Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

861940
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-03-14more like thismore than 2018-03-14
answering body
Wales Office more like this
answering dept id 28 more like this
answering dept short name Wales more like this
answering dept sort name Wales more like this
hansard heading Children: Protection more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text What recent discussions the Government has had with the Welsh Government on child protection in Wales. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 904287 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2018-03-14
answer text <p>The provision and regulation of child protection is devolved to the Welsh Assembly, and as such is a matter for the Welsh Government. However, DfE officials have regular discussions with their Welsh Government counterparts on issues of common interest relating to child protection or safeguarding.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Pudsey more like this
answering member printed Stuart Andrew more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-14T17:33:54.843Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-14T17:33:54.843Z
answering member
4032
label Biography information for Stuart Andrew more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
856905
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-03-07more like thismore than 2018-03-07
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Members: Correspondence more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when he plans to answer the letter of 12 February 2018, on military exercises and the MOD's duty of care, from the hon. Member for Bridgend. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 131417 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-13more like thismore than 2018-03-13
answer text <p>I answered the hon. Member's letter on 12 March.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-13T17:21:42.793Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-13T17:21:42.793Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
previous answer version
46694
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
853258
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-03-02more like thismore than 2018-03-02
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many completed second or third personal independence payment assessment planned award reviews there have been of people with (a) Parkinson's disease, (b) multiple sclerosis, (c) motor neurone disease, (d) rheumatoid arthritis and (e) cystic fibrosis by year of repeat assessment since the introduction of personal independence payments in 2013; and if she will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 130707 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-08more like thismore than 2018-03-08
answer text <p>The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-08T11:51:06.047Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-08T11:51:06.047Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
853259
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-03-02more like thismore than 2018-03-02
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Parkinson's Disease more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with Parkinson's disease have been given personal independence payment awards of (a) enhanced rate daily living and (b) enhanced rate care by length of award in each of the last three years. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 130708 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-08more like thismore than 2018-03-08
answer text <p>The table below shows the number of people who have been awarded either one or both of the Daily Living and Mobility components at the enhanced rate of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for awards made between November 1st 2014 and 31<sup>st</sup> October 2017, where the main disabling condition recorded was Parkinson’s Disease.</p><p><em>Table 1: Enhanced PIP Daily living and Mobility component awards made between 1<sup>st</sup> November 2014 and 31<sup>st</sup> October 2015 with main disabling condition recorded as Parkinson’s Disease.</em></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>(a) </strong><strong>Enhanced Daily Living (may also have Enhanced Mobility)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>(b) </strong><strong>Enhanced Mobility (may also have Enhanced Daily Living)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Awards</p></td><td><p>1,000</p></td><td><p>550</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Indefinite Award</p></td><td><p>180</p></td><td><p>160</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Finite</p></td><td><p>820</p></td><td><p>390</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Of which</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Less than 1 year</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 year</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2 years</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>110</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3 years</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4 years</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5 years</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>6 years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>7 years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8 years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10 years</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10+ years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Short Term Award</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: PIP ADS</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><em>Table 2: Enhanced PIP Daily living and Mobility component awards made between 1<sup>st</sup> November 2015 and 31<sup>st</sup> October 2016 with main disabling condition recorded as Parkinson’s Disease.</em></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>(a) </strong><strong>Enhanced Daily Living (may also have Enhanced Mobility)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>(b) </strong><strong>Enhanced Mobility (may also have Enhanced Daily Living)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Awards</p></td><td><p>1,650</p></td><td><p>1,290</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Indefinite Awards</p></td><td><p>790</p></td><td><p>730</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Finite Awards</p></td><td><p>870</p></td><td><p>560</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Of which</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Less than 1 year</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 year</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2 years</p></td><td><p>240</p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3 years</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>190</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4 years</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5 years</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>100</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>6 years</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>7 years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8 years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 years</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10 years</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10+ years</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Short Term Award</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: PIP ADS</p><p><em>Table 3: Enhanced PIP Daily living and Mobility component awards made between 1<sup>st</sup> November 2016 and 31<sup>st</sup> October 2017 with main disabling condition recorded as Parkinson’s Disease</em></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>(a) </strong><strong>Enhanced Daily Living (may also have Enhanced Mobility)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>(b) </strong><strong>Enhanced Mobility (may also have Enhanced Daily Living)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Awards</p></td><td><p>2,310</p></td><td><p>1,890</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Indefinite Award</p></td><td><p>1,440</p></td><td><p>1,400</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Finite Award</p></td><td><p>870</p></td><td><p>490</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Of which</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Less than 1 year</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 year</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2 years</p></td><td><p>270</p></td><td><p>130</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>3 years</p></td><td><p>310</p></td><td><p>160</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>4 years</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5 years</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>6 years</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>7 years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8 years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10 years</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10+ years</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Short Term Award</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source:PIP ADS</p><p>Notes for tables:</p><ul><li>Figures are based on the first outcome recorded for each case and include both new claims and DLA reassessment claims assessed under normal rules.</li><li>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10 cases; totals less than 5 but greater than 0 are indicated by “#”.</li><li>This is unpublished data and it should be used with caution and it may be subject to future revision.</li><li>Data is based on main disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system.</li><li>Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</li><li>The one year award length group includes cases whose award lengths are in the range 1-1.5 years. The two years award length group includes cases whose award lengths are in the range 1.5-2.5 years, and so on.</li><li>The greater than 10 years group includes cases whose lengths are greater than or equal to 10.5 years but excludes cases whose award is indefinite.</li><li>Award lengths are calculated from the date of on-flow to PIP to the review date.</li></ul>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-08T11:51:19.667Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-08T11:51:19.667Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
853260
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-03-02more like thismore than 2018-03-02
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Parkinson's Disease more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with Parkinson’s disease who previously received the (a) higher rate mobility component and (b) higher rate care component under disability living allowance received (i) a lower rate of award or (ii) no award following reassessment for personal independence payments in the latest period for which figures are available. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 130709 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-12more like thismore than 2018-03-12
answer text <p>The table below shows the number of claimants with Parkinson’s disease who received higher rate mobility or higher rate care awards under DLA but who, following reassessment to PIP, received a standard or nil award.</p><p><em> </em></p><p><em>Table: DLA to PIP Reassessment outcomes for claimants with Parkinson’s disease</em></p><p><em> </em></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Outcome Following Reassessment to PIP</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Award Received Under DLA</strong></p></td><td><p>Standard Rate of Award</p></td><td><p>No Award</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Higher Rate Care Component</p></td><td><p>190</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Higher Rate Mobility Component</p></td><td><p>500</p></td><td><p>430</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Source: PIP Computer System claimant records and DLA Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study claimant data (1<sup>st</sup> October 2013 to 31<sup>st</sup> October 2017)</p><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p> </p><p>1. PIP Reassessment outcome shows the outcome of the first DWP decision on each reassessment claim (i.e. they reflect outcomes prior to any reconsideration appeal action and award review), where that decision was made between 1st October 2013 and 31st October 2017.</p><p>2. For each individual who has a PIP reassessment outcome their PIP entitlement has been compared to their DLA entitlement at the time of their PIP reassessment registration.</p><p>3. Main disabling condition used is the disability recorded on the DLA administrative system for each individual. This is used because disability information is recorded on the PIP computer systems only for the group of cases who have a PIP assessment report.</p><p>4. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which their entitlement decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics. It is possible that a reassessment claim could have a different main disabling condition recorded on the DLA and PIP systems.</p><p>5. Figures include reassessment outcomes for individuals who were aged between 16 and 64 on 8th April 2013, and include both PIP Normal Rules and Special Rules for the Terminally Ill claims.</p><p>6. Figures exclude withdrawn cases.</p><p>7. The definition of “Parkinson’s disease” includes a small number of claimants who have “Parkinson’s syndrome”.</p><ol start="8"><li>The breakdown of data provided is unpublished data. It should be used with caution and it may be subject to future revision.</li></ol><p>9. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 10.</p><p>10. Totals may not sum due to rounding.</p><p>11. Great Britain only.</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-12T16:00:38.21Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-12T16:00:38.21Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
853261
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-03-02more like thismore than 2018-03-02
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Parkinson's Disease more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with Parkinson’s disease with an indefinite disability living allowance award received a (a) one-year award (b) two-year award or (c) no award following reassessment for personal independence payments in the latest period for which figures are available. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 130710 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-08more like thismore than 2018-03-08
answer text <p>The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Detailed Reassessment Outcome statistics for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) can be found at:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/personal-independence-payment-april-2013-to-october-2017" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/personal-independence-payment-april-2013-to-october-2017</a></p><p>Table 8D of the “Personal Independence Payment: DLA to PIP reassessment outcomes, October 2017” tables shows the outcomes of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) claimants reassessed for PIP by their main disabling condition. Please note this is not broken down by the length of DLA award but will give the DLA reassessment outcome for people with Parkinson’s disease.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-08T11:51:39.89Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-08T11:51:39.89Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
853264
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-03-02more like thismore than 2018-03-02
answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept id 201 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
hansard heading Renewable Energy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he will enable (a) onshore wind and (b) solar technologies to compete in the Contract for Difference mechanism. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 130713 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-03-12more like thismore than 2018-03-12
answer text <p>No decisions have been taken on future Contract for Difference allocation rounds for established technologies.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Devizes more like this
answering member printed Claire Perry more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-03-12T15:28:33.603Zmore like thismore than 2018-03-12T15:28:33.603Z
answering member
3974
label Biography information for Claire Perry more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
843546
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-02-19more like thismore than 2018-02-19
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Visits more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what guidance his Department provides on the provision of nursing rooms in prisons for the use by breastfeeding mothers who attend domestic visits. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 127887 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-22more like thismore than 2018-02-22
answer text <p>All prisons are expected to facilitate requests from nursing mothers to breastfeed their child during the course of a prison visit and must make every possible effort to accommodate these requests.</p><p>There is currently no central policy which sets out detailed arrangements for breastfeeding mothers who are visiting prisons and decisions on such matters are made locally. However, Prison Service Instruction 16/2011 (Providing Visits and Services to Visitors) requires prisons to take account of, inter alia, the needs of pregnant women and nursing mothers when leaving and returning to a prison establishment during a visit.</p><p>Information on the nursing facilities available at prisons across the prison estate is not centrally held and could be obtained only at disproportionate costs.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> more like this
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
grouped question UIN 127888 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-22T17:32:15.887Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-22T17:32:15.887Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
843547
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-02-19more like thismore than 2018-02-19
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Visits more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what information his Department holds on the number of prisons that provide nursing rooms for the use by breastfeeding mothers who attend domestic visits. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 127888 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-22more like thismore than 2018-02-22
answer text <p>All prisons are expected to facilitate requests from nursing mothers to breastfeed their child during the course of a prison visit and must make every possible effort to accommodate these requests.</p><p>There is currently no central policy which sets out detailed arrangements for breastfeeding mothers who are visiting prisons and decisions on such matters are made locally. However, Prison Service Instruction 16/2011 (Providing Visits and Services to Visitors) requires prisons to take account of, inter alia, the needs of pregnant women and nursing mothers when leaving and returning to a prison establishment during a visit.</p><p>Information on the nursing facilities available at prisons across the prison estate is not centrally held and could be obtained only at disproportionate costs.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> more like this
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
grouped question UIN 127887 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-22T17:32:15.997Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-22T17:32:15.997Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
843717
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-02-19more like thismore than 2018-02-19
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate he has made of the number of F-35’s ready for operations. more like this
tabling member constituency Bridgend remove filter
tabling member printed
Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this
uin 128085 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-26more like thismore than 2018-02-26
answer text <p>The UK owns 14 F-35B Lightning aircraft which are all currently based in the US. A further three are due for delivery through the course of 2018.</p><p>This summer 617 Squadron will stand up in the UK with nine front-line operational aircraft, and we plan to declare an Initial Operating Capability from land bases in December 2018.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Aberconwy more like this
answering member printed Guto Bebb more like this
grouped question UIN 128091 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-26T16:29:59.587Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-26T16:29:59.587Z
answering member
3910
label Biography information for Guto Bebb more like this
tabling member
1490
label Biography information for Mrs Madeleine Moon more like this