews are completed when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence (NPS only) or where no risk assessment has been completed.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>Not all notifications result in the completion of a review as charges are reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Similarly, the number of SFO reviews completed is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year.</p><p> </p><p>The Honourable Member may be referring to the Freedom of Information Act response 200121016 on 11 February 2020. However, that response did <em>not</em> show the number of people murdered by offenders under supervision. Rather, it showed the number of SFO reviews completed in each calendar year for 2014 to 2019, where the offender had been <em>charged with</em> murder.</p><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows the total number of SFO reviews completed in 2014 as a whole, the number of reviews completed for those who were charged with murder, and the number of subsequent convictions for murder. Tables 3 and 4 below show the number of offenders being supervised by the NPS and CRC respectively who were charged with murder, where a review was completed in the years 2015, 2016, 2017, and the offender subsequently <em>convicted of murder. W</em>e have provided the number of SFO reviews in 2014 as a separate table (Table 2), as Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) created CRCs mid-year and prior to this, Probation Trusts managed the cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>404</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>49</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All NPS Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>362</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 4</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All CRC Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>202</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>273</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>39</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes for Tables 2, 3,4</p><ol><li>Conviction data are as at 27 January 2020</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a review as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represent SFO reviews conducted following charge and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>We have not included the three month data relating to 1 January-31 March 2018.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p>In October, the Ministry of Justice will publish annual reconviction data, including murder for 2018/19, with an accompanying narrative which also explains the correct interpretation of the figures. The current publication can be found at: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>Tables 2, 3 and 4 provide the number of reviews completed in respect of offenders supervised by the NPS or CRCs who were charged with and subsequently convicted of murder between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. We have not provided data specific to individual CRCs as the total figure in some cases amounts to five people or fewer. We consider that we would be in breach of our obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation and / or the Data Protection Act 2018 if we release information that would risk identification of the individuals concerned.</p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
23575 more like this
23577 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.503Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.503Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1180820
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-02-26more like thismore than 2020-02-26
answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept id 201 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
hansard heading Climate Change Convention: Wales more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, when he last met with Welsh Government ministers on Welsh representation at COP26. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts remove filter
uin 21331 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
answer text <p>The UK Government is committed to working with the Welsh Government as well as with the Scottish Government and Northern Ireland Executive to deliver an ambitious and successful summit for the whole of the UK.</p><p> </p><p>The Business Secretary is committed to working collaboratively with the Welsh Government on common portfolio areas including Energy and Climate Change. This collaborative engagement between the UK Government and the Welsh Government will support the successful delivery of COP26.</p><p> </p><p>Officials from the UK and Welsh Governments are in regular dialogue about COP, and met again at senior level this week.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Spelthorne more like this
answering member printed Kwasi Kwarteng more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-02T18:05:58.517Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-02T18:05:58.517Z
answering member
4134
label Biography information for Kwasi Kwarteng more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this