Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

64607

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
answering dept id	13
answering dept short name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
answering dept sort name	Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
hansard heading	Bovine Tuberculosis
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government why it was a requirement that there should be access to only 70 per cent of the land area of the badger culling pilots; and whether that percentage was achieved in each of the two counties involved in the pilots.
tabling member printed	Lord Hylton
uin	HL690
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/07/2014 answer text <p>As set out in Guidance to Natural England, applications for culling licences were required to have access for culling to at least 70% of the total land area in the application. This is based on evidence from the Randomised Badger Culling Trial. In issuing a licence to each area in autumn 2012, Natural England confirmed that the applications from West Somerset and Gloucestershire had met this condition.</p> answering member printed Lord De Mauley question first answered 10/07/2014 12:37:33 answering member 2202 label Biography information for Lord De Mauley
tabling member	2018 label Biography information for Lord Hylton

64608

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	Department for International Development
answering dept id	20
answering dept short name	International Development
answering dept sort name	International Development
hansard heading	Syria
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to lead a concerted international effort to help the governments of Jordan and Lebanon and international humanitarian agencies to cope with refugees and displaced people from Syria.
tabling member printed	Lord Hylton
uin	HL691
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/07/2014 answer text <p> </p><p>The UK has committed a total of £600 million for humanitarian assistance in response to the Syria crisis, including £292 million to support refugees in neighbouring countries such as Jordan and Lebanon. The UK helped to launch and mobilise international support for UNICEF's ‘No Lost Generation' Initiative and has allocated £50m to provide protection, trauma care and education for children affected by the crisis.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Baroness Northover question first answered 09/07/2014 16:39:09 answering member 2539 label Biography information for Baroness Northover
tabling member	2018 label Biography information for Lord Hylton

64609

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
answering dept id	16
answering dept short name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
answering dept sort name	Foreign and Commonwealth Office
hansard heading	North Korea
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will propose the renewal of the mandate of the United Nations Human Rights Council's Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
tabling member printed	Lord Hylton
uin	HL692
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/07/2014 answer text <p>The Government has no plans to propose the renewal of the mandate of the United Nations Human Rights Council's Commission of Inquiry (COI) on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). The COI has fulfilled its mandate and has produced its final report after systematically collecting detailed accounts of appalling human rights violations in a way that has never been done previously.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Baroness Warsi question first answered 14/07/2014 10:36:38 answering member 3839 label Biography information for Baroness Warsi
tabling member	2018 label Biography information for Lord Hylton

64610

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	Department for Energy and Climate Change
answering dept id	63
answering dept short name	Energy and Climate Change
answering dept sort name	Energy and Climate Change
hansard heading	Fracking: Somerset
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government when hydraulic fracturing for natural gas begins in the north Somerset coal-field and the Mendip Hills; what safeguards will be enforced to prevent contamination of (1) the Bath hot springs, (2) the Cheddar Gorge caves and underground water-courses, and (3) all other local water supplies; and who will be responsible for such safeguards.
tabling member printed	Lord Hylton
uin	HL693
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/07/2014 answer text <p>There are no current proposals for hydraulic fracturing operations in the areas of Bath or the Cheddar Gorge.</p><p>Planning applications for onshore oil and gas development (including shale gas) must be subject to consultation with the local community and with relevant statutory consultation bodies such as the Environment Agency before the mineral planning authority takes a decision. Any decision must take account of all relevant planning issues. In this context, the National Planning Policy Framework states that, when considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, local planning authorities should give great weight to the asset's conservation.</p><p>The National Policy Framework also advises that any proposed development on land within or outside a Site of Special Scientific Interest, such as Cheddar Gorge, should not normally be permitted if it is likely to have an adverse effect on the Site (either individually or in combination with other developments).</p><p>I can also confirm that there are other regulatory controls which would need to be satisfied if any application for oil and gas development received planning permission. There are administered by the Environment Agency, the HSE and the Department. These controls will ensure that all prospective threats to the environment, or to safety, are effectively controlled. In particular, the Environment Agency will not permit any activity which might pose a threat to groundwater.</p><p> </p> answering member printed Baroness Verma question first answered 09/07/2014 16:34:44 answering member 3790 label Biography information for Baroness Verma
tabling member	2018 label Biography information for Lord Hylton

64611

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	Pupil Exclusions
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many secondary school pupils who were (1) permanently excluded, or (2) excluded for one or more fixed periods since 2000, subsequently passed a GCSE in (a) one, (b) two, or (c) three or more subjects.
tabling member printed	Lord Quirk
uin	HL694
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/07/2014 answer text <p>The information requested is only available at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>All children, regardless of circumstance or setting deserve a good education. We have taken a range of actions to drive up the quality of education for those children who are educated in alternative provision (AP) following an exclusion, including through the introduction of AP academies and AP free schools.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of permanent and fixed period exclusions since 2000 is published in the “Permanent and fixed period exclusions from schools in England: 2011 to 2012 academic year” Statistical First Release[1]. Information on fixed period exclusions was collected for the first time in 2003/04. Information for 2012/13 will be published on 31 July 2014.</p><p> </p><p>[1]<a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/permanent-and-fixed-period-exclusions-from-schools-in-england-2011-to-2012-academic-year" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/permanent-and-fixed-period-exclusions-from-schools-in-england-2011-to-2012-academic-year</a></p> answering member printed Lord Nash question first answered 09/07/2014 12:42:54 answering member 4270 label Biography information for Lord Nash
tabling member	3254 label Biography information for Lord Quirk

64613

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	Schools
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of having school children face each other in small groups, rather than facing the teacher, on (1) attentiveness, (2) learning, and (3) behaviour.
tabling member printed	Lord Quirk
uin	HL696
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/07/2014 answer text <p>The Department for Education has made no assessment of the impact of children facing, or not facing, the teacher.</p><p>The Department believes that teachers should have a plan for pupil seating arrangements in classrooms, rather than leaving it to pupil preference or chance. Where and how pupils are seated will depend entirely on the lesson and its objectives. Teachers are best placed to take these decisions.</p> answering member printed Lord Nash question first answered 09/07/2014 15:49:41 answering member 4270 label Biography information for Lord Nash
tabling member	3254 label Biography information for Lord Quirk

64614

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	Department for Education
answering dept id	60
answering dept short name	Education
answering dept sort name	Education
hansard heading	Schools: Discipline
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the need for parents to take responsibility for children's behaviour in schools.
tabling member printed	Lord Quirk
uin	HL697
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 09/07/2014 answer text <p>It is vital that teachers have the support and respect of parents to manage pupil behaviour so they can teach in an orderly environment.Good schools recognise the importance of engaging parents and have developed their own approaches according to the particular circumstances of the school.</p><p> </p><p>In response to a question about what teachers viewed as the most common factors causing poor behaviour in schools, excluding special educational needs and other medical factors, 72% considered ‘lack of parental support or poor parenting skills' as the most common factor causing poor behaviour, and ‘parental lack of respect for teachers and authority' was the second most frequently selected factor.</p><p> </p><p>We are aware of research, including that based on data from the National Child Development Study, that shows that parental involvement has a positive effect on children's achievement even when the influence of background factors such as social class and family size have been taken into account.</p><p> </p><p>The 2013 National Foundation for Educational Research (NfER) Teacher Voice Survey, commissioned by the Department for Education, found that 55% of teachers surveyed agreed that parents generally respected a teacher's authority to discipline pupils.</p><p> </p><p>In March 2014, we published a series of case studies on behaviour and bullying, which include examples of what good schools are doing to engage parents in a spirit of openness and shared responsibility. These case studies contain examples of the work good schools do with parents to encourage participation of hard-to-reach groups and are published online at:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/managing-behaviour-and-bullying-in-schools-case-studies" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/managing-behaviour-and-bullying-in-schools-case-studies</a></p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Nash question first answered 09/07/2014 13:40:43 answering member 4270 label Biography information for Lord Nash
tabling member	3254 label Biography information for Lord Quirk

64622

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Money Laundering
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Deighton on 17 June (WA 42), whether the current industry guidance, which has been approved by Treasury Ministers, has yet been issued; whether a risk-based approach under the Fourth Money Laundering Directive means that in the United Kingdom, United Kingdom parliamentarians will be treated as politically exposed persons; and, if so, whether the industry guidance will need to be revised.
tabling member printed	Lord Clement-Jones
uin	HL705
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/07/2014 answer text <p>A range of industry anti-money laundering guidance has been issued by bodies such as the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG). The last major revision of the JMLSG guidance was in 2011 although some detailed changes were made in 2013 and 2014. This material is published on the JMLSG website - <a href="http://www.jmlsg.org.uk/" target="_blank">http://www.jmlsg.org.uk/</a></p><p> </p><p>Discussions of the proposed Fourth Money Laundering Directive are continuing. The expectation is that in accordance with the updated global standards adopted by the Financial Action Task Force, domestic Politically Exposed Persons, including UK Parliamentarians may, on a risk-based assessment, be subject to enhanced due diligence.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Treasury expects that if the Directive is adopted and transposed into UK law, UK anti-money laundering guidance will need to be revised.</p> answering member printed Lord Deighton question first answered 10/07/2014 14:32:58 answering member 4262 label Biography information for Lord Deighton
tabling member	3396 label Biography information for Lord Clement-Jones

64623

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Financial Services: Taxation
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the eventual cost to HM Treasury of the European Union's proposed financial transaction tax should it be enforced in the United Kingdom.
tabling member printed	Lord Pearson of Rannoch
uin	HL706
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/07/2014 answer text <p>It is likely that any eventual FTT directive will be significantly different to, and narrower than, the current draft proposal. We will assess any revised proposal carefully against our concerns.</p> answering member printed Lord Deighton question first answered 10/07/2014 14:33:24 answering member 4262 label Biography information for Lord Deighton
tabling member	3153 label Biography information for Lord Pearson of Rannoch

64624

registered interest
date	30/06/2014
answering body	HM Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	CaTreasury
hansard heading	Financial Services: EU Action
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the eventual cost to HM Treasury of the European Union's proposed Alternative Investment Fund Managers' Directive should it be enforced in the United Kingdom.
tabling member printed	Lord Pearson of Rannoch
uin	HL707
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/07/2014 answer text <p>The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) entered into force on 22 July 2013.</p><p> </p><p>Costs or benefits to the Exchequer as a result of the AIFMD will result from commercial decisions that have yet to be taken by investment management firms as to whether the regulatory cost of doing business in the UK against other jurisdictions leads them to increase or decrease their activity here. Therefore no reliable assessment can be made at this time. Nevertheless the Government will continue to monitor the effects of AIFMD on the UK investment management industry.</p><p> </p><p>The Government has worked closely with industry to ensure that the requirements of AIFMD have been applied in as proportionate manner as possible so as to cause minimal disruption to UK firms and to maintain the UK's competitive status as a global fund management centre.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>An impact assessment estimating the costs to UK business was published alongside the implementing regulations. It is publically available on the www.legislation.gov.uk website.</p> answering member printed Lord Deighton question first answered 10/07/2014 14:34:25 answering member 4262 label Biography information for Lord Deighton
tabling member	3153 label Biography information for Lord Pearson of Rannoch