Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1547595
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-02more like thismore than 2022-12-02
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Taxpayer Protection Taskforce: Staff more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many people worked for the Taxpayer Protection Taskforce in each month between April 2021 and December 2022. more like this
tabling member constituency Leeds West more like this
tabling member printed
Rachel Reeves more like this
uin 101713 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-07more like thismore than 2022-12-07
answer text <p>At Spring Budget 2021 the Government announced a £100 million investment into the Taxpayer Protection Taskforce of 1,250 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff up to March 2023. The taskforce was established to extend HMRC’s work to address fraud and error in the COVID support schemes that they administered (Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, Self-Employment Income Support Scheme, and Eat Out to Help Out). The table below shows the month-by-month breakdown of resources deployed in the taskforce from April 2021 to end of October 2022. HMRC are unable to provide more recent data as this is still being assured.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1: Monthly breakdown of FTE staff deployed to taskforce:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Apr 2021</p></td><td><p>May 2021</p></td><td><p>Jun 2021</p></td><td><p>Jul 2021</p></td><td><p>Aug 2021</p></td><td><p>Sep 2021</p></td><td><p>Oct 2021</p></td><td><p>Nov 2021</p></td><td><p>Dec 2021</p></td><td><p>Jan 2022</p></td><td><p>Feb 2022</p></td><td><p>Mar 2022</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total FTE</p></td><td><p>908</p></td><td><p>1,018</p></td><td><p>1,216</p></td><td><p>1,291</p></td><td><p>1,228</p></td><td><p>1,256</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>1,184</p></td><td><p>1,145</p></td><td><p>1,101</p></td><td><p>1,096</p></td><td><p>1,142</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Apr 2022</p></td><td><p>May 2022</p></td><td><p>Jun 2022</p></td><td><p>Jul 2022</p></td><td><p>Aug 2022</p></td><td><p>Sep 2022</p></td><td><p>Oct 2022</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total FTE</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>1,155</p></td><td><p>1,246</p></td><td><p>1,203</p></td><td><p>1,230</p></td><td><p>1,232</p></td><td><p>1,187</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-07T16:27:15.317Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-07T16:27:15.317Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
4031
label Biography information for Rachel Reeves more like this
1547632
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-02more like thismore than 2022-12-02
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Safe Hands Plans: Insolvency more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Government plans to help support those people affected by the collapse of the Safe Hand Funeral plan group. more like this
tabling member constituency Wirral South more like this
tabling member printed
Alison McGovern more like this
uin 101719 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-07more like thismore than 2022-12-07
answer text <p>In January 2021, the government legislated to bring all pre-paid funeral plan providers and intermediaries within the regulatory remit of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) from 29 July 2022. This has ensured that 1.6 million funeral plan customers are, for the first time, protected by compulsory and robust regulation as they seek to put their affairs in order.</p><p> </p><p>Safe Hands Plans went into administration in March 2022. The government understands that this will be very concerning for customers of Safe Hands.</p><p> </p><p>While the detailed investigation being carried out by the administrators is ongoing, the government continues to work closely with the FCA to monitor the implementation of regulation in this sector.</p><p> </p><p>The government has been supportive of steps taken by the sector to provide assistance to Safe Hands customers. Dignity and Co-op – two of the largest providers in the country – have recently offered Safe Hands’ customers new funeral plans at a substantially discounted price, which may be helpful to some affected planholders.</p>
answering member constituency Arundel and South Downs more like this
answering member printed Andrew Griffith more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-07T11:36:15.487Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-07T11:36:15.487Z
answering member
4874
label Biography information for Andrew Griffith more like this
tabling member
4083
label Biography information for Alison McGovern more like this
1547644
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-02more like thismore than 2022-12-02
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Business: Government Assistance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the Ninth Report of Session 2021-22 of the Public Accounts Committee entitled Fraud and Error, HC 253, published on 30 June 2021, if he will take steps to implement the recommendation on introducing a presumption that the business beneficiaries of Government support schemes will be published. more like this
tabling member constituency Liverpool, Walton more like this
tabling member printed
Dan Carden more like this
uin 101778 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-07more like thismore than 2022-12-07
answer text <p>In the Government Response to the Ninth Report of Session 2021-22 of the Public Accounts Committee entitled Fraud and Error, the Government did not agree with the Public Account Committee’s recommendation to introduce a presumption that the business beneficiaries of Government support schemes should be published.</p><p> </p><p>The Government has a duty to protect the personal data and privacy of the smallest businesses in the UK, therefore the Government must exercise discretion on transparency requirements in the case of some business beneficiaries. Details of facilities made available under the COVID-19 loan schemes have been published where required.</p><p> </p><p>We have always been clear that fraud is unacceptable. The Government is taking action against those who have de-frauded the system by working closely with law enforcement, counter-fraud agencies and commercial lenders. The lack of publication has no bearing on the ability of the National Auditing Office to audit support schemes.</p>
answering member constituency Arundel and South Downs more like this
answering member printed Andrew Griffith more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-07T11:37:44.107Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-07T11:37:44.107Z
answering member
4874
label Biography information for Andrew Griffith more like this
tabling member
4651
label Biography information for Dan Carden more like this
1547663
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-02more like thismore than 2022-12-02
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Public Sector: Workplace Pensions more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment he has made of the adequacy of restrictions on transfers from public sector pension schemes to defined contribution schemes. more like this
tabling member constituency Ceredigion more like this
tabling member printed
Ben Lake more like this
uin 101769 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-07more like thismore than 2022-12-07
answer text <p>The Government acknowledges that for unfunded Public Service Pension Schemes, outward transfers are limited under the Pensions Act 2015 to schemes where members cannot avail themselves of pension draw down flexibilities introduced by that Act. This is because draw down would increase the upfront cost of these unfunded schemes to taxpayers.</p><p> </p><p>Where members move on from their public service employer, they can generally choose to become deferred members of their current pension scheme, which will see their rights in reformed 2015 Public Service Pension Schemes accrued up to this point fully price protected through continuing revaluations up to retirement.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-07T15:09:45.867Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-07T15:09:45.867Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4630
label Biography information for Ben Lake more like this
1547315
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Sanctions: Russia more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many applications for a licence to allow an activity or transaction that would otherwise be prohibited by the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, as amended, were (a) submitted to and (b) approved by the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation in (i) 2020; (ii) 2021 and (iii) 2022. more like this
tabling member constituency Aberavon more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Kinnock more like this
uin 100995 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-06more like thismore than 2022-12-06
answer text <p>The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) is responsible for financial sanctions enforcement. OFSI may issue a financial sanctions licence to allow an activity that would otherwise be prohibited under UK sanctions regimes.</p><p> </p><p>The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (“the Russia Regulations”) came into force on 1 January 2021. OFSI are able to provide the requested figures for the calendar years 2021 and 2022 year to date.</p><p> </p><p>In 2021, OFSI received 11 specific licence applications to allow an activity or transaction that would otherwise be prohibited by the Russia Regulations. In the same period, OFSI approved 9 new or amended licences under the Russia Regulations.</p><p> </p><p>In 2022 to date, OFSI has received 1031 specific licence applications. Most recent records show that OFSI has currently issued 82 new or amended licences to allow an activity or transaction that would otherwise be prohibited by the Russia Regulations. The issuance of general licences by OFSI – licensing a broad class of activity under the Regulations - has also led to specific licence applications being withdrawn.</p>
answering member constituency Arundel and South Downs more like this
answering member printed Andrew Griffith more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-06T18:00:35.383Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-06T18:00:35.383Z
answering member
4874
label Biography information for Andrew Griffith more like this
tabling member
4359
label Biography information for Stephen Kinnock more like this
1547323
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Treasury: Protective Clothing more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 17 October 2022 to Question 61148 on Treasury: Protective Clothing, at what grade the 0.25 full time equivalent staff in his Department is employed; and since what date they have been employed. more like this
tabling member constituency Ashton-under-Lyne more like this
tabling member printed
Angela Rayner more like this
uin 100993 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-06more like thismore than 2022-12-06
answer text <p>It is long-standing Government policy not to comment on individual personnel matters. The 0.25 FTE are primarily at junior grades however it includes staff across the department and at varying levels of seniority, including senior civil servants. This number has fluctuated as issues arise over the course of any period. DHSC remain the lead department on PPE storage, but resource in HMT has also been directed towards overseeing DHSC’s work on Covid-19 PPE continuously since the start of the pandemic.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Suffolk more like this
answering member printed James Cartlidge more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-06T15:29:58.353Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-06T15:29:58.353Z
answering member
4519
label Biography information for James Cartlidge more like this
tabling member
4356
label Biography information for Angela Rayner more like this
1547362
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Inflation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent discussions his Department has had with the Bank of England on meeting the two per cent inflation target. more like this
tabling member constituency Romford more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Rosindell more like this
uin 100906 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-07more like thismore than 2022-12-07
answer text <p>The Chancellor is fully committed to the independence of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) in setting monetary policy, and has no plans to review this. At Autumn Statement on 17 November, the Chancellor re-affirmed the MPC’s remit and primary target of achieving 2% CPI year on year, and stated that this government will not change the definition of price stability.</p><p> </p><p>The Chancellor and the Governor of the Bank of England remain in close contact to ensure that monetary and fiscal policy are coordinated. The government also continually monitors economic developments, including inflation, to consider their impact on businesses and households. The government does not comment on the conduct or effectiveness of monetary policy.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Arundel and South Downs more like this
answering member printed Andrew Griffith more like this
grouped question UIN
100907 more like this
100908 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-07T11:32:00.177Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-07T11:32:00.177Z
answering member
4874
label Biography information for Andrew Griffith more like this
tabling member
1447
label Biography information for Andrew Rosindell more like this
1547363
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Monetary Policy: Inflation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department has made a recent assessment of the potential impact of quantitative easing on the rate of inflation. more like this
tabling member constituency Romford more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Rosindell more like this
uin 100907 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-07more like thismore than 2022-12-07
answer text <p>The Chancellor is fully committed to the independence of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) in setting monetary policy, and has no plans to review this. At Autumn Statement on 17 November, the Chancellor re-affirmed the MPC’s remit and primary target of achieving 2% CPI year on year, and stated that this government will not change the definition of price stability.</p><p> </p><p>The Chancellor and the Governor of the Bank of England remain in close contact to ensure that monetary and fiscal policy are coordinated. The government also continually monitors economic developments, including inflation, to consider their impact on businesses and households. The government does not comment on the conduct or effectiveness of monetary policy.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Arundel and South Downs more like this
answering member printed Andrew Griffith more like this
grouped question UIN
100906 more like this
100908 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-07T11:32:00.227Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-07T11:32:00.227Z
answering member
4874
label Biography information for Andrew Griffith more like this
tabling member
1447
label Biography information for Andrew Rosindell more like this
1547364
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Bank of England: Monetary Policy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department plans to undertake a review of the autonomy of the Bank of England on monetary policy. more like this
tabling member constituency Romford more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Rosindell more like this
uin 100908 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-07more like thismore than 2022-12-07
answer text <p>The Chancellor is fully committed to the independence of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) in setting monetary policy, and has no plans to review this. At Autumn Statement on 17 November, the Chancellor re-affirmed the MPC’s remit and primary target of achieving 2% CPI year on year, and stated that this government will not change the definition of price stability.</p><p> </p><p>The Chancellor and the Governor of the Bank of England remain in close contact to ensure that monetary and fiscal policy are coordinated. The government also continually monitors economic developments, including inflation, to consider their impact on businesses and households. The government does not comment on the conduct or effectiveness of monetary policy.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Arundel and South Downs more like this
answering member printed Andrew Griffith more like this
grouped question UIN
100906 more like this
100907 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-07T11:32:00.257Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-07T11:32:00.257Z
answering member
4874
label Biography information for Andrew Griffith more like this
tabling member
1447
label Biography information for Andrew Rosindell more like this
1547420
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of agreeing a UN tax convention on reform of global tax rules. more like this
tabling member constituency Liverpool, Walton more like this
tabling member printed
Dan Carden more like this
uin 101049 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-06more like thismore than 2022-12-06
answer text <p>The Government believes that the UN has an important role to play in promoting greater participation within the international tax system and promoting better implementation of existing tax rules and standards across the world. The UK actively engages with the UN’s work on tax policy and provides expertise to the work of the various subcommittees on tax.</p><p> </p><p>The Government also cares deeply about ensuring that mechanisms for formulating and implementing international tax rules and standards are effective as well as inclusive. Therefore, the UK believes that the OECD, including the Inclusive Framework (with over 130 members) and the Global Forum (with over 160 members) is best-placed to deliver consensus-based reform to international tax rules. This comes as a result of the strong expertise that sits within the OECD and the steps taken in recent years to become ever more inclusive of the needs of developing countries.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-06T13:27:41.313Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-06T13:27:41.313Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
4651
label Biography information for Dan Carden more like this