Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1423195
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-18more like thismore than 2022-02-18
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Trials remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many trials were abandoned (a) from their start dates and (b) due to a lack of (i) prosecution and (ii) defence advocates in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 125044 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-02-24more like thismore than 2022-02-24
answer text <p>Data collated centrally by MOJ does not include a count of ‘abandoned’ trials; instead we collect data on trials that are rescheduled for a future listing (ineffective).</p><p>An ineffective trial is a trial that does not go ahead on the scheduled trial date and a further listing is required. This can be due to action or inaction by one or more of the prosecution, the defence or the court.</p><p>This data is published as part of the Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly release and the latest data is available to September 2021: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-court-statistics-quarterly-july-to-september-2021" target="_blank">Criminal court statistics quarterly: July to September 2021 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)</a></p><p> </p><p>There are a number of reasons why a trial might be ineffective. For example, 16% of ineffective trials in 2021 are caused by either the prosecution or defence not being ready to proceed, and 12% are caused by the prosecution witness being absent.</p><p>We continue to work with Criminal Justice System partners to increase compliance with Better Case Management, a set of best practice principles published in 2015, and – in doing so – reduce the ineffective trial rate by ensuring all parties are fully prepared for the trial.</p>
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-02-24T18:00:08.22Zmore like thismore than 2022-02-24T18:00:08.22Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
1423199
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-02-18more like thismore than 2022-02-18
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Trials remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, the (a) mean and (b) median average time taken was for a trial where the original start date was abandoned to be assigned a successful new date in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 125048 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-03-04more like thismore than 2022-03-04
answer text <p>Data collated centrally by MOJ does not include a count of ‘abandoned’ trials. Rather, trials are recorded as ‘ineffective’, meaning, that does not go ahead on the scheduled trial date and a further listing is required. This can be due to action or inaction by one or more of the prosecution, the defence or the court.</p><p> </p><p>There has been an increase in ineffective trials during the pandemic, partly driven by defendants being ill due to Covid. We continue to take action to tackle the impact the pandemic has had on our courts and tribunals system. We invested a quarter of a billion pounds to support recovery in the last financial year (20/21). In the recent Spending Review, more than £1 billion has been allocated to boost capacity and accelerate recovery from the pandemic in courts and tribunals. This increased funding will enable us to hear more cases and reduce backlogs. We removed the limit on the number of days the Crown Court can sit in the 21/22 financial year and as a result of this, in the next financial year we expect to get through 20% more Crown Court cases than we did pre-Covid (116,700 in 22/23 compared to 97,000 in 19/20).</p><p> </p><p>We have also been asked to provide data on how many trials for offences of rape, sexual assault and indecent assault have been abandoned from their start dates and are awaiting a new start date as of 17 February 2022. However, the total number of trials for rape, sexual assault and indecent assault would include those where a new trial date is not required (e.g. a plea has changed to guilty), so we are not able to accurately answer that question.</p><p>We have provided data on ineffective trial reasons where the sole reason is no advocate being available for one or both sides in the attached document. The data for each calendar year includes the figures as of 31<sup>st</sup> December of that year. For 2021, we provide data up to the 30<sup>th</sup> September which is the latest data available. This data shows that before the pandemic, the numbers of ineffective trials were falling significantly across all the offence types listed.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
grouped question UIN
125045 more like this
125046 more like this
125047 more like this
125049 more like this
125050 more like this
125051 more like this
125052 more like this
125053 more like this
125054 more like this
125055 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-03-04T16:26:32.213Zmore like thismore than 2022-03-04T16:26:32.213Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
attachment
1
file name 125045-125055 table.xlsx more like this
title 125045_55_table more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
1387789
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-12-14more like thismore than 2021-12-14
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Trials remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, whether (a) she or (b) the Crown Prosecution Service have set a maximum limit on the number of criminal cases awaiting trial, to act as a target for capping and reducing the current backlog of cases. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 92849 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-01-05more like thismore than 2022-01-05
answer text <p>Neither the Attorney General nor the Crown Prosecution Service set maximum limits for the amount of time a criminal case should await trial.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-01-05T09:00:47.677Zmore like thismore than 2022-01-05T09:00:47.677Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
1387790
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-12-14more like thismore than 2021-12-14
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Trials remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, whether (a) she or (b) the Crown Prosecution Service have set a maximum limit on the amount of time criminal cases should await trial, to act as a target for capping and reducing the increase in waiting times. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 92850 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-12-21more like thismore than 2021-12-21
answer text <p>Neither the Attorney General nor the Crown Prosecution Service set maximum limits for the number of criminal cases awaiting trial.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-12-21T09:41:20.737Zmore like thismore than 2021-12-21T09:41:20.737Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this