Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1486248
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept id 208 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office more like this
hansard heading Gaza: Israel more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what representations she has made to her Israeli counterpart on ending the blockade of Gaza in compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 1860 (2009). more like this
tabling member constituency Middlesbrough more like this
tabling member printed
Andy McDonald more like this
uin 30027 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-07more like thismore than 2022-07-07
answer text <p>I [Minister Milling] recently visited Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs) where I saw first-hand the challenges of the prolonged conflict and the impact of the occupation. I reiterated UK support for a two-state solution and the need to improve conditions for ordinary Palestinians in my meetings with Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Roll, and with the Palestinian leadership, including Prime Minister Shtayyeh. The UK continues to urge the parties to prioritise progress towards reaching a durable solution for Gaza and to take the necessary practical steps to ensure Gaza's reconstruction and economic recovery. We repeatedly call on Israel to abide by its obligations under international law and have a regular dialogue on legal issues relating to the occupation, including the treatment of Palestinian children.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Cannock Chase more like this
answering member printed Amanda Milling more like this
grouped question UIN 30026 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-07T15:46:03.413Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-07T15:46:03.413Z
answering member
4454
label Biography information for Dame Amanda Milling more like this
tabling member
4269
label Biography information for Andy McDonald more like this
1486255
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Pharmacy: Labour Turnover and Recruitment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to support pharmacies in the recruitment and retention of pharmacists. more like this
tabling member constituency Batley and Spen more like this
tabling member printed
Kim Leadbeater more like this
uin 30209 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-12more like thismore than 2022-07-12
answer text <p>Community pharmacies are commercial organisations with responsibility for staff recruitment and retention. However, with the National Health Service, we continue to monitor workforce pressures in community pharmacy. Analysis undertaken by NHS England shows that reported workforce pressures facing community pharmacies is limited to geographical areas and are complex and multifactorial. NHS England is working with employers to provide support and maintain good access to NHS pharmaceutical services.</p><p>In addition to the £2.5 billion a year allocated to the sector, Health Education England is investing a further £15.9 million over the next four years to support the expansion of frontline pharmacy staff in primary and community care.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Halesowen and Rowley Regis more like this
answering member printed James Morris more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-12T16:27:12.57Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-12T16:27:12.57Z
answering member
3992
label Biography information for James Morris more like this
tabling member
4923
label Biography information for Kim Leadbeater more like this
1486256
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Prader-Willi Syndrome: North West more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of provision of specialist care for patients diagnosed with Prader-Willi Syndrome in the North West. more like this
tabling member constituency Manchester, Gorton more like this
tabling member printed
Afzal Khan more like this
uin 30126 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-12more like thismore than 2022-07-12
answer text <p>No specific assessment has been made.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Halesowen and Rowley Regis more like this
answering member printed James Morris more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-12T09:29:17.17Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-12T09:29:17.17Z
answering member
3992
label Biography information for James Morris more like this
previous answer version
11542
answering member constituency Lewes more like this
answering member printed Maria Caulfield more like this
answering member
4492
label Biography information for Maria Caulfield more like this
tabling member
4671
label Biography information for Afzal Khan more like this
1486261
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Food: Prices more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to mitigate against increases in food prices. more like this
tabling member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
uin 29940 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-12more like thismore than 2022-07-12
answer text <p>The Government monitors food prices using the ONS’s inflation figures (Consumer Prices Index including Housing Costs).</p><p> </p><p>Defra is taking action to maintain an efficient food supply chain by mitigating against any potential burdens or friction which could otherwise drive-up consumer food prices. For example, we have introduced labelling flexibility to reduce additional cost burdens resulting from the availability of sunflower oil. Food prices themselves are set by business and it is not for the UK Government to set retail food prices nor to comment on day-to-day commercial decisions by companies.</p><p> </p><p>The broader affordability of food, and individuals’ access to food, is a key element of the Government’s approach to tackling poverty as we manage the impact of cost-of-living pressures. Defra is holding regular discussions with industry to explore ways in which industry can support low-income households by ensuring affordable food remains available, for example by maintaining value ranges, price matching, price freezing measures and use of loyalty card offers.</p><p> </p><p>The Government recently announced a new £15 billion support package to help families with the cost of living, bringing total support for households this year to £37 billion.</p><p> </p><p>Agricultural commodities are closely linked to global gas prices. Farmers are facing increased input costs for fertiliser, livestock feed, fuel and energy. We have taken steps to assist farmers with the availability of fertiliser ahead of the coming growing season and we have also brought forward 50% of the BPS payment to July to help ease cash flow pressures.</p>
answering member constituency Banbury more like this
answering member printed Victoria Prentis more like this
grouped question UIN 30197 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-12T16:50:47.173Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-12T16:50:47.173Z
answering member
4401
label Biography information for Victoria Prentis more like this
tabling member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
1486268
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Digital, Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Broadband: Finance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps she is taking to support Openreach to reopen their Community Fibre Partnership applications. more like this
tabling member constituency Bury North more like this
tabling member printed
James Daly more like this
uin 30204 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-11more like thismore than 2022-07-11
answer text <p>Building Digital UK (BDUK) has been in frequent communication with Openreach to assist with their review of their Fibre Community Partnership (FCP) scheme and to support them in reopening the scheme as soon as possible. BDUK is also continuing to work through existing high priority FCP projects that have been submitted to the Gigabit Broadband Voucher Scheme as suggested and sequenced by Openreach.</p><p>Communities that are interested in the FCP scheme can register their contact details on the <a href="https://www.openreach.com/fibre-broadband/fibre-community-partnership" target="_blank">Openreach website</a> to receive a notification once the scheme has been reopened to new applications.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Boston and Skegness more like this
answering member printed Matt Warman more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-11T13:17:12.54Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-11T13:17:12.54Z
answering member
4361
label Biography information for Matt Warman more like this
tabling member
4854
label Biography information for James Daly more like this
1486271
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Air Routes more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department has made a recent estimate of the number of people living under highly concentrated flight paths in (a) south west London and (b) the UK. more like this
tabling member constituency Twickenham more like this
tabling member printed
Munira Wilson more like this
uin 30160 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-11more like thismore than 2022-07-11
answer text <p>All major airports are required to map their noise impacts on a common basis every five years. However, there is no definition of ‘highly concentrated flightpath’ so no specific assessment has been made of the number of people impacted by such flightpaths.</p><p>All proposals to alter flightpath arrangements must follow the Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA) airspace change process (CAP 1616) which was revised in 2018 following the publication by the department of revised air navigation guidance. This guidance sets out the Government’s objective to limit and, where possible, reduce the total adverse effects on people as a result of aviation noise.</p><p>A key requirement in the guidance is the need for airspace change sponsors to consider the use of multiple flightpaths to disperse air traffic, as well as undertaking a full assessment of the airspace options they are considering. Noise impacts must be assessed using the Department’s Transport Analysis Guidance which includes a module for valuing the impacts of noise on health and quality of life.</p><p>The Government accepts that there are health impacts associated with aircraft noise and keeps all relevant evidence under review. The Department has previously commissioned research on the effects of aviation noise on annoyance, health and wellbeing and has tasked the CAA to carry out a further survey in the next year.</p><p>The airspace modernisation programme is a critical national infrastructure project that aims to deliver quicker, quieter and cleaner journeys to the benefit of all airspace users and those impacted, including communities. Airports are responsible for the specific arrangements for low-level flightpaths. Engagement with all relevant stakeholders, including communities, is an important part of CAP1616 and is crucial to the success of the airspace modernisation programme. It is the responsibility of every airspace change sponsor (usually an airport or Air Navigation Service Provider (ANSP)) to ensure engagement meets the needs of local stakeholders. The majority of sponsors in the programme are currently at Stage 2 of the CAP1616 process. Once approved by the CAA, each sponsor will move to Stage 3. It is at this stage that sponsors will undertake a full options appraisal before undertaking a formal public consultation with all interested stakeholders, including local communities. We expect that the majority of sponsors will be in a position to consult publicly from 2023 onwards.</p>
answering member constituency Witney more like this
answering member printed Robert Courts more like this
grouped question UIN
30159 more like this
30161 more like this
30162 more like this
30163 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-11T09:17:28.047Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-11T09:17:28.047Z
answering member
4589
label Biography information for Robert Courts more like this
tabling member
4776
label Biography information for Munira Wilson more like this
1486272
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Air Routes more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the potential effect of the Airspace Modernisation Programme on the number of people living under highly concentrated flight paths in (a) south west London and (b) the UK. more like this
tabling member constituency Twickenham more like this
tabling member printed
Munira Wilson more like this
uin 30161 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-11more like thismore than 2022-07-11
answer text <p>All major airports are required to map their noise impacts on a common basis every five years. However, there is no definition of ‘highly concentrated flightpath’ so no specific assessment has been made of the number of people impacted by such flightpaths.</p><p>All proposals to alter flightpath arrangements must follow the Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA) airspace change process (CAP 1616) which was revised in 2018 following the publication by the department of revised air navigation guidance. This guidance sets out the Government’s objective to limit and, where possible, reduce the total adverse effects on people as a result of aviation noise.</p><p>A key requirement in the guidance is the need for airspace change sponsors to consider the use of multiple flightpaths to disperse air traffic, as well as undertaking a full assessment of the airspace options they are considering. Noise impacts must be assessed using the Department’s Transport Analysis Guidance which includes a module for valuing the impacts of noise on health and quality of life.</p><p>The Government accepts that there are health impacts associated with aircraft noise and keeps all relevant evidence under review. The Department has previously commissioned research on the effects of aviation noise on annoyance, health and wellbeing and has tasked the CAA to carry out a further survey in the next year.</p><p>The airspace modernisation programme is a critical national infrastructure project that aims to deliver quicker, quieter and cleaner journeys to the benefit of all airspace users and those impacted, including communities. Airports are responsible for the specific arrangements for low-level flightpaths. Engagement with all relevant stakeholders, including communities, is an important part of CAP1616 and is crucial to the success of the airspace modernisation programme. It is the responsibility of every airspace change sponsor (usually an airport or Air Navigation Service Provider (ANSP)) to ensure engagement meets the needs of local stakeholders. The majority of sponsors in the programme are currently at Stage 2 of the CAP1616 process. Once approved by the CAA, each sponsor will move to Stage 3. It is at this stage that sponsors will undertake a full options appraisal before undertaking a formal public consultation with all interested stakeholders, including local communities. We expect that the majority of sponsors will be in a position to consult publicly from 2023 onwards.</p>
answering member constituency Witney more like this
answering member printed Robert Courts more like this
grouped question UIN
30159 more like this
30160 more like this
30162 more like this
30163 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-11T09:17:28.077Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-11T09:17:28.077Z
answering member
4589
label Biography information for Robert Courts more like this
tabling member
4776
label Biography information for Munira Wilson more like this
1486276
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Ambulance Services: Barnsley more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent estimate his Department has made of the average ambulance waiting times in Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council. more like this
tabling member constituency Barnsley Central more like this
tabling member printed
Dan Jarvis more like this
uin 30021 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-15more like thismore than 2022-07-15
answer text <p>No specific assessment has been made, as ambulance waiting times are collected at regional ambulance trust level.</p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Lewes more like this
answering member printed Maria Caulfield more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-15T10:40:56.63Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-15T10:40:56.63Z
answering member
4492
label Biography information for Maria Caulfield more like this
previous answer version
11529
answering member constituency Lewes more like this
answering member printed Maria Caulfield more like this
answering member
4492
label Biography information for Maria Caulfield more like this
tabling member
4243
label Biography information for Dan Jarvis more like this
1486278
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Aviation: Health Hazards more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department has commissioned research on the health impacts of living under concentrated flight paths in the context of airspace modernisation. more like this
tabling member constituency Twickenham more like this
tabling member printed
Munira Wilson more like this
uin 30163 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-11more like thismore than 2022-07-11
answer text <p>All major airports are required to map their noise impacts on a common basis every five years. However, there is no definition of ‘highly concentrated flightpath’ so no specific assessment has been made of the number of people impacted by such flightpaths.</p><p>All proposals to alter flightpath arrangements must follow the Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA) airspace change process (CAP 1616) which was revised in 2018 following the publication by the department of revised air navigation guidance. This guidance sets out the Government’s objective to limit and, where possible, reduce the total adverse effects on people as a result of aviation noise.</p><p>A key requirement in the guidance is the need for airspace change sponsors to consider the use of multiple flightpaths to disperse air traffic, as well as undertaking a full assessment of the airspace options they are considering. Noise impacts must be assessed using the Department’s Transport Analysis Guidance which includes a module for valuing the impacts of noise on health and quality of life.</p><p>The Government accepts that there are health impacts associated with aircraft noise and keeps all relevant evidence under review. The Department has previously commissioned research on the effects of aviation noise on annoyance, health and wellbeing and has tasked the CAA to carry out a further survey in the next year.</p><p>The airspace modernisation programme is a critical national infrastructure project that aims to deliver quicker, quieter and cleaner journeys to the benefit of all airspace users and those impacted, including communities. Airports are responsible for the specific arrangements for low-level flightpaths. Engagement with all relevant stakeholders, including communities, is an important part of CAP1616 and is crucial to the success of the airspace modernisation programme. It is the responsibility of every airspace change sponsor (usually an airport or Air Navigation Service Provider (ANSP)) to ensure engagement meets the needs of local stakeholders. The majority of sponsors in the programme are currently at Stage 2 of the CAP1616 process. Once approved by the CAA, each sponsor will move to Stage 3. It is at this stage that sponsors will undertake a full options appraisal before undertaking a formal public consultation with all interested stakeholders, including local communities. We expect that the majority of sponsors will be in a position to consult publicly from 2023 onwards.</p>
answering member constituency Witney more like this
answering member printed Robert Courts more like this
grouped question UIN
30159 more like this
30160 more like this
30161 more like this
30162 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-11T09:17:28.173Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-11T09:17:28.173Z
answering member
4589
label Biography information for Robert Courts more like this
tabling member
4776
label Biography information for Munira Wilson more like this
1486279
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Army: Data Protection more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether any personnel information was accessed during the data breach of the Army’s social media accounts on 3 July 2022. more like this
tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
uin 29873 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-07-06more like thismore than 2022-07-06
answer text <p>No personnel information was accessed as a result of the Army's Twitter and Youtube accounts being compromised.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Aldershot more like this
answering member printed Leo Docherty more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-07-06T15:32:06.747Zmore like thismore than 2022-07-06T15:32:06.747Z
answering member
4600
label Biography information for Leo Docherty more like this
tabling member
400
label Biography information for John Healey more like this