Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

514677
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-04-21more like thismore than 2016-04-21
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Access to Elected Office for Disabled People Fund more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have for the future of the pilot Access to Elected Office Fund. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL7823 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-05-05more like thismore than 2016-05-05
answer text <p>The Access to Elected Office Fund was a pilot established in 2012 to test this type of support for disabled candidates. We are now reviewing the findings of the assessment of the pilot and anticipate making an announcement in due course.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-05-05T12:33:52.957Zmore like thismore than 2016-05-05T12:33:52.957Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter
514304
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-04-20more like thismore than 2016-04-20
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading High Speed 2 Line more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will now update the benefit-cost ratios for both Phase 1 of HS2 and the complete project to allow for: (1) extra costs arising from the mitigation and compensation that has already been agreed or should be allowed for as a contingency to cover recommendations of the House of Commons High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Select Committee and other Parliamentary committees or official bodies, and negotiations between the Government and affected parties; (2) any extra expenditure required to strengthen the track in order to run trains at the proposed speed, in the light of the research conducted by Professor Peter Woodward; (3) any other costs extra to those allowed for in previous benefit-cost ratio calculations; (4) revised estimates of benefits; and (5) delays in construction and the start of operations not anticipated in previous benefit-cost ratio calculations. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL7794 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-04-29more like thismore than 2016-04-29
answer text <p>The Government intends to publish updated benefit-cost ratios for different phases of the scheme at the next iteration of the relevant business cases, including Phase 1, reflecting all the latest information on costs and benefits.</p><p> </p><p>All published benefit-cost ratios for HS2 account for unexpected costs. For Phase 1, the benefit-cost ratio published in October 2013 in the <em>Economic Case for HS2</em> included contingencies for unforeseen costs. There is therefore no increase to overall costs as a result of the Parliamentary process, as the cost estimate included provision for that process. The benefit-cost ratio was also tested against a range of different cost assumptions.</p><p> </p><p>For the rest of the project, the cost estimates were adjusted for optimism bias. The benefit-cost ratio estimates for the full Y and Phase 2a in latest update, published in November 2015 in the <em>West Midlands to Crewe Economic Case</em>, also accounted for the risk of construction inflation exceeding general inflation over the next five years. This information has been placed in the libraries of the House.</p><p> </p><p>There is no change to the planned opening date for HS2 and HS2 Ltd remain on track to start construction in 2017.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-04-29T11:53:24.873Zmore like thismore than 2016-04-29T11:53:24.873Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter
510226
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-04-11more like thismore than 2016-04-11
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Landfill Communities Fund more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether waste operators can distribute Landfill Communities Fund monies directly to projects, or must do so through an environmental body. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL7432 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-04-25more like thismore than 2016-04-25
answer text <p>Landfill operators can only distribute monies from the Landfilll Communities Fund to environmental bodies. In order to receive money directly from a landfill operator, a project would have to register as an environmental body with the scheme’s regulator, ENTRUST.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-04-25T14:58:02.807Zmore like thismore than 2016-04-25T14:58:02.807Z
answering member
4536
label Biography information for Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter
455976
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-29more like thismore than 2016-02-29
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Fraud more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was the total budget for the National Benefit Fraud Hotline in 2014–15; how many allegations of suspected benefit fraud were reported via that hotline or the online reporting form in 2014–15; what was the total cost of investigating those allegations; and how much was identified in recoverable overpayments by those investigations. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL6556 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-03-10more like thismore than 2016-03-10
answer text <p>The Fraud and Error Service (FES), part of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is responsible for the prevention, detection and where appropriate, investigation of Fraud and Error against all benefits administered by and on behalf of DWP.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The National Benefit Fraud Hotline (NBFH) is outsourced; therefore there is a yearly cost for outsourcing as opposed to a budget. The total outsourcing cost the NBFH for 2014/15 is £303,480<strong>.</strong> This figure covers the 52 week period commencing 31 March 2014.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The available data on allegations of benefit fraud reported via the NBFD or online only covers incidents recorded on the internal FES Fraud Referral and Information Management System (FRAIMS.) It does not give the total volume of enquiries and calls made to NBFH, only those that were entered onto FRAIMS. There are various reasons for allegations not being entered onto FRAIMS, including the fact that not all enquiries and calls are of an appropriate nature. In 2014/15 there were 207,600 cases of suspected benefit fraud reported via the NBFH that were entered onto FRAIMS or reported online.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>We are unable to provide a precise response on the cost of investigating these allegations because some of the investigations from the allegations made in 2014/15 are still on going. We are able to provide an estimate of the cost of investigations that achieved an outcome in 2014/15 which were initially triggered by an allegation made through the hotline or online reporting. We cannot distinguish the exact costs of investigating NBFH allegations from the total cost of investigating all allegations and so this figure is an estimate, calculated by apportioning total costs of Local Service that were undertaken in 2014/15 on the basis of Positive Outcomes as this is the main cost driver. This was estimated to be £16.9m. This figure only includes direct costs of Investigations – there are no overheads included.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>As with the cost of investigation, we are unable to provide a precise response on the amount identified in recoverable overpayments because some of the investigations from the allegations made in 2014/15 are still ongoing. We have instead provided the value of overpayments that achieved an outcome in 2014/15 which were initially triggered by an allegation made through the hotline or online reporting. £46,068,848 was identified as recoverable.</p><p> </p><p>Note that identifying overpayments also prevents a significant amount of future losses which are not included in the value of recoverable overpayments identified shown here. Referrals from members of the public therefore provide good value for money.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Freud more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-10T15:29:04.143Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-10T15:29:04.143Z
answering member
3893
label Biography information for Lord Freud more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter
451145
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-08more like thismore than 2016-02-08
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Aviation: Excise Duties more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of how much revenue would be raised if aviation fuel were subject to the same rate of tax as fuel for motor vehicles. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL6011 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-22more like thismore than 2016-02-22
answer text <p>In accordance with its bilateral Air Service Agreements, the 1944 Chicago Convention and EU law, the UK does not tax aviation fuel. Consequently, no such assessments have been made.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-22T17:22:11.617Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-22T17:22:11.617Z
answering member
4536
label Biography information for Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter
451146
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-08more like thismore than 2016-02-08
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Aviation: Taxation more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of how much revenue would be raised if all air fares for aircraft departing from UK airports were subject to a tax at 20 per cent. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL6012 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-22more like thismore than 2016-02-22
answer text <p>Such a form of taxation would be in breach of the UK’s obligations under its bilateral Air Service Agreements, the 1944 Chicago Convention and EU law. Consequently, no such assessment has been made.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-22T17:25:57.337Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-22T17:25:57.337Z
answering member
4536
label Biography information for Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter
451147
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-08more like thismore than 2016-02-08
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Air Passenger Duty more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what estimate they have made of how much revenue will be raised from Air Passenger Duty this financial year, and how much would need to be raised to compensate for the loss of fuel tax and VAT on air fares. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL6013 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-22more like thismore than 2016-02-22
answer text <p>The government expects APD to raise £3.1 billion over the financial year 2015-16.</p><p> </p><p>In accordance with the long standing 1944 Chicago Convention, its bilateral Air Service Agreements and EU law, the UK does not tax aviation fuel or charge VAT on air fares. Consequently, the government does not consider this lost revenue and no such estimates have been made.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-22T17:06:05.197Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-22T17:06:05.197Z
answering member
4536
label Biography information for Lord O'Neill of Gatley more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter
451148
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-02-08more like thismore than 2016-02-08
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Air Passenger Duty more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much the Carbon Airports Commission calculated that air fares would need to rise in order to comply with the capped model, and what estimate they have made of the increase in air passenger duty that would be necessary to achieve that increase. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL6014 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-02-15more like thismore than 2016-02-15
answer text <p>The Airports Commission included an estimate of the impact of air fares in the carbon capped case in Chapter 4 of their interim report, copies of which are available in the Libraries of both Houses.</p><p> </p><p>There are no such estimates alongside the updated forecasts in their final report, nor is there consideration of the interaction between carbon prices and air passenger duty.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-02-15T12:25:46.283Zmore like thismore than 2016-02-15T12:25:46.283Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter
434093
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-12-03more like thismore than 2015-12-03
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Roads: Norwich more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made, if any, of the reasons for the increase in the contract target costs of the Norwich Northern Distributor Road. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL4212 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-12-17more like thismore than 2015-12-17
answer text <p>No assessment was made by the Department for Transport of the reasons for the increase in the contract target costs of the Norwich Northern Distributor Road. Norfolk County Council officials provided the Department with information on this and with the papers provided to their Councillors prior to the meeting on 6 November where the revised cost of the scheme was approved.</p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-12-17T11:55:59.97Zmore like thismore than 2015-12-17T11:55:59.97Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter
434094
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2015-12-03more like thismore than 2015-12-03
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Roads: Norwich more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what process was used to assess the value-for-money that would be achieved from the additional Department for Transport funding provided to Norfolk County Council in relation to the Norwich Northern Distributor Road project. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb more like this
uin HL4213 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-12-17more like thismore than 2015-12-17
answer text <p>A value for money assessment was undertaken on the full revised cost of the Norwich Northern Distributor Road which showed that it remained very high value for money under the Department’s value for money assessment with an adjusted Benefit Cost Ratio of 6.07.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-12-17T11:58:53.46Zmore like thismore than 2015-12-17T11:58:53.46Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
4297
label Biography information for Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb remove filter