Show Search Form

Search Results

human indexable	true false
published	true false
registered interest	true false
answer date	exactly: or between: and
date	exactly: or between: and
date tabled	exactly: or between: and
ddp created	exactly: or between: and
answering body
question status
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
ddp modified
hansard heading
house id
identifier
legislature
parliament number
question first answered
question text
session
session number
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
title
type
uin
version
written parliamentary question type
answer	is ministerial correction true false answer text question first answered
creator	label
publisher
tabling member	label

Search

1083652

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 18:14:58
	answering body	Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	90
	answering dept short name	Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
	answering dept sort name	Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
	ddp modified	13/03/2019 17:15:07 14/03/2019 15:36:02
	hansard heading	Members: Finance
	house id	1
	identifier	229668
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	14/03/2019 15:04:11
	question text	To ask The Member for Broxbourne, representing the Speaker's Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, if the Committee will undertake a survey of hon. Members on the (a) cost and (b) resources allocated by hon. Members to responding to e-mails from (i) 38 Degrees and (ii) other campaigning organisations; and if he will make a statement.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Edinburgh South
	tabling member printed	Ian Murray
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 229668
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	229668
	version	2
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Independent Parliamentary Standard Authority (IPSA) was established to ensure MPs have the funding and support they need to conduct their parliamentary duties effectively. IPSA is also responsible for setting the level of the MPs’ Staffing Budget and for periodically consulting on all aspects of its expenses scheme, including on Members’ staff expenditure. At these times, Members and others are invited to respond to IPSA’s consultations and to suggest amendments to its scheme.</p><p>It is for individual MPs themselves to decide how their own staffing arrangements best support their work and how they respond to campaigning organisations such as 38 Degrees.</p><p>In respect of oversight of IPSA’s budgets, the Speaker’s Committee for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority is in place to approve its annual estimates of resources. In addition, the Administration Committee meets representatives from IPSA to consider its support for Members and the way it operates its scheme.</p> question first answered 14/03/2019 15:04:11
	creator	3966 label Biography information for Ian Murray
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	3966 label Biography information for Ian Murray

1083604

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 18:13:01
	answering body	Attorney General
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	88
	answering dept short name	Attorney General
	answering dept sort name	Attorney General
	ddp modified	07/03/2019 18:28:14 14/03/2019 17:42:03
	hansard heading	Sentencing: Appeals
	house id	1
	identifier	229766
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	14/03/2019 17:10:09
	question text	To ask the Attorney General, what discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on weight given to victim statements under the unduly lenient sentencing scheme.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Strangford
	tabling member printed	Jim Shannon
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 229766
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	229766
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>Making a personal statement gives a victim of crime a voice in the criminal justice system. It enables them to explain the impact the crime has had on them in their own words so that it can be taken into account when an offender is sentenced.</p><p>The weight to be given to the impact a crime has had on a victim is a matter of discretion for the sentencing judge and will vary from case to case. It is one of several factors that the sentence judge will have to consider.</p><p>Where the case is one within the unduly lenient sentencing scheme and the a Law Officer considers that the sentencing judge has not given proper weight to the impact a crime has had on the victim, then they may decide to refer the case to the Court of Appeal as being potentially unduly lenient.</p> question first answered 14/03/2019 17:10:09
	creator	4131 label Biography information for Jim Shannon
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4131 label Biography information for Jim Shannon

1083788

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	21/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 20:39:19
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	07/03/2019 20:46:12 21/03/2019 15:12:02
	hansard heading	EU Grants and Loans: Cornwall
	house id	2
	identifier	HL14351
	legislature	25277
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	21/03/2019 14:40:57
	question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what plan they have to replace the EU Objective 1 funding programme, with particular regard to Cornwall.
	session	2017/19 (57)
	session number	1
	tabling member printed	Viscount Waverley
	title	House of Lords Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 (57) HL14351
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	HL14351
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Government continues to develop the design and priorities of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund. The new Fund will seek to improve productivity and reduce economic inequalities. We will consult widely on the fund and the Government encourages all interested parties to take part in this process.</p> question first answered 21/03/2019 14:40:57
	creator	1744 label Biography information for Viscount Waverley
	publisher	25277
	tabling member	1744 label Biography information for Viscount Waverley

1083513

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 18:09:20
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	07/03/2019 18:15:11 14/03/2019 14:53:04
	hansard heading	High Rise Flats: Fire Prevention
	house id	1
	identifier	229620
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	14/03/2019 14:21:16
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether it is his Department's policy to fund the cost of replacing faulty composite fire doors in all public and private sector high rise buildings.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
	tabling member printed	John Healey
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 229620
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	229620
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>My Department has worked closely with the fire door industry to ensure all affected doors have been removed from the market and has gained industry commitment that no product will return to market until it can be proven to meet the required standard, including 30-minute fire resistance on both sides of the door.</p><p>We have been clear that the Glass Reinforced Polyester composite fire door industry is responsible for replacing their defective fire doors. My Department is working with the Association of Composite Door Manufacturers and wider stakeholders as the fire door industry develops its plan for repair and replacement of affected doors where required.</p><p> </p> question first answered 14/03/2019 14:21:16
	creator	400 label Biography information for John Healey
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

1083514

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 18:09:23
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	07/03/2019 18:15:14 14/03/2019 14:51:02
	hansard heading	Social Rented Housing: Repairs and Maintenance
	house id	1
	identifier	229621
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	14/03/2019 14:19:07
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the extent of financial pressure on social landlords caused by the pursuit of property disrepair claims.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
	tabling member printed	John Healey
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 229621
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	229621
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Department has made no such assessment.</p><p>All registered providers of social housing must comply with the regulatory standards set by the independent Regulator of Social Housing. This requires landlords to provide a cost-effective repairs and maintenance service, that responds to the needs of tenants, offers choices, and has the objective of getting repairs and improvements right the first time.</p><p> </p> question first answered 14/03/2019 14:19:07
	creator	400 label Biography information for John Healey
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

1083515

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 18:09:26
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	07/03/2019 18:15:17 12/03/2019 15:33:02
	hansard heading	Sleeping Rough
	house id	1
	identifier	229622
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	12/03/2019 15:01:32
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will ensure that the rough sleeping statistics published by his Department comply with the code of practice for official statistics.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
	tabling member printed	John Healey
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 229622
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	229622
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>I can confirm that the rough sleeping statistics, as ‘Official Statistics’ are produced in accordance with the principles and practices of the UK Statistics Authority’s <em>Code of Practice for Statistics</em> (Edition 2.0), which replaced the Authority’s <em>Code of Practice for Official Statistics</em> (Edition 1.0) in February 2018.</p> question first answered 12/03/2019 15:01:32
	creator	400 label Biography information for John Healey
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

1083517

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 18:09:30
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	07/03/2019 18:15:23 14/03/2019 14:52:02
	hansard heading	Community Housing Fund
	house id	1
	identifier	229623
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	14/03/2019 14:20:21
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps he is taking to ensure the full allocation of the Community Housing Fund is allocated.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
	tabling member printed	John Healey
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 229623
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	229623
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>In July last year, a new Homes England programme was launched to deliver the Community Housing Fund outside London. My Department has also funded a similar programme in London, which was launched in January and will be delivered by the Greater London Authority. Community groups and local authorities in all parts of England are now able to apply for capital and revenue funding to bring community-led housing schemes forward.</p><p>My Department has also made available £6 million to a consortium of the leading stakeholder groups within the community-led housing sector to expand and develop a network of professional technical advisors who will help guide community-based organisations through the process of instigating and developing local housebuilding projects. An initiative was therefore launched in February under the brand name Community Led Homes. I expect this initiative to be an important factor in helping realise the potential of the community-led housing sector and supporting the delivery of the Community Housing Fund.</p><p>Work is underway within Homes England and Greater London Authority to understand the potential demand for the Community Housing Fund over the next few years.</p> question first answered 14/03/2019 14:20:21
	creator	400 label Biography information for John Healey
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

1083534

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 18:10:11
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	07/03/2019 18:25:19 13/03/2019 16:55:08
	hansard heading	Housing
	house id	1
	identifier	229725
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	13/03/2019 16:23:02
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether the default measure of housing supply derived under the standardised methodology can be bypassed where a Local Plan has been submitted under the transitional arrangements which meets its objectively assessed need; whether increased weight can be attributed to the emerging plan in respect of a five-year housing land supply; and if he will make a statement.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Tonbridge and Malling
	tabling member printed	Tom Tugendhat
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 229725
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	229725
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>Local planning authorities who submitted their local plans by 24 January this year are not bound to use the standard method. Instead their assessment of housing need should have been generated using policy in the previous National Planning Policy Framework. Under this, authorities were still expected to identify their full housing needs.</p><p>The revised Framework retains the pre-existing policy that weight may be given to emerging policies (including the land supply policies) according to how advanced the plan is, the extent to which there are any unresolved objections and the degree of consistency between the emerging policies and national planning policy. In the case of plans submitted during the transitional arrangement, these are policies in the previous framework.</p> question first answered 13/03/2019 16:23:02
	creator	4462 label Biography information for Tom Tugendhat
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	4462 label Biography information for Tom Tugendhat

1083546

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 18:10:40
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	07/03/2019 18:25:47 14/03/2019 14:39:03
	hansard heading	National Holocaust Memorial Centre and Learning Service
	house id	1
	identifier	229625
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	14/03/2019 14:07:24
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the Answer of 16 October 2017 to Question 106036, how many of the sites considered for the UK Holocaust Memorial were first brought to the attention of the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation (a) before 7 September 2015, (b) between 7 September and 30 October 2015 inclusive and (c) after 30 October 2015.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Gainsborough
	tabling member printed	Sir Edward Leigh
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 229625
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	229625
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>Prior to publishing the site specification and criteria for the location on 7 September, the sites under consideration were those referred to in <em>Britain’s Promise to Remember</em> . Between 7 September and 30 October 2015, a search was conducted and almost 50 sites were identified none of which were deemed to meet the published criteria. In light of this, the Foundation suggested Victoria Tower Gardens as a potential location. Following investigations into the feasibility of this site, the Foundation recommended Victoria Tower Gardens to the Government in January 2016 as the best choice of site. The then Prime Minister accepted this recommendation and announced Victoria Tower Gardens as the chosen site on Holocaust Memorial Day 2016.</p> question first answered 14/03/2019 14:07:24
	creator	345 label Biography information for Sir Edward Leigh
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	345 label Biography information for Sir Edward Leigh

1083547

	human indexable
	published
	registered interest
	answer date	11/03/2019
	date	07/03/2019
	date tabled	07/03/2019
	ddp created	07/03/2019 18:10:42
	answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
	question status	Tabled
	answering dept id	7
	answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
	ddp modified	07/03/2019 18:25:49 14/03/2019 14:39:02
	hansard heading	National Holocaust Memorial Centre and Learning Service
	house id	1
	identifier	229626
	legislature	25259
	parliament number	57
	question first answered	14/03/2019 14:07:51
	question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the Answer of 21 December 2018 to Question 203298, on what date the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation made the decision that (a) Millbank Tower should no longer be considered as a possible site for the Holocaust Learning Centre and (b) the preferred site for the Learning Centre was Victoria Tower Gardens.
	session	2017/19
	session number	1
	tabling member constituency	Gainsborough
	tabling member printed	Sir Edward Leigh
	title	House of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2017/19 229626
	type	WrittenParliamentaryQuestion
	uin	229626
	version	1
	written parliamentary question type	Ordinary
	answer	answer is ministerial correction answer text <p>The Foundation ruled out Millbank Tower as a feasible location in November 2015. The Foundation subsequently suggested Victoria Tower Gardens as a potential location and following investigations into the feasibility of this site, recommended the site in January 2016 as the best choice of site to the Government.</p> question first answered 14/03/2019 14:07:51
	creator	345 label Biography information for Sir Edward Leigh
	publisher	25259
	tabling member	345 label Biography information for Sir Edward Leigh