Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1243847

registered interest
date	15/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Youth Offending Teams
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of trends in the (a) number and (b) type of concerns measured by youth offending teams using the AssetPlus assessment tool, during the covid-19 outbreak.
tabling member constituency	Hove
tabling member printed	Peter Kyle
uin	104132
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 20/10/2020 answer text <p>Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic the Youth Justice Board (YJB) has actively monitored a range of existing and new sources of information to evaluate the impact on children coming into contact with Youth Offending Teams. AssetPlus data is included in the oversight of YOT performance, and to protect vulnerable children and sustain best outcomes for children under COVID-19 restrictions.</p><p>The YJB plan to publish updated and additional data from AssetPlus again as Experimental Statistics under the Code of Practice [COP] for statistics in January 2021. The forthcoming publication will cover up to 31<sup>st</sup> March 2020 and will not focus specifically on the COVID-19 period.</p><p>Note that experimental statistics are a subset of newly developed or innovative official statistics undergoing evaluation. They are developed under the guidance of the Head of Profession for Statistics and published to involve users and stakeholders in the assessment of their suitability and quality at an early stage. [‘Regulatory Guidance Experimental statistics – official statistics in development’, <a href="https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Regulatory-Guidance-Experimental-Statistics-2019.pdf" target="_blank">https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Regulatory-Guidance-Experimental-Statistics-2019.pdf</a>].</p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 20/10/2020 17:44:45 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
tabling member	4505 label Biography information for Peter Kyle

1243935

registered interest
date	15/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Treatment of, and Outcomes for, Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Individuals in the Criminal Justice System Independent Review
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what progress there has been on the implementation of the Lammy Review recommendations.
tabling member constituency	Warwick and Leamington
tabling member printed	Matt Western
uin	104164
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 23/10/2020 answer text <p>The Government has provided updates on the implementation of the independent review into the treatment of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic individuals in the criminal justice system (the Lammy Review). <br>Where a recommendation could not be implemented in full or exactly as set out in the Review, alternative approaches have been sought to achieve the same aim. As of 16th October 2020, the status of the recommendations is as follows:</p><p>Out of the 35 recommendations listed in the Lammy Review: <br>i. Actions in relation to 16 recommendations have been completed (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 22, 23, 33, 35)</p><p>ii. Actions in relation to 17 recommendations are still in progress, of which:<br>a. 11 recommendations aim to be completed within 6 – 12 months (15, 17, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30)</p><p>b. 6 recommendations will take longer than 12 months to be completed (1, 9, 10, 31, 32, 34)</p><p>iii. Two recommendations (14, 16), specific to a target for judicial appointments and appraisal, are not being taken forward. This was announced in the Government’s response to the Review in December 2017.</p><p>The Government’s response identified actions going beyond the Review’s recommendations. Progress on recommendations and additional actions are overseen by a CJS Race and Ethnicity Board which was created in response to the Review.</p><p>An Independent Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities is currently reviewing inequality in the UK, focusing on areas including education, employment, health and the criminal justice system. The Independent Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities will aim to report to the Prime Minister by the end of the year</p> answering member constituency Cheltenham answering member printed Alex Chalk question first answered 23/10/2020 13:39:22 answering member 4481 label Biography information for Alex Chalk
tabling member	4617 label Biography information for Matt Western

1243529

registered interest
date	14/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Prisons: Drugs
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will provide an estimate of the volume of the reduction of illegal drugs smuggled into prisons he expects to be delivered through the implementation of the National Prison Drugs Strategy.
tabling member constituency	East Londonderry
tabling member printed	Mr Gregory Campbell
uin	103441
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/10/2020 answer text <p>By its very nature, drug trafficking is intended to be a clandestine activity. It is therefore not possible to estimate a volume reduction in drugs being smuggled into prisons. However, we are taking a number of steps to strengthen our prisons’ defences against this type of criminality.</p><p>To support the ‘reducing supply’ strand of the National Prison Drugs Strategy, we are taking decisive action to improve security. This will make it much harder for illicit items to be smuggled in by prisoners, staff and visitors; strengthen staff resilience to corruption; and target organised criminals who exploit prisons as a lucrative illicit market. This package of measures is being funded through the £100m investment to tackle crime behind bars, announced by the Prime Minister last summer. This is funding tough new measures including X-ray body scanners to detect items smuggled inside prisoners’ bodies. Our ability to tackle drugs supply is also supported by efforts to reduce demand for drugs. This is why the National Drugs Strategy takes a three-pronged approach and focusses on tackling supply, reducing demand and building recovery from substance misuse.</p><p>A planned evaluation of the £100m investment will consider the wider benefits and outcomes for the safety and security of prisons as measures of success. It will use a range of both quantitative and qualitative measures to assess whether delivery of the investment has successfully reduced drug trafficking into prisons through the targeted supply routes.</p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 19/10/2020 15:39:44 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
tabling member	1409 label Biography information for Mr Gregory Campbell

1243551

registered interest
date	14/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Youth Justice: Coronavirus
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what plans he has to manage the delivery of youth court hearings during a second wave of covid-19.
tabling member constituency	Hove
tabling member printed	Peter Kyle
uin	103580
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/10/2020 answer text <p>In consultation with Public Health England, and Public Health Wales, HMCTS has put in place arrangements for social distancing and mitigation of the risks associated with the pandemic. <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/915493/HMCTS401_recovery_overview_for_crime_WEB.pdf" target="_blank">COVID-19: Update on the HMCTS response for Criminal Courts in England and Wales</a>.</p><p>These arrangements have, since July, enabled youth courts to conclude more cases every week than have been received, with the safety of all those involved in these hearings being paramount.</p><p>We do not currently envisage that it will be necessary to revert to any contingency listing arrangements during a second wave of covid-19. The position will be kept under review.</p> answering member constituency Croydon South answering member printed Chris Philp question first answered 19/10/2020 15:34:56 answering member 4503 label Biography information for Chris Philp
tabling member	4505 label Biography information for Peter Kyle

1243562

registered interest
date	14/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Youth Rehabilitation Orders
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent estimate he has made of the number of interventions mandated by Youth Rehabilitation Orders that are being delivered.
tabling member constituency	Hove
tabling member printed	Peter Kyle
uin	103581
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/10/2020 answer text <p>Youth Rehabilitation Orders (YROs) can be imposed in any case where the mandatory referral order conditions do not apply. It provides the court with a menu of 18 requirements to choose from (such as education, activity or curfew requirements).</p><p> </p><p>Youth Offending Teams supervise young people serving a community sentence and figures on the delivery of requirements that have been given to children who received a YRO are not held centrally. Youth Justice Statistics are published annually, including the number of requirements that have been given to children who received a YRO. In the year ending March 2019 this was as follows:</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table: Types of requirements given to children receiving a Youth Rehabilitation Order (YRO), year ending March 2019<sup>(1)</sup></strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Requirement</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of requirements</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Share</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Supervision</p></td><td><p>3,655</p></td><td><p>32%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Activity</p></td><td><p>2,138</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Electronic Monitoring</p></td><td><p>1,556</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Curfew</p></td><td><p>1,478</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Programme</p></td><td><p>930</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unpaid Work</p></td><td><p>434</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Prohibited Activity</p></td><td><p>418</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attendance Centre</p></td><td><p>330</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Exclusion</p></td><td><p>290</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Education</p></td><td><p>108</p></td><td><p>1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Residence</p></td><td><p>74</p></td><td><p>1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Local Authority Residence</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Drug Treatment</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Drug Testing</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mental Health Treatment</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Intoxicating Substance Treatment</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>11,525</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>100%</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>(1) In the year ending March 2019 according to Youth Justice Application Framework (YJJAF) there were 5,075 YROs given to 3,883 children. These YROs had 11,525 requirements attached to them. For 1,240 of 5,075 YROs given no requirement type was recorded.</p><p> </p><p>Source: Youth Justice statistics: 2018 to 2019 supplementary tables, Chapter 5 – Sentencing of Children, Table 5.7 <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/youth-justice-statistics" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/youth-justice-statistics</a></p> answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire answering member printed Lucy Frazer question first answered 19/10/2020 15:31:45 answering member 4517 label Biography information for Lucy Frazer
tabling member	4505 label Biography information for Peter Kyle

1243623

registered interest
date	14/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Administration of Justice: Recordings
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what proportion of hearings in courts and tribunals used audio or video technology either for the whole of the hearing, or in part, during September 2020.
tabling member printed	Lord Wasserman
uin	HL9202
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/10/2020 answer text <p>The proportion of hearings in the criminal courts, that have taken place using video or audio in the month of September is 46% as shown in the HMCTS data below:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Number of hearings in courts and tribunals by method for September 2020</p></td><td><p>Proportional Av.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total number of hearings held, mostly conducted face-to-face</p></td><td><p>39%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total number of hearings held, mostly conducted using an audio platform</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total number of hearings held, mostly conducted using a video platform</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total number of other hearings conducted</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p>100%</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member printed Baroness Scott of Bybrook question first answered 28/10/2020 16:21:39 answering member 4553 label Biography information for Baroness Scott of Bybrook
tabling member	4207 label Biography information for Lord Wasserman

1243624

registered interest
date	14/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Courts: Video Conferencing
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many (1) magistrates' courts, (2) crown courts, (3) civil courts and (4) family courts were using the Cloud Video Platform as of 1 October 2020.
tabling member printed	Lord Wasserman
uin	HL9203
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/10/2020 answer text <table><tbody><tr><td><p>Number of courts by jurisdiction that have reported using CVP as of 1 October 2020</p></td><td><p>No.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Civil</p></td><td><p>75</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Crown</p></td><td><p>45</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Family</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Magistrates’</p></td><td><p>103</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Multi-jurisdictional court centres</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tribunals</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p>319</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Caveats:</p><ul><li>Data are taken from a live management information system and can change over time.</li><li>Data are taken off manual returns.</li><li>Data are management information and are not subject to the same level of checks as official statistics.</li><li>Data provided are the most recent available and for that reason might differ slightly from any previously published information.</li><li>Data has not been cross referenced with case files.</li><li>Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale MI system. It is the best data that is available and is subject to significant underreporting and some duplication.</li><li>The data only looks at data between 18 May 2020 and 01 October 2020.</li></ul> answering member printed Baroness Scott of Bybrook question first answered 28/10/2020 16:23:19 answering member 4553 label Biography information for Baroness Scott of Bybrook
tabling member	4207 label Biography information for Lord Wasserman

1242777

registered interest
date	13/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Prisoners: Transgender People
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of compliance with the Equality Act 2010 of decisions to move male prisoners who are gender transitioning to female prison units.
tabling member printed	Lord Blencathra
uin	HL9110
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/10/2020 answer text <p>We are committed to ensuring that transgender offenders are treated fairly, lawfully and decently, with their rights and safety properly respected. Regardless of where a transgender individual is being held, we expect that they will be respected and addressed in the gender with which they identify.</p><p>In 2019 the Ministry of Justice conducted a review into the care and management of individuals who are transgender and this led to the publication of a revised Policy Framework which strengthened the risk and safeguarding process. The Framework was developed in consultation with a range of internal and external stakeholders, and comprehensive consideration was given to HMPPS’s responsibilities under the Equality Act 2010 throughout the process. The Framework emphasises the requirement to protect both the welfare and rights of the individual, and the welfare and rights of others around them. This includes staff and other prisoners. All decisions made on the location of transgender individuals are made in line with this policy, and decisions to locate an individual in the opposite side of the estate to their legal gender can only be made by a Complex Case Board (CCB), chaired by a senior prison manager, following a full assessment of all known risks posed both to, and from, the individual</p><p><br> Under the Gender Recognition Act 2004, once an individual obtains a GRC, their acquired gender becomes legally recognised and they are entitled to the rights appropriate to anyone else of that gender. This means that a transgender female with a GRC entering the prison estate would be placed in a women’s prison, unless there were exceptional circumstances. Where such circumstances are identified, a referral is made to the CCB to consider all available evidence relating to an individual’s care and management, including risks posed both to and from the individual, before making a decision on an individual’s location.</p><p>Further information can be found on the following link:- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-care-and-management-of-individuals-who-are-transgender</p> answering member printed Baroness Scott of Bybrook grouped question UIN HL9111 question first answered 27/10/2020 17:43:12 answering member 4553 label Biography information for Baroness Scott of Bybrook
tabling member	497 label Biography information for Lord Blencathra

1242778

registered interest
date	13/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Prisoners: Transgender People
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government what criteria they use to assess decisions to move biologically male prisoners with a Gender Recognition Certificate into a female prison unit when the prison in question has a transgender unit.
tabling member printed	Lord Blencathra
uin	HL9111
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/10/2020 answer text <p>We are committed to ensuring that transgender offenders are treated fairly, lawfully and decently, with their rights and safety properly respected. Regardless of where a transgender individual is being held, we expect that they will be respected and addressed in the gender with which they identify.</p><p>In 2019 the Ministry of Justice conducted a review into the care and management of individuals who are transgender and this led to the publication of a revised Policy Framework which strengthened the risk and safeguarding process. The Framework was developed in consultation with a range of internal and external stakeholders, and comprehensive consideration was given to HMPPS’s responsibilities under the Equality Act 2010 throughout the process. The Framework emphasises the requirement to protect both the welfare and rights of the individual, and the welfare and rights of others around them. This includes staff and other prisoners. All decisions made on the location of transgender individuals are made in line with this policy, and decisions to locate an individual in the opposite side of the estate to their legal gender can only be made by a Complex Case Board (CCB), chaired by a senior prison manager, following a full assessment of all known risks posed both to, and from, the individual</p><p><br> Under the Gender Recognition Act 2004, once an individual obtains a GRC, their acquired gender becomes legally recognised and they are entitled to the rights appropriate to anyone else of that gender. This means that a transgender female with a GRC entering the prison estate would be placed in a women’s prison, unless there were exceptional circumstances. Where such circumstances are identified, a referral is made to the CCB to consider all available evidence relating to an individual’s care and management, including risks posed both to and from the individual, before making a decision on an individual’s location.</p><p>Further information can be found on the following link:- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-care-and-management-of-individuals-who-are-transgender</p> answering member printed Baroness Scott of Bybrook grouped question UIN HL9110 question first answered 27/10/2020 17:43:12 answering member 4553 label Biography information for Baroness Scott of Bybrook
tabling member	497 label Biography information for Lord Blencathra

1242784

registered interest
date	13/10/2020
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Divorce: Counselling and Mediation
house id	2
legislature	25277 pref label House of Lords
question text	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the passing of the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 on 25 June, what information and guidance they plan to provide online about the availability of counselling and mediation services for couples going through the procedure of divorce.
tabling member printed	The Lord Bishop of Carlisle
uin	HL9117
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/10/2020 answer text <p>As part of implementing the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act, the Government is committed to ensuring that appropriate support services are clearly signposted from gov.uk webpages for those contemplating divorce. We are also committed to providing appropriate signposting as part of the legal process of divorce through an updated online divorce service. While precise details are yet to be finalised, these services would likely include mediation and marriage and relationship support services.</p> answering member printed Baroness Scott of Bybrook question first answered 27/10/2020 17:40:02 answering member 4553 label Biography information for Baroness Scott of Bybrook
tabling member	4307 label Biography information for The Lord Bishop of Carlisle