Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1201505
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-06-05
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Migrants: Children more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will publish the instruction to caseworkers that was ordered to be published in paragraph 76(b) of the judgment of W&J v Secretary of State for the Home Department (CO/3036/2019). more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 55705 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-16more like thismore than 2020-06-16
answer text <p>Updated guidance to caseworkers containing this instruction was published on 29 May in line with paragraph 76(b) of the judgment of W&amp;J v Secretary of State for the Home Department: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/family-life-as-a-partner-or-parent-private-life-and-exceptional-circumstance</p> more like this
answering member constituency Torbay more like this
answering member printed Kevin Foster more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-16T08:25:28.16Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-16T08:25:28.16Z
answering member
4451
label Biography information for Kevin Foster more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1201538
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-06-05
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Migrants more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment her department has made of the effect of the No Recourse to Public Funds restrictions on (a) BAME communities and (b) other communities. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 55706 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-10more like thismore than 2020-06-10
answer text <p>The Home Office has published its policy equality statement on the impact of the No Recourse to Public Fund (NRPF) policy on migrants on the 10-year human rights route. It can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/application-for-change-of-conditions-of-leave-to-allow-access-to-public-funds-if-your-circumstances-change.</p><p>The NRPF policy, which is based on the principle that migrants coming to the UK are expected to maintain and support themselves and their families without posing a burden on the UK’s welfare system. NRPF conditions were introduced in the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. Access to benefits and other publicly funded services reflects the strength of a migrant’s connections to the UK and, in the main, only become available to migrants when they have become settled in the UK with indefinite leave to remain.</p><p>People on the 10-year human rights route can apply to have the condition lifted and other groups, such as refugees, are exempt from the condition.</p>
answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
grouped question UIN
55707 more like this
55709 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-10T15:08:43.627Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-10T15:08:43.627Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1201539
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-06-05
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Migrants more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what equality impact assessments her Department has undertaken on the effect of No Recourse to Public Funds’ restrictions in relation to (a) race and (b) other protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 55707 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-10more like thismore than 2020-06-10
answer text <p>The Home Office has published its policy equality statement on the impact of the No Recourse to Public Fund (NRPF) policy on migrants on the 10-year human rights route. It can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/application-for-change-of-conditions-of-leave-to-allow-access-to-public-funds-if-your-circumstances-change.</p><p>The NRPF policy, which is based on the principle that migrants coming to the UK are expected to maintain and support themselves and their families without posing a burden on the UK’s welfare system. NRPF conditions were introduced in the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. Access to benefits and other publicly funded services reflects the strength of a migrant’s connections to the UK and, in the main, only become available to migrants when they have become settled in the UK with indefinite leave to remain.</p><p>People on the 10-year human rights route can apply to have the condition lifted and other groups, such as refugees, are exempt from the condition.</p>
answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
grouped question UIN
55706 more like this
55709 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-10T15:08:43.69Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-10T15:08:43.69Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1201541
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-06-05
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Migrants more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what equality impact assessments her Department has undertaken on people who have been refused access to social security benefits as a result of being subject to No Recourse to Public Funds restrictions with in relation to (a) race and (b) other protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 55708 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-10more like thismore than 2020-06-10
answer text <p><strong> </strong></p><p>I can confirm that there have been no equality impact assessments undertaken. Non-UK nationals and family members who are issued with a residence permit with a NRPF condition are not eligible to access taxpayer-funded benefits such as Universal Credit, Child Benefit or housing assistance for the duration of their leave. Public funds does not include contributions-based benefits and the State Pension. DWP has no powers to award taxpayer-funded benefits to an individual whose Home Office immigration status specifies no recourse to public funds.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-10T13:27:15.83Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-10T13:27:15.83Z
answering member
4105
label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1201542
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-06-05
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Migrants: Health more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what equality impact assessments his Department has undertaken in relation to the effect of No Recourse to Public Funds restrictions on health outcomes by (a) race and (b) other protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 55709 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-10more like thismore than 2020-06-10
answer text <p>The Home Office has published its policy equality statement on the impact of the No Recourse to Public Fund (NRPF) policy on migrants on the 10-year human rights route. It can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/application-for-change-of-conditions-of-leave-to-allow-access-to-public-funds-if-your-circumstances-change.</p><p>The NRPF policy, which is based on the principle that migrants coming to the UK are expected to maintain and support themselves and their families without posing a burden on the UK’s welfare system. NRPF conditions were introduced in the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. Access to benefits and other publicly funded services reflects the strength of a migrant’s connections to the UK and, in the main, only become available to migrants when they have become settled in the UK with indefinite leave to remain.</p><p>People on the 10-year human rights route can apply to have the condition lifted and other groups, such as refugees, are exempt from the condition.</p>
answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
grouped question UIN
55706 more like this
55707 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-10T15:08:43.737Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-10T15:08:43.737Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1201543
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-06-05
answering body
Women and Equalities more like this
answering dept id 31 more like this
answering dept short name Women and Equalities more like this
answering dept sort name Women and Equalities more like this
hansard heading Immigrants: Equality more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what equality impact assessments have been undertaken on the differential effect of No Recourse to Public Funds in relation to (a) race and (b) other protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 55710 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-08-06more like thismore than 2020-08-06
answer text <p>The Home Office reviewed the policy on removing the No Recourse to Public Funds condition in relation to race and other protected characteristics earlier this year. A Policy Equality Statement was published in April and placed on <a href="http://gov.uk/" target="_blank">GOV.UK</a>: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880531/Policy_Equality_Statement__PES__21_April_2020.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880531/Policy_Equality_Statement__PES__21_April_2020.pdf</a></p> more like this
answering member constituency Saffron Walden more like this
answering member printed Kemi Badenoch more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-08-06T08:51:04.627Zmore like thismore than 2020-08-06T08:51:04.627Z
answering member
4597
label Biography information for Kemi Badenoch more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1200564
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-04more like thismore than 2020-06-04
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Belly Mujinga more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions he has had with the British Transport Police on its investigation into the death of Belly Mujinga. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 54933 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-09more like thismore than 2020-06-09
answer text <p>The Secretary of State has not had any discussions with the British Transport Police on their investigation into the death of Belly Mujinga at Victoria Station on 21 March 2020. The investigation is an operational matter for BTP.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Daventry more like this
answering member printed Chris Heaton-Harris more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-09T13:39:23.297Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-09T13:39:23.297Z
answering member
3977
label Biography information for Chris Heaton-Harris more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1200566
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-04more like thismore than 2020-06-04
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Belly Mujinga more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions he has had with the British Transport Police on releasing the CCTV footage of the assault of Belly Mujinga at Victoria Station on 21 March 2020. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 54934 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-09more like thismore than 2020-06-09
answer text <p>The Secretary of State has not had any discussions with the British Transport Police on releasing the CCTV footage of the alleged assault of Belly Mujinga at Victoria Station on 21 March 2020.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Daventry more like this
answering member printed Chris Heaton-Harris more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-09T13:46:04.21Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-09T13:46:04.21Z
answering member
3977
label Biography information for Chris Heaton-Harris more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1200567
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-04more like thismore than 2020-06-04
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Belly Mujinga more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions he has had with the (a) British Transport Police and (b) Crown Prosecution service on the decision by the British Transport Police not to refer the alleged assault of Belly Mujinga at Victoria Station on 21 March 2020 to the Crown Prosecution Service. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 54935 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-09more like thismore than 2020-06-09
answer text <p>The Secretary of State has not had any discussions with either (a) the British Transport Police or (b) the Crown Prosecution Service on the alleged assault of Belly Mujinga at Victoria Station on 21 March 2020. The decision on whether to progress the case is one for BTP.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Daventry more like this
answering member printed Chris Heaton-Harris more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-09T13:49:09.75Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-09T13:49:09.75Z
answering member
3977
label Biography information for Chris Heaton-Harris more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1200640
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-04more like thismore than 2020-06-04
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Driving Licences more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the number of people who qualify to continue driving while waiting for the DVLA to process their application for renewal of their driving licence under Section 88 of The Road Traffic Act 1988 but cannot obtain car insurance coverage due to that situation. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North remove filter
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 54936 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-09more like thismore than 2020-06-09
answer text <p>No figures are available on the number of drivers who continue to drive under the Section 88 provisions of the Road Traffic Act 1988. This is because drivers must consider whether they can meet the relevant criteria.</p><p> </p><p>Insurance cover in these circumstances would be a matter for the driver and their insurer.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Redditch more like this
answering member printed Rachel Maclean more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-09T15:06:52.947Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-09T15:06:52.947Z
answering member
4668
label Biography information for Rachel Maclean more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this