Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

837964

registered interest
date	06/02/2018
answering body	Department for Transport
answering dept id	27
answering dept short name	Transport
answering dept sort name	Transport
hansard heading	Severn River Crossing: Tolls
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what modelling the Government has conducted on the potential effect on traffic on nearby roads of the removal of the Severn Bridge tolls.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	126994
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/02/2018 answer text <p>Prior to the Severn Crossings consultation in 2017 the Government undertook modelling to assess the impact of the policy to continue tolling at a reduced rate, and on the possible option of free-flow tolling. The modelling used a version of the M4-CAN traffic model extended to take account of the impact of changes in tolls on both the South West of England and Wales and included estimates of wider economic impacts consistent with DfT Transport Appraisal Guidance.</p><p> </p><p>The Government announced on 21 July 2017 that it was removing tolls by the end of 2018. No further modelling was undertaken by the Department for Transport on this specific option.</p> answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire answering member printed Jesse Norman question first answered 14/02/2018 11:43:29 answering member 3991 label Biography information for Jesse Norman
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall

832666

registered interest
date	29/01/2018
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	Special Educational Needs
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	What steps his Department is taking to improve support for children with special educational needs and disabilities.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	903599
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/01/2018 answer text <p>We have been strengthening the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities system through the biggest programme of reforms in a generation. We have legislated to improve the system and have invested £341 million since 2014 to help ensure the reforms make a real difference. We will continue to build on this, so that every child has the chance to fulfil their potential.</p> answering member constituency Stratford-on-Avon answering member printed Nadhim Zahawi grouped question UIN 903593 903594 903598 question first answered 29/01/2018 16:30:29 answering member 4113 label Biography information for Nadhim Zahawi
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall

758509

registered interest
date	29/08/2017
answering body	Department for Exiting the European Union
answering dept id	203
answering dept short name	Exiting the European Union
answering dept sort name	Exiting the European Union
hansard heading	National Security
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, what discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on ensuring future cooperation with the EU on security policy after the UK has left the EU.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	900656
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 07/09/2017 answer text <p>DExEU ministers regularly discuss exit issues with Cabinet and Ministerial colleagues. This includes security. <br><br>The Prime Minister has been clear that we will continue to work closely with our European partners to tackle a range of security issues.<br><br>The safety of the British public is a top priority. That security is enhanced through cooperating with Europe. The UK has always been, and will continue to be, a major global player in the fight against threats to security. <br><br>With the threat constantly evolving, our response must be to work more closely with our partners, including the EU and its Member States, sharing information and supporting each other in combating the threats posed by those who wish us harm.</p> answering member constituency Worcester answering member printed Mr Robin Walker question first answered 07/09/2017 15:40:54 answering member 4091 label Biography information for Mr Robin Walker
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall

724092

registered interest
date	25/04/2017
answering body	Department for Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Housing: South Gloucestershire
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, whether South Gloucestershire Council has made any funding applications to his Department for new developments, spatial plans or strategic development sites in Thornbury and Yate constituency.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	71867
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/04/2017 answer text <p>In 2016/17 South Gloucestershire Council submitted an application for Garden Villages capacity funding and an application for Large Sites and Housing Zones capacity funding in Thornbury and Yate constituency. These were unsuccessful.</p><p>South Gloucestershire Council also submitted a joint application for Large Sites and Housing Zones capacity funding in 2016/17 with Bath and North East Somerset Council, Bristol City Council and North Somerset Council. This funding application included some sites within the Thornbury and Yate constituency. The funding application was unsuccessful.</p> answering member constituency Croydon Central answering member printed Gavin Barwell question first answered 27/04/2017 10:41:37 answering member 3955 label Biography information for Lord Barwell
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall

724093

registered interest
date	25/04/2017
answering body	Department for Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Garden Communities: South Gloucestershire
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what the outcome of South Gloucestershire Council's application to the large sites and housing zones capacity fund for a new Buckover Garden Village is.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	71866
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/04/2017 answer text <p>South Gloucestershire Council put in an application for Large Sites and Housing Zones capacity funding 2016/17 for Buckover garden village. This was unsuccessful.</p> answering member constituency Croydon Central answering member printed Gavin Barwell question first answered 27/04/2017 10:35:22 answering member 3955 label Biography information for Lord Barwell
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall

677945

registered interest
date	24/01/2017
answering body	Department for Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Garden Communities
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, whether garden village proposals which do not meet the criteria in the report Locally-Led Garden Villages, Towns and Cities, published by his Department in March 2016, will not receive either formally or informally any aspect of the Government support package set out in paragraphs 31 to 44 of that document.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	61388
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/01/2017 answer text <p>We are keen that local areas continue to pursue their garden village ambitions. The Homes and Communites Agency has offered a conversation with local authorities whose garden village proposals were not selected to establish how they might be supported to progress their ambitions.</p><p>We want local areas to be ambitious and want to encourage well developed locally led proposals that will provide high quality, transformational housing growth.</p> answering member constituency Croydon Central answering member printed Gavin Barwell question first answered 27/01/2017 14:15:33 answering member 3955 label Biography information for Lord Barwell
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall

674200

registered interest
date	17/01/2017
answering body	Department for Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Garden Communities: Construction
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, whether Garden Village proposals which do not meet the criteria set out in Locally-Led Garden Villages, Towns and Cities, published by his Department in March 2016, and which were not selected in the initial round will not receive either informal or formal support by the Homes and Communities Agency in progressing those proposals outside of the scheme.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	60412
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/01/2017 answer text <p>The Homes and Communities Agency has offered a conversation with local authorities whose garden village proposals were not selected to establish how they might be supported to progress their ambitions.</p><p>The 14 garden villages selected stood out as the strongest against the criteria we had set, including the likelihood of timely progress and accelerated delivery; viability and local demand; the strength of quality, innovation and design in the proposal; and the strength of local leadership and support.</p> answering member constituency Croydon Central answering member printed Gavin Barwell grouped question UIN 60372 60373 60374 60375 60376 question first answered 24/01/2017 16:31:47 answering member 3955 label Biography information for Lord Barwell
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall

674201

registered interest
date	17/01/2017
answering body	Department for Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Garden Communities: Construction
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, whether Garden Village proposals which do not meet the criteria of having a substantive engagement strategy to win local support as set out at point 17 on page 7 of Locally-led Garden Villages, Towns and Cities, published by his Department in March 2016, and which were not selected in the initial round will not receive either informal or formal support from the Homes and Communities Agency in progressing those proposals outside the scheme.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	60376
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/01/2017 answer text <p>The Homes and Communities Agency has offered a conversation with local authorities whose garden village proposals were not selected to establish how they might be supported to progress their ambitions.</p><p>The 14 garden villages selected stood out as the strongest against the criteria we had set, including the likelihood of timely progress and accelerated delivery; viability and local demand; the strength of quality, innovation and design in the proposal; and the strength of local leadership and support.</p> answering member constituency Croydon Central answering member printed Gavin Barwell grouped question UIN 60372 60373 60374 60375 60412 question first answered 24/01/2017 16:31:47 answering member 3955 label Biography information for Lord Barwell
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall

674202

registered interest
date	17/01/2017
answering body	Department for Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Garden Communities: Construction
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, whether Garden Village proposals which do not meet the criteria of demonstrating that their infrastructure has been clearly assessed as set out at point 29 on page 8 of Locally-led Garden Villages, Towns and Cities, published by his Department in March 2016, and which were not selected in the initial round will not receive either informal or formal support from the Homes and Communities Agency in progressing those proposals outside the scheme.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	60373
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/01/2017 answer text <p>The Homes and Communities Agency has offered a conversation with local authorities whose garden village proposals were not selected to establish how they might be supported to progress their ambitions.</p><p>The 14 garden villages selected stood out as the strongest against the criteria we had set, including the likelihood of timely progress and accelerated delivery; viability and local demand; the strength of quality, innovation and design in the proposal; and the strength of local leadership and support.</p> answering member constituency Croydon Central answering member printed Gavin Barwell grouped question UIN 60372 60374 60375 60376 60412 question first answered 24/01/2017 16:31:47 answering member 3955 label Biography information for Lord Barwell
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall

674203

registered interest
date	17/01/2017
answering body	Department for Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Garden Communities: Construction
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, whether Garden Village proposals which do not meet the criteria of making use of public sector or brownfield land as set out at point 20 on page 8 of Locally-led Garden Villages, Towns and Cities, published by his Department in March 2016, and which were not selected in the initial round will not receive either informal or formal support from the Homes and Communities Agency in progressing those proposals outside the scheme.
tabling member constituency	Thornbury and Yate
tabling member printed	Luke Hall
uin	60374
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/01/2017 answer text <p>The Homes and Communities Agency has offered a conversation with local authorities whose garden village proposals were not selected to establish how they might be supported to progress their ambitions.</p><p>The 14 garden villages selected stood out as the strongest against the criteria we had set, including the likelihood of timely progress and accelerated delivery; viability and local demand; the strength of quality, innovation and design in the proposal; and the strength of local leadership and support.</p> answering member constituency Croydon Central answering member printed Gavin Barwell grouped question UIN 60372 60373 60375 60376 60412 question first answered 24/01/2017 16:31:47 answering member 3955 label Biography information for Lord Barwell
tabling member	4450 label Biography information for Luke Hall