Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1299320

registered interest
date	03/03/2021
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Protective Clothing
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether court service staff who are required to wear goggles as part of their duties are (a) issued with their own personal sets or (b) required to share communal sets of goggles.
tabling member constituency	Stockton North
tabling member printed	Alex Cunningham
uin	162583
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/03/2021 answer text <p>Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is not typically required by court or tribunal staff, given the nature of the roles they undertake, the way they are undertaken, and the framework of risk mitigations (in respect of Covid-19 transmission or more generally) entrenched. Wherever PPE is risk-assessed as necessary, it is provided by HMCTS. Wherever there is a specific need for goggles or protective glasses, they are issued to the individual member of staff concerned. The protective equipment is personal to that individual. Glasses/goggles are not shared.</p> answering member constituency Croydon South answering member printed Chris Philp question first answered 08/03/2021 17:31:10 answering member 4503 label Biography information for Chris Philp
tabling member	4122 label Biography information for Alex Cunningham

1299354

registered interest
date	03/03/2021
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Young Offenders: Pre-sentence Reports
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the comprehensiveness of maturity assessments in pre-sentence reports for defendants aged 18-25 in the (a) magistrates’ court and (b) Crown Court.
tabling member constituency	Stockton North
tabling member printed	Alex Cunningham
uin	162584
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/03/2021 answer text <p>The assessment of the comprehensiveness of maturity assessments in pre-sentence reports (PSRs) is captured within National Internal Audits and through the application of the Quality Development Tool (QDT) at a local level.</p><p>As a result of an internal audit on court reports in 2018, work was undertaken by Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) to develop staff knowledge and skills in this area, which led to the development of a briefing video and Maturity Assessments Guidance for court officers. HMPPS are currently undertaking a further internal audit on the quality of reports undertaken during the pandemic and are due to report their findings later this month. In addition to the National Internal Audit, regional teams utilise the QDT to oversee the quality of PSRs and to support staff development.</p><p>The Sentencing White Paper published in September 2020 contained a commitment to improving the quality and delivery of advice to courts, including through a PSR pilot. One element of this pilot targets fast delivery reports at specific cohorts including young adults (from 18 to 25 years of age) to take account of the more complex needs that this cohort of service users generally has. As part of this pilot, we are providing refresher training on maturity assessments for court probation staff to ensure staff are able to capture the complexity of needs of this cohort of service users.</p><p>There also a number of measures in place to support the type of individualised practice that benefits this cohort. An evidence-informed screening tool is available across prisons and probation to assess young adults who are still maturing neurologically, and a resource pack is also available to help staff work with those identified as needing more support.</p> answering member constituency Croydon South answering member printed Chris Philp question first answered 08/03/2021 17:32:29 answering member 4503 label Biography information for Chris Philp
tabling member	4122 label Biography information for Alex Cunningham

1299355

registered interest
date	03/03/2021
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Prisoners: Older People
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what progress he has made on developing the older offenders strategy; and what the timescale is for its publication.
tabling member constituency	Stockton North
tabling member printed	Alex Cunningham
uin	162585
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/03/2021 answer text <p>Following the Justice Select Committee’s inquiry into the ageing prison population last year, we commenced work on an older offenders strategy. Our strategic priorities for this work are that it will ensure that older offenders:</p><ul><li>Are held in the most appropriate environments;</li><li>Can access a purposeful and rehabilitative regime within prison;</li><li>Can access health and care services equivalent to those within the community; and</li><li>Are prepared for their release and resettled effectively.</li></ul><p>We have established a steering group to oversee progress on the strategy, and officials have undertaken fieldwork which has included meetings with prison governors, scrutiny bodies, academics and third sector organisations. We are developing proposals to be included in this strategy in advance of publication this summer.</p> answering member constituency Cheltenham answering member printed Alex Chalk question first answered 08/03/2021 16:55:56 answering member 4481 label Biography information for Alex Chalk
tabling member	4122 label Biography information for Alex Cunningham

1299356

registered interest
date	03/03/2021
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Crown Estate Commissioners: Wind Power
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will list the annual fees to date paid to the Crown Estate by developers granted leasing rights during Round 3 of the Offshore Wind Leasing process in 2010.
tabling member constituency	Stockton North
tabling member printed	Alex Cunningham
uin	162586
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/03/2021 answer text <p>The Treasury has asked for this information from The Crown Estate, who have provided the following figures for total cash receipts from Round 3, for each year since 2010. More information on the revenues generated from offshore wind, including details of co-investment made by The Crown Estate into Round 3 projects, is published in The Crown Estate’s annual report and accounts.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Calendar Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total R3 related Cash Receipts </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>£1.9m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>£3.0m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>£23.0m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>£21.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>£8.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>£2.9m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>£14.3m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>£47.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p>£122.9m</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency Saffron Walden answering member printed Kemi Badenoch question first answered 08/03/2021 10:24:21 answering member 4597 label Biography information for Kemi Badenoch
tabling member	4122 label Biography information for Alex Cunningham

1299357

registered interest
date	03/03/2021
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Wind Power: Seas and Oceans
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Net Zero Review will forecast the effect on the (a) labour market and (b) households following the recent outcome of the Crown Estate’s Round 4 Offshore Wind Leasing process.
tabling member constituency	Stockton North
tabling member printed	Alex Cunningham
uin	162587
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 08/03/2021 answer text <p>HM Treasury’s Net Zero Review will explore how the transition to a net zero economy could be funded and where the costs could fall. It will look at options for a balance of contributions between households, businesses and the taxpayer, and how to maximise economic growth opportunities from the transition.</p> answering member constituency Saffron Walden answering member printed Kemi Badenoch question first answered 08/03/2021 14:19:18 answering member 4597 label Biography information for Kemi Badenoch
tabling member	4122 label Biography information for Alex Cunningham