Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1717978
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-05-14more like thismore than 2024-05-14
answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept id 208 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
hansard heading Tawfik Ghanem more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Deputy Foreign Secretary, whether he has had discussions with his counterpart in Egypt on the detention of Tawfik Ghanem. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 26077 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-05-23more like thismore than 2024-05-23
answer text <p>We have not raised Mr Ghanem's specific case directly with the Egyptians, but we regularly raise pre-trial detention cases, restrictions on media freedom and detentions of political activists with Egypt, both in London and Cairo. Lord [Tariq] Ahmad of Wimbledon discussed human rights with the Egyptian Ambassador on 20 February and with Foreign Minister Shoukry on 28 March. The Foreign Secretary raised human rights with FM Shoukry on 29 April.</p><p>We also raise human rights issues multilaterally through our Human Rights Council Item 4 Statements and detail our concerns through our Annual Human Rights and Development Reports.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Macclesfield more like this
answering member printed David Rutley more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-05-23T16:33:17.31Zmore like thismore than 2024-05-23T16:33:17.31Z
answering member
4033
label Biography information for David Rutley more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this
1696474
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-15more like thismore than 2024-03-15
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Administration of Justice more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 14 March 2024 to Question 17822 on Administration of Justice, if he will publish the protected characteristic data for single justice procedure cases in 2023. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 18867 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-20more like thismore than 2024-03-20
answer text <p>Data on the protected characteristics of SJP users, under the descriptor of “online plea for the Single Justice Service”, can be found at: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hmcts-protected-characteristics-questionnaire-2023/hmcts-protected-characteristics-questionnaire-data-on-users-of-reformed-services" target="_blank">HMCTS Protected Characteristics Questionnaire - Data on Users of Reformed Services - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk).</a></p><p>The published data covers SJP cases for May 2023 to July 2023 inclusive. The scope of this data collection is limited to cases dealt with via the Common Platform, which represents around 32% of SJP cases over this time period.</p><p>An updated view of the protected characteristics questionnaire is likely to be published in Autumn 2024.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green more like this
answering member printed Mike Freer more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-20T17:11:57.567Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-20T17:11:57.567Z
answering member
4004
label Biography information for Mike Freer more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this
1695072
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-11more like thismore than 2024-03-11
answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept id 208 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
hansard heading Kurds: Politics and Government more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, what assessment he has made of the implications for his policies of the Iraqi Federal Supreme Court ruling of February 2024 on the removal of 11 quota seats for ethnic and religious minorities within the Kurdistan Region Parliament. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 17820 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-14more like thismore than 2024-03-14
answer text <p>Promotion of the right to Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) is a longstanding priority for the UK. We frequently raise ethnic and religious minorities with the Government of Iraq and Kurdistan Regional Government, calling for greater protection and deeper inclusion in national and local government.</p><p>Although we welcome the announcement that Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) elections will be held on 10 June, we continue to assess the implications of the rulings by the Federal Supreme Court to remove 11 quota seats for ethnic and religious minorities.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Macclesfield more like this
answering member printed David Rutley more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-14T17:10:24.39Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-14T17:10:24.39Z
answering member
4033
label Biography information for David Rutley more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this
1695074
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-11more like thismore than 2024-03-11
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Administration of Justice more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of cases under the single justice procedure were prosecuted in (a) 2021, (b) 2022 and (c) 2023. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 17821 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-14more like thismore than 2024-03-14
answer text <p>The number of defendants dealt with via Single Justice Procedure (SJP) notifications at the magistrates’ courts is published as part of the National Statistics series ‘Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly’. Additionally, this series also provides the total number of defendants dealt with in the magistrates’ court, these can be used to calculate the proportion of SJPs in the magistrates’ caseload.</p><p>The latest published data is available to September 2023 and can be found in Tables T1 &amp; T2 which are accessible by the following link: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-court-statistics-quarterly-july-to-september-2023" target="_blank">Criminal court statistics quarterly: July to September 2023 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk).</a></p> more like this
answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green more like this
answering member printed Mike Freer more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-14T17:06:55.773Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-14T17:06:55.773Z
answering member
4004
label Biography information for Mike Freer more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this
1695075
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-11more like thismore than 2024-03-11
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Administration of Justice more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he has made an assessment of the potential impact of the Equality Act 2010 on legal cases brought forward via the single justice procedure. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 17822 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-14more like thismore than 2024-03-14
answer text <p>The Single Justice Procedure (SJP) was introduced under the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. Prior to the introduction of the procedure, in accordance with the Equalities Act 2010, an equality impact assessment was undertaken in relation to SJP. This concluded that on the basis of the available evidence, the planned change in summary justice would not lead to any positive or negative impact on people with protected characteristics.</p><p> </p><p>HMCTS committed to the Justice Select Committee to collect protected characteristic data in all reform services. This includes protected characteristic data for SJP, which has been monitored since 2023.</p><p> </p><p>The decision to prosecute under SJP is a decision for the prosecutor and not the Government.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green more like this
answering member printed Mike Freer more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-14T17:07:37.74Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-14T17:07:37.74Z
answering member
4004
label Biography information for Mike Freer more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this
1695076
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-11more like thismore than 2024-03-11
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Administration of Justice more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he has made an estimate of the average number of single justice procedure cases magistrates presided over per day in the last 12 months. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 17823 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-14more like thismore than 2024-03-14
answer text <p>There were 251 distinct days in which Single Justice Procedure (SJP) cases were heard in a magistrates’ court between October 2022 and September 2023.</p><p>The latest published data on completed SJP cases is available to September 2023 and can be found in Table T1 which is accessible at the following link: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-court-statistics-quarterly-july-to-september-2023" target="_blank">Criminal court statistics quarterly: July to September 2023 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk).</a></p><p>Based on this information, the average number of SJP cases completed per working day is 3,151. This excludes weekends and the 9 public holidays.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green more like this
answering member printed Mike Freer more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-14T17:08:22.373Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-14T17:08:22.373Z
answering member
4004
label Biography information for Mike Freer more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this
1694652
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-07more like thismore than 2024-03-07
answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept id 208 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
hansard heading Alaa Abdel Fattah more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, what recent estimate he has made of when UK officials will be granted consular access to Alaa Abd el-Fattah. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 17544 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-13more like thismore than 2024-03-13
answer text <p>Ministers and officials continue to raise Mr Alaa Abd El-Fattah's case at the highest levels with the Egyptian government and have been consistently clear in our calls for his release, while continuing to press the need for urgent consular access. The Foreign Secretary most recently raised his case with Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry on 22 February. The Foreign Secretary and Minister of State for the Middle East, Lord (Tariq) Ahmad of Wimbledon, also raised his case with President Sisi and Egyptian Foreign Minister Shoukry on 21 December 2023. The Prime Minister raised Mr El-Fattah's case with President Sisi on 1 December 2023.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Macclesfield more like this
answering member printed David Rutley more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-13T16:28:31.367Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-13T16:28:31.367Z
answering member
4033
label Biography information for David Rutley more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this
1691360
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-02-23more like thismore than 2024-02-23
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Administration of Justice more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps his Department is taking to assess the potential vulnerability of people prosecuted under the single justice procedure. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 15409 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-02-28more like thismore than 2024-02-28
answer text <p>The Government does not intervene in individual cases, including Single Justice Procedure (SJP) cases, which are a matter for the independent judiciary.</p><p> </p><p>SJP is used by a number of approved prosecutors. It is a more proportionate way of dealing with straightforward, uncontested, summary-only non-imprisonable offences. The prosecuting body cannot choose this route for any case which falls outside of these criteria. SJP also cannot be used in cases where a defendant pleads not guilty.</p><p> </p><p>Where a guilty plea is submitted, defendants are able to enter mitigating circumstances, if they wish, alongside their guilty plea, to be considered by the magistrate dealing with their case. Cases where defendants have not responded to a notification that they are being prosecuted may also be dealt with under the SJP.</p><p>For prosecutors, guilty pleas and any entered mitigation are available on the system for them to review as soon as the plea is received online, or as soon as scanned into the system if received by post, however, prosecutors are not required to view this.</p><p> </p><p>Often the defendants’ circumstances and any potential vulnerability are not known until they provide their mitigation. Any mitigation provided under SJP is considered by the magistrate in the same way that it would be in open court. Although prosecutors decide whether to offer defendants the option of having their case dealt with under the SJP, magistrates may refer a case to open court if they think that would be more appropriate rather than continuing under the SJP.</p><p> </p><p>The mitigation provided sometimes suggests that the prosecution may not be in the public interest; a magistrate can then adjourn the case and ask the prosecution to review the mitigation. Alternatively, the magistrate can reduce the penalty imposed and even deal with the case by way of a conditional or absolute discharge. Guidance for magistrates on mitigating factors is provided in the sentencing guidelines.</p><p> </p><p>Support channels are also available to defendants who require clarification of information and processes ranging from web chat or telephone assistance to more intensive face-to-face assistance.</p><p> </p><p>The Government keeps all policies under review and listens to feedback from stakeholders on how they are working.</p>
answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green more like this
answering member printed Mike Freer more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-02-28T16:55:39.277Zmore like thismore than 2024-02-28T16:55:39.277Z
answering member
4004
label Biography information for Mike Freer more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this
1691361
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-02-23more like thismore than 2024-02-23
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Administration of Justice more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of cases under the single justice procedure were not progressed to prosecution because they were deemed to not be in the public interest due to the vulnerability of defendants in each year since 2021. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 15410 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-02-28more like thismore than 2024-02-28
answer text <p>Whilst information on the number of Single Justice Procedure (SJP) cases withdrawn or dismissed is available, we do not hold information on the number of prosecutions not progressed due to not being in the public interest due to the defendants' vulnerability.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green more like this
answering member printed Mike Freer more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-02-28T16:47:46.133Zmore like thismore than 2024-02-28T16:47:46.133Z
answering member
4004
label Biography information for Mike Freer more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this
1691362
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-02-23more like thismore than 2024-02-23
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Administration of Justice more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of cases under the single justice procedure were stopped by magistrates as not being in the public interest in each year since 2021. more like this
tabling member constituency Caerphilly remove filter
tabling member printed
Wayne David more like this
uin 15411 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-02-28more like thismore than 2024-02-28
answer text <p>Magistrates have no powers to stop a prosecution on the grounds that it is not in the public interest. A magistrate can refer a case back to the prosecutor and request that they review their decision to prosecute. We do not hold any data on the number of times that this occurs. Alternatively, the magistrate can reduce the penalty imposed and even deal with the case by way of a conditional or absolute discharge. Guidance for magistrates on mitigating factors is provided in the sentencing guidelines.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green more like this
answering member printed Mike Freer more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-02-28T16:59:22.61Zmore like thismore than 2024-02-28T16:59:22.61Z
answering member
4004
label Biography information for Mike Freer more like this
tabling member
1398
label Biography information for Wayne David more like this