Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1668069
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-07more like thismore than 2023-11-07
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Remand in Custody: Women more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what percentage of women remanded into custody in each of the past five years subsequently received a custodial sentence of (1) one year and over, (2) six months to one year, (3) three to six months, (4) one to three months, and (5) less than one month. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradley more like this
uin HL17 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-21more like thismore than 2023-11-21
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice holds data on sentence outcomes and custodial sentence lengths after being remanded in custody. Data for the last five years is publicly available and can be viewed in remands data tool, available via the following link: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2022" target="_blank">Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly: December 2022 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)</a>.</p><p>To view data relating to cases completed at magistrates’ courts, navigate to the ‘Magistrates’ Courts’ tab. To view data relating to cases completed at Crown courts, navigate to the ‘Crown Courts’ tab. <br> <br>To select data for cases where the defendant is known to be female, ’01: Female’ should be selected within the Sex filter. To see data for cases where the female is aged over 18, select ‘02: Young adults’ and ’03: Adults’ in the Age group filter. To view those remanded in custody, ’03: Custody’ should be selected within the Remand status at magistrates’ court and Remand status at the Crown Court filters on the appropriate tabs.</p><p><strong>Table 1: Proportion of women issued a custodial sentence, community sentence, other sentence, or no sentence, after being remanded in custody, in cases completed at all courts in England and Wales, between 2018 and 2022 (Note 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Outcome</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2021</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2022</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immediate custody</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>49%</p></td><td><p>47%</p></td><td><p>44%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Community sentence</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>No sentence</p></td><td><p>23%</p></td><td><p>23%</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Court Proceedings Database</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2: Proportion of women issued a custodial sentence after being remanded in custody, by custodial sentence length, in cases completed at all courts in England and Wales, between 2018 and 2022. (Note 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Custodial sentence length</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2021</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2022</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 year and over</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td><td><p>27%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>6 months and up to 1 year</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Over 3 months and up to 6 months</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Over 1 month and up to and including 3 months</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Up to and including 1 month</p></td><td><p>7%</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>N/A (received other sentence type or not sentenced)</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>51%</p></td><td><p>53%</p></td><td><p>56%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Court Proceedings Database</p><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p> </p><p>1) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p><p>2) The figures given in the table relate to defendants for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.</p><p>3) Defendants are reported against their principal (i.e. most serious) remand status. Court custody includes those remanded in custody at any stage of proceedings who may also have been given bail or not remanded at some stage of those proceedings.</p><p>4) 'To obtain percentages for cases completed at both magistrates' and Crown courts, cases where a defendant has failed to appear to their hearing have been excluded from the totals. This can be replicated within the remand tool, by deselecting '01: Failure to appear' in the Outcome filter within the Magistrates' Court tab.</p><p>5) Defendants proceeded against at magistrates’ courts and subsequently committed to the Crown Court will have separate remand decisions made in both courts and will be included in both totals. To avoid duplication of figures, those committed to trial/sentence at Crown court following a hearing at magistrates' courts have been removed from the totals. This can be replicated within the remand tool, by deselecting '03: Committed to Crown Court for trial/sentencing' in the Outcome filters within the Magistrates' Court and Crown Courts tabs.</p><p>6) Please note, an issue we are currently investigating is the high proportion of unknown remand status at Crown Court – early findings suggest that these cases are split broadly proportionally (to offence breakdowns) across those remanded at custody and those granted bail. In 2022, 24% of defendants remanded at Crown Court had unknown remand status. We are working on a solution to fill in those unknown remand statuses with the actual status. Due to this, the figures presented only includes data for those where remand status is known.</p><p>7) The figures given in the table relate to those where sex is known to be female and age is known to be 18 or over.</p><p>8) An outcome of 'no sentence' includes cases where proceedings are discontinued, withdrawn, dismissed, or discharged Sec 6 at magistrates' courts, and not tried or acquitted at Crown Court.</p><p>9) The figures given in the table under outcome 'Other' relate to cases where the offender has been received a suspended sentence, absolute/conditional discharge, sentenced to pay a fine or compensation, or has been otherwise dealt with.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T12:33:37.58Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T12:33:37.58Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
452
label Biography information for Lord Bradley more like this
1461022
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-05-10more like thismore than 2022-05-10
answering body
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities more like this
answering dept id 211 more like this
answering dept short name Levelling Up, Housing and Communities more like this
answering dept sort name Levelling Up, Housing and Communities more like this
hansard heading Local Government: Candidates more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what percentage of candidates in the May 2022 council elections have a disability; and what plans they have (1) to enable, and (2) to assist, disabled candidates (a) to participate in local elections, and (b) to serve as councillors. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle more like this
uin HL17 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-05-23more like thismore than 2022-05-23
answer text <p>It is the Government’s ambition to see more disabled people in public office.</p><p>DLUHC do not hold or collect data centrally on percentages of candidates standing for local election. However, DLUHC has developed a new scheme to support disabled people seeking to become local candidates and to support those who have been elected to local public office. This work is a part of the 2022/23 local government improvement programme, delivered largely by the LGA, launched in April this year.</p><p>The scheme includes:</p><ul><li>a coaching programme for disabled councillors to support them as resilient and confident leaders of their communities</li><li>a campaign to attract more people with disabilities to stand for council elections and a new ‘Be a Councillor’ guide for disabled candidates who are considering standing for the 2023 elections</li><li>a bespoke leadership development programme for disabled councillors, which provides councillors with unique networking opportunities and support.</li></ul><p>The full 2022-2023 Sector Support Offer for local councils is available (attached) on the LGA website: <a href="https://gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flocal.gov.uk%2Fpublications%2Fsector-support-offer-2022-23&amp;data=05%7C01%7CNatasha.Alleyne%40levellingup.gov.uk%7C93bedb0d1c714829134708da3400faba%7Cbf3468109c7d43dea87224a2ef3995a8%7C0%7C0%7C637879476043411915%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=JRUGC%2FvJS10F1VZGKuWCFHEAuz1aBaQRKNkFUbhxFzk%3D&amp;reserved=0" target="_blank">https://local.gov.uk/publications/sector-support-offer-2022-23</a></p>
answering member printed Lord Greenhalgh more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-05-23T14:41:05.34Zmore like thismore than 2022-05-23T14:41:05.34Z
answering member
4877
label Biography information for Lord Greenhalgh more like this
attachment
1
file name 220523 Sector support offer for councils _ Local Government Association - HL17.pdf more like this
title 2022-2023 Sector Support Offer for local councils more like this
tabling member
4719
label Biography information for Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle more like this
1168559
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-12-19more like thismore than 2019-12-19
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Metropolitan Police Service's Handling of Non-recent Sexual Offence Investigations Alleged against Persons of Public Prominence Independent Review more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the report by Sir Richard Henriques, An Independent Review of the Metropolitan Police Service's handling of non-recent sexual offence investigations alleged against persons of public prominence, published on 4 October, whether they consider the Independent Office for Police Conduct to be fit-for-purpose; and if so, why. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Cavendish of Little Venice more like this
uin HL17 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-01-07more like thismore than 2020-01-07
answer text <p>Following Sir Richard Henriques’ review in 2016 of the handling of Operation Midland, the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) referred a number of allegations to the then Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).</p><p>On 7 October 2019, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) published the report of its investigation into three of the officers involved in Operation Midland. This report includes learning recommendations for a number of bodies, including the IOPC itself.</p><p>Having an effective police watchdog to investigate allegations of wrongdoing is crucial to public confidence. The Government welcomes recent improvements by IOPC and further plans to improve. The Government will also introduce major reforms in early 2020, aimed at increasing the effectiveness, accountability and proportionality of the police complaints and discipline systems.</p><p>At the Home Secretary’s request, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS) are carrying out an inspection of the MPS to ensure learning from Sir Richard’s report and the IOPC’s investigation has been taken on board. The Government will decide whether any further steps are necessary following publication of HMICFRS’ report.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
grouped question UIN HL18 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-01-07T13:56:15.21Zmore like thismore than 2020-01-07T13:56:15.21Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
4578
label Biography information for Baroness Cavendish of Little Venice more like this
1149724
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-10-14more like thismore than 2019-10-14
answering body
Northern Ireland Office more like this
answering dept id 21 more like this
answering dept short name Northern Ireland more like this
answering dept sort name Northern Ireland more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Northern Ireland more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government which ministers from the Northern Ireland Office attended the commemorative events held at Lisburn on 17 August to mark the 50th anniversary of Operation Banner. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Caine more like this
uin HL17 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-10-21more like thismore than 2019-10-21
answer text <p>I have enormous respect for all those who served their country with distinction during Operation Banner. The UK Government was represented by Ministers at the following events to mark the 50th Anniversary of the start of Operation Banner:</p><ul><li>The Secretary of State for Defence attended the Royal British Legion event at the National memorial Arboretum on 14 August 2019;</li><li>The Minister for Defence Procurement attended the memorial event in Lisburn on 17 August 2019.</li></ul> more like this
answering member printed Lord Duncan of Springbank more like this
grouped question UIN HL18 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-10-21T10:46:41.477Zmore like thismore than 2019-10-21T10:46:41.477Z
answering member
4686
label Biography information for Lord Duncan of Springbank more like this
tabling member
4581
label Biography information for Lord Caine more like this