Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1064889
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-22more like thismore than 2019-02-22
answering body
Department for International Development more like this
answering dept id 20 more like this
answering dept short name International Development more like this
answering dept sort name International Development more like this
hansard heading Overseas Aid more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what recent assessment her Department has made of whether Official Development Assistance spending is meeting targets set by the UK aid strategy. more like this
tabling member constituency Birmingham, Yardley more like this
tabling member printed
Jess Phillips more like this
uin 224809 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-28more like thismore than 2019-02-28
answer text <p>DFID <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/750989/DFID-Annual-Report-Accounts-2017-18-amended-Oct18.pdf" target="_blank">reports annually</a> on its progress in meeting the objectives set out in the Aid Strategy, while other departments are responsible for reporting against their own ODA spend. The cross-government ODA Senior Officials Group is exploring ways to drive further coherence in monitoring.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency West Worcestershire more like this
answering member printed Harriett Baldwin more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-28T16:28:54.297Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-28T16:28:54.297Z
answering member
4107
label Biography information for Dame Harriett Baldwin more like this
tabling member
4370
label Biography information for Jess Phillips more like this
1064900
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-22more like thismore than 2019-02-22
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Sexually Transmitted Infections: Screening more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what representations he has received in the last 12 months on the closure of physical clinics providing testing for sexually transmitted infections; what plans he has to encourage the use of online and postal testing services for sexually-transmitted infections; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Leicester South more like this
tabling member printed
Jonathan Ashworth more like this
uin 224806 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-27more like thismore than 2019-02-27
answer text <p>We have identified one item of correspondence received since 1 February 2018 about the closure of physical clinics providing testing for sexually-transmitted infections. This figure represents correspondence received by the Department’s Ministerial correspondence unit only.</p><p> </p><p>The Government has mandated local authorities to commission comprehensive open access sexual health services, including sexually transmitted infection testing and treatment. Local authorities are utilising technology, such as online and postal testing services for sexually-transmitted infections, to manage lower risk and asymptomatic patients. As these services develop, they also have the potential to reach groups not currently engaged with clinic services. The expansion of digital services increases patient choice and service accessibility but local authorities must still meet their open access mandate and ensure that appropriate walk-in and appointment only physical services are still available to anyone wishing to use them.</p>
answering member constituency Winchester more like this
answering member printed Steve Brine more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-27T16:17:50.647Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-27T16:17:50.647Z
answering member
4067
label Biography information for Steve Brine more like this
tabling member
4244
label Biography information for Jonathan Ashworth more like this
1064904
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-22more like thismore than 2019-02-22
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading D-Day Landings: Anniversaries more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what funding the Government plans to allocate to the Daks Over Normandy event taking place to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the D-Day landings. more like this
tabling member constituency South Cambridgeshire more like this
tabling member printed
Heidi Allen more like this
uin 224818 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-28more like thismore than 2019-02-28
answer text <p>This Government pays tribute to the courageous men and women who participated in and contributed to the D-Day landings and, of course, the wider Normandy Campaign. The Government, through the Ministry of Defence, and in conjunction with the Royal British Legion, are proud to be supporting and participating in a wide range of commemorative events for the 75th Anniversary of D-Day. These include the UK National event in Portsmouth on 5 June, and a series of events in Normandy.</p><p>Daks over Normandy is a privately funded event with no official participation or funding from the Government. However, we applaud and congratulate organisations such as this that are contributing to the commemoration of the events of 1944.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
answering member printed Mark Lancaster more like this
grouped question UIN 224816 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-28T15:30:05.97Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-28T15:30:05.97Z
answering member
1544
label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
tabling member
4516
label Biography information for Heidi Allen more like this
1064910
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-22more like thismore than 2019-02-22
answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept id 201 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
hansard heading Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy: Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, with reference to the guidance entitled Procurement policy note 03/14: promoting tax compliance, how many suppliers have been excluded from bidding for contracts as a result of not meeting the criteria in that document in each year since 2014. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 224825 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-27more like thismore than 2019-02-27
answer text <p>BEIS has not excluded any suppliers from bidding for contracts as a result of not meeting the criteria in Procurement Policy Note 03/14.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Watford more like this
answering member printed Richard Harrington more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-27T13:27:29.647Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-27T13:27:29.647Z
answering member
4068
label Biography information for Lord Harrington of Watford more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this
1064924
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-22more like thismore than 2019-02-22
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading HIV Infection: Drugs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he has taken to increase the number of places on the PrEP Impact Trial in (a) England and (b) Brentford and Isleworth constituency. more like this
tabling member constituency Brentford and Isleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Ruth Cadbury more like this
uin 224811 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-03-04more like thismore than 2019-03-04
answer text <p>On 30 January, my Rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care announced that the Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Impact trial would be expanded to 26,000 people. Work is underway with partners to take this forward. The PrEP Oversight Board has requested information on local capacity to make the additional places available and will review this shortly.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Winchester more like this
answering member printed Steve Brine more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-03-04T17:03:30.52Zmore like thismore than 2019-03-04T17:03:30.52Z
answering member
4067
label Biography information for Steve Brine more like this
tabling member
4389
label Biography information for Ruth Cadbury more like this
1064926
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-22more like thismore than 2019-02-22
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Epilepsy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many and what proportion of (a) all new claimants of personal independence payment and (b) new claimants of that payment identifying as having a primary condition of epilepsy did not receive an award during their initial assessment but received an award at (i) mandatory reconsideration and (ii) tribunal in Scotland in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens more like this
uin 224815 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-27more like thismore than 2019-02-27
answer text <p>The information requested is shown in the tables below.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p>Table 1: Personal Independence Payment (PIP) new claims and reassessments for claimants with a primary disabling condition of Epilepsy - initial decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals, Scotland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Of which:</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year of initial decision</p></td><td><p>Initial Decisions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions - disallowed due to failing the assessment</p></td><td><p>MR - new decision award changed</p></td><td><p>Appeal – decision overturned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>940</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>910</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>660</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>1,440</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,030</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>230</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>1,480</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>960</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>250</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April to Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>900</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>340</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Decisions</p></td><td><p>5,830</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>3,550</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>670</p></td></tr></tbody></table>Table 2: Personal Independence Payment (PIP) new claims - initial decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals, Scotland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Of which:</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year of initial decision</p></td><td><p>Initial Decisions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions - disallowed due to failing the assessment</p></td><td><p>MR - new decision award changed</p></td><td><p>Appeal - decision overturned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>10,470</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2,490</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>160</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>55,740</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>13,180</p></td><td><p>360</p></td><td><p>1,190</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>49,020</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>12,680</p></td><td><p>370</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>52,820</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>13,500</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>1,170</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>57,580</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>15,910</p></td><td><p>560</p></td><td><p>1,620</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April to Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>27,710</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>8,130</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Decisions</p></td><td><p>253,340</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>65,890</p></td><td><p>2,090</p></td><td><p>5,410</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p>Table 3: Personal Independence Payment (PIP) new claims for claimants with a primary disabling condition of Epilepsy - initial decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals, Scotland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Of which:</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year of initial decision</p></td><td><p>Initial Decisions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions - disallowed due to failing the assessment</p></td><td><p>MR - new decision award changed</p></td><td><p>Appeal - decision overturned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>790</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>450</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>410</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>550</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>440</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>700</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>500</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April to Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>400</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>200</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Decisions</p></td><td><p>3,110</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2,050</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>220</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p /><p>Under PIP, 27 per cent of working age claimants with epilepsy recorded as their primary disabling condition receive the highest level of support compared to 6 per cent under Disability Living Allowance when PIP was introduced.</p><p>Notes</p><p>Tables 2 and 3 are for PIP new claims only, whereas Table 1 is for both new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p>In the application process, claimants’ primary disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. Therefore the initial decisions in Table 2 will include claims where the disability has not been recorded due to the assessment not being completed, and are therefore not comparable to the figures in Table 3.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>The disability subgroup of Epilepsy in the PIP Computer System includes Cataplexy, Generalised seizures (with status epilepticus in last 12 months), Generalised seizures (without status epilepticus in last 12 months), Narcolepsy, Partial seizures (with status epilepticus in last 12 months), Partial seizures (without status epilepticus in last 12 months) and Seizures - unclassified.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants.</p><p>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10.</p><p>Appeals data taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at MR, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at MR and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 224814 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-27T13:36:34.69Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-27T13:36:34.69Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1064928
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-22more like thismore than 2019-02-22
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading St Pancras Station: Immigration Controls more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps he is taking to prevent delays at passport control at the Eurostar terminal at London St Pancras station in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal. more like this
tabling member constituency Hornsey and Wood Green more like this
tabling member printed
Catherine West more like this
uin 224821 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-27more like thismore than 2019-02-27
answer text <p>Following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and the end of free movement, the White Paper ‘The UK’s future skills-based immigration system’ sets out the Government’s plans to improve the flow of legitimate travellers through our ports, including by making greater use of automation, and to seek reciprocal treatment for UK nationals travelling to EU Member States.</p><p>And in line with the Political Declaration on the future relationship between the EU and the UK, we will continue to engage with the EU to explore the possibility to facilitate the crossing of our respective borders for legitimate travel, including at the Eurostar Terminal at St Pancras station.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Romsey and Southampton North more like this
answering member printed Caroline Nokes more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-27T16:20:16.99Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-27T16:20:16.99Z
answering member
4048
label Biography information for Caroline Nokes more like this
tabling member
4523
label Biography information for Catherine West more like this
1064657
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-21more like thismore than 2019-02-21
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Domestic Abuse more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps he is taking to tackle domestic abuse. more like this
tabling member constituency Chichester more like this
tabling member printed
Gillian Keegan more like this
uin 909406 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-25more like thismore than 2019-02-25
answer text <p>On 21 January we published a landmark draft Domestic Abuse Bill, containing a ground-breaking series of measures to promote awareness, support victims, tackle perpetrators and improve services.</p><p>We have also published a package of non-legislative actions that will see further support for children, the elderly, disabled, male and migrant victims and those in the LGBTQ community.</p><p>We have already committed over £100million to tackle violence against women and girls, including £20m for victims of domestic abuse and £40 million for safe accommodation services.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-25T17:47:59.417Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-25T17:47:59.417Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
4680
label Biography information for Gillian Keegan more like this
1064670
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-21more like thismore than 2019-02-21
answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept id 16 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
hansard heading China: Uyghurs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what recent discussions he has had with his Chinese counterpart on the treatment of Uighur Muslims in China. more like this
tabling member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
tabling member printed
Laura Smith more like this
uin 224366 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-27more like thismore than 2019-02-27
answer text <p>We have serious concerns about the human rights situation in Xinjiang Province and the Chinese government’s deepening crackdown; including credible reports that over 1 million Uighur Muslims have been held in re-education camps, and reports of widespread surveillance and restrictions targeted at ethnic minorities.</p><p>Ministers and senior officials have been raising our concerns directly with the Chinese authorities for some time, and will continue to do so. I raised our concerns about Xinjiang with Vice Minister Guo Yezhou during my visit to China on 22 July 2018. The Foreign Secretary also raised our concerns about the region with Chinese State Councillor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi during his visit to China on 30 July 2018.</p><p>During China’s Universal Periodic Review at the UN Human Rights Council on 6 November 2018, the UK made a statement which described our concern about the treatment of ethnic minorities in China, including Uighurs. We issued a specific recommendation, calling on China to not only implement the recommendations by the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) on Xinjiang, but also to allow the UN to monitor the implementation.</p><p>Following the Universal Periodic Review, the Minister for the Commonwealth and UN issued a <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/universal-periodic-review-31st-session-minister-for-human-rights-statement" target="_blank">statement</a> where he said: “I am very concerned about the human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the re-education camps and the widespread surveillance and restrictions targeted at ethnic minorities, particularly the Uighurs. The UK and many of our international partners have made clear during China’s UPR that this is a priority issue. We recommended that China should implement CERD recommendations in Xinjiang and allow the UN to monitor implementation.”</p>
answering member constituency Cities of London and Westminster more like this
answering member printed Mark Field more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-27T16:09:43.467Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-27T16:09:43.467Z
answering member
1405
label Biography information for Mark Field more like this
tabling member
4648
label Biography information for Laura Smith more like this
1064674
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-21more like thismore than 2019-02-21
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Army: Health more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps he is taking to reduce the proportion of army personnel that cannot be sent overseas due to medical reasons. more like this
tabling member constituency Strangford more like this
tabling member printed
Jim Shannon more like this
uin 224332 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-28more like thismore than 2019-02-28
answer text <p>I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 12 February 2019 to Question 216134 to the hon. Member for Romford (Mr Andrew Rosindell).</p><p>For the Army, the health and wellbeing of personnel is a priority. A range of initiatives and policies are continuously being developed and implemented to address the conditions which most frequently cause medical downgrades.</p><p>The introduction earlier this year of new Physical Employment Standards for Ground Close Combat (GCC) roles followed evidence from research as part of a five-year programme that aims to reduce musculo-skeletal injury and optimise operational effectiveness. Work is now under way to develop the most suitable standards for non-GCC roles.</p><p>Additionally, there are a number of initiatives that aim to provide long-term support to address poor lifestyle choices and weight management issues, which we recognise as an issue for modern society. For example, some units are trialling a Healthy Living programme, using wearable technology linked to an online application which aims to instil a personal responsibility culture for soldiers to maintain their fitness.</p>
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-28T15:53:57.4Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-28T15:53:57.4Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
attachment
1
file name 216134_Armed_Forces_Health.docx more like this
title 216134 - Armed Forces; Health more like this
tabling member
4131
label Biography information for Jim Shannon more like this