Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1697252
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-19more like thismore than 2024-03-19
answering body
Department for Business and Trade more like this
answering dept id 214 more like this
answering dept short name Business and Trade more like this
answering dept sort name Business and Trade more like this
hansard heading Brexit more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have any plans to commission a review into the (1) economic, and (2) other, (a) benefits, and (b) disbenefits, of Brexit. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Birt more like this
uin HL3357 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2024-04-16more like thismore than 2024-04-16
answer text <p>The Department for Business and Trade has no plans to commission a review into the economic, and other benefits or disbenefits of Brexit. However, to mark the fourth anniversary of Brexit, on 31<sup>st</sup> January this year, the Department for Business and Trade published an overview of Brexit successes: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/brexit-4th-anniversary-update" target="_blank">Brexit 4th Anniversary</a></p><p>Since the referendum the UK has grown faster than Germany, Italy, and Japan. Latest figures show that UK exports are £8<ins class="ministerial">62</ins><del class="ministerial">55</del>bn in current prices and <ins class="ministerial">2</ins><del class="ministerial">1</del>% above pre-COVID (2018) levels when adjusting for inflation. The lnternational Monetary Fund (lMF) predicts that between 2024-202<ins class="ministerial">9</ins><del class="ministerial">8</del> the UK will see the third fastest growth in the G7.</p><p>The Department has secured free trade deals with 73 countries plus the EU, partners that accounted for £1.1 trillion UK trade in 2022 and simplified import tariffs to lower costs for businesses and households.</p>
answering member printed Lord Johnson of Lainston more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-16T16:29:29.977Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-16T16:29:29.977Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-04-19T12:20:38.663Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-19T12:20:38.663Z
answering member
4949
label Biography information for Lord Johnson of Lainston more like this
previous answer version
28059
answering member printed Lord Johnson of Lainston more like this
answering member
4949
label Biography information for Lord Johnson of Lainston more like this
tabling member
2533
label Biography information for Lord Birt more like this
1697308
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-19more like thismore than 2024-03-19
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prison Sentences more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, excluding sexual or violent offences, under what circumstances can someone subject to an Imprisonment for Public Protection sentence who has completed their license period have earlier, minor offences dropped from their record. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Blunkett more like this
uin HL3362 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2024-04-04more like thismore than 2024-04-04
answer text <p>The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (the ROA) sets out when an offender is considered to be ‘rehabilitated’ for the purposes of the Act and the relevant rehabilitation periods for cautions and convictions (also referred to as when a caution or a conviction become ‘spent’). This does not mean that an offence is dropped from their record, rather that the offender only needs to disclose the spent caution or conviction in some circumstances.</p><p>The ROA also provides that where a person commits another offence before the first has become spent, then the rehabilitation periods <ins class="ministerial">for all sentences</ins> are extended to the longest period. <ins class="ministerial">This is set out in section 6 of the ROA and referred to as ‘the drag on effect’.</ins> The ROA sets out that<del class="ministerial">, as with other indeterminate sentences, IPP sentences</del> <ins class="ministerial">Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) and Detention for Public Protection (DPP) sentences are excluded from rehabilitation and therefore</ins> can never become spent, regardless of whether the licence is terminated or not. <del class="ministerial">The same, therefore, applies to any unspent caution or conviction imposed on the offender prior to the IPP sentence.</del></p><p><del class="ministerial">We have taken action through the Victims and Prisoners Bill to curtail IPP licence periods to give offenders the opportunity to move on with their lives. Whether the ROA should be reviewed in the light of these changes would require further consideration in the context of indeterminate sentences generally.</del></p><p><ins class="ministerial">A conviction imposed on an offender before a sentence of IPP will not be spent if, at the time the IPP or DPP was imposed, the sentence for that conviction was still in its rehabilitation period. However, any sentence which is not excluded from rehabilitation, and is received after an IPP or DPP sentence is imposed, will become spent in respect of the usual rehabilitation periods set out in section 5 and 6 of the ROA. </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">The ROA is kept under review but there are no plans to make further changes at this time. </ins></p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-04T15:14:39.803Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-04T15:14:39.803Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-05-24T13:48:06.727Zmore like thismore than 2024-05-24T13:48:06.727Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
previous answer version
27245
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
395
label Biography information for Lord Blunkett more like this
1694709
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-07more like thismore than 2024-03-07
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Sugar Beet: Neonicotinoids more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government with regard to the ban on the use of neonicotinoids, what is their rationale for allowing a derogation in 2024 year for sugar beet growers; and for how many years an emergency authorisation can be in place. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer more like this
uin HL3120 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-21more like thismore than 2024-03-21
answer text <p>A statement of reasons for the emergency authorisation of Cruiser SB in 2024 <del class="ministerial">is </del> <ins class="ministerial">can be found</ins> attached to this answer.</p><p>An emergency authorisation cannot run from year to year. This authorisation is for the 2024 sugar beet crop only and is valid for 120 days. Use of Cruiser SB or a similar product in any subsequent years would require the submission of a further application. Any future applications would be carefully assessed against the regulatory framework for emergency authorisations.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-21T17:37:37.073Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-21T17:37:37.073Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-03-21T17:43:03.257Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-21T17:43:03.257Z
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
attachment
1
file name HL3120 attachment.pdf more like this
title List of Reasons more like this
previous answer version
25323
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
tabling member
1934
label Biography information for Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer more like this
1690187
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-02-19more like thismore than 2024-02-19
answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 217 more like this
answering dept short name Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Listed Events Regime: Digital Rights Review more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government when they will publish the results of the Digital Rights Review 2022. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Foster of Bath more like this
uin HL2538 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-04more like thismore than 2024-03-04
answer text <p><del class="ministerial">We are undertaking a review to look at whether, in the face of technological change, the objectives of the existing regime are still being met and whether digital rights should now be included in the regime.</del></p><p><del class="ministerial">In considering this issue, it is important that we maintain the right balance between access for audiences, and the commercial freedoms that allow rights holders to reinvest in their sport at all levels. This is a complex issue and it's important we get it right.</del></p><p><ins class="ministerial">HM Government is undertaking a review to look at whether, in the face of technological change, the objectives of the existing regime are still being met and whether digital rights should now be included in the regime.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">In considering this issue, it is important that we maintain the right balance between access for audiences and the commercial freedoms which allow rights-holders to reinvest in their sport at all levels. We will publish further details in due course.</ins></p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-04T17:53:03.927Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-04T17:53:03.927Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-03-12T15:16:47.6Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-12T15:16:47.6Z
answering member
4728
label Biography information for Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay more like this
previous answer version
21234
answering member printed Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay more like this
answering member
4728
label Biography information for Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay more like this
tabling member
214
label Biography information for Lord Foster of Bath more like this
1683926
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-22more like thismore than 2024-01-22
answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept id 208 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
hansard heading Sudan: Armed Conflict more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the United Nations' concerns that the government of the United Arab Emirates has been funding or supplying Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL1777 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2024-02-05more like thismore than 2024-02-05
answer text <p><del class="ministerial">The UK strongly supports an immediate end of hostilities in Sudan, both for the sake of its own people, and to avoid damaging consequences for its relations with neighbours and serious impacts for the wider region. We continue to support the international community's efforts to reach a ceasefire and work towards a civilian political transition. The UK expects all countries to comply with existing UN sanctions and continues to work closely with partners in the UN Security Council to enforce these.</del></p><p><ins class="ministerial">The UK supports an immediate end to hostilities, both for the sake of Sudan's people, and to avoid risks of spillover into the wider region. We continue to support the international community's efforts to reach a ceasefire and work towards a civilian political transition. The UK welcomes the UN Panel of Experts' report on Sudan and expects all countries to comply with existing UN sanctions. We continue to work closely with partners in the UN Security Council to enforce these.</ins></p>
answering member printed Lord Benyon more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-02-05T17:37:53.387Zmore like thismore than 2024-02-05T17:37:53.387Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-02-05T17:52:44.557Zmore like thismore than 2024-02-05T17:52:44.557Z
answering member
1547
label Biography information for Lord Benyon more like this
previous answer version
15629
answering member printed Lord Benyon more like this
answering member
1547
label Biography information for Lord Benyon more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
1681743
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-11more like thismore than 2024-01-11
answering body
Department for Business and Trade more like this
answering dept id 214 more like this
answering dept short name Business and Trade more like this
answering dept sort name Business and Trade more like this
hansard heading Small Businesses: Government Assistance more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to support small firms struggling financially as a result of adverse economic conditions. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
uin HL1540 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-23more like thismore than 2024-01-23
answer text <p>Small and medium sized businesses are the backbone of our economy, driving economic growth. The Department for Business and Trade continues to deliver over 40 support schemes that help businesses start, grow and export. At the Autumn Statement, my Rt Hon Friend the Chancellor announced further support for SMEs over the next five years. This support can be accessed through local Growth Hubs, Help to Grow and a dedicated Business Support Helpline. In addition, The British Business Bank improves access to finance to help businesses invest and grow. It currently supports over £12.<ins class="ministerial">4</ins><del class="ministerial">2</del>bn of finance to over 9<ins class="ministerial">0</ins><del class="ministerial">6</del>,000 <ins class="ministerial">businesses</ins><del class="ministerial">SMEs</del>.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Offord of Garvel more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-23T17:07:40.673Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-23T17:07:40.673Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-02-09T12:23:39.067Zmore like thismore than 2024-02-09T12:23:39.067Z
answering member
4931
label Biography information for Lord Offord of Garvel more like this
previous answer version
13163
answering member printed Lord Offord of Garvel more like this
answering member
4931
label Biography information for Lord Offord of Garvel more like this
tabling member
1796
label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
1681750
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-01-11more like thismore than 2024-01-11
answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept id 208 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
hansard heading Guyana: Venezuela more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the current threat to the territorial integrity of Guyana posed by Venezuela. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Weir of Ballyholme more like this
uin HL1547 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-17more like thismore than 2024-01-17
answer text <p>We are concerned by the recent steps taken by Venezuela. The UK's position is clear: the border was settled in 1899 through international arbitration. The Foreign Secretary has reassured President Ali of this. The UK continues to engage with regional partners and international bodies to de-escalate tensions.</p><p><del class="ministerial">I [Minister Rutley]</del><ins class="ministerial">Minister Rutley</ins> visited Guyana on 18 December. HMS Trent also visited on 29/30 December as a further signal of support for Guyana's sovereign borders.</p><p>The UK welcomes the Argyle Declaration signed by Venezuela and Guyana in St Vincent and the Grenadines on 14 December, which makes clear that Venezuela is to refrain from the use of force and any further escalation.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-17T17:23:24.09Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-17T17:23:24.09Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-01-19T12:03:56.38Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-19T12:03:56.38Z
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
previous answer version
11902
answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
answering member
4210
label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
tabling member
4970
label Biography information for Lord Weir of Ballyholme more like this
1679281
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-12-19more like thismore than 2023-12-19
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Government Assistance: Northern Ireland more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government how many approvals have been sought from the European Commission for state aid in Northern Ireland since the coming into force of the Northern Ireland Protocol; what are these approvals; and what estimate they have made of the total amount of funds for which approval has been sought. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Dodds of Duncairn more like this
uin HL1330 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2024-01-05more like thismore than 2024-01-05
answer text <p>The Windsor Framework addressed the risk of &quot;reach back&quot; of EU state aid rules and, based on past experience, ensures that more than 98% of aid can be granted without notification, preserving the functioning of the UK internal market. This sits alongside the uniquely generous arrangements for agricultural subsidies in Northern Ireland under the Framework. Under the old Protocol, there were 11 cases that required EU approval. Since the Windsor Framework, there has been only one such case, the Energy <del class="ministerial">Business</del> <ins class="ministerial">Bills</ins> Discount Scheme, which was resolved in order to ensure a UK-wide subsidy scheme, and continuing access to the EU market for all manufacturers in scope.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-01-05T11:19:02.657Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-05T11:19:02.657Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-01-17T15:49:14.59Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-17T15:49:14.59Z
answering member
4284
label Biography information for Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
previous answer version
9756
answering member printed Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
answering member
4284
label Biography information for Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
tabling member
1388
label Biography information for Lord Dodds of Duncairn more like this
1677976
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-12-13more like thismore than 2023-12-13
answering body
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities more like this
answering dept id 211 more like this
answering dept short name Levelling Up, Housing and Communities more like this
answering dept sort name Levelling Up, Housing and Communities more like this
hansard heading High Rise Flats: Electrical Safety more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers from Baroness Scott of Bybrook on 26 June (HL8412, HL8413 and HL8414), when they expect the Building Safety Regulator will undertake the cost benefit analysis of making regular inspections and testing of electrical installations in relevant buildings. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rooker more like this
uin HL1176 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2023-12-28more like thismore than 2023-12-28
answer text <p>Under Section 21 of the Building Safety Act, the Building Safety Regulator must carry out a cost-benefit analysis of making regular inspections of, and testing and reporting on, the condition of electrical installations in relevant buildings. <del class="ministerial">As outlined in Section 21 of the Act when it was passed in 2022, this</del> <ins class="ministerial">This </ins>report will be provided <ins class="ministerial">by 1 October 2026. </ins><del class="ministerial">within three years of the passage of the Act.</del> The Regulator remains on track for completing this activity within the agreed timeframe.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Penn more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-12-28T16:09:23.247Zmore like thismore than 2023-12-28T16:09:23.247Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-01-29T12:38:23.407Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-29T12:38:23.407Z
answering member
4726
label Biography information for Baroness Penn more like this
previous answer version
9591
answering member printed Baroness Penn more like this
answering member
4726
label Biography information for Baroness Penn more like this
tabling member
302
label Biography information for Lord Rooker more like this
1674987
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-12-04more like thismore than 2023-12-04
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading High Speed 2 Line: Old Oak Common Station more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Davies of Gower of 22 November (HL338), what assessment they have made of expected journey times between Old Oak Common and Bond Street via (1) the planned HS2 station at Euston and the Northern Line, and (2) the Elizabeth Line broken down into (a) in-vehicle time, (b) wait time, and (c) walking time. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Berkeley more like this
uin HL801 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2023-12-15more like thismore than 2023-12-15
answer text <p>The breakdown of expected journey times between Old Oak Common and Bond Street via (1) the planned HS2 station at Euston and the Northern Line, and (2) the Elizabeth Line is shown in the table below. All times are shown in minutes.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Destination: Bond Street</p></td><td><p>In vehicle time</p></td><td><p>Walk time</p></td><td><p>Wait time</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Via HS2 to Euston/<del class="ministerial">Northern Line</del> <ins class="ministerial">London Underground</ins></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">6.6</del> <ins class="ministerial">12.6</ins></p></td><td><p>16.7</p></td><td><p>1.3</p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">24.6</del> <ins class="ministerial">30.6 </ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Via Old Oak Common/Elizabeth Line</p></td><td><p>9.8</p></td><td><p>13.8</p></td><td><p>1.2</p></td><td><p>24.8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Davies of Gower more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-12-15T11:41:47.98Zmore like thismore than 2023-12-15T11:41:47.98Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-01-29T11:24:03.823Zmore like thismore than 2024-01-29T11:24:03.823Z
answering member
4499
label Biography information for Lord Davies of Gower more like this
previous answer version
7724
answering member printed Lord Davies of Gower more like this
answering member
4499
label Biography information for Lord Davies of Gower more like this
tabling member
3526
label Biography information for Lord Berkeley more like this