Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1568981

registered interest
date	20/01/2023
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Housing
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much he plans to invest in housing for personnel based at Robertson Barracks in Norfolk in each year until its closure.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	128717
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 26/01/2023 answer text <p>Works to upgrade Service Family Accommodation at Robertson Barracks, Norfolk, have been undertaken in previous years; with no further works currently planned.</p><p> </p><p>The table below provides details of the works currently planned to Single Living Accommodation (SLA) at Robertson Barracks in each year until its closure. This may be subject to change.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Establishment</p></td><td><p>2022-23 Value £million</p></td><td><p>2023-24 Value £million</p></td><td><p>2024-25 Value £million</p></td><td><p>2025-26 Value £million</p></td><td><p>2026-27 Value £million</p></td><td><p>2027-28 Value £million</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Robertson Barracks</p></td><td><p>0.409</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>0.200</p></td><td><p>0.400</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>0.282</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency Cheltenham answering member printed Alex Chalk question first answered 26/01/2023 13:03:08 answering member 4481 label Biography information for Alex Chalk
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1567095

registered interest
date	16/01/2023
answering body	Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
answering dept id	211
answering dept short name	Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
answering dept sort name	Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
hansard heading	Buildings: Safety
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, with reference to the Building Safety Act 2022 defining leaseholders as either qualifying or non-qualifying for legal protections from historical building safety costs, what steps his Department is taking to ensure the new guidance does not prevent remediation works to be carried out in a timely manner.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	124074
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/01/2023 answer text <p>Building owners must ensure that buildings are safe. All qualifying leaseholders are protected from historical safety remediation costs for cladding-related work. This protection includes all works, and non-qualifying leaseholders, if their building owner or landlord is or is associated with the developer responsible for that defect. If a leaseholder owns a total of more than three properties, their principal home always qualifies for the protections if it is in a relevant building. Where this is not the case, non-qualifying leaseholders are liable for historical safety remediation costs as per the terms of their lease, in the same way they were before the Act came into force. This amount cannot be increased to replace money that qualifying leaseholders are protected from paying.</p><p>The Act provides a toolkit of measures to allow landlords and others to pursue those responsible. The Government has made it very clear that any necessary remediation work should not be delayed. The Act provides for interested parties - including local authorities and leaseholders - to apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a remediation order where historical safety remediation work does not commence in a timely manner. These orders are enforceable as if they were orders of the county court, ensuring that landlords comply with their new liabilities under the Act.</p> answering member constituency North East Derbyshire answering member printed Lee Rowley grouped question UIN 124075 124076 question first answered 24/01/2023 18:00:00 answering member 4652 label Biography information for Lee Rowley
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1567096

registered interest
date	16/01/2023
answering body	Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
answering dept id	211
answering dept short name	Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
answering dept sort name	Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
hansard heading	Buildings: Safety
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, with reference to the Building Safety Act 2022 defining leaseholders as either qualifying or non-qualifying for legal protections from historical building safety costs, what assessment he has made of the ability of non-qualifying leaseholders to afford building remediation works.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	124075
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/01/2023 answer text <p>Building owners must ensure that buildings are safe. All qualifying leaseholders are protected from historical safety remediation costs for cladding-related work. This protection includes all works, and non-qualifying leaseholders, if their building owner or landlord is or is associated with the developer responsible for that defect. If a leaseholder owns a total of more than three properties, their principal home always qualifies for the protections if it is in a relevant building. Where this is not the case, non-qualifying leaseholders are liable for historical safety remediation costs as per the terms of their lease, in the same way they were before the Act came into force. This amount cannot be increased to replace money that qualifying leaseholders are protected from paying.</p><p>The Act provides a toolkit of measures to allow landlords and others to pursue those responsible. The Government has made it very clear that any necessary remediation work should not be delayed. The Act provides for interested parties - including local authorities and leaseholders - to apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a remediation order where historical safety remediation work does not commence in a timely manner. These orders are enforceable as if they were orders of the county court, ensuring that landlords comply with their new liabilities under the Act.</p> answering member constituency North East Derbyshire answering member printed Lee Rowley grouped question UIN 124074 124076 question first answered 24/01/2023 18:00:00 answering member 4652 label Biography information for Lee Rowley
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1567097

registered interest
date	16/01/2023
answering body	Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
answering dept id	211
answering dept short name	Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
answering dept sort name	Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
hansard heading	Buildings: Fire Prevention
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, what steps the Government is taking to make funding available to leaseholders where neither the developer nor the building owner is able to fund the essential remediation of non-cladding related fire safety issues.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	124076
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/01/2023 answer text <p>Building owners must ensure that buildings are safe. All qualifying leaseholders are protected from historical safety remediation costs for cladding-related work. This protection includes all works, and non-qualifying leaseholders, if their building owner or landlord is or is associated with the developer responsible for that defect. If a leaseholder owns a total of more than three properties, their principal home always qualifies for the protections if it is in a relevant building. Where this is not the case, non-qualifying leaseholders are liable for historical safety remediation costs as per the terms of their lease, in the same way they were before the Act came into force. This amount cannot be increased to replace money that qualifying leaseholders are protected from paying.</p><p>The Act provides a toolkit of measures to allow landlords and others to pursue those responsible. The Government has made it very clear that any necessary remediation work should not be delayed. The Act provides for interested parties - including local authorities and leaseholders - to apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a remediation order where historical safety remediation work does not commence in a timely manner. These orders are enforceable as if they were orders of the county court, ensuring that landlords comply with their new liabilities under the Act.</p> answering member constituency North East Derbyshire answering member printed Lee Rowley grouped question UIN 124074 124075 question first answered 24/01/2023 18:00:00 answering member 4652 label Biography information for Lee Rowley
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1567098

registered interest
date	16/01/2023
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Internet: Hate Crime
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent estimate she has made of the number of (a) internet users in the UK accessing violent misogynistic content online and (b) posts online promoting violent misogyny.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	124077
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 20/01/2023 answer text <p>The Home Office invests in research and analysis to better understand the scale and challenge of violent online misogyny. However, it is difficult to provide a reliable estimate of the number of users accessing violent misogynistic content or the number of posts online promoting violent misogyny as this content is found across a broad range of platforms, including mainstream and closed spaces, and is often the subject of moderation by the platforms, or attempts by users to circumvent detection.</p><p>The Online Safety Bill will mean that alongside removing illegal content, companies must be clear and transparent in their terms and conditions on which types of legal content they will allow on their platforms and uphold this consistently. If a platform does not allow hateful or abusive speech, they must remove this content when they become aware of it. Companies will be held to account by Ofcom and could face significant fines if they fail to fulfil their duties to protect users.</p> answering member constituency Derbyshire Dales answering member printed Miss Sarah Dines question first answered 20/01/2023 14:06:51 answering member 4816 label Biography information for Miss Sarah Dines
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1566773

registered interest
date	13/01/2023
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Firearms: 3D Printing
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she plans to take steps to help tackle the production of 3D-printed guns.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	122496
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/01/2023 answer text <p>The Government is committed to tackling the threat posed by 3D printed firearms. The UK has some of the toughest firearms controls in the world. To protect public safety, we keep these controls under constant review to ensure that they are fit for purpose to safeguard against abuse by criminals and terrorists.</p><p>3D printed firearms fall within the scope of the Firearms Act 1968 and are subject to the same controls and licensing requirements as any other firearm.</p><p>We are working closely with law enforcement, which includes the National Crime Agency, as part of Project Interknow which is the multi-agency response to the threat posed by 3D printed firearms.</p> answering member constituency Croydon South answering member printed Chris Philp question first answered 19/01/2023 10:57:46 answering member 4503 label Biography information for Chris Philp
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1566780

registered interest
date	13/01/2023
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Ministry of Defence: Holiday Leave
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many of his Department's civil servants sold annual leave in the last financial year.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	122497
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/01/2023 answer text <p>In December 2022, the Ministry of Defence (MOD) announced a new Annual Leave Payment Scheme. Under the terms of the Scheme, it has been exceptionally agreed that MOD civil servants with unused annual leave balances, after taking adequate rest and recuperation (statutory annual leave; 20 days annual leave plus Public Holidays (pro-rata for non-standard workers)), can submit a single request for the MOD to buy back up to a maximum of five contractual days annual leave (pro-rata for non-standard workers). This buy back facility is a one-off scheme which is available from 14 December 2022 until 28 February 2023.</p><p>The Annual Leave Payment Scheme did not exist in Financial Year 2021-22. Applications for the Scheme in Financial Year 2022-23 are being processed by Defence Business Services and no payments have yet been made.</p> answering member constituency South West Wiltshire answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison question first answered 19/01/2023 11:18:14 answering member 1466 label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1566797

registered interest
date	13/01/2023
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Radicalism: Young People
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she plans to introduce a national strategy on incel culture to tackle the radicalisation of young people.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	122498
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 20/01/2023 answer text <p>Prevent aims to protect people from radicalisation and provides appropriate support to people regardless of ideology. This can include individuals who have shown an interest in incel narratives. People who are referred to Prevent for incel-related concerns will receive tailored support just as they would for any other ideological issue.</p><p>Prevent is threat agnostic and is designed to tackle radicalisation across all ideologies, and so staff resource and budget are not specifically allocated against any particular type of ideology or threat.</p><p>Statistics related to individuals referred to and supported through the Prevent programme between April 2021 to March 2022 are due to be published on Thursday 26th January 2023. For the first time these statistics will include a separate category for Incel related referrals. The statistics will be available at the following link:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/announcements/individuals-referred-to-and-supported-through-the-prevent-programme-april-2021-to-march-2022" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/announcements/individuals-referred-to-and-supported-through-the-prevent-programme-april-2021-to-march-2022</a></p><p>Prevent continues to monitor emerging radicalisation trends and ideologies that may pose a threat, and establishing whether or not they pose a terrorism risk.</p> answering member constituency Tonbridge and Malling answering member printed Tom Tugendhat grouped question UIN 122499 question first answered 20/01/2023 14:51:48 answering member 4462 label Biography information for Tom Tugendhat
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1566798

registered interest
date	13/01/2023
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Radicalism: Young People
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many civil servants in her Department are responsible for supporting work on deterring the radicalisation of young people with incel ideology; and what budget is allocated for that purpose.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	122499
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 20/01/2023 answer text <p>Prevent aims to protect people from radicalisation and provides appropriate support to people regardless of ideology. This can include individuals who have shown an interest in incel narratives. People who are referred to Prevent for incel-related concerns will receive tailored support just as they would for any other ideological issue.</p><p>Prevent is threat agnostic and is designed to tackle radicalisation across all ideologies, and so staff resource and budget are not specifically allocated against any particular type of ideology or threat.</p><p>Statistics related to individuals referred to and supported through the Prevent programme between April 2021 to March 2022 are due to be published on Thursday 26th January 2023. For the first time these statistics will include a separate category for Incel related referrals. The statistics will be available at the following link:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/announcements/individuals-referred-to-and-supported-through-the-prevent-programme-april-2021-to-march-2022" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/announcements/individuals-referred-to-and-supported-through-the-prevent-programme-april-2021-to-march-2022</a></p><p>Prevent continues to monitor emerging radicalisation trends and ideologies that may pose a threat, and establishing whether or not they pose a terrorism risk.</p> answering member constituency Tonbridge and Malling answering member printed Tom Tugendhat grouped question UIN 122498 question first answered 20/01/2023 14:51:48 answering member 4462 label Biography information for Tom Tugendhat
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1566465

registered interest
date	12/01/2023
answering body	Home Office
answering dept id	1
answering dept short name	Home Office
answering dept sort name	Home Office
hansard heading	Biometric Residence Permits
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the average wait time was for a person who has had their biometric residence permit lost or stolen to receive a replacement in the last 12 months.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	122266
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/01/2023 answer text <p>The information is not available publicly and could only be obtained at a disproportionate cost.</p> answering member constituency Newark answering member printed Robert Jenrick grouped question UIN 122267 question first answered 18/01/2023 10:49:43 answering member 4320 label Biography information for Robert Jenrick
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard