Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

101048
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
HM Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept id 14 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Treasury more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
star this property hansard heading Corporation Tax more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many (a) company headquarters and (b) jobs have been reshored in the UK since the reduction in corporation tax rates. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Windsor more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Adam Afriyie more like this
star this property uin 211930 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-11-04more like thismore than 2014-11-04
star this property answer text <p>Supporting businesses and helping them to invest, create jobs and to grow is a key part of the Government’s long term economic plan. Since 2010 we have already cut Corporation Tax (CT) from 28% to 21%, and next year it will fall to 20% - the joint lowest rate in the G20. The Government has also cut the small profits rate to 20%. Overall these CT cuts for large and small firms will be worth £9.5bn a year to business by 2016.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>HM Treasury has not estimated the number of jobs reshored.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>We will continue to work to ensure that the tax system in the UK remains competitive and enables us to attract business investment.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr David Gauke more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-11-04T16:46:42.492848Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
star this property answering member
1529
star this property label Biography information for Mr David Gauke more like this
unstar this property tabling member
1586
unstar this property label Biography information for Adam Afriyie more like this
101167
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept id 1 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Home Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
star this property hansard heading Domestic Abuse: Brigg more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many domestic violence arrests were made in Brigg and Goole constituency in each of the last 10 years. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Brigg and Goole more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Andrew Percy more like this
star this property uin 212070 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-11-04more like thismore than 2014-11-04
star this property answer text <p>I regret that the requested arrests data are not collected centrally.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Lewes more like this
star this property answering member printed Norman Baker more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-11-04T17:02:32.8258927Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-04T17:02:32.8258927Z
star this property answering member
28
star this property label Biography information for Norman Baker more like this
star this property previous answer version
25285
star this property answering member constituency Lewes more like this
star this property answering member printed Norman Baker more like this
star this property answering member
28
star this property label Biography information for Norman Baker more like this
unstar this property tabling member
3939
unstar this property label Biography information for Andrew Percy more like this
101075
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Air Space more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if two non-cooperating aircraft operating in the same Class G airspace at the same time can be regarded as a Risk to Life. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Moray more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
star this property uin 212060 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-11-10more like thismore than 2014-11-10
star this property answer text <p>The appropriate military Duty Holder for each aircraft fleet is required to undertake a Risk to Life assessment at quarterly intervals. One of the risks considered is that of mid air collision with non-cooperating aircraft. This includes in uncontrolled airspace away from airfields, airports and the airways system (Class G airspace). Following this assessment, the Duty Holder is required to put in place appropriate controls and mitigating measures to ensure that any potential risk is both tolerable and as low as reasonably practicable.</p> more like this
star this property answering member constituency Broxtowe more like this
star this property answering member printed Anna Soubry more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-11-10T17:26:43.522474Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-10T17:26:43.522474Z
star this property answering member
3938
star this property label Biography information for Anna Soubry more like this
star this property previous answer version
25872
star this property answering member constituency Rayleigh and Wickford more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Mark Francois more like this
star this property answering member 1444
unstar this property tabling member
1433
unstar this property label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
101076
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Radioactive Materials more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many nuclear safety events there were at HMNB Clyde and RNAD Coulport, by category, in each of the last six years. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Moray more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
star this property uin 212061 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-02-27more like thismore than 2015-02-27
star this property answer text <p>The information requested, accompanied by the category definitions, is provided below.</p><p> </p><p>Events are categorised in accordance with Her Majesty's Naval Base Clyde's internal criteria, which record all events, however seemingly minor. This comprehensive, independent recording process allows Clyde to maintain a robust reporting culture, undertake learning from experience and to take early corrective action. This reporting process has been agreed by, and is subject to routine inspections by, the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator.</p><p> </p><p>None of the events in the reports caused any harm to the health of any member of staff on the Naval Base, or to any member of the public, and the severity of the reported events has remained at a very low level. For example, incorrect labelling of an empty pallet and not filling out the correct form before painting inside a submarine are two of the recorded events. Investigations into all such events are carried out and, where necessary, measures are, put in place to prevent a recurrence.</p><p> </p><p>Nuclear safety events involving Nuclear Propulsion:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>FY</p><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>200910</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category A</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category B</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category C</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>186</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category D</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TOTAL</p></td><td><p>73</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>398</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Nuclear safety events involving Nuclear Weapons:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>FY</p><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category A</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category B</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category C</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category D</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TOTAL</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>53</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>There were no Category A or Category B events involving Nuclear Weapons, nor any Category A events involving Nuclear Propulsion. The details of the twelve Category B incidents involving Nuclear Propulsion are as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Date</p></td><td><p>Description</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11 May 2008</p></td><td><p>Low level contamination detected on the discharge pipework within the Radioactive Effluent Disposal Facility.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 June 2008</p></td><td><p>Temporary shielding to a valve in the Reactor Compartment had been removed without correct authorisation.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>27 June 2008</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent draining of onboard chemically treated water tanks into the contained submarine bilge, with no loss of water into the environment.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 July 2008</p></td><td><p>A crane at the berth was operated in a non-standard configuration without an approved concession.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2 October 2008</p></td><td><p>Radiography Testing using a Faulty Source Mechanism.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>27 October 2008</p></td><td><p>A diving operation was undertaken while the reactor was operational.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8 December 2008</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent shutting of steam valves out-with normal operating procedures.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11 February 2009</p></td><td><p>Explosives Handling Jetty (EHJ) 125 tonne crane - lifts total breached. While within the capacity of the crane, the number of lifts exceeded the agreed annual total.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>20 March 2009</p></td><td><p>EHJ 125 tonne crane - lifts total breached. Following the previous incident, a concession was granted, however, this was subsequently exceeded for operational support purposes.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12 June 2010</p></td><td><p>Loss of a freeze seal during routine valve maintenance leading to a contained submarine compartment water spill, with no loss of water into the environment.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14 June 2010</p></td><td><p>Used protective suits in a double-layered plastic bag were accidentally dropped into the waters in the Base and recovered immediately. A member of staff became wet when recovering them: as a precaution, he was monitored to ensure no contamination, and was given the all clear.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>17 August 2012</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent radiation dose received by contractors while conducting submarine tank defect rectification work.</p><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>HM NAVAL BASE CLYDE - NUCLEAR SAFETY EVENT REPORTING</strong></p><p><strong>CATEGORY DEFINITIONS </strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p><p><strong>Cat</strong></p></td><td><p> </p><p><strong>Nuclear Event Consequence</strong></p></td><td><p> </p><p><strong>Description</strong></p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>A</p></td><td><p>Actual or high potential for radioactive release to the environment or over exposure to radiation.</p></td><td rowspan="2"><p>· Major failure of Site or Nuclear Propulsion/Nuclear Weapon (NP/NW) services.</p><p> </p><p>· Major reduction of defence in depth.</p><p> </p><p>· Major failure in administrative controls or regulatory compliance.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>B</p></td><td><p>Actual or high potential for a contained release within building or submarine or unplanned exposure to radiation.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>C</p></td><td><p>Moderate potential for future release or exposure, or localised release within a designated radiological controlled area.</p></td><td><p>· Minor failure of Site or NP/NW services (eg with protection via defence in depth).</p><p> </p><p>· Minor regulatory or procedural compliance breach.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>D</p></td><td><p>Low potential for release – but may contribute towards an adverse trend producing latent conditions.</p></td><td><p>· Poor safety culture, eg:</p><p> </p><p>- Failure to report shortfalls.</p><p>- Communication failures.</p><p>- Leadership issues.</p><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p>
star this property answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 212062 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-02-27T13:26:10.957Zmore like thismore than 2015-02-27T13:26:10.957Z
star this property answering member
1542
star this property label Biography information for Mr Philip Dunne more like this
star this property previous answer version
25856
star this property answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
star this property answering member
1542
star this property label Biography information for Mr Philip Dunne more like this
unstar this property tabling member
1433
unstar this property label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
101077
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
star this property answering dept id 11 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Defence more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Defence more like this
star this property hansard heading Radioactive Materials more like this
unstar this property house id 1 more like this
star this property legislature
25259
star this property pref label House of Commons more like this
star this property question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many nuclear safety events there were at HMNB Clyde and RNAD Coulport involving (a) Class A and (b) Class B incidents involving (i) nuclear propulsion and (ii) nuclear weapons; and what the details were of each such incident. more like this
star this property tabling member constituency Moray more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Angus Robertson more like this
star this property uin 212062 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2015-02-27more like thismore than 2015-02-27
star this property answer text <p>The information requested, accompanied by the category definitions, is provided below.</p><p> </p><p>Events are categorised in accordance with Her Majesty's Naval Base Clyde's internal criteria, which record all events, however seemingly minor. This comprehensive, independent recording process allows Clyde to maintain a robust reporting culture, undertake learning from experience and to take early corrective action. This reporting process has been agreed by, and is subject to routine inspections by, the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator.</p><p> </p><p>None of the events in the reports caused any harm to the health of any member of staff on the Naval Base, or to any member of the public, and the severity of the reported events has remained at a very low level. For example, incorrect labelling of an empty pallet and not filling out the correct form before painting inside a submarine are two of the recorded events. Investigations into all such events are carried out and, where necessary, measures are, put in place to prevent a recurrence.</p><p> </p><p>Nuclear safety events involving Nuclear Propulsion:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>FY</p><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>200910</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category A</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category B</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category C</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>45</p></td><td><p>186</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category D</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TOTAL</p></td><td><p>73</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>398</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Nuclear safety events involving Nuclear Weapons:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>FY</p><p>2008-09</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2009-10</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2010-11</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2011-12</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>FY</p><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category A</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category B</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category C</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Category D</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>TOTAL</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>53</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>There were no Category A or Category B events involving Nuclear Weapons, nor any Category A events involving Nuclear Propulsion. The details of the twelve Category B incidents involving Nuclear Propulsion are as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Date</p></td><td><p>Description</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11 May 2008</p></td><td><p>Low level contamination detected on the discharge pipework within the Radioactive Effluent Disposal Facility.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 June 2008</p></td><td><p>Temporary shielding to a valve in the Reactor Compartment had been removed without correct authorisation.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>27 June 2008</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent draining of onboard chemically treated water tanks into the contained submarine bilge, with no loss of water into the environment.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>9 July 2008</p></td><td><p>A crane at the berth was operated in a non-standard configuration without an approved concession.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2 October 2008</p></td><td><p>Radiography Testing using a Faulty Source Mechanism.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>27 October 2008</p></td><td><p>A diving operation was undertaken while the reactor was operational.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>8 December 2008</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent shutting of steam valves out-with normal operating procedures.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>11 February 2009</p></td><td><p>Explosives Handling Jetty (EHJ) 125 tonne crane - lifts total breached. While within the capacity of the crane, the number of lifts exceeded the agreed annual total.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>20 March 2009</p></td><td><p>EHJ 125 tonne crane - lifts total breached. Following the previous incident, a concession was granted, however, this was subsequently exceeded for operational support purposes.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>12 June 2010</p></td><td><p>Loss of a freeze seal during routine valve maintenance leading to a contained submarine compartment water spill, with no loss of water into the environment.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14 June 2010</p></td><td><p>Used protective suits in a double-layered plastic bag were accidentally dropped into the waters in the Base and recovered immediately. A member of staff became wet when recovering them: as a precaution, he was monitored to ensure no contamination, and was given the all clear.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>17 August 2012</p></td><td><p>Inadvertent radiation dose received by contractors while conducting submarine tank defect rectification work.</p><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>HM NAVAL BASE CLYDE - NUCLEAR SAFETY EVENT REPORTING</strong></p><p><strong>CATEGORY DEFINITIONS </strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p><p><strong>Cat</strong></p></td><td><p> </p><p><strong>Nuclear Event Consequence</strong></p></td><td><p> </p><p><strong>Description</strong></p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>A</p></td><td><p>Actual or high potential for radioactive release to the environment or over exposure to radiation.</p></td><td rowspan="2"><p>· Major failure of Site or Nuclear Propulsion/Nuclear Weapon (NP/NW) services.</p><p> </p><p>· Major reduction of defence in depth.</p><p> </p><p>· Major failure in administrative controls or regulatory compliance.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>B</p></td><td><p>Actual or high potential for a contained release within building or submarine or unplanned exposure to radiation.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>C</p></td><td><p>Moderate potential for future release or exposure, or localised release within a designated radiological controlled area.</p></td><td><p>· Minor failure of Site or NP/NW services (eg with protection via defence in depth).</p><p> </p><p>· Minor regulatory or procedural compliance breach.</p><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>D</p></td><td><p>Low potential for release – but may contribute towards an adverse trend producing latent conditions.</p></td><td><p>· Poor safety culture, eg:</p><p> </p><p>- Failure to report shortfalls.</p><p>- Communication failures.</p><p>- Leadership issues.</p><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p>
star this property answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
star this property grouped question UIN 212061 more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2015-02-27T13:26:11.173Zmore like thismore than 2015-02-27T13:26:11.173Z
star this property answering member
1542
star this property label Biography information for Mr Philip Dunne more like this
star this property previous answer version
25839
star this property answering member constituency Ludlow more like this
star this property answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne more like this
star this property answering member
1542
star this property label Biography information for Mr Philip Dunne more like this
unstar this property tabling member
1433
unstar this property label Biography information for Angus Robertson more like this
100983
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Church Schools more like this
unstar this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what impact assessment they have made of the risk of Islamic extremism occurring in Christian schools which teach traditional Christian views about marriage. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Eaton more like this
star this property uin HL2439 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-11-10more like thismore than 2014-11-10
star this property answer text <p>All schools have an important part to play in increasing their pupils’ resilience to extremism and radicalisation and preparing them for life in modern Britain by promoting the fundamental British values of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs. The Department for Education has not carried out a formal assessment of the risk of Islamic extremism occurring in the types of schools to which my noble Friend refers.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-11-10T14:28:10.3775949Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-10T14:28:10.3775949Z
star this property answering member
4270
star this property label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4184
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Eaton more like this
100984
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Education more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Church Schools more like this
unstar this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in the light of the implementation of the Education (Independent School Standards) (England) (Amendment) 2014, requiring the active promotion of protected characteristics as set down in the Equality Act 2010, what provision will be made to enable Christian schools to teach traditional Christian values and views about marriage; and what measures they have taken to ensure that any such provisions are not overridden. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Eaton more like this
star this property uin HL2440 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-11-05more like thismore than 2014-11-05
star this property answer text <p>The Education (Independent School Standards) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 do not require the active promotion of the protected characteristics in the Equality Act.</p><p> </p><p>The Regulations require that schools actively promote principles which encourage respect for other people, paying particular regard to the protected characteristics. This is a crucial distinction. It is right to respect other people, even if one does not agree with them or their way of life. This is a fundamental part of preparation for life in modern Britain.</p><p> </p><p>The Government is absolutely clear that the changes make no difference to the existing legal obligations that schools have under the Equality Act 2010. All schools are already required to abide by the Act and their obligations are not altered by the changes to the standards. The changes do not fetter the views of individual teachers or censor the discussion of relevant matters. A teacher who, for instance, disagrees with same-sex marriage because of their Christian faith will not be prevented from expressing that view by these changes. Since the changes make no difference to schools’ existing legal obligations under the Equality Act there is no question of the ability of schools to teach traditional Christian values being overridden.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-11-05T17:55:38.8428136Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-05T17:55:38.8428136Z
star this property answering member
4270
star this property label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4184
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Eaton more like this
100981
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
star this property answering dept id 53 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
star this property hansard heading Muslim Brotherhood more like this
unstar this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they will publish the report of the inquiry by Sir John Jenkins into the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United Kingdom. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Falkner of Margravine more like this
star this property uin HL2437 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-11-10more like thismore than 2014-11-10
star this property answer text <p>I refer the noble peer to the answer I gave on 13 October, <em>Official Report</em>, Column WA13.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Wallace of Saltaire more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-11-10T17:35:36.0844492Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-10T17:35:36.0844492Z
star this property answering member
1816
star this property label Biography information for Lord Wallace of Saltaire more like this
unstar this property tabling member
3670
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Falkner of Margravine more like this
100993
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for International Development more like this
star this property answering dept id 20 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name International Development more like this
star this property answering dept sort name International Development more like this
star this property hansard heading Developing Countries: Sanitation more like this
unstar this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what financial commitment they have made in the development aid budget to improving sanitation in the last four years; and what percentage of the development aid budget it represents. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead more like this
star this property uin HL2449 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-11-10more like thismore than 2014-11-10
star this property answer text <p>Please see the table below for the UK’s financial commitments to the development aid budget to improve water supply and sanitation for the last four years (statistics are only given for broad sector rather than by individual intervention):</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Spend in £</p></td><td><p>Spend as %</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010-2013</p></td><td><p>£444m</p></td><td><p>1.9%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Full details of the UK’s financial commitments to the development aid budget are published annually in ‘Statistics on International Development’ (SID). The most recent version, for 2014 is available online at <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/statistics-on-international-development-2014" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/statistics-on-international-development-2014</a> .</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Northover more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-11-10T15:15:27.1004577Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-10T15:15:27.1004577Z
star this property answering member
2539
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Northover more like this
unstar this property tabling member
3895
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead more like this
100979
star this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government more like this
star this property answering dept id 7 more like this
unstar this property answering dept short name Communities and Local Government more like this
star this property answering dept sort name Communities and Local Government more like this
star this property hansard heading Welfare Assistance Schemes more like this
unstar this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they expect to publish the review of the use of local welfare provision funding, mentioned at paragraph 1.10 of Local Welfare Provision in 2015–16; and whether they plan to make a written statement when it is published and place a copy of the review in the library of the House. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
star this property uin HL2435 more like this
star this property answer
answer
star this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-11-06more like thismore than 2014-11-06
star this property answer text <p>I refer the noble Lady to my answer to the noble, Lady Baroness King of Bow, of 5 November 2014 (<em>Official</em> <em>Report, </em>Column WA 255).</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-11-06T14:17:58.2659077Zmore like thismore than 2014-11-06T14:17:58.2659077Z
star this property answering member
4210
star this property label Biography information for Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon more like this
unstar this property tabling member
4234
unstar this property label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this