Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1010106

registered interest
date	19/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Insolvency
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the announcement in the 2018 Budget of making HMRC a secondary preferential creditor in insolvency on (1) secured creditors, (2) floating charge holders, and (3) unsecured creditors such as pension funds and small businesses.
tabling member printed	Baroness Burt of Solihull
uin	HL11553
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/12/2018 answer text <p>The government does not expect this reform to significantly impact access to finance or the cost of borrowing.</p><p>The independent OBR did not make any adjustments to their economic forecast in regard to this measure.</p><p>At Budget 2018, the Government published the following assessment:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Type of Creditor</p></td><td><p>Explanation and Examples</p></td><td><p>Current Average Percentage of Debt Recovered in Insolvency</p></td><td><p>New Average Percentage of Debt Recovered in Insolvency</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol><li>Fixed charge secured creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Lenders to whom the business granted security, primarily financial institutions. When a fixed charge is provided, the company loses the right to sell or trade the item. These assets tend to be fundamental to the business; for example, machinery, property or vehicles.</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>36% (unchanged)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="2"><li>Insolvency practitioners</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Fees for overseeing the process.</p></td><td><p>As charged</p></td><td><p>As charged</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="3"><li>Preferential Creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Claims by the Redundancy Payment Service (RPS) and Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) on behalf of employees and customers (to statutory limits); and from 2020, HMRC will be a secondary preferential creditor (below the RPS and FSCS) for Value-Added Tax, Employee National Insurance contributions, Pay-As-You-Earn Income Tax and Construction Industry Scheme Deductions.</p></td><td><p>83%</p></td><td><p>83% (unchanged) for existing preferential creditors; 14% for HMRC</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="4"><li>Floating charge secured creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Lenders for whom the company is not granted security, primarily financial institutions. This tends t be the case in relation to assets that are not fixed; for example, stocks, raw materials, fixtures and fittings or cash.</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>Less than 36%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="5"><li>Unsecured creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>All remaining creditors, including HMRC debts levied directly on businesses; and debts owed to suppliers, contractors, landlords and customers.</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>Less than 4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="6"><li>Shareholder</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Only get paid if all the above creditors are paid in full.</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Bates grouped question UIN HL11554 HL11555 question first answered 03/12/2018 14:50:03 answering member 1091 label Biography information for Lord Bates
tabling member	1567 label Biography information for Baroness Burt of Solihull

1010107

registered interest
date	19/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Insolvency
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on lending to UK businesses of the announcement in the 2018 Budget of making HMRC a secondary preferential creditor in insolvency.
tabling member printed	Baroness Burt of Solihull
uin	HL11554
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/12/2018 answer text <p>The government does not expect this reform to significantly impact access to finance or the cost of borrowing.</p><p>The independent OBR did not make any adjustments to their economic forecast in regard to this measure.</p><p>At Budget 2018, the Government published the following assessment:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Type of Creditor</p></td><td><p>Explanation and Examples</p></td><td><p>Current Average Percentage of Debt Recovered in Insolvency</p></td><td><p>New Average Percentage of Debt Recovered in Insolvency</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol><li>Fixed charge secured creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Lenders to whom the business granted security, primarily financial institutions. When a fixed charge is provided, the company loses the right to sell or trade the item. These assets tend to be fundamental to the business; for example, machinery, property or vehicles.</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>36% (unchanged)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="2"><li>Insolvency practitioners</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Fees for overseeing the process.</p></td><td><p>As charged</p></td><td><p>As charged</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="3"><li>Preferential Creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Claims by the Redundancy Payment Service (RPS) and Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) on behalf of employees and customers (to statutory limits); and from 2020, HMRC will be a secondary preferential creditor (below the RPS and FSCS) for Value-Added Tax, Employee National Insurance contributions, Pay-As-You-Earn Income Tax and Construction Industry Scheme Deductions.</p></td><td><p>83%</p></td><td><p>83% (unchanged) for existing preferential creditors; 14% for HMRC</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="4"><li>Floating charge secured creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Lenders for whom the company is not granted security, primarily financial institutions. This tends t be the case in relation to assets that are not fixed; for example, stocks, raw materials, fixtures and fittings or cash.</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>Less than 36%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="5"><li>Unsecured creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>All remaining creditors, including HMRC debts levied directly on businesses; and debts owed to suppliers, contractors, landlords and customers.</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>Less than 4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="6"><li>Shareholder</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Only get paid if all the above creditors are paid in full.</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Bates grouped question UIN HL11553 HL11555 question first answered 03/12/2018 14:50:03 answering member 1091 label Biography information for Lord Bates
tabling member	1567 label Biography information for Baroness Burt of Solihull

1010108

registered interest
date	19/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Insolvency
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what economic analysis they used to support the decision in the 2018 Budget to make HMRC a secondary preferential creditor in insolvency.
tabling member printed	Baroness Burt of Solihull
uin	HL11555
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/12/2018 answer text <p>The government does not expect this reform to significantly impact access to finance or the cost of borrowing.</p><p>The independent OBR did not make any adjustments to their economic forecast in regard to this measure.</p><p>At Budget 2018, the Government published the following assessment:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Type of Creditor</p></td><td><p>Explanation and Examples</p></td><td><p>Current Average Percentage of Debt Recovered in Insolvency</p></td><td><p>New Average Percentage of Debt Recovered in Insolvency</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol><li>Fixed charge secured creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Lenders to whom the business granted security, primarily financial institutions. When a fixed charge is provided, the company loses the right to sell or trade the item. These assets tend to be fundamental to the business; for example, machinery, property or vehicles.</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>36% (unchanged)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="2"><li>Insolvency practitioners</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Fees for overseeing the process.</p></td><td><p>As charged</p></td><td><p>As charged</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="3"><li>Preferential Creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Claims by the Redundancy Payment Service (RPS) and Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) on behalf of employees and customers (to statutory limits); and from 2020, HMRC will be a secondary preferential creditor (below the RPS and FSCS) for Value-Added Tax, Employee National Insurance contributions, Pay-As-You-Earn Income Tax and Construction Industry Scheme Deductions.</p></td><td><p>83%</p></td><td><p>83% (unchanged) for existing preferential creditors; 14% for HMRC</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="4"><li>Floating charge secured creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Lenders for whom the company is not granted security, primarily financial institutions. This tends t be the case in relation to assets that are not fixed; for example, stocks, raw materials, fixtures and fittings or cash.</p></td><td><p>36%</p></td><td><p>Less than 36%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="5"><li>Unsecured creditors</li></ol></p></td><td><p>All remaining creditors, including HMRC debts levied directly on businesses; and debts owed to suppliers, contractors, landlords and customers.</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>Less than 4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ol start="6"><li>Shareholder</li></ol></p></td><td><p>Only get paid if all the above creditors are paid in full.</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p> answering member printed Lord Bates grouped question UIN HL11553 HL11554 question first answered 03/12/2018 14:50:04 answering member 1091 label Biography information for Lord Bates
tabling member	1567 label Biography information for Baroness Burt of Solihull

1010143

registered interest
date	19/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Banks: Closures
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of bank branch closures on the financial well-being of the elderly.
tabling member printed	Lord Taylor of Warwick
uin	HL11590
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 03/12/2018 answer text <p>The Treasury does not make assessments of bank branch closures, including the impact on the financial well-being of the elderly, as this is a commercial matter for banks. However, the Government believes it is important the impact of branch closures on communities is understood, considered and mitigated where possible.</p><p> </p><p>That’s why the Government supports the industry’s Access to Banking Standard which helps customers to understand the options they have locally to continue to access banking services, including specialist assistance for customers who need more help, which may include the elderly.</p><p> </p><p>The Government also considers it important that all customers, wherever they live and especially those who are vulnerable, can still access over the counter banking services. The Post Office’s Banking Framework Agreement enables 99% of banks’ personal customers to carry out their everyday banking at a Post Office counter via its network of 11,500 branches. The Government believes it is essential that more customers are aware of these useful services. This is why we asked UK Finance and the Post Office to create a 5-point action plan to increase publicity of Post Office banking services and ensure more customers can benefit from them.</p> answering member printed Lord Bates question first answered 03/12/2018 14:38:20 answering member 1091 label Biography information for Lord Bates
tabling member	1796 label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick

1010347

registered interest
date	19/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Insurance: EU Countries
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether (a) he and (b) the Financial Conduct Authority plan to investigate the alleged unlicensed selling of insurance products in EU countries to UK investors by UK companies using Isle of Man subsidiaries.
tabling member constituency	Oxford West and Abingdon
tabling member printed	Layla Moran
uin	192912
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/11/2018 answer text <p>Under EU rules, it is the responsibility of the regulator in the country where the insurance product is purchased to monitor its insurance market for unauthorised products.</p><p> </p><p>The FCA has powers to act if a firm is conducting a regulated activity in the UK without the required permission. The Government is confident in the FCA’s ability to monitor the UK insurance market and protect people who buy insurance products in the UK.</p> answering member constituency Salisbury answering member printed John Glen question first answered 22/11/2018 13:52:01 answering member 4051 label Biography information for John Glen
tabling member	4656 label Biography information for Layla Moran

1006873

registered interest
date	14/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	VAT: Electronic Government
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what progress has been made on implementing the pilot system for VAT ahead of the introduction of the Making Tax Digital regime in April 2019.
tabling member constituency	East Londonderry
tabling member printed	Mr Gregory Campbell
uin	191318
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/11/2018 answer text <p>In October HMRC opened the pilot to around half a million businesses which meet the initial eligibility criteria. This means that around half of businesses with turnover above the VAT threshold will be able to join the new service now, and begin familiarising themselves with it, with further businesses eligible to join shortly.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 19/11/2018 15:59:24 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	1409 label Biography information for Mr Gregory Campbell

1007007

registered interest
date	14/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Tax Avoidance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has accrued to the public purse since 2011 from preventing individuals and companies using accounting derecognition rules in relation to loans and derivatives to avoid paying corporation tax.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	191458
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/11/2018 answer text <p>Legislation was introduced with effect from 6 December 2010 to address avoidance schemes under which profits were said to fall out of account, or tax relief for losses were claimed, as a result of the way in which financial assets were recognised in accounts. Since that date, existing schemes have been unwound and there have been no further known iterations of these schemes. The measure has therefore been successful in protecting revenues, but it is not possible to say how much would otherwise have been lost.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 19/11/2018 15:35:42 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

1007010

registered interest
date	14/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Tax Avoidance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has accrued to the public purse since 2011 through the prevention of tax avoidance resulting from the creation for corporate investors of a credit for UK tax where no tax has been paid.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	191459
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/11/2018 answer text <p>Legislation was introduced with effect from 27 February 2012 to address a tax avoidance scheme which sought to obtain tax credits for a corporate investor in relation to distributions made by an Authorised Investment Fund where no underlying tax had in fact been suffered. Separately, legislation was introduced with effect from 15 September 2011 to address tax avoidance which sought to obtain a tax advantage in relation to manufactured overseas dividends, involving claims to repay or set-off withholding tax which had not actually been suffered.</p><p> </p><p>Since these measures were introduced, there have been no known further iterations of these avoidance schemes. They have therefore been successful in protecting revenues, but it is not possible to say how much would otherwise have been lost.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 19/11/2018 15:49:21 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

1007013

registered interest
date	14/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Tax Avoidance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has accrued to the public purse since 2011 from enabling HMRC to require a security from employers where there is a serious risk that tax due under PAYE or class 1 NICs will go unpaid.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	191460
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/11/2018 answer text <p>HMRC do not measure revenue accruals from Security payments relating to PAYE and/or NICs as this type of intervention is a deposit in absolute terms, which is either used against unpaid liabilities as may be appropriate, or returned to the customer once the risk of non- payment has been reasonably mitigated; therefore the deposits are not additional monies outside of any such liability.</p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 19/11/2018 15:55:36 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd

1007014

registered interest
date	14/11/2018
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Tax Avoidance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much revenue has accrued to the public purse since 2011 from the (a) introduction of anti-avoidance measures which have modified tax rules that apply to overseas life insurance companies and (b) application of the transfer of business rules when non-profit business is transferred to a non-EEA country.
tabling member constituency	Bootle
tabling member printed	Peter Dowd
uin	191461
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/11/2018 answer text <p>Legislation was introduced following the 2010 Summer Budget to counter an avoidance scheme involving the transfer of insurance business with unrecognised profits. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) is not aware of any instances of this avoidance entered into after the legislation was announced, but it is not possible to say how much tax would otherwise have been lost.</p><p>The changes referred to in the question relating to overseas life insurance companies and to transfers of business to non-EEA countries, also proposed in the 2010 Summer Budget, were not anti-avoidance measures. Subsequently Ministers decided not proceed with these measures so HMRC and industry could focus on the substantial changes to the tax rules for life insurance companies introduced in Finance Act 2012.</p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency Central Devon answering member printed Mel Stride question first answered 19/11/2018 15:52:56 answering member 3935 label Biography information for Mel Stride
tabling member	4397 label Biography information for Peter Dowd