Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1652278

registered interest
date	12/07/2023
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of court fines have been written back in each year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Croydon North
tabling member printed	Steve Reed
uin	193601
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 17/07/2023 answer text <p>Financial penalties imposed by the courts will often consist of multiple elements including, amongst others, compensation, victim surcharge, prosecutor’s costs and a fine.</p><p>The Government takes the recovery and enforcement of all financial impositions very seriously and remains committed to ensuring impositions are paid. The courts will do everything within their powers to trace those who do not pay and use a variety of sanctions to ensure the recovery of criminal fines and financial penalties.</p><p>In very limited scenarios, HMCTS may decide to administratively write-off the debt, the circumstances in which this can happen are severely restricted and occur only when there is no opportunity for the debt to be collected, for example, when a company has been dissolved with no distributable assets. The debt is written off for administrative purposes only, the imposition is still legally enforceable and if in the future it becomes apparent that assets are available to pay the debt then the account is written back. In 2016-17, HMCTS commenced a project to enforce accounts that had previously been written off, this resulted in a period of three financial years where a large number of accounts were written back. There also remain specific and limited situations where the Court can legally cancel any debt.</p><p>The table below details the estimated volume and value of the fine element of an imposition that has been administratively written back for each financial year from 2013-14 to 2022-23. Data is not readily available prior to 2013.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Financial Year</p></td><td><p>Estimated volume of accounts (estimated due to complexity of consolidated accounts)</p></td><td><p>Value of fine accounts written back £</p></td><td><p>Value of fine accounts written off £</p></td><td><p>Value of fines written back as percentage of amounts written off in year</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022-23</p></td><td><p>1,888</p></td><td><p>605,307</p></td><td><p>12,748,036</p></td><td><p>4.7%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021-22</p></td><td><p>1,974</p></td><td><p>616,156</p></td><td><p>9,096,490</p></td><td><p>6.8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020-21</p></td><td><p>1,584</p></td><td><p>645,262</p></td><td><p>9,411,764</p></td><td><p>6.8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019-20</p></td><td><p>2,986</p></td><td><p>1,480,343</p></td><td><p>10,938,117</p></td><td><p>13.5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018-19</p></td><td><p>69,322</p></td><td><p>16,583,176 – larger value due to historic debt project</p></td><td><p>8,261,350</p></td><td><p>200%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>297,269</p></td><td><p>56,548,650 - larger value due to historic debt project</p></td><td><p>12,107,194</p></td><td><p>467%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>Data not currently available</p></td><td><p>20,782,112- larger value due to historic debt project</p></td><td><p>3,057,882</p></td><td><p>679%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>Data not currently available</p></td><td><p>7,854,674</p></td><td><p>37,582,739</p></td><td><p>20.9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>Data not currently available</p></td><td><p>2,457,203</p></td><td><p>47,801,989</p></td><td><p>5.1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>Data not currently available</p></td><td><p>2,292,379</p></td><td><p>70,505,888</p></td><td><p>3.2%</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer question first answered 17/07/2023 11:20:06 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
tabling member	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed

1610394

registered interest
date	14/04/2023
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of court fines issued have been collected in each year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Croydon North
tabling member printed	Steve Reed
uin	180527
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/04/2023 answer text <p>The table below details the percentage of a fine collected each year from 2011-12 to 2021-22.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="12"><p>Amount collected in financial year</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Year fine was issued</p></td><td><p>Amount imposed</p></td><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>2018-19</p></td><td><p>2019-20</p></td><td><p>2020-21</p></td><td><p>2021-22</p></td><td><p>Total collected</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>£000</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>188,530</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>193,897</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>82</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>190,728</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>84</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>213,611</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>81</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>263,763</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>79</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>362,490</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>74</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>355,773</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>48</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>79</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018-19</p></td><td><p>329,679</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019-20</p></td><td><p>316,219</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020-21</p></td><td><p>217,479</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021-22</p></td><td><p>746,470</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Financial penalties imposed by the courts will often consist of multiple elements including, amongst others, compensation, victim surcharge, prosecutor’s costs and a fine. The imposition is enforced as a whole, and any receipts received are applied to the offender’s account in accordance with a strict legal hierarchy. This ensures that the victims receive any monies they are due first, with the fine element being the last to be collected. This can result in the fine element taking longer to be paid.</p><p>Defendants may be allowed to pay their financial penalty through an attachment of earnings/benefits. For defendants who have multiple impositions, which have often been imposed over a period of years, the impositions are all consolidated into one account and a payment plan agreed for the total balance. This can result in an imposition taking a longer period of time to collect. The defendant will not necessarily be in default as their regular contributions will be paying off their compensation, victim surcharge and costs elements first.</p><p>On average, by the time a financial penalty is 5 years old 80% of the total imposition will have been collected.</p><p>This Government takes the recovery and enforcement of financial impositions very seriously and remains committed to ensuring impositions are paid. The courts will do everything within their powers to trace those who do not pay and use a variety of means to ensure the recovery of criminal fines and financial penalties. Money can be deducted from an offender's earnings or benefits and warrants can be issued instructing approved enforcement agents to seize and sell goods belonging to the offender. Ultimately an offender can be imprisoned for non-payment of their fine.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer question first answered 24/04/2023 14:55:48 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
tabling member	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed

1604612

registered interest
date	15/03/2023
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what estimate he has made of the average sum court fines issued in each year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Croydon North
tabling member printed	Steve Reed
uin	166244
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 20/03/2023 answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice publishes information on average fine amounts issued at all courts in England and Wales between 2010 and 2021 across the following data tools:</p><ul><li>2010-2016: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1063880/outcomes-by-offence-2020-revised.xlsx" target="_blank">Outcomes by Offence data tool: December 2020</a>.</li><li>2017-2021: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1113400/outcomes-by-offence-tool-2021-revised-2.xlsx" target="_blank">Outcomes by Offence data tool: December 2021</a>.</li></ul><p>The average fine amount issued at courts has increased between 2010 and 2021, from £223 in 2010 to £497 in 2021.</p><p>This information for the annual year of 2022 is due for publication in May 2023.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer question first answered 20/03/2023 15:12:49 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
tabling member	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed

1586307

registered interest
date	17/02/2023
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what estimate he has made of the total value of court fines that have not been paid in each year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Croydon North
tabling member printed	Steve Reed
uin	146983
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 07/03/2023 answer text <p>The table below details the balance of fine impositions outstanding for each financial year from 2010-11 to 2021-22, along with the amount of the original fine impositions made:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Financial year fine was imposed</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Fine impositions made in the financial year</strong> <strong>£000</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Balance of fine outstanding as at 31 March 2022</strong> <strong>£000</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2010-11</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>210,010</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>7,507</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2011-12</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>188,530</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>8,262</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2012-13</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>193,897</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10,201</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2013-14</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>190,728</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>12,743</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2014-15</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>213,611</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>22,947</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>263,763</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>43,339</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016-17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>362,490</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>56,527</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017-18</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>355,773</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>97,723</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2018-19</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>329,679</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>100,096</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2019-20</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>316,219</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>127,297</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2020-21</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>217,479</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>118,190</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2021-22</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>746,470</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274,842</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Financial penalties imposed by the courts will often consist of multiple elements including, amongst others, compensation, victim surcharge, prosecutor’s costs and a fine. The imposition is enforced as a whole, and any receipts received are applied to the offender’s account in accordance with a strict legal hierarchy. This ensures that the victims receive any monies they are due first, with the fine element being the last to be collected. This can result in the fine element taking longer to be paid.</p><p>Defendants may be allowed to pay their financial penalty through an attachment of earnings/benefits. For defendants who have multiple impositions, which have often been imposed over a period of years, the impositions are all consolidated into one account and a payment plan agreed for the total balance. This can result in an imposition taking a longer period of time to collect. The defendant will not necessarily be in default as their regular contributions will be paying off their compensation, victim surcharge and costs elements first.</p><p>On average, by the time a financial penalty is 5 years old 80% of the total imposition will have been collected. This is therefore the why outstanding fines appear to be significantly higher in recent years.</p><p>The Government takes the recovery and enforcement of all financial impositions very seriously and remains committed to ensuring impositions are paid. The courts will do everything within their powers to trace those who do not pay and use a variety of sanctions to ensure the recovery of criminal fines and financial penalties. These sanctions can include deducting money from an individual offender’s earnings or benefits, if they are unemployed, or issuing warrants instructing approved enforcement agents to seize and sell goods belonging to the offender. If the offender does not pay as ordered and the money cannot be recovered by other means, then the court can take other actions which includes sending them to prison for non-payment of the financial penalty including a fine.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer question first answered 07/03/2023 09:42:16 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
tabling member	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed

1586308

registered interest
date	17/02/2023
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what estimate he has made of the total value of court fines that have been written off in each year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Croydon North
tabling member printed	Steve Reed
uin	146984
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/02/2023 answer text <p>The table below details the net value of the fine element of an imposition that has been administratively written off/ (written back) for each financial year from 2010-11 to 2021-22. Judicial cancellations are not included as these are a direct instruction from the court to amend the value of the imposition.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Financial year</p></td><td><p>Net fine impositions written off/ (written back) in each year £000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>38,685</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>48,802</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>53,663</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>68,214</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>45,345</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>29,728</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>(17,728)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>(44,441)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018-19</p></td><td><p>(8,332)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019-20</p></td><td><p>9,458</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020-21</p></td><td><p>8,797</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021-22</p></td><td><p>8,480</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Financial penalties imposed by the courts will often consist of multiple elements including, amongst others, compensation, victim surcharge, prosecutor’s costs and a fine.</p><p> </p><p>The Government takes the recovery and enforcement of all financial impositions very seriously and remains committed to ensuring impositions are paid. The courts will do everything within their powers to trace those who do not pay and use a variety of sanctions to ensure the recovery of criminal fines and financial penalties.</p><p> </p><p>In very limited scenarios HMCTS may decide to administratively write-off the debt, the circumstances in which this can happen are severely restricted and occur only when there is no opportunity for the debt to be collected, for example, when a company has been dissolved with no distributable assets. The debt is written off for administrative purposes only, the imposition is still legally enforceable and if in the future it becomes apparent that assets are available to pay the debt then the account is written back. In 2016-17, HMCTS commenced a project to enforce accounts that had previously been written off, this resulted in a period of three financial years where a large number of accounts were written back. There also remain specific and limited situations where the Court can legally cancel any debt.</p> answering member constituency Finchley and Golders Green answering member printed Mike Freer question first answered 27/02/2023 15:47:16 answering member 4004 label Biography information for Mike Freer
tabling member	4268 label Biography information for Steve Reed

1438521

registered interest
date	07/03/2022
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many individual offenders were issued attachment of earnings orders as a way of enforcing a court fine in (1) 2016, (2) 2017, (3) 2018, (4) 2019, and (5) 2020.
tabling member printed	Lord Wasserman
uin	HL6704
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/03/2022 answer text <p>Central data does not exist in respect of the total number of Attachments of Earnings Orders issued in respect of financial penalties imposed by the criminal courts. It would incur disproportionate costs to answer this question.</p> answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar question first answered 21/03/2022 16:29:55 answering member 4901 label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
tabling member	4207 label Biography information for Lord Wasserman

1438522

registered interest
date	07/03/2022
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many individual offenders were issued deduction from benefit orders as a way of enforcing a court fine in (1) 2016, (2) 2017, (3) 2018, (4) 2019, and (5) 2020.
tabling member printed	Lord Wasserman
uin	HL6705
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/03/2022 answer text <p>Central data does not exist in respect of the total number of Deduction from Benefit Orders issued in respect of financial penalties imposed by the criminal courts. It would incur disproportionate costs to answer this question.</p> answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar question first answered 21/03/2022 16:30:24 answering member 4901 label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
tabling member	4207 label Biography information for Lord Wasserman

1438524

registered interest
date	07/03/2022
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many individual offenders were issued distress warrants as a way of enforcing a court fine in (1) 2016, (2) 2017, (3) 2018, (4) 2019, and (5) 2020.
tabling member printed	Lord Wasserman
uin	HL6706
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/03/2022 answer text <p>In 2016/17, 590,649 warrants of control (previously referred to as distress warrants) were issued in respect of financial penalties imposed by the criminal courts. Verifiable centralised records do not exist beyond this date and it would incur disproportionate costs to answer this question.</p> answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar question first answered 21/03/2022 16:30:37 answering member 4901 label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
tabling member	4207 label Biography information for Lord Wasserman

1438525

registered interest
date	07/03/2022
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many individual offenders were issued attendance centre orders as a way of enforcing a court fine in (1) 2016, (2) 2017, (3) 2018, (4) 2019, and (5) 2020.
tabling member printed	Lord Wasserman
uin	HL6707
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/03/2022 answer text <p>The table provided below shows the number of cases heard in the magistrates’ court that resulted in a specific code to signal that an Attendance Centre Order (ACO) had been made in default of a financial penalty imposed by the criminal courts. It is possible that further ACOs were made that did not utilise this code. In respect of the data provided we are not able to say how many of these were made specifically in relation to fines (as opposed to other financial penalties<em>).</em></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>ACO</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar question first answered 21/03/2022 16:41:52 answering member 4901 label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
tabling member	4207 label Biography information for Lord Wasserman

1438527

registered interest
date	07/03/2022
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Fines
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many individual offenders were committed to prison as a way of enforcing a court fine in (1) 2016, (2) 2017, (3) 2018, (4) 2019, and (5) 2020.
tabling member printed	Lord Wasserman
uin	HL6708
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/03/2022 answer text <p>The below table provides the number of committals to prison for non-payment of financial penalties imposed by the criminal courts. We are not able to say how many of these were made specifically in relation to fines.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Sentenced* admissions into prison – for non-payment of financial penalties</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>398</p></td><td><p>257</p></td><td><p>163</p></td><td><p>125</p></td><td><p>63</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>* Sentenced admissions provide a count of prisoners that are classified as sentenced (i.e. the custodial punishment has been decided for the offender) following a court hearing for the first time in the reporting period.</p> answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar question first answered 21/03/2022 16:42:10 answering member 4901 label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
tabling member	4207 label Biography information for Lord Wasserman