Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1681595
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-11more like thismore than 2024-01-11
answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
answering dept id 216 more like this
answering dept short name Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
answering dept sort name Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
hansard heading Animal Experiments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to help facilitate an increase in non-animal testing methods. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 9225 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-19more like thismore than 2024-01-19
answer text <p>The Government is committed to supporting the growth of technologies that support non-animal research. UK Research &amp; Innovation funds the development of techniques that replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in research (the 3Rs) through the National Centre for 3Rs (NC3Rs). Since it was established the NC3Rs has invested £89.3 million in research and £27 million in contracts through its CRACK IT Challenges scheme. UK law requires that animals are only used in science where there are no alternatives, where the number of animals used, and potential harm is the minimum needed to achieve scientific benefit.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Arundel and South Downs more like this
answering member printed Andrew Griffith more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-19T11:09:55.977Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-19T11:09:55.977Z
answering member
4874
label Biography information for Andrew Griffith more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter
1681596
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-11more like thismore than 2024-01-11
answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
answering dept id 216 more like this
answering dept short name Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
answering dept sort name Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
hansard heading Animal Experiments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, if her Department will take steps to create (a) partnerships and (b) collaborations with industry stakeholders to (i) establish best practice for and (ii) increase the uptake of non-animal testing. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 9226 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-19more like thismore than 2024-01-19
answer text <p>The Government is committed to supporting the growth of technologies that support non-animal research. UK Research &amp; Innovation funds the development of techniques that replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in research (the 3Rs) through the National Centre for 3Rs (NC3Rs). Since it was established the NC3Rs has invested £89.3 million in research and £27 million in contracts through its CRACK IT Challenges scheme.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Arundel and South Downs more like this
answering member printed Andrew Griffith more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-19T11:07:31.99Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-19T11:07:31.99Z
answering member
4874
label Biography information for Andrew Griffith more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter
1681597
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-11more like thismore than 2024-01-11
answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
answering dept id 216 more like this
answering dept short name Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
answering dept sort name Science, Innovation and Technology more like this
hansard heading Animal Experiments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, if she will have discussions with Cabinet colleagues on the potential merits of establishing a cross-departmental roadmap to transition away from animal testing. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 9227 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-19more like thismore than 2024-01-19
answer text <p>The Government has no current plans to establish a cross-departmental roadmap. The Government supports advances in biomedical science to reduce the use of animals in research, including stem cell research, cell culture, imaging and computer modelling techniques. UK Research &amp; Innovation funds the development of techniques that replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in research (the 3Rs) through the National Centre for 3Rs (NC3Rs). UK law requires that animals are only used in science where there are no alternatives, where the number of animals used, and potential harm is the minimum needed to achieve scientific benefit.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Arundel and South Downs more like this
answering member printed Andrew Griffith more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-19T11:04:29.273Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-19T11:04:29.273Z
answering member
4874
label Biography information for Andrew Griffith more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter
1679527
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-05more like thismore than 2024-01-05
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Patient Choice Schemes more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to her Department's guidance entitled Elective recovery taskforce: implementation plan, published on 4 August 2023, what steps she is taking to ensure equity of access for those unable to use digital platforms. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 7964 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-15more like thismore than 2024-01-15
answer text <p>In September 2023, NHS England published a framework for action on digital inclusion to help the system design and implement inclusive digital approaches and technologies, including actions to build digital skills and capability among patients and National Health Service staff. This covers all NHS digital platforms. Patients unable to use digital channels will continue to be able to access services via telephone and through face-to-face services.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Pendle more like this
answering member printed Andrew Stephenson more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-15T14:44:37.843Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-15T14:44:37.843Z
answering member
4044
label Biography information for Andrew Stephenson more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter
1679532
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-05more like thismore than 2024-01-05
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Cerebral Palsy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many children with cerebral palsy in (a) Bootle constituency and (b) England and Wales have been assigned education, health and care plans. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 7965 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-15more like thismore than 2024-01-15
answer text <p>The department’s ambition is for all children and young people, no matter what their Special Educational Need (SEN), to receive the right support to succeed in their education and as they move into adult life. The department wants them to achieve well in early years, at school (whether mainstream or special), in further education and to live more fulfilling and independent adult lives with improved employment outcomes. The department is creating a new single national SEN and disability system in England for how needs are identified and met across education, health and care, including for those with cerebral palsy.</p><p>The department does not hold the data requested.</p><p>The department collects data from schools in England on pupils with SEN, but type of need is held according to the categories specified in the school census.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wantage more like this
answering member printed David Johnston more like this
grouped question UIN 7967 more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-15T17:04:49.263Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-15T17:04:49.263Z
answering member
4761
label Biography information for David Johnston more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter
1679533
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-05more like thismore than 2024-01-05
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Special Educational Needs: Cerebral Palsy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, for what reason the SEND and alternative provision improvement plan does not make specific reference to (a) cerebral palsy and (b) physical disability; and what steps her Department is taking to ensure that children with cerebral palsy are not overlooked by the SEND and alternative provision implementation board. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 7966 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-15more like thismore than 2024-01-15
answer text <p>The department wants all children and young people to be able to reach their full potential and receive the right support to succeed in their education and as they move into adult life.</p><p>The Special Education Needs and Disability (SEND) and Alternative Provision Improvement Plan is designed to support all children, rather than being restricted to specific conditions, and to meet those needs within a fair and financially sustainable system, by improving national consistency. This will mean that the right support is provided in the right place at the right time for children and young people with SEND.</p><p>Under the Children and Families Act 2014, mainstream schools and colleges must use their best endeavours to make sure any child or young person who has Special Educational Needs, including those with cerebral palsy and physical disabilities, gets the special educational provision they need. Alongside this, all schools have duties under the Equality Act 2010 towards individual disabled children and young people. They must make reasonable adjustments, including the provision of auxiliary aids and services for disabled children, to prevent them being put at a substantial disadvantage.</p>
answering member constituency Wantage more like this
answering member printed David Johnston more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-15T17:12:31.687Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-15T17:12:31.687Z
answering member
4761
label Biography information for David Johnston more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter
1679534
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-05more like thismore than 2024-01-05
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Pupils: Cerebral Palsy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many and what proportion of children with cerebral palsy attend mainstream schools. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 7967 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-15more like thismore than 2024-01-15
answer text <p>The department’s ambition is for all children and young people, no matter what their Special Educational Need (SEN), to receive the right support to succeed in their education and as they move into adult life. The department wants them to achieve well in early years, at school (whether mainstream or special), in further education and to live more fulfilling and independent adult lives with improved employment outcomes. The department is creating a new single national SEN and disability system in England for how needs are identified and met across education, health and care, including for those with cerebral palsy.</p><p>The department does not hold the data requested.</p><p>The department collects data from schools in England on pupils with SEN, but type of need is held according to the categories specified in the school census.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wantage more like this
answering member printed David Johnston more like this
grouped question UIN 7965 more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-15T17:04:49.31Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-15T17:04:49.31Z
answering member
4761
label Biography information for David Johnston more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter
1677260
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-12-12more like thismore than 2023-12-12
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Skin Diseases: Health Services more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether she is taking steps to monitor the effectiveness of NHS England’s guidance on Referral optimisation for people with skin conditions. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 6510 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-12-18more like thismore than 2023-12-18
answer text <p>As advised in the Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) national report on dermatology, published in August 2021, 56% of trusts reported that they had to wait for commissioner approval before prescribing drugs approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and 12% of trusts said they had been told by clinical commissioning groups that they could not prescribe certain NICE-approved biologics for psoriasis at the time of NHS England’s data questionnaire in 2018/19.</p><p>During GIRFT’s subsequent deep dives into the 110 trusts with significant dermatology activity, it became apparent that there was ongoing variation in the way trusts adopt NICE guidelines. While some allow clinicians to prescribe drugs as soon as they are NICE approved, others have processes in place which can produce delays of more than a year in some cases.</p><p>GIRFT is aiming to publish trust- and system-level data for dermatology on the Model Health System in early 2024, enabling dermatology clinicians and managers to monitor their variation in provision of care, services, and treatments for skin disorders. Specific metrics for inflammatory skin disorders, including biologic prescribing for psoriasis and eczema, will be included. The aim is to use this data to inform the dermatology element of GIRFT’s Further Faster programme to help target unwarranted variation in care provision for inflammatory skin disease. The Further Faster programme supports providers to deliver rapid clinical transformation to reduce 52-week waits.</p><p>There are no plans to introduce specific targets to adopt the NHS England guidance on Referral Optimisation for people with skin conditions. The Outpatient Recovery &amp; Transformation Programme in NHS England will continue to promote the guidance through NHS England regional teams, integrated care boards and directly to provider organisations.</p><p>In addition, specific engagement events, such as the webinar delivered on 21 November 2023, will continue to reinforce the need for appropriate and timely referral optimisation across skin care pathways. The programme is working closely with GIRFT and the Further Faster teams to ensure that referral optimisation is seen as a valuable tool to effectively manage the skin care pathway. Through this effort to engage the system combined with the publication of consistent guidance and evidence across the whole skin care pathway, it is hoped that variation can be reduced, across pathway implementation.</p><p>It should be recognised that there may be appropriate clinical reasons for some regional or local variation, so it is important to ensure that all patients who need specialist skincare have equal access. The programme will look to review data over the course of the year to understand the impact and consider relevant next steps.</p>
answering member constituency Pendle more like this
answering member printed Andrew Stephenson more like this
grouped question UIN
6511 more like this
6512 more like this
6513 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-12-18T17:11:22.813Zmore like thismore than 2023-12-18T17:11:22.813Z
answering member
4044
label Biography information for Andrew Stephenson more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter
1677261
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-12-12more like thismore than 2023-12-12
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Skin Diseases: Health Services more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if her Department will set a target for the number of trusts to adopt the NHS England guidance on Referral optimisation for people with skin conditions. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 6511 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-12-18more like thismore than 2023-12-18
answer text <p>As advised in the Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) national report on dermatology, published in August 2021, 56% of trusts reported that they had to wait for commissioner approval before prescribing drugs approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and 12% of trusts said they had been told by clinical commissioning groups that they could not prescribe certain NICE-approved biologics for psoriasis at the time of NHS England’s data questionnaire in 2018/19.</p><p>During GIRFT’s subsequent deep dives into the 110 trusts with significant dermatology activity, it became apparent that there was ongoing variation in the way trusts adopt NICE guidelines. While some allow clinicians to prescribe drugs as soon as they are NICE approved, others have processes in place which can produce delays of more than a year in some cases.</p><p>GIRFT is aiming to publish trust- and system-level data for dermatology on the Model Health System in early 2024, enabling dermatology clinicians and managers to monitor their variation in provision of care, services, and treatments for skin disorders. Specific metrics for inflammatory skin disorders, including biologic prescribing for psoriasis and eczema, will be included. The aim is to use this data to inform the dermatology element of GIRFT’s Further Faster programme to help target unwarranted variation in care provision for inflammatory skin disease. The Further Faster programme supports providers to deliver rapid clinical transformation to reduce 52-week waits.</p><p>There are no plans to introduce specific targets to adopt the NHS England guidance on Referral Optimisation for people with skin conditions. The Outpatient Recovery &amp; Transformation Programme in NHS England will continue to promote the guidance through NHS England regional teams, integrated care boards and directly to provider organisations.</p><p>In addition, specific engagement events, such as the webinar delivered on 21 November 2023, will continue to reinforce the need for appropriate and timely referral optimisation across skin care pathways. The programme is working closely with GIRFT and the Further Faster teams to ensure that referral optimisation is seen as a valuable tool to effectively manage the skin care pathway. Through this effort to engage the system combined with the publication of consistent guidance and evidence across the whole skin care pathway, it is hoped that variation can be reduced, across pathway implementation.</p><p>It should be recognised that there may be appropriate clinical reasons for some regional or local variation, so it is important to ensure that all patients who need specialist skincare have equal access. The programme will look to review data over the course of the year to understand the impact and consider relevant next steps.</p>
answering member constituency Pendle more like this
answering member printed Andrew Stephenson more like this
grouped question UIN
6510 more like this
6512 more like this
6513 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-12-18T17:11:22.877Zmore like thismore than 2023-12-18T17:11:22.877Z
answering member
4044
label Biography information for Andrew Stephenson more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter
1677262
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-12-12more like thismore than 2023-12-12
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Skin Diseases: Drugs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to page 85 of the Getting it Right First Time report on Dermatology, published by the NHS in August 2021, how many and what proportion of trusts are required to wait for commissioner approval before prescribing (a) NICE-approved biologics for psoriasis and (b) other NICE-approved drugs. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle remove filter
tabling member printed
Peter Dowd more like this
uin 6512 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-12-18more like thismore than 2023-12-18
answer text <p>As advised in the Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) national report on dermatology, published in August 2021, 56% of trusts reported that they had to wait for commissioner approval before prescribing drugs approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and 12% of trusts said they had been told by clinical commissioning groups that they could not prescribe certain NICE-approved biologics for psoriasis at the time of NHS England’s data questionnaire in 2018/19.</p><p>During GIRFT’s subsequent deep dives into the 110 trusts with significant dermatology activity, it became apparent that there was ongoing variation in the way trusts adopt NICE guidelines. While some allow clinicians to prescribe drugs as soon as they are NICE approved, others have processes in place which can produce delays of more than a year in some cases.</p><p>GIRFT is aiming to publish trust- and system-level data for dermatology on the Model Health System in early 2024, enabling dermatology clinicians and managers to monitor their variation in provision of care, services, and treatments for skin disorders. Specific metrics for inflammatory skin disorders, including biologic prescribing for psoriasis and eczema, will be included. The aim is to use this data to inform the dermatology element of GIRFT’s Further Faster programme to help target unwarranted variation in care provision for inflammatory skin disease. The Further Faster programme supports providers to deliver rapid clinical transformation to reduce 52-week waits.</p><p>There are no plans to introduce specific targets to adopt the NHS England guidance on Referral Optimisation for people with skin conditions. The Outpatient Recovery &amp; Transformation Programme in NHS England will continue to promote the guidance through NHS England regional teams, integrated care boards and directly to provider organisations.</p><p>In addition, specific engagement events, such as the webinar delivered on 21 November 2023, will continue to reinforce the need for appropriate and timely referral optimisation across skin care pathways. The programme is working closely with GIRFT and the Further Faster teams to ensure that referral optimisation is seen as a valuable tool to effectively manage the skin care pathway. Through this effort to engage the system combined with the publication of consistent guidance and evidence across the whole skin care pathway, it is hoped that variation can be reduced, across pathway implementation.</p><p>It should be recognised that there may be appropriate clinical reasons for some regional or local variation, so it is important to ensure that all patients who need specialist skincare have equal access. The programme will look to review data over the course of the year to understand the impact and consider relevant next steps.</p>
answering member constituency Pendle more like this
answering member printed Andrew Stephenson more like this
grouped question UIN
6510 more like this
6511 more like this
6513 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-12-18T17:11:22.937Zmore like thismore than 2023-12-18T17:11:22.937Z
answering member
4044
label Biography information for Andrew Stephenson more like this
tabling member
4397
label Biography information for Peter Dowd remove filter