Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1151524

registered interest
date	22/10/2019
answering body	Department for Exiting the European Union
answering dept id	203
answering dept short name	Exiting the European Union
answering dept sort name	Exiting the European Union
hansard heading	UK Trade with EU
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, what assessment he has made of the potential effectiveness of the provisions in the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill for Parliament to scrutinise the UK-EU free trade agreement negotiations.
tabling member constituency	Manchester, Withington
tabling member printed	Jeff Smith
uin	3727
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/10/2019 answer text <p>The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill, introduced on 21 October included a clause intended to give Parliament a crucial role in shaping and agreeing the UK’s future relationship with the European Union. This clause would require:</p><ul><li><p>that Parliament signs off of the final objectives for the negotiations, before negotiations EU-UK can begin.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>that Parliament sign off on the final deal, once political agreement has been reached.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>that the Government formally reports on progress of negotiations against the objectives set by Parliament every three months.</p></li></ul><p><strong><p><p></strong></p> answering member constituency Rochford and Southend East answering member printed James Duddridge question first answered 31/10/2019 11:56:05 answering member 1559 label Biography information for Sir James Duddridge
tabling member	4456 label Biography information for Jeff Smith

750335

registered interest
date	10/07/2017
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Mortgages: Tax Allowances
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether it is the Government's policy that support for mortgage interest will become an interest-bearing loan secured against the mortgaged property from April 2018.
tabling member constituency	Stretford and Urmston
tabling member printed	Kate Green
uin	3727
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/07/2017 answer text <p>From 6 April 2018 a new loans-based system of support for mortgage interest will replace the current benefits based provision. Eligible owner-occupier recipients of income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance, income-related Employment and Support Allowance, Income Support, Pension Credit and Universal Credit will be offered interest-bearing loans that give the same level of protection against repossession as current provision. These loans will be secured against their property and repaid from available equity when the property is sold.</p> answering member constituency Gosport answering member printed Caroline Dinenage grouped question UIN 3742 question first answered 18/07/2017 14:52:24 answering member 4008 label Biography information for Dame Caroline Dinenage
tabling member	4120 label Biography information for Kate Green

384849

registered interest
date	23/06/2015
answering body	Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
answering dept id	26
answering dept short name	Business, Innovation and Skills
answering dept sort name	Business, Innovation and Skills
hansard heading	Science: Finance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what his policy is on the future of ring-fencing science revenue spending.
tabling member constituency	Pudsey
tabling member printed	Stuart Andrew
uin	3727
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/06/2015 answer text <p>This Government recognises the value of science and innovation as a crucial driver of UK economic success. We protected the science ring-fence over the last Parliament and are investing £6.9 billion in science capital from this year to 2021, including £2.9 billion on Grand Challenges at the forefront of global research. A Spending Review later this year will examine where best to make robust investments in science and research that bring economic growth.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>We are not able to provide an assessment of the effectiveness of science investment specific to Yorkshire but research suggests that the returns on public investment are high and that for every one pound the government spends on research and development, private sector productivity rises by twenty pence per year in perpetuity. There is also evidence that public sector investment leverages in additional private sector investment.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>This Government is committed to rebalancing the economy of our country and building a Northern Powerhouse. Science in Yorkshire is benefiting from a range of initiatives including the recent Engineering and Physical Science Council’s £24M investment in a Quantum Technology Hub based in York – designed to exploit an expanding area of technological development. The table below provides breakdown of investment over the last five years for which we have data.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="10"><p><strong>RCUK Regional and Devolved Administration Spend 2005/06-2013/14 (£k) </strong></p><p><strong>Yorkshire &amp; Humberside</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td> </td><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2009-10</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td> </td><td><p>151,183</p></td><td><p>137,486</p></td><td><p>139,644</p></td><td><p>135,528</p></td><td><p>142,005</p></td><td> </td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency Grantham and Stamford answering member printed Nick Boles grouped question UIN 4151 4152 question first answered 29/06/2015 15:55:10 answering member 3995 label Biography information for Nick Boles
tabling member	4032 label Biography information for Stuart Andrew