Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

91410
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-09-10more like thismore than 2014-09-10
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Local Safeguarding Children Boards more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, who is responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of child sexual exploitation action plans by local safeguarding children's boards. more like this
tabling member constituency East Worthing and Shoreham remove filter
tabling member printed
Tim Loughton more like this
uin 209052 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answer text <p>Ofsted undertakes a review of each local safeguarding children’s board (LSCB) at the same time as they undertake their inspection of local authorities’ services for children in need of help and protection and looked after children. Neither the review nor the inspection makes specific judgements about the sexual exploitation of children or the effectiveness of the local child sexual exploitation action plans. However, inspectors are required to include in the cases they evaluate “children at risk of harm from physical, emotional and sexual abuse and neglect; inspectors will also want to identify those children and young people where the local authority have concerns that they may be vulnerable to child sexual exploitation and those children and young people who have been missing from care, home and education”. In undertaking the LSCB review inspectors are required to “evaluate the quality and impact of the policies and procedures produced by the LSCB, such as the local thresholds document and the child sexual exploitation action plan.” An LSCB’s response to child sexual exploitation is considered as part of the overall judgement on the performance of the LSCB. Seven LSCBs of the 3<ins class="ministerial">3</ins><del class="ministerial">1</del> inspected since the new framework came into being in November 2013 have been found to be inadequate.</p>
answering member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
answering member printed Mr Edward Timpson more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-13T16:12:11.21Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-13T16:12:11.21Z
question first ministerially corrected
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-10-20T16:41:22.6005788Z
answering member
1605
label Biography information for Edward Timpson more like this
previous answer version
21507
answering member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
answering member printed Mr Edward Timpson more like this
answering member
1605
label Biography information for Edward Timpson more like this
tabling member
114
label Biography information for Tim Loughton more like this
91412
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-09-10more like thismore than 2014-09-10
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Local Safeguarding Children Boards more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, which local safeguarding children's boards have failed inspections on their child sexual exploitation action plans. more like this
tabling member constituency East Worthing and Shoreham remove filter
tabling member printed
Tim Loughton more like this
uin 209053 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answer text <p>Ofsted undertakes a review of each local safeguarding children’s board (LSCB) at the same time as they undertake their inspection of local authorities’ services for children in need of help and protection and looked after children. Neither the review nor the inspection makes specific judgements about the sexual exploitation of children or the effectiveness of the local child sexual exploitation action plans. However, inspectors are required to include in the cases they evaluate “children at risk of harm from physical, emotional and sexual abuse and neglect; inspectors will also want to identify those children and young people where the local authority have concerns that they may be vulnerable to child sexual exploitation and those children and young people who have been missing from care, home and education”. In undertaking the LSCB review inspectors are required to “evaluate the quality and impact of the policies and procedures produced by the LSCB, such as the local thresholds document and the child sexual exploitation action plan.” An LSCB’s response to child sexual exploitation is considered as part of the overall judgement on the performance of the LSCB. Seven LSCBs of the 3<ins class="ministerial">3</ins><del class="ministerial">1</del> inspected since the new framework came into being in November 2013 have been found to be inadequate.</p>
answering member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
answering member printed Mr Edward Timpson more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-13T16:12:11.21Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-13T16:12:11.21Z
question first ministerially corrected
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-10-20T16:41:22.6005788Z
answering member
1605
label Biography information for Edward Timpson more like this
previous answer version
21593
answering member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
answering member printed Mr Edward Timpson more like this
answering member
1605
label Biography information for Edward Timpson more like this
tabling member
114
label Biography information for Tim Loughton more like this
91483
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-09-10more like thismore than 2014-09-10
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Local Safeguarding Children Boards more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, who is responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of local safeguarding children boards' child sexual exploitation action plans. more like this
tabling member constituency East Worthing and Shoreham remove filter
tabling member printed
Tim Loughton more like this
uin 209003 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2014-10-13more like thismore than 2014-10-13
answer text <p>Ofsted undertakes a review of each local safeguarding children’s board (LSCB) at the same time as they undertake their inspection of local authorities’ services for children in need of help and protection and looked after children. Neither the review nor the inspection makes specific judgements about the sexual exploitation of children or the effectiveness of the local child sexual exploitation action plans. However, inspectors are required to include in the cases they evaluate “children at risk of harm from physical, emotional and sexual abuse and neglect; inspectors will also want to identify those children and young people where the local authority have concerns that they may be vulnerable to child sexual exploitation and those children and young people who have been missing from care, home and education”. In undertaking the LSCB review inspectors are required to “evaluate the quality and impact of the policies and procedures produced by the LSCB, such as the local thresholds document and the child sexual exploitation action plan.” An LSCB’s response to child sexual exploitation is considered as part of the overall judgement on the performance of the LSCB. Seven LSCBs of the 3<ins class="ministerial">3</ins><del class="ministerial">1</del> inspected since the new framework came into being in November 2013 have been found to be inadequate.</p>
answering member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
answering member printed Mr Edward Timpson more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-13T16:12:11.21Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-13T16:12:11.21Z
question first ministerially corrected
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2014-10-20T16:41:22.6005788Z
answering member
1605
label Biography information for Edward Timpson more like this
previous answer version
21592
answering member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
answering member printed Mr Edward Timpson more like this
answering member
1605
label Biography information for Edward Timpson more like this
tabling member
114
label Biography information for Tim Loughton more like this