Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

64605
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
star this property answering dept id 13 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
star this property hansard heading Bovine Tuberculosis more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what proportion of the badgers shot or trapped in the Somerset and Gloucestershire pilot culls were infected with tuberculosis. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Hylton more like this
star this property uin HL688 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-14more like thismore than 2014-07-14
star this property answer text <p> </p><p>The purpose of the structured programme of field observations of controlled shooting and the associated post-mortem examination of carcases was to gather the required evidence to support an assessment of humaneness of controlled shooting, not to test badgers culled for infection with <em>M.bovis</em>.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord De Mauley more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-14T13:22:01.9909591Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-14T13:22:01.9909591Z
star this property answering member
2202
star this property label Biography information for Lord De Mauley more like this
star this property tabling member
2018
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Hylton more like this
64606
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
star this property answering dept id 13 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
star this property hansard heading Bovine Tuberculosis more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many separate contractors were employed in (1) Somerset, and (2) Gloucestershire in the recent badger culls; and how many people were actively engaged in culling in each county. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Hylton more like this
star this property uin HL689 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-15more like thismore than 2014-07-15
star this property answer text <p> </p><p>During the pilot badger culls of 2013, the number of contractors employed in Somerset was 107, and 95 in Gloucestershire.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>As set out in the licences issued by Natural England to each area, the licensees were required to submit details of the persons they wished to be authorised to take or kill badgers. As such, a list of 107 such persons was provided for West Somerset and 95 provided for West Goucestershire. How many of these contractors were deployed or actively engaged in culling operations was and remains an operational matter for the licensees and, as such, this information is not available.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord De Mauley more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-15T17:20:44.8057832Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-15T17:20:44.8057832Z
star this property answering member
2202
star this property label Biography information for Lord De Mauley more like this
star this property tabling member
2018
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Hylton more like this
64607
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
star this property answering dept id 13 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
star this property hansard heading Bovine Tuberculosis more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government why it was a requirement that there should be access to only 70 per cent of the land area of the badger culling pilots; and whether that percentage was achieved in each of the two counties involved in the pilots. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Hylton more like this
star this property uin HL690 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-10more like thismore than 2014-07-10
star this property answer text <p>As set out in Guidance to Natural England, applications for culling licences were required to have access for culling to at least 70% of the total land area in the application. This is based on evidence from the Randomised Badger Culling Trial. In issuing a licence to each area in autumn 2012, Natural England confirmed that the applications from West Somerset and Gloucestershire had met this condition.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord De Mauley more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-10T12:37:33.2229203Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-10T12:37:33.2229203Z
star this property answering member
2202
star this property label Biography information for Lord De Mauley more like this
star this property tabling member
2018
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Hylton more like this
64608
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for International Development more like this
star this property answering dept id 20 more like this
star this property answering dept short name International Development more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name International Development more like this
star this property hansard heading Syria more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to lead a concerted international effort to help the governments of Jordan and Lebanon and international humanitarian agencies to cope with refugees and displaced people from Syria. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Hylton more like this
star this property uin HL691 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
star this property answer text <p> </p><p>The UK has committed a total of £600 million for humanitarian assistance in response to the Syria crisis, including £292 million to support refugees in neighbouring countries such as Jordan and Lebanon. The UK helped to launch and mobilise international support for UNICEF's ‘No Lost Generation' Initiative and has allocated £50m to provide protection, trauma care and education for children affected by the crisis.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Northover more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-09T16:39:09.9224072Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-09T16:39:09.9224072Z
star this property answering member
2539
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Northover more like this
star this property tabling member
2018
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Hylton more like this
64609
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
star this property answering dept id 16 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
star this property hansard heading North Korea more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will propose the renewal of the mandate of the United Nations Human Rights Council's Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Hylton more like this
star this property uin HL692 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-14more like thismore than 2014-07-14
star this property answer text <p>The Government has no plans to propose the renewal of the mandate of the United Nations Human Rights Council's Commission of Inquiry (COI) on Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). The COI has fulfilled its mandate and has produced its final report after systematically collecting detailed accounts of appalling human rights violations in a way that has never been done previously.</p><p> </p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Baroness Warsi more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-14T10:36:38.6927616Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-14T10:36:38.6927616Z
star this property answering member
3839
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Warsi more like this
star this property tabling member
2018
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Hylton more like this
64610
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Energy and Climate Change more like this
star this property answering dept id 63 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Energy and Climate Change more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Energy and Climate Change more like this
star this property hansard heading Fracking: Somerset more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government when hydraulic fracturing for natural gas begins in the north Somerset coal-field and the Mendip Hills; what safeguards will be enforced to prevent contamination of (1) the Bath hot springs, (2) the Cheddar Gorge caves and underground water-courses, and (3) all other local water supplies; and who will be responsible for such safeguards. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Hylton more like this
star this property uin HL693 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
star this property answer text <p>There are no current proposals for hydraulic fracturing operations in the areas of Bath or the Cheddar Gorge.</p><p>Planning applications for onshore oil and gas development (including shale gas) must be subject to consultation with the local community and with relevant statutory consultation bodies such as the Environment Agency before the mineral planning authority takes a decision. Any decision must take account of all relevant planning issues. In this context, the National Planning Policy Framework states that, when considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, local planning authorities should give great weight to the asset's conservation.</p><p>The National Policy Framework also advises that any proposed development on land within or outside a Site of Special Scientific Interest, such as Cheddar Gorge, should not normally be permitted if it is likely to have an adverse effect on the Site (either individually or in combination with other developments).</p><p>I can also confirm that there are other regulatory controls which would need to be satisfied if any application for oil and gas development received planning permission. There are administered by the Environment Agency, the HSE and the Department. These controls will ensure that all prospective threats to the environment, or to safety, are effectively controlled. In particular, the Environment Agency will not permit any activity which might pose a threat to groundwater.</p><p> </p>
star this property answering member printed Baroness Verma more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-09T16:34:44.9810477Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-09T16:34:44.9810477Z
star this property answering member
3790
star this property label Biography information for Baroness Verma more like this
star this property tabling member
2018
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Hylton more like this
64611
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Education more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Pupil Exclusions more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many secondary school pupils who were (1) permanently excluded, or (2) excluded for one or more fixed periods since 2000, subsequently passed a GCSE in (a) one, (b) two, or (c) three or more subjects. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Quirk more like this
star this property uin HL694 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
star this property answer text <p>The information requested is only available at disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><p>All children, regardless of circumstance or setting deserve a good education. We have taken a range of actions to drive up the quality of education for those children who are educated in alternative provision (AP) following an exclusion, including through the introduction of AP academies and AP free schools.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of permanent and fixed period exclusions since 2000 is published in the “Permanent and fixed period exclusions from schools in England: 2011 to 2012 academic year” Statistical First Release[1]. Information on fixed period exclusions was collected for the first time in 2003/04. Information for 2012/13 will be published on 31 July 2014.</p><p> </p><p>[1]<a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/permanent-and-fixed-period-exclusions-from-schools-in-england-2011-to-2012-academic-year" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/permanent-and-fixed-period-exclusions-from-schools-in-england-2011-to-2012-academic-year</a></p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-09T12:42:54.8228811Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
star this property answering member
4270
star this property label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
star this property tabling member
3254
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Quirk more like this
64612
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Education more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Schools: Discipline more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to address the conclusion of the recent Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development report that 40 per cent of classrooms in England are "not favourable to learning" because of bad behaviour. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Quirk more like this
star this property uin HL695 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-14more like thismore than 2014-07-14
star this property answer text <p>Good behaviour and discipline are key to effective teaching and learning. The recent OECD report identified that serious disciplinary problems in England are unusual and in most schools the learning environment is good. Just 21% of teachers in England agree or strongly agree that they have to wait quite a long time at the start of their class for students to quieten down. This is less than the median for all countries of 27% and below all but one of the high-performing countries. England is typically very close to the international average on other measures of classroom disciplinary environment, including disruptive noise and interruptions in the classroom.</p><p> </p><p>This Government has never been complacent in trying to equip schools with the tools they need to manage discipline in the classroom. That is why we gave schools the powers to impose same-day detentions, extended their powers to search for items that could cause harm or offence, made clear that schools should not have a ‘no touch' policy and clarified the use of reasonable force. The Government also introduced a system of independent review panels which, unlike the previous system, cannot undermine schools' decisions on permanent exclusion. In September 2012 we introduced the New National Professional Qualification for Headship with more robust content on behaviour management. In addition, Ofsted have begun implementing no-notice follow-up school monitoring inspections where concerns were previously identified about standards of behaviour.</p><p> </p><p>More recently, in February 2014, and following results from the Teacher Voice Survey (2013) which showed that one in three secondary teachers lacked confidence in their powers to discipline pupils, we:</p><p>· issued updated behaviour advice to make clear that tough but proportionate sanctions, including litter picking in the playground, removing graffiti, writing lines or an essay, are all valid punishments;</p><p>· produced a series of case studies showing how good schools manage behaviour, ranging from the use of inclusion art projects, having a specially modified curriculum, using Saturday detentions and increased visibility of senior staff around school throughout the day.</p><p> </p><p>We remain determined to support schools in providing safe, calm and orderly classrooms where pupils can learn effectively.</p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-14T16:11:27.8899302Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-14T16:11:27.8899302Z
star this property answering member
4270
star this property label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
star this property tabling member
3254
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Quirk more like this
64613
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Education more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Schools more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of having school children face each other in small groups, rather than facing the teacher, on (1) attentiveness, (2) learning, and (3) behaviour. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Quirk more like this
star this property uin HL696 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
star this property answer text <p>The Department for Education has made no assessment of the impact of children facing, or not facing, the teacher.</p><p>The Department believes that teachers should have a plan for pupil seating arrangements in classrooms, rather than leaving it to pupil preference or chance. Where and how pupils are seated will depend entirely on the lesson and its objectives. Teachers are best placed to take these decisions.</p> more like this
star this property answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-09T15:49:41.0618255Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-09T15:49:41.0618255Z
star this property answering member
4270
star this property label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
star this property tabling member
3254
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Quirk more like this
64614
unstar this property registered interest false more like this
star this property date remove filter
star this property answering body
Department for Education more like this
star this property answering dept id 60 more like this
star this property answering dept short name Education more like this
unstar this property answering dept sort name Education more like this
star this property hansard heading Schools: Discipline more like this
star this property house id 2 more like this
star this property legislature
25277
star this property pref label House of Lords more like this
star this property question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the need for parents to take responsibility for children's behaviour in schools. more like this
star this property tabling member printed
Lord Quirk more like this
star this property uin HL697 more like this
star this property answer
answer
unstar this property is ministerial correction false more like this
star this property date of answer less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
star this property answer text <p>It is vital that teachers have the support and respect of parents to manage pupil behaviour so they can teach in an orderly environment.Good schools recognise the importance of engaging parents and have developed their own approaches according to the particular circumstances of the school.</p><p> </p><p>In response to a question about what teachers viewed as the most common factors causing poor behaviour in schools, excluding special educational needs and other medical factors, 72% considered ‘lack of parental support or poor parenting skills' as the most common factor causing poor behaviour, and ‘parental lack of respect for teachers and authority' was the second most frequently selected factor.</p><p> </p><p>We are aware of research, including that based on data from the National Child Development Study, that shows that parental involvement has a positive effect on children's achievement even when the influence of background factors such as social class and family size have been taken into account.</p><p> </p><p>The 2013 National Foundation for Educational Research (NfER) Teacher Voice Survey, commissioned by the Department for Education, found that 55% of teachers surveyed agreed that parents generally respected a teacher's authority to discipline pupils.</p><p> </p><p>In March 2014, we published a series of case studies on behaviour and bullying, which include examples of what good schools are doing to engage parents in a spirit of openness and shared responsibility. These case studies contain examples of the work good schools do with parents to encourage participation of hard-to-reach groups and are published online at:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/managing-behaviour-and-bullying-in-schools-case-studies" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/managing-behaviour-and-bullying-in-schools-case-studies</a></p><p> </p>
star this property answering member printed Lord Nash more like this
star this property question first answered
less than 2014-07-09T13:40:43.7377999Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-09T13:40:43.7377999Z
star this property answering member
4270
star this property label Biography information for Lord Nash more like this
star this property tabling member
3254
unstar this property label Biography information for Lord Quirk more like this