Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

731709

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Surgery: Waiting Lists
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment has been made of the potential effect on waiting times for operations of the capped expenditure process.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	650
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/06/2017 answer text <p>The National Health Service and wider health system has examined how to sustain and improve care – which produced the NHS Five Year Forward View. The Government committed to providing an additional £10 billion in real terms by 2020-21 to back the NHS’ plan, enabling it to deliver key priorities like seven day care, improved access to cancer treatments and better mental health services.</p><p> </p><p>All public services, including local NHS areas need to live within the budget agreed – otherwise they effectively take up resources that could be spent on general practitioners, mental health care, and cancer treatment. As part of their financial planning, NHS England and NHS Improvement have been running a process to look at how a small number of areas could do more to balance their financial plans, as many already have.</p><p> </p><p>The NHS is required to meet its operational standards as set out in the mandate and ensure access to appropriate care for all, in line with the NHS constitution. It is right that the NHS should consider efficiency savings such as reducing delayed transfers of care, reducing running costs, or reviewing treatments that are of low clinical effectiveness – because this improves patient care overall.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 651 652 653 852 question first answered 27/06/2017 14:25:29 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

731710

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	NHS: Finance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has been made of the number of patients potentially affected by the capped expenditure process.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	651
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/06/2017 answer text <p>The National Health Service and wider health system has examined how to sustain and improve care – which produced the NHS Five Year Forward View. The Government committed to providing an additional £10 billion in real terms by 2020-21 to back the NHS’ plan, enabling it to deliver key priorities like seven day care, improved access to cancer treatments and better mental health services.</p><p> </p><p>All public services, including local NHS areas need to live within the budget agreed – otherwise they effectively take up resources that could be spent on general practitioners, mental health care, and cancer treatment. As part of their financial planning, NHS England and NHS Improvement have been running a process to look at how a small number of areas could do more to balance their financial plans, as many already have.</p><p> </p><p>The NHS is required to meet its operational standards as set out in the mandate and ensure access to appropriate care for all, in line with the NHS constitution. It is right that the NHS should consider efficiency savings such as reducing delayed transfers of care, reducing running costs, or reviewing treatments that are of low clinical effectiveness – because this improves patient care overall.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 650 652 653 852 question first answered 27/06/2017 14:25:29 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

731711

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	NHS: Finance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what role he has played in identifying areas due to be subject to the capped expenditure process.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	652
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/06/2017 answer text <p>The National Health Service and wider health system has examined how to sustain and improve care – which produced the NHS Five Year Forward View. The Government committed to providing an additional £10 billion in real terms by 2020-21 to back the NHS’ plan, enabling it to deliver key priorities like seven day care, improved access to cancer treatments and better mental health services.</p><p> </p><p>All public services, including local NHS areas need to live within the budget agreed – otherwise they effectively take up resources that could be spent on general practitioners, mental health care, and cancer treatment. As part of their financial planning, NHS England and NHS Improvement have been running a process to look at how a small number of areas could do more to balance their financial plans, as many already have.</p><p> </p><p>The NHS is required to meet its operational standards as set out in the mandate and ensure access to appropriate care for all, in line with the NHS constitution. It is right that the NHS should consider efficiency savings such as reducing delayed transfers of care, reducing running costs, or reviewing treatments that are of low clinical effectiveness – because this improves patient care overall.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 650 651 653 852 question first answered 27/06/2017 14:25:29 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

731712

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	NHS: Finance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what public consultation has taken place on the capped expenditure process.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	653
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/06/2017 answer text <p>The National Health Service and wider health system has examined how to sustain and improve care – which produced the NHS Five Year Forward View. The Government committed to providing an additional £10 billion in real terms by 2020-21 to back the NHS’ plan, enabling it to deliver key priorities like seven day care, improved access to cancer treatments and better mental health services.</p><p> </p><p>All public services, including local NHS areas need to live within the budget agreed – otherwise they effectively take up resources that could be spent on general practitioners, mental health care, and cancer treatment. As part of their financial planning, NHS England and NHS Improvement have been running a process to look at how a small number of areas could do more to balance their financial plans, as many already have.</p><p> </p><p>The NHS is required to meet its operational standards as set out in the mandate and ensure access to appropriate care for all, in line with the NHS constitution. It is right that the NHS should consider efficiency savings such as reducing delayed transfers of care, reducing running costs, or reviewing treatments that are of low clinical effectiveness – because this improves patient care overall.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 650 651 652 852 question first answered 27/06/2017 14:25:29 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

731713

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Cabinet Office
answering dept id	53
answering dept short name	Cabinet Office
answering dept sort name	Cabinet Office
hansard heading	House of Lords: Reform
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what his policy is on reform of the House of Lords.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	613
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/06/2017 answer text <p>As set out in the Conservative manifesto, although comprehensive reform is not a priority, we are committed to ensure that the House of Lords continues to fulfil its constitutional role as a revising and scrutinising chamber which respects the primacy of the House of Commons. We will continue to work to ensure the work of the House of Lords remains relevant and effective by addressing issues such as its size.</p> answering member constituency Kingswood answering member printed Chris Skidmore question first answered 28/06/2017 16:11:37 answering member 4021 label Biography information for Chris Skidmore
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

731714

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Cabinet Office
answering dept id	53
answering dept short name	Cabinet Office
answering dept sort name	Cabinet Office
hansard heading	Constituencies
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what his policy is on the 2018 constituency boundary review.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	614
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/06/2017 answer text <p>The Government's manifesto re-affirms the commitment to deliver equal and updated boundaries and reduce the size of the House of Commons.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Following laws already passed by Parliament, the independent and impartial Boundary Commissions are consulting on their proposals to deliver the boundary changes, and they will submit their final proposals to Parliament in autumn 2018. These reforms will ensure fair and equal representation for the voting public across the United Kingdom.</p><p> </p><p>Equalising the size of constituencies in the Boundary Review will ensure everyone’s vote will carry equal weight. Without such boundary reforms, MPs could end up representing constituencies based on data that is over 20 years’ old, disregarding significant changes in demographics, house building and migration.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Kingswood answering member printed Chris Skidmore question first answered 29/06/2017 15:53:42 answering member 4021 label Biography information for Chris Skidmore
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

731715

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	NHS: Buildings
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of income to be received by the NHS in each of the next five years as a result of the implementation of the Naylor Review.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	824
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/06/2017 answer text <p>NHS Property and Estates: why the estate matters for patients (the Naylor Review) is an independent report prepared for the Department and published on 31 March 2017. The report is available on the Department’s website at:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-property-and-estates-naylor-review" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-property-and-estates-naylor-review</a></p><p> </p><p>Recognising that the estate is critical to the delivery of National Health Service services as well as one of its largest assets and drivers of cost, the Review sets out a number of recommendations for how the NHS estate can be better utilised in a way that both:</p><p> </p><p>- supports the delivery of high quality, modern services for patients as envisaged in the NHS’s own plan for change, the Five Year Forward View; and</p><p>- maximises value for taxpayers by releasing land and buildings that it no longer needs or uses, and reinvesting the proceeds into new or updated facilities that are more suited to the delivery of modern clinical services.</p><p> </p><p>The Government is giving careful consideration to the Review’s recommendations and will respond fully in due course.</p><p> </p><p>The Department has an existing aim to release land no longer required by the NHS sufficient for 26,000 houses and to generate up to £2 billion of proceeds for reinvestment in healthcare facilities and services. The Review and its recommendations aim to support delivery of this and the Review flagged the longer term potential for going further.</p><p> </p><p>It is important to stress that the requirements for beds and other healthcare capacity are driven by local plans developed by sustainability and transformation plans. The Review is focussed on how best to support the development of an estate which meets these needs and supports best value for money for taxpayers through the most efficient use of the NHS estate, including where local clinical plans identify estate that is no longer required for health services.</p><p> </p><p>NHS organisations are under a legal duty to consult local people and communities on proposals to make substantial changes to the services that they provide to patients.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 823 825 826 827 question first answered 29/06/2017 15:55:38 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

731716

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	NHS: Buildings
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will make it a requirement that local trusts consult with staff, patients and the public on the consequences of the implementation of the Naylor Review for local committees.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	825
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/06/2017 answer text <p>NHS Property and Estates: why the estate matters for patients (the Naylor Review) is an independent report prepared for the Department and published on 31 March 2017. The report is available on the Department’s website at:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-property-and-estates-naylor-review" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-property-and-estates-naylor-review</a></p><p> </p><p>Recognising that the estate is critical to the delivery of National Health Service services as well as one of its largest assets and drivers of cost, the Review sets out a number of recommendations for how the NHS estate can be better utilised in a way that both:</p><p> </p><p>- supports the delivery of high quality, modern services for patients as envisaged in the NHS’s own plan for change, the Five Year Forward View; and</p><p>- maximises value for taxpayers by releasing land and buildings that it no longer needs or uses, and reinvesting the proceeds into new or updated facilities that are more suited to the delivery of modern clinical services.</p><p> </p><p>The Government is giving careful consideration to the Review’s recommendations and will respond fully in due course.</p><p> </p><p>The Department has an existing aim to release land no longer required by the NHS sufficient for 26,000 houses and to generate up to £2 billion of proceeds for reinvestment in healthcare facilities and services. The Review and its recommendations aim to support delivery of this and the Review flagged the longer term potential for going further.</p><p> </p><p>It is important to stress that the requirements for beds and other healthcare capacity are driven by local plans developed by sustainability and transformation plans. The Review is focussed on how best to support the development of an estate which meets these needs and supports best value for money for taxpayers through the most efficient use of the NHS estate, including where local clinical plans identify estate that is no longer required for health services.</p><p> </p><p>NHS organisations are under a legal duty to consult local people and communities on proposals to make substantial changes to the services that they provide to patients.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 823 824 826 827 question first answered 29/06/2017 15:55:38 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

731717

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	NHS: Buildings
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of the amount of publicly owned land that will be released to the private sector as a result of implementation of the Naylor Review.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	826
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/06/2017 answer text <p>NHS Property and Estates: why the estate matters for patients (the Naylor Review) is an independent report prepared for the Department and published on 31 March 2017. The report is available on the Department’s website at:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-property-and-estates-naylor-review" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-property-and-estates-naylor-review</a></p><p> </p><p>Recognising that the estate is critical to the delivery of National Health Service services as well as one of its largest assets and drivers of cost, the Review sets out a number of recommendations for how the NHS estate can be better utilised in a way that both:</p><p> </p><p>- supports the delivery of high quality, modern services for patients as envisaged in the NHS’s own plan for change, the Five Year Forward View; and</p><p>- maximises value for taxpayers by releasing land and buildings that it no longer needs or uses, and reinvesting the proceeds into new or updated facilities that are more suited to the delivery of modern clinical services.</p><p> </p><p>The Government is giving careful consideration to the Review’s recommendations and will respond fully in due course.</p><p> </p><p>The Department has an existing aim to release land no longer required by the NHS sufficient for 26,000 houses and to generate up to £2 billion of proceeds for reinvestment in healthcare facilities and services. The Review and its recommendations aim to support delivery of this and the Review flagged the longer term potential for going further.</p><p> </p><p>It is important to stress that the requirements for beds and other healthcare capacity are driven by local plans developed by sustainability and transformation plans. The Review is focussed on how best to support the development of an estate which meets these needs and supports best value for money for taxpayers through the most efficient use of the NHS estate, including where local clinical plans identify estate that is no longer required for health services.</p><p> </p><p>NHS organisations are under a legal duty to consult local people and communities on proposals to make substantial changes to the services that they provide to patients.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 823 824 825 827 question first answered 29/06/2017 15:55:38 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

731718

registered interest
date	22/06/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	NHS: Buildings
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of trends in the number of beds available as a result of the implementation of the Naylor Review.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	827
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/06/2017 answer text <p>NHS Property and Estates: why the estate matters for patients (the Naylor Review) is an independent report prepared for the Department and published on 31 March 2017. The report is available on the Department’s website at:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-property-and-estates-naylor-review" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-property-and-estates-naylor-review</a></p><p> </p><p>Recognising that the estate is critical to the delivery of National Health Service services as well as one of its largest assets and drivers of cost, the Review sets out a number of recommendations for how the NHS estate can be better utilised in a way that both:</p><p> </p><p>- supports the delivery of high quality, modern services for patients as envisaged in the NHS’s own plan for change, the Five Year Forward View; and</p><p>- maximises value for taxpayers by releasing land and buildings that it no longer needs or uses, and reinvesting the proceeds into new or updated facilities that are more suited to the delivery of modern clinical services.</p><p> </p><p>The Government is giving careful consideration to the Review’s recommendations and will respond fully in due course.</p><p> </p><p>The Department has an existing aim to release land no longer required by the NHS sufficient for 26,000 houses and to generate up to £2 billion of proceeds for reinvestment in healthcare facilities and services. The Review and its recommendations aim to support delivery of this and the Review flagged the longer term potential for going further.</p><p> </p><p>It is important to stress that the requirements for beds and other healthcare capacity are driven by local plans developed by sustainability and transformation plans. The Review is focussed on how best to support the development of an estate which meets these needs and supports best value for money for taxpayers through the most efficient use of the NHS estate, including where local clinical plans identify estate that is no longer required for health services.</p><p> </p><p>NHS organisations are under a legal duty to consult local people and communities on proposals to make substantial changes to the services that they provide to patients.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 823 824 825 826 question first answered 29/06/2017 15:55:38 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders