Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

92101

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Attorney General
answering dept id	88
answering dept short name	Attorney General
answering dept sort name	Attorney General
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Attorney General, how many officials in the Law Officers' Departments of each (a) gender, (b) ethnicity and (c) age received the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System's (i) exceeded, (ii) met and (iii) must improve performance mark in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209473
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>The following tables contain the information requested for officials in the Law Officers’ Departments who received a performance appraisal in the 2013-14 reporting year. Ethnicity data is based on confidential voluntary declarations and therefore only covers staff who have chosen to make such a declaration.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Crown Prosecution Service <sup>1</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Gender</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Exceeded</strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Achieved</strong></p><p><strong>(Met)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Not Achieved</strong></p><p><strong>(Must Improve)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>474</p></td><td><p>3225</p></td><td><p>57</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>263</p></td><td><p>1675</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Ethnicity</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Exceeded</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Achieved</strong></p><p><strong>(Met)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Not Achieved</strong></p><p><strong>(Must Improve)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>BME</p></td><td><p>92</p></td><td><p>762</p></td><td><p>35</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>562</p></td><td><p>3513</p></td><td><p>47</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Exceeded</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Achieved</strong></p><p><strong>(Met)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Not Achieved</strong></p><p><strong>(Must Improve)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>16-19</strong></p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>20-29</strong></p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>320</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>30-39</strong></p></td><td><p>187</p></td><td><p>1162</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>40-49</strong></p></td><td><p>302</p></td><td><p>1887</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>50-59</strong></p></td><td><p>168</p></td><td><p>1275</p></td><td><p>33</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>60-64</strong></p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>171</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>65+</strong></p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong><sup>1.</sup></strong> <em>The source data has been extracted from the CPS e-PDR database using the base data report of 29/09/14. Consequent change to data input may mean that this data will change at some point in the future.</em></p><p> </p><p><em>* Staff</em><em> numbers which are less than five have been suppressed to preserve staff confidentiality.</em></p><p> </p><p><em> </em></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Treasury Solicitor’s Department <sup>1</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Gender</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Exceeded</strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Met</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Must Improve</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>232</p></td><td><p>525</p></td><td><p>27</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>337</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Ethnicity</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Exceeded</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Met</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Must Improve</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Asian/Asian British</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>62</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Black/African/Carib</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>64</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mixed/multiple ethnic</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other Ethnic</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>183</p></td><td><p>371</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Exceeded</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Met</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Must Improve</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>16-24</strong></p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>25-29</strong></p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>30-34</strong></p></td><td><p>79</p></td><td><p>125</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>35-39</strong></p></td><td><p>64</p></td><td><p>159</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>40-44</strong></p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>143</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>45-49</strong></p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>50-54</strong></p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>104</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>55-59</strong></p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>46</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>60-64</strong></p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>65+</strong></p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><em><sup>1.</sup></em> <em>Tsol data also covers staff employed by the Attorney General’s Office and HMCPSI.</em></p><p> </p><p><em>* Staff</em><em> numbers which are less than five have been suppressed to preserve staff confidentiality.</em></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Serious Fraud Office<sup>1</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Gender</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Outstanding</strong></p><p><strong>(Exceeded)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Effective</strong></p><p><strong>(Met)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Unsatisfactory</strong></p><p><strong>(Must Improve)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>37</p></td><td><p>116</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Ethnicity</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Outstanding</strong></p><p><strong>(Exceeded)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Effective</strong></p><p><strong>(Met)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Unsatisfactory</strong></p><p><strong>(Must Improve)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>BME</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>108</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Age</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Outstanding</strong></p><p><strong>(Exceeded)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Effective</strong></p><p><strong>(Met)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Unsatisfactory</strong></p><p><strong>(Must Improve)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>25 or under</strong></p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>26-35</strong></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>36-45</strong></p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>61</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>46-55</strong></p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>56+</strong></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><em>* Staff</em><em> numbers which are less than five have been suppressed to preserve staff confidentiality.</em></p><p><strong><br> </strong></p> answering member constituency South Swindon answering member printed Mr Robert Buckland question first answered 14/10/2014 14:36:41 answering member 4106 label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92104

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Attorney General
answering dept id	88
answering dept short name	Attorney General
answering dept sort name	Attorney General
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Attorney General, how many officials in the Law Officers' Departments who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209621
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>The following tables contain the information requested for officials in the Law Officers’ Departments who received a performance appraisal in the 2013-14 reporting year. Disability data is based on confidential voluntary declarations and therefore only covers staff who have chosen to make such a declaration.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Crown Prosecution Service<sup>1</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Exceeded</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Achieved</strong></p><p><strong>(Met)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Not Achieved</strong></p><p><strong>(Must Improve)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Declared - Disabled</strong></p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>311</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Full Time</strong></p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>3601</p></td><td><p>74</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Part Time</strong></p></td><td><p>102</p></td><td><p>1299</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong><sup>1.</sup></strong> <em>The source data has been extracted from the CPS e-PDR database using the base data report of 29/09/14. Consequent change to data input may mean that this data will change at some point in the future.</em></p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><p><strong>Treasury Solicitor’s Department<sup>1</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Exceeded</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Met</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Must Improve</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Declared - Disabled</strong></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>**</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Full Time</strong></p></td><td><p>286</p></td><td><p>658</p></td><td><p>47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Part Time</strong></p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>204</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><em><sup>1.</sup></em> <em>TSol data also covers staff employed by the Attorney General’s Office and HMCPSI.</em></p><p> </p><p><em>** Staff</em><em> numbers which are less than five have been suppressed to preserve staff confidentiality.</em></p><p> </p><p><em> </em></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="4"><strong><br> </strong><p><strong>Serious Fraud Office</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Outstanding</strong></p><p><strong>(Exceeded)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Effective</strong></p><p><strong>(Met)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Unsatisfactory</strong></p><p><strong>(Must Improve)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Declared - Disabled</strong></p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Full Time</strong></p></td><td><p>62</p></td><td><p>177</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Part Time</strong></p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><em>* Staff</em><em> numbers which are less than five have been suppressed to preserve staff confidentiality.</em></p><p> </p> answering member constituency South Swindon answering member printed Mr Robert Buckland question first answered 14/10/2014 14:15:30 answering member 4106 label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92110

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
answering dept id	26
answering dept short name	Business, Innovation and Skills
answering dept sort name	Business, Innovation and Skills
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many officials in his Department of each (a) gender, (b) ethnicity and (c) age received the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System's (i) exceeded, (ii) met and (iii) must improve performance mark in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209472
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>In common with other Government Departments, BIS has three performance management categories, but uses the titles Category 1, Category 2, and Category 3. Category 1 encompasses our high performers, while Category 3 has been expanded, in comparison to other Departments, to place more emphasis on identifying those who have greater learning or development needs and providing them with more focused development opportunities and support, as well as including poor performers.</p><p>It was anticipated that 20 – 25% of BIS staff would fall into the third category during the 2013-14 reporting year.</p><p>The following table shows the number of males and females that were awarded each performance rating during the 2013-14 performance management year.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Category 1</p></td><td><p>Category 2</p></td><td><p>Category 3</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>226</p></td><td><p>618</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>1054</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>260</p></td><td><p>655</p></td><td><p>168</p></td><td><p>1083</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The following table sets out the 2013/14 performance ratings awarded to employees who have declared their ethnicity, and those who have not make a declaration against this characteristic. In order to maintain anonymity, any data for any groups in which less than 5 individuals fall under one category has been suppressed. Analysis of the 2013/14 performance management outcomes is correct for those that have made a declaration, however, diversity declarations are voluntary and are currently low within BIS. Therefore, any attempt to consider these findings as being representative for the Department, as a whole, should be viewed with caution as we are not confident that the data is an accurate reflection for all staff with protected characteristics. This is especially the case when considering ethnicity, as less than 10% of staff have a recorded ethnicity declaration.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Category 1</p></td><td><p>Category 2</p></td><td><p>Category 3</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>64</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>231</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>BME</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>54</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Undeclared</p></td><td><p>414</p></td><td><p>1107</p></td><td><p>327</p></td><td><p>1848</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Prefer not to say</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The following table provides the performance ratings awarded to each age group during the 2013/14 performance management year. In order to maintain anonymity, any data for groups in which less than 5 individuals fall under one category has been suppressed.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Category 1</p></td><td><p>Category 2</p></td><td><p>Category 3</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>20-24</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>25-29</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>163</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>30-34</p></td><td><p>83</p></td><td><p>155</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>261</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>35-39</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>167</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>40-44</p></td><td><p>61</p></td><td><p>165</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>280</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>45-49</p></td><td><p>92</p></td><td><p>249</p></td><td><p>83</p></td><td><p>424</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>50-54</p></td><td><p>64</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>69</p></td><td><p>343</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>55-59</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>144</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>60-64</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>100</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>65 &amp; over</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unspecified</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The current BIS Equality, Diversity and Inclusion strategy aims to improve performance outcomes for minority groups, with particular focus on Black and Minority Ethnic staff, disabled staff and older workers. Various methods are being used to do this, such as mandatory unconscious bias training for managers, a new Reverse Mentoring programme to expose leaders to diversity within BIS and consistency checking and validation processes across directorates for performance ratings.</p> answering member constituency East Dunbartonshire answering member printed Jo Swinson question first answered 14/10/2014 12:50:03 answering member 1513 label Biography information for Jo Swinson
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92111

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
answering dept id	26
answering dept short name	Business, Innovation and Skills
answering dept sort name	Business, Innovation and Skills
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many officials in his Department who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209620
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>In common with other Government Departments, BIS has three performance management categories, but uses the titles Category 1, Category 2, and Category 3. Category 1 encompasses our high performers, while Category 3 has been expanded, in comparison to other Departments, to place more emphasis on identifying those who have greater learning or development needs and providing them with more focused development opportunities and support, as well as including poor performers.</p><p>It was anticipated that 20 – 25% of BIS staff would fall into the third category during the 2013-14 reporting year.</p><p>The following table shows the number of individuals that have declared a disability who were awarded each performance rating in 2013-14 and the number of other staff that received each rating within that performance year. Diversity declarations are voluntary and currently within BIS they are low. Analysis of the 2013/14 performance management outcomes is correct for those that have made a declaration. However, any attempt to consider these findings as being representative for the Department, as a whole, should be viewed with caution as we are not confident that the data is an accurate reflection for staff with protected characteristics.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Number of Individuals</p></td><td><p>Category 1</p></td><td><p>Category 2</p></td><td><p>Category 3</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Those who have declared a disability</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>48</p></td><td><p>162</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>All other staff</p></td><td><p>460</p></td><td><p>1185</p></td><td><p>330</p></td><td><p>1975</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The following table demonstrates the number of individuals that that work part-time and full-time that were awarded each performance rating in 2013-14.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Number of Individuals</p></td><td><p>Category 1</p></td><td><p>Category 2</p></td><td><p>Category 3</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part-time</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>177</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>280</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Full-time</p></td><td><p>428</p></td><td><p>1096</p></td><td><p>333</p></td><td><p>1857</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The current BIS Equality, Diversity and Inclusion strategy aims to improve performance outcomes for minority groups, with particular focus on Black and Minority Ethnic staff, disabled staff and older workers. Various methods are being used to do this, such as mandatory unconscious bias training for managers, a new Reverse Mentoring programme to expose leaders to the diversity within BIS and consistency checking and validation processes across directorates for performance ratings.</p> answering member constituency East Dunbartonshire answering member printed Jo Swinson question first answered 14/10/2014 11:51:30 answering member 1513 label Biography information for Jo Swinson
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92113

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
answering dept id	26
answering dept short name	Business, Innovation and Skills
answering dept sort name	Business, Innovation and Skills
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many officials in his Department completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14; how many and what proportion of those officials received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark; and how many and what proportion (i) did and (ii) did not qualify for a bonus under that process.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209642
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>In common with other Government Departments, BIS uses three performance management categories, but uses the titles Category 1, Category 2, and Category 3. Category 1 encompasses our high performers, while Category 3 has been expanded, in comparison to other Departments, to place more emphasis on identifying those who have greater learning or development needs to enable them to be provided with more focused development opportunities and support, as well as including poor performers.</p><p>It was anticipated that 20 – 25% of BIS staff would fall into the third category during the 2013-14 reporting year.</p><p>The following table provides the number of individuals that were awarded each of these category ratings for the 2013-14 performance year, and the individuals that qualified for the performance award as a result of this.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Category 1</p></td><td><p>Category 2</p></td><td><p>Category 3</p></td><td><p>Total Number</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Completed performance management</p></td><td><p>486 (23%)</p></td><td><p>1273 (60%)</p></td><td><p>378 (18%)</p></td><td><p>2137 (100%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qualified for Performance Award</p></td><td><p>486 (100% of category)</p></td><td><p>0 (0%)</p></td><td><p>0 (0%)</p></td><td><p>486 (23%)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Performance awards at BIS are non-consolidated and non-pensionable. They are used to drive high performance, have to be earned each year against pre-determined objectives and do not add to future pay bills. The payments are entirely related to staff performance, and so were awarded to individuals that had received a Category 1 performance rating following the end of year performance appraisals for 2013-14.</p> answering member constituency East Dunbartonshire answering member printed Jo Swinson question first answered 14/10/2014 11:49:05 answering member 1513 label Biography information for Jo Swinson
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92136

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many officials in his Department of each (a) gender, (b) ethnicity and (c) age received the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System's (i) exceeded, (ii) met and (iii) must improve performance mark in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209492
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>The Treasury is implementing the Civil Service Employee Policy Performance Management System in 2014-15, so the data requested is not available for 2013-14.</p> answering member constituency South Northamptonshire answering member printed Andrea Leadsom question first answered 14/10/2014 15:41:41 answering member 4117 label Biography information for Andrea Leadsom
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92137

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many officials in his Department completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14; how many and what proportion of those officials received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark; and how many and what proportion (i) did and (ii) did not qualify for a bonus under that process.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209661
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>The Treasury is implementing the Civil Service Employee Policy Performance Management System in 2014-15, so the data requested is not available for 2013-14.</p> answering member constituency South Northamptonshire answering member printed Andrea Leadsom question first answered 14/10/2014 15:35:50 answering member 4117 label Biography information for Andrea Leadsom
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92138

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many officials in his Department who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209639
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>The Treasury is implementing the Civil Service Employee Policy Performance Management System in 2014-15, so the data requested is not available for 2013-14.</p> answering member constituency South Northamptonshire answering member printed Andrea Leadsom question first answered 14/10/2014 15:39:04 answering member 4117 label Biography information for Andrea Leadsom
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92152

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Culture Media and Sport
answering dept id	10
answering dept short name	Culture, Media and Sport
answering dept sort name	Culture, Media and Sport
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, how many officials in his Department who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209624
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p><strong>The table sets out the number of employees, within each performance category, who have declared a disability. </strong><strong>The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) takes seriously its obligations to collect diversity data as required by the Equality Act 2010. All staff have been asked to provide personal diversity data to be held anonymously, and we continue to encourage increased declaration by staff. As such these figures will not be fully representative of workforce diversity</strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>i) </strong><strong>Disability</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>DCMS</p></td><td><p>EYR Rating</p></td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td><p>Disability</p></td><td><p><strong>Exceptional</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Good</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Must Improve</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Not disclosed</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>64</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>No</p></td><td><p>52</p></td><td><p>76</p></td><td> </td></tr><tr><td><p>Prefer not to say</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td><p>Yes</p></td><td><p>*</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>*The disclosure of numbers where they amount to fewer than five could enable identification of individuals to whom this information relates. This would amount to a release of their personal data in breach of the Data Protection Act</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>ii)&amp;iii) Full –time/part –time </strong></p><p> </p><p><strong>The following table sets out the number of employees, within each performance category, who work full time or part time.</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>DCMS</p></td><td><p>EYR Rating</p></td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td><p>Part time full time</p></td><td><p><strong>Exceptional</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Good</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Must Improve</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Full Time</p></td><td><p>79</p></td><td><p>138</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part Time</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>*</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>*The disclosure of numbers where they amount to fewer than five could enable identification of individuals to whom this information relates. This would amount to a release of their personal data in breach of the Data Protection Act</p> answering member constituency Maidstone and The Weald answering member printed Mrs Helen Grant question first answered 14/10/2014 16:30:56 answering member 4018 label Biography information for Mrs Helen Grant
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92153

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Culture Media and Sport
answering dept id	10
answering dept short name	Culture, Media and Sport
answering dept sort name	Culture, Media and Sport
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, how many officials in his Department completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14; how many and what proportion of those officials received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark; and how many and what proportion (i) did and (ii) did not qualify for a bonus under that process.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209646
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p><strong>The table sets out the number of employees who completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14; and the proportion of those officials who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark. and how many and what proportion who (i) did and (ii) did not qualify for a bonus.</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>DCMS</p></td><td><p>EYR Rating</p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td><p><strong>Exceptional</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Good</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Must Improve</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Grand Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>87</p></td><td><p>148</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>240</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Percentage</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>62%</p></td><td><p>2%</p></td><td><p>100%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Bonus</p></td><td><p><strong>Eligible</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> Not eligible</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> Grand Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td> </td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>64%</p></td><td><p>100%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency Maidstone and The Weald answering member printed Mrs Helen Grant question first answered 14/10/2014 16:32:29 answering member 4018 label Biography information for Mrs Helen Grant
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey