Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label attachment file name title
tabling member	label

Search

1460405

registered interest
date	26/04/2022
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of extending the salary sacrifice scheme to members of the armed forces to enable them to pay for items such as cars and bikes directly through their payroll.
tabling member constituency	Dudley North
tabling member printed	Marco Longhi
uin	160562
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/04/2022 answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has no plans to introduce salary sacrifice schemes for members of the Armed Forces. However, the MOD continually reviews the overall offer to Service personnel with the aim of making it as attractive as possible, supporting maximum levels of recruitment and retention within available resources.</p> answering member constituency Aldershot answering member printed Leo Docherty question first answered 28/04/2022 09:56:36 answering member 4600 label Biography information for Leo Docherty
tabling member	4789 label Biography information for Marco Longhi

1423217

registered interest
date	18/02/2022
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the terms of reference are for the comprehensive review into military pay.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	125483
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/02/2022 answer text <p>The Comprehensive Review is to examine Armed Forces (Regular and Reserve) terms and conditions of service, and recommend changes required to render them appropriate to the needs of Defence as it delivers the Integrated Operating Concept into the 2040s. The full scope of the Review, including the terms of reference, will be discussed with the Chair of the Review when formally appointed. The review is due to report in spring 2023 and will cover all financial and non-financial aspects of the military offer.</p> answering member constituency Aldershot answering member printed Leo Docherty grouped question UIN 125488 question first answered 28/02/2022 14:23:47 answering member 4600 label Biography information for Leo Docherty
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1423222

registered interest
date	18/02/2022
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when he expects the comprehensive review into military pay to be completed.
tabling member constituency	Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
tabling member printed	Luke Pollard
uin	125488
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/02/2022 answer text <p>The Comprehensive Review is to examine Armed Forces (Regular and Reserve) terms and conditions of service, and recommend changes required to render them appropriate to the needs of Defence as it delivers the Integrated Operating Concept into the 2040s. The full scope of the Review, including the terms of reference, will be discussed with the Chair of the Review when formally appointed. The review is due to report in spring 2023 and will cover all financial and non-financial aspects of the military offer.</p> answering member constituency Aldershot answering member printed Leo Docherty grouped question UIN 125483 question first answered 28/02/2022 14:23:47 answering member 4600 label Biography information for Leo Docherty
tabling member	4682 label Biography information for Luke Pollard

1302563

registered interest
date	15/03/2021
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the average median pay for armed forces personnel will be in 2021-22.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	168831
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/03/2021 answer text <p>In November 2020 my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer set out, as part of the 2020 Spending Review, the rationale behind a public sector pay pause this year. As outlined in the Secretary of State for Defence's recent letter to the Chair of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body, covering Pay Round 2021/22, and as detailed in HM Treasury's earlier Economic Evidence to the Pay Review Bodies 2020/21, the pay pause recognises that public sector pay has been shielded from the pandemic's economic effects. It also serves to protect public sector jobs at this time of crisis whilst ensuring fairness between the public and private sectors. As such, no consideration has been given to the effect of a pay pause on average median pay; the household income of Service personnel; or a comparison with projected rates of inflation.</p> answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View answering member printed Johnny Mercer grouped question UIN 168832 168833 question first answered 18/03/2021 11:32:45 answering member 4485 label Biography information for Johnny Mercer
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

1302564

registered interest
date	15/03/2021
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of the pay freeze on the household income of armed forces personnel in 2021-22.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	168832
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/03/2021 answer text <p>In November 2020 my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer set out, as part of the 2020 Spending Review, the rationale behind a public sector pay pause this year. As outlined in the Secretary of State for Defence's recent letter to the Chair of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body, covering Pay Round 2021/22, and as detailed in HM Treasury's earlier Economic Evidence to the Pay Review Bodies 2020/21, the pay pause recognises that public sector pay has been shielded from the pandemic's economic effects. It also serves to protect public sector jobs at this time of crisis whilst ensuring fairness between the public and private sectors. As such, no consideration has been given to the effect of a pay pause on average median pay; the household income of Service personnel; or a comparison with projected rates of inflation.</p> answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View answering member printed Johnny Mercer grouped question UIN 168831 168833 question first answered 18/03/2021 11:32:45 answering member 4485 label Biography information for Johnny Mercer
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

1302565

registered interest
date	15/03/2021
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what comparative assessment he has made of the armed forces pay increase and the projected rate of inflation in 2021-22.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	168833
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/03/2021 answer text <p>In November 2020 my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer set out, as part of the 2020 Spending Review, the rationale behind a public sector pay pause this year. As outlined in the Secretary of State for Defence's recent letter to the Chair of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body, covering Pay Round 2021/22, and as detailed in HM Treasury's earlier Economic Evidence to the Pay Review Bodies 2020/21, the pay pause recognises that public sector pay has been shielded from the pandemic's economic effects. It also serves to protect public sector jobs at this time of crisis whilst ensuring fairness between the public and private sectors. As such, no consideration has been given to the effect of a pay pause on average median pay; the household income of Service personnel; or a comparison with projected rates of inflation.</p> answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View answering member printed Johnny Mercer grouped question UIN 168831 168832 question first answered 18/03/2021 11:32:45 answering member 4485 label Biography information for Johnny Mercer
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

1302566

registered interest
date	15/03/2021
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the ratio of pay between an officer and a non-officer was in each year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	168834
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 18/03/2021 answer text <p>The requested information can be found it the table below:</p><p><br> <strong>Ratio of median annual salary (average Officer salary relative to average Other Ranks salary) in each year since 2010:</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Date</p></td><td><p>Other Ranks (OR) to Officer (OF) Pay Ratio (OR : OF)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2010</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2011</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2012</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2013</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2014</p></td><td><p>1:1.79</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2015</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2016</p></td><td><p>1:1.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2017</p></td><td><p>1:1.73</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2018</p></td><td><p>1:1.70</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2019</p></td><td><p>1:1.66</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>01/04/2020</p></td><td><p>1:1.70</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p>1. The median average (mid-point of the distribution of personnel within the rank) salaries provided in this response are calculated from the annual salaries for all Regular Officers and Other Ranks as at 1-April each year. This means that the averages are based on salary at that point in the year, not what each Service person will have been paid in total across the year, which may differ, for example due to pay rate changes and promotions. Where there was a promotion within the month of March, the new rank’s rate of pay was used in the calculation.</p><p>2. Median salaries are measured as at 1 April within the financial year. Changes in the medians can therefore reflect both changes in pay rates and changes in the relative distribution of personnel within the rank.</p><p>3. The year-on-year change in average pay should not be interpreted as the growth in pay that an average service person will have experienced. The data purely reflects the change in the median salary over time and it would be unrealistic to assume that an individual's pay would follow this path. Many Service personnel also benefit from an annual increment in addition to any rise recommended by the independent Armed Forces Pay Review Body and, for senior officers, the Senior Salaries Review Body</p><p>4. The pay structure changed significantly with the introduction of Pay 16 which accounts for the large change in ratio in 2017. A simple comparison of medians between years is not possible.</p><p>5. This data uses a different method for calculating the average than the Military Salaries Index (MSI) published in the Quarterly Service Personnel Statistics and are the actual average annual salaries as at April each year.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View answering member printed Johnny Mercer question first answered 18/03/2021 11:33:12 answering member 4485 label Biography information for Johnny Mercer
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

1300291

registered interest
date	08/03/2021
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 24 February 2021 to Question 154826, on Armed Forces: Pay, for what reason the Office of Manpower Economics disagrees with his assessment that the recommendations of the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body have always been accepted by his Department.
tabling member constituency	North Durham
tabling member printed	Mr Kevan Jones
uin	164373
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 11/03/2021 answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence is not aware of any such disagreement and has nothing to add to the Answer provided to Question 154826 on 24 February 2021.</p> answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View answering member printed Johnny Mercer question first answered 11/03/2021 08:33:31 answering member 4485 label Biography information for Johnny Mercer attachment 1 file name Armed Forces pay.docx title 154826 - Armed Forces Pay
tabling member	1438 label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones

1287517

registered interest
date	19/02/2021
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 11 February 2021 to Question 150701 on Armed Forces: Pay, whether his Department has implemented the pay increase recommendations of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body.
tabling member constituency	North Durham
tabling member printed	Mr Kevan Jones
uin	154826
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 24/02/2021 answer text <p>As stated in my answer of 11 February 2021, the recommendations of the Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body (AFPRB) have always been accepted by the Ministry of Defence. The Department has always implemented the AFPRB’s pay increase recommendations, including in 2013 when the 0.5% increase in X-Factor was delivered a month late, and in 2018 when the Government implemented a 2% consolidated uplift with a 0.9% non-consolidated payment to meet the spirit of the AFPRB’s 2.9% recommendation.</p> answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View answering member printed Johnny Mercer question first answered 24/02/2021 11:03:05 answering member 4485 label Biography information for Johnny Mercer
tabling member	1438 label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones

1284791

registered interest
date	08/02/2021
answering body	Ministry of Defence
answering dept id	11
answering dept short name	Defence
answering dept sort name	Defence
hansard heading	Armed Forces: Pay
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the (a) recommendations of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body and (b) Government's pay increases were for the main remit group, in each year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	North Durham
tabling member printed	Mr Kevan Jones
uin	150701
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 11/02/2021 answer text <p>he Armed Forces Pay Review Body (AFPRB) is an independent advisory non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Ministry of Defence (MOD). Copies of the AFPRB's reports, containing their recommendations, can be found at the following link:</p><p>https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/armed-forces-pay-review-body</p><p>The AFPRB's recommendations have always been accepted by the MOD. The reports contain the final settlements for the Armed Forces.</p><p>Copies of the AFPRB's reports are also available in the Vote Office.</p> answering member constituency Plymouth, Moor View answering member printed Johnny Mercer question first answered 11/02/2021 11:07:36 answering member 4485 label Biography information for Johnny Mercer
tabling member	1438 label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones