Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1300084
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Public Sector: Pay more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the effect of a pay freeze on the (a) retention and (b) recruitment of public sector workers. more like this
tabling member constituency Slough more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
uin 164603 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-16more like thismore than 2021-03-16
answer text <p>Covid-19 has had an unprecedented impact on the private sector labour market, with unemployment and redundancies rising, and those on the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme seeing a significant fall in earnings. The public sector has been shielded from these effects.</p><p> </p><p>Later this year, the independent Pay Review Bodies (PRB’s) will publish evidence and commentary on recruitment and retention for ten of the largest public sector workforces including: armed forces, teachers, police officers, the National Crime Agency, prison officers, doctors and dentists, Agenda for Change NHS non-medical staff, the Judiciary, senior civil servants and senior military personnel.</p><p> </p><p>The Government will reassess public sector pay policy ahead of the 2022/23 Annual Pay Round when the impact of Covid-19 on the wider labour market will be clearer.</p><p> </p><p>Latest data shows that recruitment and retention in some of our largest workforces remains strong. We have recruited over 41,000 new trainee teachers this year – 23% more than last year – and postgraduate recruitment is at its highest level since 2010/11.</p><p>In the NHS joiner rates are higher than last year at 13.8%, and leaver rates have fallen since 2017/18. UCAS end of cycle data shows 25,100 student nurses enrolled on courses in 2020/2, a 27% increase at English providers compared to the previous year.</p>
answering member constituency North East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Steve Barclay more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-16T13:16:39.023Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-16T13:16:39.023Z
answering member
4095
label Biography information for Steve Barclay more like this
tabling member
4638
label Biography information for Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi more like this
1300112
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Broadband: Capital Allowances more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether investment in the laying of fibre cables as part of the UK's broadband rollout will qualify for the Super Deduction on capital expenditure announced in Budget 2021. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle upon Tyne Central more like this
tabling member printed
Chi Onwurah more like this
uin 164465 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-11more like thismore than 2021-03-11
answer text <p>Budget 2021 announced that from 1 April 2021 until 31 March 2023, companies investing in qualifying new plant and machinery assets will benefit from both the 130% super-deduction and a 50% first-year capital allowance.</p><p> </p><p>Expenditure on qualifying plant and machinery capital investments used by a company in the course of a trade can qualify for the relevant first-year allowance, including fibre cables. Software can also qualify for the super-deduction, provided the company makes an election to remove software from the intangible fixed assets regime. Expenditure on the learning and development of staff does not qualify for the super-deduction but is already an allowable expense for tax purposes.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
grouped question UIN 164468 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-11T14:34:39.943Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-11T14:34:39.943Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4124
label Biography information for Chi Onwurah more like this
1300114
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Treasury: Publications more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, on what date the erroneous graph on page 19 of the Build Back Better budget document was corrected to show the UK has a higher than average employment rate than the EU, G7 and OECD. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle upon Tyne Central more like this
tabling member printed
Chi Onwurah more like this
uin 164466 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-16more like thismore than 2021-03-16
answer text <p>On 3<sup>rd</sup> March 2021, HMT published <em>Build Back Better: our plan for growth, </em>a publication setting out the government’s plans to support economic growth through significant investment in infrastructure, skills and innovation.</p><p> </p><p>Due to a technical error when creating the web accessible document, some of the charts generated for the original web accessible version either contained an error or did not match the layout of the charts in the main print version. The web accessible version was corrected on 4<sup>th</sup> March 2021 to ensure consistency with the print version.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Salisbury more like this
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-16T11:09:56.77Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-16T11:09:56.77Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4124
label Biography information for Chi Onwurah more like this
1300119
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Capital Allowances more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential effect of the Super Deduction capital allowance introduced in Budget 2021 on investment in people and skills. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle upon Tyne Central more like this
tabling member printed
Chi Onwurah more like this
uin 164468 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-11more like thismore than 2021-03-11
answer text <p>Budget 2021 announced that from 1 April 2021 until 31 March 2023, companies investing in qualifying new plant and machinery assets will benefit from both the 130% super-deduction and a 50% first-year capital allowance.</p><p> </p><p>Expenditure on qualifying plant and machinery capital investments used by a company in the course of a trade can qualify for the relevant first-year allowance, including fibre cables. Software can also qualify for the super-deduction, provided the company makes an election to remove software from the intangible fixed assets regime. Expenditure on the learning and development of staff does not qualify for the super-deduction but is already an allowable expense for tax purposes.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
grouped question UIN 164465 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-11T14:34:39.99Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-11T14:34:39.99Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4124
label Biography information for Chi Onwurah more like this
1300136
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Levelling Up Fund and UK Community Renewal Fund more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he had sight of the lists of areas for priority funding from the (a) Levelling Up Fund and (b) UK Community Renewal Fund prior to the publication of those lists. more like this
tabling member constituency Croydon North more like this
tabling member printed
Steve Reed more like this
uin 164492 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-12more like thismore than 2021-03-12
answer text <p>On the Levelling Up Fund, Ministers approved metrics at the design stage based on alignment with the policy goals of the Fund. Ministers did not see a list of specific places before agreeing the list of metrics. At no point did Ministers make changes to the index, weightings or metrics recommended by officials.</p><p>On the Community Renewal Fund, the design of the fund, including the allocation process was led by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Saffron Walden more like this
answering member printed Kemi Badenoch more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-12T14:37:10.197Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-12T14:37:10.197Z
answering member
4597
label Biography information for Kemi Badenoch more like this
tabling member
4268
label Biography information for Steve Reed more like this
1300142
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Protective Clothing: VAT Zero Rating more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of extending the VAT exemption on personal protective equipment available for (a) funeral homes and (b) other businesses. more like this
tabling member constituency Coventry South more like this
tabling member printed
Zarah Sultana more like this
uin 164644 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-11more like thismore than 2021-03-11
answer text <p>The temporary zero rate was an extraordinary measure introduced to help affected sectors such as hospitals and care homes during the initial acute period of the COVID-19 crisis, when global supply of PPE did not meet demand and PPE was procured directly from the open market.</p><p> </p><p>Companies in the funeral sector source their own PPE through their normal supply routes. In extreme circumstances, there is provision for them to approach their Local Resilience Forum (LRF) or local authority, where the LRF has stood down, to discuss access to an emergency supply. Given this, there are no plans to review the VAT treatment of PPE.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-11T12:47:18.823Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4786
label Biography information for Zarah Sultana more like this
1300173
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Self-employment Income Support Scheme more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of extending the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme to include people who did not return a self-assessment form before 3 March 2021. more like this
tabling member constituency Romford more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Rosindell more like this
uin 164380 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-16more like thismore than 2021-03-16
answer text <p>At the Budget on 3 March, the Government announced the details of two further rounds of the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS). Alongside this, the Government announced that HMRC will now use 2019-20 tax returns to determine the eligibility and award for the SEISS, provided these returns were submitted by 2 March.</p><p> </p><p>This means that more than 600,000 people, many of whom became self-employed in 2019-20, may now be able to claim the fourth and fifth grants, bringing the total number of people who could be eligible to 3.7 million.</p><p> </p><p>The Government has already given self-employed people more than a month after the statutory deadline to submit their returns without penalty. HMRC waived late filing penalties until 28 February. Self-employed individuals who did not file by 31 January will, where possible, have received a notification from HMRC that their return was late.</p><p> </p><p>Allowing returns submitted on or after the terms and criteria of the SEISS grants were announced on 3 March would create a significant incentive for fraud.</p><p><strong> </strong></p>
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-16T13:19:30.337Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-16T13:19:30.337Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
1447
label Biography information for Andrew Rosindell more like this
1300182
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Packaging: Taxation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of publishing an exhaustive list of the items to be included in the Plastic Packaging Tax that will take effect from April 2022. more like this
tabling member constituency Coventry South more like this
tabling member printed
Zarah Sultana more like this
uin 164650 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-16more like thismore than 2021-03-16
answer text <p>The Government is currently in the early stages of implementing the tax via the primary legislation, which by its nature, only provides relatively high-level definitions as a foundation for the tax. As the Government moves to the next stage of implementing the tax, it will work with industry to develop regulations and guidance to provide clarity on how businesses determine the types of product that will be taxable.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Saffron Walden more like this
answering member printed Kemi Badenoch more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-16T16:42:04.647Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-16T16:42:04.647Z
answering member
4597
label Biography information for Kemi Badenoch more like this
tabling member
4786
label Biography information for Zarah Sultana more like this
1300184
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Corporation Tax: Coronavirus more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of increasing corporation tax now for those companies with a higher profit margin during the covid-19 outbreak. more like this
tabling member constituency Coventry South more like this
tabling member printed
Zarah Sultana more like this
uin 164652 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-16more like thismore than 2021-03-16
answer text <p>It is right that businesses share in the burden of restoring the public finances to a sustainable footing; that is why the Government announced an increase in the rate of Corporation Tax at Budget. The rate increase will not come into force until April 2023, by which time GDP is forecast to have recovered to its pre-pandemic level.</p><p> </p><p>Companies that have made profits during the pandemic have continued to pay Corporation Tax on those profits as normal. Corporation Tax is charged in line with the level of a company’s profits, so more profitable companies will have contributed more.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-16T13:20:51.377Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-16T13:20:51.377Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4786
label Biography information for Zarah Sultana more like this
1300213
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Freeports more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the announcement of eight freeports as part of Budget 2021, whether the Government plans to designate any further freeports in England, on the basis of bids submitted in advance of the 5 February 2021 bid deadline. more like this
tabling member constituency Houghton and Sunderland South more like this
tabling member printed
Bridget Phillipson more like this
uin 164428 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-03-11more like thismore than 2021-03-11
answer text <p>The government has no plans to designate further Freeports in England beyond those allocated at this time.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Steve Barclay more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-03-11T15:06:02.923Zmore like thismore than 2021-03-11T15:06:02.923Z
answering member
4095
label Biography information for Steve Barclay more like this
tabling member
4046
label Biography information for Bridget Phillipson more like this