Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1015532
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-27more like thismore than 2018-11-27
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading Palliative Care: Children more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will develop outcome indicators to measure the extent to which children with life-limiting conditions and their families are able to make choices on the palliative care they receive. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 196297 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-12-03more like thismore than 2018-12-03
answer text <p>Public Health England has no plans to develop indicators on the extent to which children with life limiting conditions and their families are able to make choices on the palliative care they receive. Data is not held on patient preferences for palliative care on which to base such indicators.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Gosport more like this
answering member printed Caroline Dinenage more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-12-03T17:39:16.217Zmore like thismore than 2018-12-03T17:39:16.217Z
answering member
4008
label Biography information for Dame Caroline Dinenage more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this
999659
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-01more like thismore than 2018-11-01
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit: Disability more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the effect of measures related to universal credit announced in Budget 2018 on disabled people who are (a) in work and (b) out of work. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 187026 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-06more like thismore than 2018-11-06
answer text <p>We will spend over £50 billion in 2018/19 on benefits to support disabled people and people with health conditions.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>In the budget we have announced that work allowance rates will be increased by £1000 from April 2019 and uprated in line with inflation thereafter. Raising the current work allowances will direct additional funding to working disabled people by allowing them to keep more of their earnings before the earnings taper is applied. By increasing the work allowances many disabled families on UC will be £630 better off, in a package worth £1.7bn in 2023/24.</p><p> </p><p>It has also been announced that income related legacy benefits, Income Support (IS), Income Related Employment and Support Allowance and Income Based Jobseeker’s Allowance will continue for two weeks after a claim for Universal Credit has been made. This change will particularly support vulnerable claimants who may have been on benefits for some time, have little or no savings to fall back on and currently rely on regular payments at shorter intervals.</p><p> </p><p>We have also previously announced that transitional payments for former recipients of Severe Disability Premium (SDP) and protection for those who are receiving SDP as part of their existing benefit entitlement. These claimants will now only move to UC with transitional protection. Those who have already moved to UC will be considered for a lump sum payment that will be back-dated to the start of their UC claim, and will receive ongoing monthly payments.</p><p> </p><p>These regulations provide transitional support to recipients of the SDP while removing the complexity of dealing with different rules for seven different disability additions. 500,000 vulnerable people receive the SDP alongside their benefit awards. All of these people will ultimately move to UC and benefit from this enhanced support.</p><p> </p><p>Not replicating the Severe Disability Premium in UC means the government can target additional support to a wider group. UC provides a higher level of support for the most severely disabled people than the benefit it replaces, worth up to £328.32 per month.</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 187027 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-06T17:52:11.44Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-06T17:52:11.44Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this
999660
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-01more like thismore than 2018-11-01
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Disability more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she had made of the levels of spending on social security for disabled people as a result of the provisions of Budget 2018. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 187027 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-06more like thismore than 2018-11-06
answer text <p>We will spend over £50 billion in 2018/19 on benefits to support disabled people and people with health conditions.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>In the budget we have announced that work allowance rates will be increased by £1000 from April 2019 and uprated in line with inflation thereafter. Raising the current work allowances will direct additional funding to working disabled people by allowing them to keep more of their earnings before the earnings taper is applied. By increasing the work allowances many disabled families on UC will be £630 better off, in a package worth £1.7bn in 2023/24.</p><p> </p><p>It has also been announced that income related legacy benefits, Income Support (IS), Income Related Employment and Support Allowance and Income Based Jobseeker’s Allowance will continue for two weeks after a claim for Universal Credit has been made. This change will particularly support vulnerable claimants who may have been on benefits for some time, have little or no savings to fall back on and currently rely on regular payments at shorter intervals.</p><p> </p><p>We have also previously announced that transitional payments for former recipients of Severe Disability Premium (SDP) and protection for those who are receiving SDP as part of their existing benefit entitlement. These claimants will now only move to UC with transitional protection. Those who have already moved to UC will be considered for a lump sum payment that will be back-dated to the start of their UC claim, and will receive ongoing monthly payments.</p><p> </p><p>These regulations provide transitional support to recipients of the SDP while removing the complexity of dealing with different rules for seven different disability additions. 500,000 vulnerable people receive the SDP alongside their benefit awards. All of these people will ultimately move to UC and benefit from this enhanced support.</p><p> </p><p>Not replicating the Severe Disability Premium in UC means the government can target additional support to a wider group. UC provides a higher level of support for the most severely disabled people than the benefit it replaces, worth up to £328.32 per month.</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 187026 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-06T17:52:11.487Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-06T17:52:11.487Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this
999661
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-01more like thismore than 2018-11-01
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit: Self-employed more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the potential effect of changes to universal credit announced in Budget 2018 on self-employed people. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 187028 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-06more like thismore than 2018-11-06
answer text <p>The legacy system serves to prop up unsustainable enterprises indefinitely and trap claimants in welfare dependency. We want to support people to be self-employed when it is the right thing for them to do to be financially self-sufficient. Key to this is continuing to support people in, or considering, self-employment to progress to a level of sustained financial self-sufficiency.</p><p> </p><p>We recognise that it takes time for new businesses to grow and that even established businesses can experience difficulties. Last month’s Autumn Budget announced a 12-month exemption period from the Universal Credit Minimum Income Floor (MIF) for all new gainfully self-employed claimants, and an extension of the New Enterprise Allowance programme for a further two years beyond its current expiry date of March 2019.</p><p> </p><p>We already provide a 12-month start-up period where the MIF is not applied for newly created businesses. The new 12-month exemption period will include new claims, such as from those running a long-standing business and those moving from legacy benefits to Universal Credit, whether following a change of circumstances or moved by DWP. This also includes those existing Universal Credit claimants who become gainfully self-employed.</p><p> </p><p>These changes will provide all gainfully self-employed claimants with an equal chance, and support from specially trained work coaches, to grow their earnings, prepare and adjust for the application of the MIF. Currently, we forecast that, in 2023/24 130,000 self-employed people will have the space to grow a successful business when moving on to Universal Credit</p>
answering member constituency Reading West more like this
answering member printed Alok Sharma more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-06T17:47:46.63Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-06T17:47:46.63Z
answering member
4014
label Biography information for Sir Alok Sharma more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this
997277
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-10-29more like thismore than 2018-10-29
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit: Telephone Services more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many calls to the universal credit helpline were (a) received and (b) abandoned in each month from November 2017 to date . more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 185027 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-11-01more like thismore than 2018-11-01
answer text <p>The table below shows the total number of calls received each month to the Universal Credit helplines and the total number of calls abandoned by the caller in each month.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Calls Received</p></td><td><p>Calls Abandoned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-17</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-17</p></td><td><p>802,752</p></td><td><p>101,460</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan-18</p></td><td><p>1,093,644</p></td><td><p>106,273</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feb-18</p></td><td><p>988,243</p></td><td><p>120,511</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-18</p></td><td><p>1,056,778</p></td><td><p>133,124</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-18</p></td><td><p>1,028,343</p></td><td><p>122,402</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-18</p></td><td><p>1,065,983</p></td><td><p>153,988</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-18</p></td><td><p>1,128,677</p></td><td><p>214,973</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-18</p></td><td><p>1,230,751</p></td><td><p>249,513</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-18</p></td><td><p>1,230,985</p></td><td><p>256,914</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-18</p></td><td><p>1,171,124</p></td><td><p>209,140</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Notes:</strong></p><ol><li>The data provided is for Universal Credit Full and Live Service, including outsourced helplines and is derived from unpublished management information, collected and intended for Departmental use. This has not been quality assured to national statistics or official statistics publication standards.</li><li>Calls “Abandoned” is the total number of calls abandoned by the caller.</li><li>Accurate telephony data for the complete month of November 2017 is not available due to a technical issue during roll out of the DWP Next Generation Contact Centre (NGCC) system.</li></ol>
answering member constituency Reading West more like this
answering member printed Alok Sharma more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-01T16:32:19.337Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-01T16:32:19.337Z
answering member
4014
label Biography information for Sir Alok Sharma more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this
986400
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-10-12more like thismore than 2018-10-12
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Hearing Impairment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with a primary disability of deafness or hearing impairment aged between 16 to 25 applied for personal independence payment in the last 12 months. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 178504 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-10-22more like thismore than 2018-10-22
answer text <p>In the application process, claimants’ main disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. It is not recorded at the point of application. The Department does not therefore hold data on the number of applicants to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) with a primary disability of deafness or hearing impairment.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 178374 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-10-22T11:13:32.36Zmore like thismore than 2018-10-22T11:13:32.36Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
previous answer version
79250
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this
986401
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-10-12more like thismore than 2018-10-12
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Hearing Impairment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many applications her Department has received from deaf people aged 16 to 25 for personal independence payments in the last 12 months; and (a) what the outcome of each claim was and (b) how many of those applicants have requested a mandatory reconsideration or appealed to the social security tribunal. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 178505 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-10-22more like thismore than 2018-10-22
answer text <p>In the application process, claimants’ main disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. It is not recorded at the point of application. The Department does not therefore hold data on the number of all applicants or outcome of all applications to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for people with a primary disability of deafness or hearing impairment.</p><p> </p><p>For those who have undergone a PIP assessment, information on the number of initial decisions in 2017/18, and mandatory reconsiderations and appeals, for people aged 16 to 25 with a main disabling condition of a hearing disorder are shown in the table below.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Initial decisions, mandatory reconsiderations and appeals</strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Initial Decisions</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>1,450</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Awarded</p></td><td><p>620</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disallowed</p></td><td><p>830</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Withdrawn</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Mandatory Reconsiderations</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Registrations</p></td><td><p>410</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Clearances</p></td><td><p>400</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>New Decision - Award Changed</p></td><td><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>New Decision - Award Unchanged</p></td><td><p>340</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Decision Not Revised</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Withdrawn/<br> Cancelled</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Appeals</strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Receipts</p></td><td><p>160</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Clearances</p></td><td><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Decision overturned</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Decision maintained</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to initial PIP decisions in 2017/18 and any MRs and appeals relating to those initial decisions recorded up to June 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and is for both new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 178375 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-10-22T11:22:24.733Zmore like thismore than 2018-10-22T11:22:24.733Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
previous answer version
79251
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this
973201
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-09-13more like thismore than 2018-09-13
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the draft Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) (Managed Migration) Regulations 2018, what estimate she has made of the number and proportion of claimants in receipt of (a) severe disability premium and (b) enhanced disability premium under employment support allowance who will see a reduction in social security support as a result of moving to universal credit. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 174727 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-10-09more like thismore than 2018-10-09
answer text <p>The Government has already made a commitment that anyone who is moved to Universal Credit without a change of circumstance will be protected. Transitional protection will be provided to eligible claimants, including those in receipt of severe disability or enhanced disability premiums, to safeguard their existing benefit entitlement until their circumstances change.</p><p>We are also changing the system to prevent those claimants in receipt of Severe Disability Premium on existing benefits from moving to Universal Credit until they qualify for transitional protection. In addition, we will provide both an on-going payment to claimants who have already lost this Premium as a consequence of moving to Universal Credit and an additional payment to cover the period since they moved.</p><p> </p><p>These changes are subject to parliamentary approval of the Universal Credit Managed Migration and Transitional Protection Regulations which we intend to bring forward in the autumn. In the legacy system there are £2.4bn of unclaimed benefits not taken up by people who need them, because they do not know about them. These Regulations will ensure that 700,000 more people will get paid their full entitlement under Universal Credit.</p>
answering member constituency Reading West more like this
answering member printed Alok Sharma more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-10-09T16:19:31.393Zmore like thismore than 2018-10-09T16:19:31.393Z
answering member
4014
label Biography information for Sir Alok Sharma more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this
972383
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-09-12more like thismore than 2018-09-12
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the Written Statement of 19 January 2018 on Welfare, HCWS414, how many of the 1.6 million personal independence payment cases have been reviewed by her Department to date. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 174060 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-10-09more like thismore than 2018-10-09
answer text <p>As outlined in the Written Statement of 25 June 2018 (HCWS793), my Department is carrying out an administrative exercise to identify anyone who may be entitled to more support under Personal Independence Payment (PIP) as a result of the MH and RJ judgments.</p><p> </p><p>As additionally outlined in the Written Statement of 25 June 2018, I am committed to updating the House regularly and a statement on progress of this exercise will be tabled in the autumn.</p><p> </p><p>The administrative cost of the exercise will depend on a number of factors, including the number of cases identified.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 174061 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-10-09T10:44:34.23Zmore like thismore than 2018-10-09T10:44:34.23Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this
972384
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-09-12more like thismore than 2018-09-12
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Mental Health more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 2 February 2018 to Question 125505 on Personal Independence Payment: Mental Health, what recent assessment she has made of the administrative costs to her Department of reviewing the 1.6 million personal independence payment claims. more like this
tabling member constituency Oldham East and Saddleworth more like this
tabling member printed
Debbie Abrahams more like this
uin 174061 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-10-09more like thismore than 2018-10-09
answer text <p>As outlined in the Written Statement of 25 June 2018 (HCWS793), my Department is carrying out an administrative exercise to identify anyone who may be entitled to more support under Personal Independence Payment (PIP) as a result of the MH and RJ judgments.</p><p> </p><p>As additionally outlined in the Written Statement of 25 June 2018, I am committed to updating the House regularly and a statement on progress of this exercise will be tabled in the autumn.</p><p> </p><p>The administrative cost of the exercise will depend on a number of factors, including the number of cases identified.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 174060 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-10-09T10:44:34.29Zmore like thismore than 2018-10-09T10:44:34.29Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4212
label Biography information for Debbie Abrahams more like this