Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

717210
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-04-03more like thismore than 2017-04-03
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Primodos remove filter
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord O’Shaughnessy on 28 March (HL6261), whether they will meet with Marie Lyon and representatives of the Primodos victims support group. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL6511 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-06more like thismore than 2017-04-06
answer text <p>One of the terms of reference of the Expert Working Group on Hormonal Pregnancy Tests is to consider what lessons may be learnt for further improving existing regulatory systems to identify, monitor and minimise any adverse effects of medicines in pregnancy. The regulatory, legal and social landscape has changed significantly since hormonal pregnancy tests were on the market; many of these changes have been driven by previous experience. The Group will consider the processes and tools that were available to the United Kingdom regulator when hormonal pregnancy tests were on the market and make recommendations for any changes necessary to further improve the capability of current regulatory systems to identify, monitor and minimise any adverse effects of medicines in pregnancy. This will include all aspects of medicines regulation, from the assessment of safety pre-authorisation to communication of an identified risk.</p><p>There has been continued engagement with the Association for Children Damaged by Hormonal Pregnancy Tests throughout the Expert Working Group review process. I am meeting the All Party Parliamentary Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests and representatives of the Association in the near future.</p>
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
grouped question UIN HL6515 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-06T11:03:19.49Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-06T11:03:19.49Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool remove filter
714920
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-03-29more like thisremove minimum value filter
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Primodos remove filter
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord O’Shaughnessy on 28 March (HL6261), whether the Expert Working Group on Hormonal Pregnancy Tests will review the reasons why tests on Primodos, which remained on the market until 1978 despite the publication of a study in 1967 indicating a causal relationship between hormonal pregnancy tests and congenital abnormalities, were not ordered by the Committee for the Safety of Medicines under the Medicines Act 1971. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL6408 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-04-06more like thismore than 2017-04-06
answer text <p>The terms of reference of the Expert Working Group on Hormonal Pregnancy Tests are focused on a scientific review of the strength of evidence for a possible association between exposure in pregnancy to hormonal pregnancy tests and adverse outcomes in pregnancy. An important part of the Group’s work is to consider what lessons may be learnt for further improving existing regulatory systems to identify, monitor and minimise any adverse effects of medicines in pregnancy.</p><p>Records show that the Committee on Safety of Drugs (subsequently the Committee on Safety of Medicines) carefully considered the results of the 1967 study and considered the methodology to be flawed.</p><p>In 1969, the Committee on Safety of Drugs requested the manufacturers of hormonal pregnancy tests to provide all relevant laboratory data and initiated their own long-term study of maternal drug histories in mothers of children with birth defects. In 1970, the Standing Committee on the Classification of Proprietary Medicines (the ‘MacGregor Committee’) asked Schering, the then licence holder, to remove ‘diagnosis of pregnancy’ from the indications for Primodos.</p>
answering member printed Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-04-06T10:56:01.147Zmore like thismore than 2017-04-06T10:56:01.147Z
answering member
4545
label Biography information for Lord O'Shaughnessy more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool remove filter