Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

527970
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
answering dept id 26 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
hansard heading Overseas Investment: Treaties more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what assessment he has made of the effect of the Government's bilateral investment treaties on its policies on human rights, development and the environment in each of the countries with which it has signed a treaty. more like this
tabling member constituency Cardiff West remove filter
tabling member printed
Kevin Brennan more like this
uin 41057 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-06-30more like thismore than 2016-06-30
answer text <p>The UK is signatory to over 90 bilateral investment treaties (BITs). The objective of BITs is to provide investors with fair and equitable treatment, protection against discriminatory action and a commitment not to expropriate investments without compensation. The contents of BITs do not provide specific obligations to either investors or states regarding human rights, development or the environment, however fair, non-discriminatory and proportionate action taken by a host state to protect human rights, development and the environment would not breach an investment protection. The Government is not aware of any Investor-State Dispute Settlement claims made by UK investors under existing BITs that have led directly to or contributed towards a negative impact on these areas.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-06-30T09:59:43.357Zmore like thismore than 2016-06-30T09:59:43.357Z
answering member
3938
label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
tabling member
1400
label Biography information for Kevin Brennan more like this
527971
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
answering dept id 26 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
hansard heading Overseas Investment: Treaties more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of mechanisms for parliamentary oversight of the UK's bilateral investment treaties. more like this
tabling member constituency Cardiff West remove filter
tabling member printed
Kevin Brennan more like this
uin 41073 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-06-29more like thismore than 2016-06-29
answer text <p>Treaties, including bilateral investment treaties, that are subject to ratification, approval, acceptance, accession or the mutual notification of completion of procedures are laid before Parliament for scrutiny purposes for a period of 21 parliamentary sitting days under the provisions of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 (Part 2: ratification of treaties) which commenced on 11 November 2010. This legislation provides that the UK cannot legally ratify or consent to be bound by a treaty laid under its provisions until the statutory 21 sitting day process has elapsed. During the 21 sitting days, hon Members and Select Committees have the chance to scrutinise the treaty provisions, ask questions, and potentially report. They may ask for extra time. The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act does not guarantee a debate, but any request would have to be seriously considered. If Parliament debated and resolved that HMG “shall not ratify”, then the latter could not legally do so at that point.</p>
answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-06-29T08:56:32.363Zmore like thismore than 2016-06-29T08:56:32.363Z
answering member
3938
label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
tabling member
1400
label Biography information for Kevin Brennan more like this
527972
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
answering dept id 26 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Innovation and Skills more like this
hansard heading Manufacturing Industries more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what recent representations he has received on the potential merits of establishing a materials catapult for manufacturing. more like this
tabling member constituency Cardiff West remove filter
tabling member printed
Kevin Brennan more like this
uin 41077 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-06-30more like thismore than 2016-06-30
answer text The Department refers proposals for new Catapults to Innovate UK, who have an established process for considering the case for new Catapult Centres. This includes proposals for Materials Centres. Innovate UK currently consider the broad materials needs of the manufacturing sector are well served by existing Catapults and Research and Technology Organisations (RTOs). more like this
answering member constituency Orpington more like this
answering member printed Joseph Johnson more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-06-30T16:18:43.857Zmore like thismore than 2016-06-30T16:18:43.857Z
answering member
4039
label Biography information for Lord Johnson of Marylebone more like this
previous answer version
5304
answering member constituency Orpington more like this
answering member printed Joseph Johnson more like this
answering member
4039
label Biography information for Lord Johnson of Marylebone more like this
tabling member
1400
label Biography information for Kevin Brennan more like this
528075
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Milk: Nutrition more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment his Department made of the health benefits of milk as part of the development of the Government's Eatwell guide. more like this
tabling member constituency Cardiff West remove filter
tabling member printed
Kevin Brennan more like this
uin 41058 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-07-04more like thismore than 2016-07-04
answer text <p>Dairy products are a valuable source of essential nutrients including protein and calcium. Government advice continues to encourage the inclusion of dairy products as part of a healthy, balanced diet for all age groups. This recommendation is depicted in the Eatwell Guide which promotes the consumption of lower fat and lower sugar dairy products to help reduce saturated fat and sugar intakes in the United Kingdom, which are currently above dietary recommendations.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Battersea more like this
answering member printed Jane Ellison more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-07-04T13:55:22.433Zmore like thismore than 2016-07-04T13:55:22.433Z
answering member
3918
label Biography information for Jane Ellison more like this
tabling member
1400
label Biography information for Kevin Brennan more like this
528077
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading School Meals: Standards more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment his Department made of the applicability of the requirements of school food standards as part of the development of the Government's Eatwell guide. more like this
tabling member constituency Cardiff West remove filter
tabling member printed
Kevin Brennan more like this
uin 41076 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-06-29more like thismore than 2016-06-29
answer text <p>The Eatwell Guide is suitable for everyone over the age of five years to follow and intends to assist the population in choosing a varied and balanced diet to meet Government dietary recommendations.</p><p> </p><p>The School Food Standards aim to assist school aged children in achieving Government dietary recommendations, tying in with the aims of the Eatwell Guide. Common themes include the encouragement of fruits, vegetables and wholegrain starchy carbohydrates, as well as promoting the contribution of water and lower fat milks.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Battersea more like this
answering member printed Jane Ellison more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-06-29T16:11:37.803Zmore like thismore than 2016-06-29T16:11:37.803Z
answering member
3918
label Biography information for Jane Ellison more like this
tabling member
1400
label Biography information for Kevin Brennan more like this