Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1588425
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thisremove minimum value filter
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Elizabeth Truss more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Neville-Rolfe on 20 February (HL5518), why revealing only the cost of (1) a car and driver, and (2) security protection, will affect the security arrangements; and whether they will now reconsider and answer the question put. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock more like this
uin HL5791 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-03-08more like thismore than 2023-03-08
answer text <p>Across successive governments, it has been long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on the security arrangements for protected individuals. To do so could compromise the integrity of those arrangements and affect the security of the individuals concerned.</p><p>Whilst the requested information in isolation may seem innocuous, granular information on spending – especially if mixed with other information - could allow specific individuals perceived to have lower levels of protection to be targeted by hostile actors.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-03-08T12:14:31.97Zmore like thismore than 2023-03-08T12:14:31.97Z
answering member
4284
label Biography information for Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
tabling member
579
label Biography information for Lord Foulkes of Cumnock remove filter