Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1331054
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-06-08more like thismore than 2021-06-08
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many people have been killed by someone who has previously been found guilty of homicide, imprisoned, and subsequently released, for the years for which figures are available. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Tebbit more like this
uin HL904 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-06-22more like thismore than 2021-06-22
answer text <p>The table below provides the number of people killed by offenders who were at the time on licence for an earlier homicide offence, for which they had served a prison sentence and been released. As they were on licence, when they were charged with a new offence of killing [homicide], it would have generated a formal serious further offence (SFO) notification to HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS), and the number in each calendar year reflects the year in which HMPPS received the notification. The answer interprets homicide to include offences of murder, manslaughter, death by dangerous driving and death by careless driving when under the influence of drink or drugs.</p><p> </p><p>Data are not available on offenders with a previous conviction for homicide who had completed their sentence and associated statutory probation supervision by probation and then went on to commit a further homicide.</p><p> </p><p>SFOs are rare. Fewer than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of serious further offences. Nonetheless every single serious further offence is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any lessons for the better management of future cases.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year SFO notification received</p></td><td><p>Total number of people killed in a SFO by someone convicted of homicide offences at both index offence and SFO</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019<sup>[1]</sup></p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><ol><li>We will publish SFO conviction data for 2019/20 in October 2021, therefore data for 2019 can only be provided for January, February and March.</li><li>Figures are based on conviction data that was produced in September 2020.</li><li>Data are derived from the date of SFO notification to HMPPS</li><li>This figure only includes convictions for serious further offences that have been notified to the national SFO Team, HMPPS.</li><li>The data provided are provisional figures subject to change when any outstanding cases are concluded at court.</li><li>The data also includes cases where the offender committed suicide or died prior to the trial, where a Court has subsequently ruled that they were responsible.</li></ol><p>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-06-22T16:40:04.927Zmore like thismore than 2021-06-22T16:40:04.927Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
952
label Biography information for Lord Tebbit more like this
1309525
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-04-15more like thismore than 2021-04-15
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many offenders with previous suspended sentences have received convictions for murder in each of the last 10 years. more like this
tabling member constituency Barnsley Central more like this
tabling member printed
Dan Jarvis more like this
uin 181276 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-04-20more like thismore than 2021-04-20
answer text <p>Obtaining the necessary information to answer these questions involves accessing the secure Police National Computer (PNC) system, which my relevant officials are unable to do at this time due to the current national restrictions and the need to minimise non-essential travel.</p><p>I will write to the Hon Member in due course with the information requested, once my officials are able to safely access the PNC system, and will place a copy of my letter in the Library.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Croydon South more like this
answering member printed Chris Philp more like this
grouped question UIN
181275 more like this
181277 more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-04-20T15:30:14.387Zmore like thismore than 2021-04-20T15:30:14.387Z
answering member
4503
label Biography information for Chris Philp more like this
tabling member
4243
label Biography information for Dan Jarvis more like this
1186778
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-20more like thismore than 2020-03-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people have been murdered by people that were previously convicted of attempted murder and then released having served their prison sentences in each of the last 20 years. more like this
tabling member constituency Shipley more like this
tabling member printed
Philip Davies more like this
uin 32649 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-30more like thismore than 2020-03-30
answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>PQ 32649</strong></p><p>The most recent data available are for the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2018 and relate only relates to convictions for SFOs by offenders under the supervision of the Probation Service at the time they committed the SFO. There have been no people murdered by an offender during their period of supervision following release from prison for the offence of attempted murder. There may be a small number of cases where the offender might have had a previous conviction for attempted murder, but these cases will not have been captured by the SFO Review Procedures.</p><p> </p><p><strong>PQ 32664</strong></p><p> </p><p>The table below shows how many SFOs were committed (convictions) by offenders that were automatically released from prison between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2018, which are the most recent data available. We will publish conviction data for 2018/19 in October 2020.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Number of offenders convicted of a SFO following an automatic release from prison</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 April 2015 – 31 March 2016</p></td><td><p>115</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 April 2016 – 31 March 2017</p></td><td><p>164</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 April 2017 – 31 April 2018</p></td><td><p>145</p></td></tr></tbody></table><ol><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording systems, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing</li><li>The data do not include a small number of offenders who were (i) sentenced to a hospital order, (ii) died before the conclusion of criminal proceedings (iii) sentenced to an extended determinate sentence or an extended sentence for public protection who may have been released by the Parole Board and (iv) released automatically from prison, who were then recalled to prison and re-released via a decision by the Parole Board or by executive release by the Public Protection Casework Section prior to committing the SFO.</li></ol><p>The data do include any offender who was sentenced to imprisonment of under 12 months, who may have been released directly onto post sentence supervision (PSS) rather than a licence.</p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN 32664 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-30T15:10:57.56Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-30T15:10:57.56Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
1565
label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies more like this
1181966
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many instances of a Serious Further Offence review of murder have resulted in the perpetrator being (a) charged and (b) convicted where the supervisory agency has been (i) the National Probation Service and (ii) a community rehabilitation company by each geographic area of those community rehabilitation companies in each year since 2014. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 23577 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-05more like thismore than 2020-03-05
answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases. As a proportion of the offenders managed by the NPS and CRCs respectively, there is no evidence of a difference between the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) when it comes to offenders committing murder.</p><p> </p><p>SFO reviews are initiated where the NPS or a CRC <em>notifies</em> HM Prison and Probation Service that an offender under supervision has been charged with an SFO. The number of SFO <em>notifications</em> is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year. About half of all SFO notifications do not result in SFO convictions. In other cases, after initial notification charges will be dropped or an offender acquitted or an offender convicted of a lesser offence.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below shows the number of SFO <em>notifications</em> – that is, cases of an offender under probation supervision <em>charged</em> with an SFO - received between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019, by SFO offence, where the offender was supervised by (a) the National Probation Service (NPS) and (b) Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC).</p><p> </p><p>Table 1<strong>.</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2014*</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SFO Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>56</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Female genital mutilation</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>127</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>391</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>310</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>238</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>350</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>425</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>315</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>338</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>224</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>329</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>215</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes for Table 1:</p><ol><li>*CRCs were created as part of Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) in June 2014. Therefore, data provided for NPS for 2014 include cases managed by former Probation Trusts prior to TR.</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete automatic reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Conditional reviews are completed when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence (NPS only) or where no risk assessment has been completed.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>Not all notifications result in the completion of a review as charges are reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Similarly, the number of SFO reviews completed is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year.</p><p> </p><p>The Honourable Member may be referring to the Freedom of Information Act response 200121016 on 11 February 2020. However, that response did <em>not</em> show the number of people murdered by offenders under supervision. Rather, it showed the number of SFO reviews completed in each calendar year for 2014 to 2019, where the offender had been <em>charged with</em> murder.</p><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows the total number of SFO reviews completed in 2014 as a whole, the number of reviews completed for those who were charged with murder, and the number of subsequent convictions for murder. Tables 3 and 4 below show the number of offenders being supervised by the NPS and CRC respectively who were charged with murder, where a review was completed in the years 2015, 2016, 2017, and the offender subsequently <em>convicted of murder. W</em>e have provided the number of SFO reviews in 2014 as a separate table (Table 2), as Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) created CRCs mid-year and prior to this, Probation Trusts managed the cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>404</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>49</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All NPS Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>362</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 4</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All CRC Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>202</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>273</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>39</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes for Tables 2, 3,4</p><ol><li>Conviction data are as at 27 January 2020</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a review as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represent SFO reviews conducted following charge and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>We have not included the three month data relating to 1 January-31 March 2018.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p>In October, the Ministry of Justice will publish annual reconviction data, including murder for 2018/19, with an accompanying narrative which also explains the correct interpretation of the figures. The current publication can be found at: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>Tables 2, 3 and 4 provide the number of reviews completed in respect of offenders supervised by the NPS or CRCs who were charged with and subsequently convicted of murder between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. We have not provided data specific to individual CRCs as the total figure in some cases amounts to five people or fewer. We consider that we would be in breach of our obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation and / or the Data Protection Act 2018 if we release information that would risk identification of the individuals concerned.</p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
23575 more like this
23576 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.627Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.627Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1181968
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will publish his Department's recent Freedom of Information Act response showing the number of people murdered by reoffenders. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 23576 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-05more like thismore than 2020-03-05
answer text <p>Serious Further Offences (SFOs) are rare. Less than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of an SFO; for murder, the proportion will be lower. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any necessary actions which need to be taken to improve the management of other cases. As a proportion of the offenders managed by the NPS and CRCs respectively, there is no evidence of a difference between the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) when it comes to offenders committing murder.</p><p> </p><p>SFO reviews are initiated where the NPS or a CRC <em>notifies</em> HM Prison and Probation Service that an offender under supervision has been charged with an SFO. The number of SFO <em>notifications</em> is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year. About half of all SFO notifications do not result in SFO convictions. In other cases, after initial notification charges will be dropped or an offender acquitted or an offender convicted of a lesser offence.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below shows the number of SFO <em>notifications</em> – that is, cases of an offender under probation supervision <em>charged</em> with an SFO - received between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019, by SFO offence, where the offender was supervised by (a) the National Probation Service (NPS) and (b) Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC).</p><p> </p><p>Table 1<strong>.</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2014*</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td colspan="2"><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SFO Offence</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Arson with intent to endanger life</em></p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Assault by penetration</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Attempt or conspiracy to commit murder</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>51</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>31</p></td><td><p>51</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Aggravated Burglary</em></p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>35</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Causing death by dangerous/careless driving/aggravated vehicle taking</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>False imprisonment</em></p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Firearms offences including possession with intent</em></p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Kidnapping</em></p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manslaughter</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Murder</p></td><td><p>56</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Offences under the Explosive Substances Act</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other qualifying sexual offences</em></p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>34</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Other serious violent offence</em></p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Female genital mutilation</em></p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other specified offence causing death</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rape</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>43</p></td><td><p>112</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>118</p></td><td><p>127</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>131</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><em>Robbery with firearm</em></p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Under 13 sexual offences including rape</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>391</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>90</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>310</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>238</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>350</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>274</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>425</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>315</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>338</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>224</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>329</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>215</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Notes for Table 1:</p><ol><li>*CRCs were created as part of Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) in June 2014. Therefore, data provided for NPS for 2014 include cases managed by former Probation Trusts prior to TR.</li><li>The NPS and CRCs are required to complete automatic reviews on any eligible offender who has been charged with (including attempted or conspiracy to commit offences): murder manslaughter, other specified offences causing death, rape or assault by penetration, or a sexual offence against a child under 13 years of age.</li><li>Conditional reviews are completed when an offender has been assessed as high risk of harm during the current sentence (NPS only) or where no risk assessment has been completed.</li><li>The data represents SFO charges and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>Not all notifications result in the completion of a review as charges are reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Similarly, the number of SFO reviews completed is not equivalent to the number of SFO convictions in any year.</p><p> </p><p>The Honourable Member may be referring to the Freedom of Information Act response 200121016 on 11 February 2020. However, that response did <em>not</em> show the number of people murdered by offenders under supervision. Rather, it showed the number of SFO reviews completed in each calendar year for 2014 to 2019, where the offender had been <em>charged with</em> murder.</p><p> </p><p>Table 2 shows the total number of SFO reviews completed in 2014 as a whole, the number of reviews completed for those who were charged with murder, and the number of subsequent convictions for murder. Tables 3 and 4 below show the number of offenders being supervised by the NPS and CRC respectively who were charged with murder, where a review was completed in the years 2015, 2016, 2017, and the offender subsequently <em>convicted of murder. W</em>e have provided the number of SFO reviews in 2014 as a separate table (Table 2), as Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) created CRCs mid-year and prior to this, Probation Trusts managed the cases.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>404</p></td><td><p>71</p></td><td><p>49</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All NPS Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>NPS Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>362</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Table 4</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>All CRC Reviews</strong> <strong>(a)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>CRC Reviews involving a Charge of Murder</strong> <strong>(b) </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews in (b) that resulted in a Murder conviction</strong> <strong>(c)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p>202</p></td><td><p>42</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td><td><p>235</p></td><td><p>47</p></td><td><p>26</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>2017</strong></p></td><td><p>273</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>39</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Notes for Tables 2, 3,4</p><ol><li>Conviction data are as at 27 January 2020</li><li>Not all SFO notifications result in the completion of a review as charges can be reduced or dropped. Not every offender charged with a SFO is convicted.</li><li>The data represent SFO reviews conducted following charge and not a unique count of offenders.</li><li>We have not included the three month data relating to 1 January-31 March 2018.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p>In October, the Ministry of Justice will publish annual reconviction data, including murder for 2018/19, with an accompanying narrative which also explains the correct interpretation of the figures. The current publication can be found at: <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843382/Serious_Further_Offences_-Bulletin.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>Tables 2, 3 and 4 provide the number of reviews completed in respect of offenders supervised by the NPS or CRCs who were charged with and subsequently convicted of murder between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. We have not provided data specific to individual CRCs as the total figure in some cases amounts to five people or fewer. We consider that we would be in breach of our obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation and / or the Data Protection Act 2018 if we release information that would risk identification of the individuals concerned.</p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN
23575 more like this
23577 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.503Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-05T16:52:31.503Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
1177301
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-02-10more like thismore than 2020-02-10
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people have been murdered since 2017 by people who were previously convicted of murder and then released having served their prison sentences. more like this
tabling member constituency Shipley more like this
tabling member printed
Philip Davies more like this
uin 14641 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-02-18more like thismore than 2020-02-18
answer text <p>Serious further offences are very rare. Fewer than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are charged with a serious further offence.</p><p>Anyone convicted of murder is sentenced to a mandatory life sentence. The convicted murderer is eligible for release on life licence only once he has completed the minimum term (tariff) specified by the Court at the point of sentence. It falls to the independent Parole Board to determine whether to release a life sentence prisoner who has completed his minimum term and the Board will direct release only where it is satisfied that it is no longer necessary for the purposes of public protection for the prisoner to remain confined.</p><p> </p><p>Section 21 of Criminal Justice Act 2003 sets out the starting point for the sentencing Judge to impose a whole life tariff in cases where an offender has been previously convicted of murder. Whole life orders are the most severe form of punishment, such sentences have no tariff and no possibility of parole board release.</p><p> </p><p>Since 2017, three<sup>1 2</sup> people have been murdered by offenders subject to supervision on a life licence for murder at the time.</p><p> </p><p>This figure includes two victims who were included in the data provided to answer PQ 140689 from the last session.</p><p> </p><ol><li><p>This figure only includes convictions for murder by life sentence prisoners on supervision that have been notified to HMPPS.</p></li><li>Data Sources and Quality. We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol><p> </p>
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-02-18T14:16:12.35Zmore like thismore than 2020-02-18T14:16:12.35Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
tabling member
1565
label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies more like this
1081731
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-03-04more like thismore than 2019-03-04
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Homicide: Reoffenders remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many instances of a Serious Further Offence review of murder has resulted in the perpetrator being (a) charged and (b) convicted where the supervisory agency has been (i) the National Probation Service and (b) a Community Rehabilitation Company in each year since 2014 in England and Wales. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 228067 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-03-12more like thismore than 2019-03-12
answer text <p>The number of offenders managed by (i) the National Probation Service (NPS) and (ii) a Community Rehabilitation Company who were (a) charged with murder and (b) subsequently convicted of murder in each year since 2014 in England and Wales is given in the table below. The number of convictions is a provisional figure and is subject to change as some cases have not yet reached conclusion.</p><p> </p><p>In addition, there was an offender supervised by the NPS in 2015 and another in 2016 who were charged with a lesser offence but eventually convicted of murder. Similarly, there was an offender supervised by a CRC in 2015 and three offenders supervised by a CRC in 2018 who were charged with a lesser offender but eventually convicted of murder.</p><p> </p><p>A Serious Further Offence (SFO) review is triggered where an offender under statutory supervision in the community is charged with a qualifying offence – a “notification”. However, in cases where charges are dropped in the three-month period for the SFO review to be produced, the SFO review will not be completed.</p><p> </p><p>SFOs are rare. Less than 0.1% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of murder, and less than 0.5% convicted of any SFO. Nonetheless, every single SFO is taken extremely seriously, and in all cases a review is carried out to identify any lessons for the better management of future cases.</p><p> </p><p>The probation caseload, counted in September of each year was: 2015 – 127,000, 2016 – 181,000, 2017 – 185,000 and 2018 – 180,000. The CRCs have a much larger proportion of the caseload than the NPS.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2"><p>Year</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>(i)National Probation Service</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>(ii) Community Rehabilitation Companies</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(a)Number of Notifications (charges)</p></td><td><p>(b) Number of Convictions</p></td><td><p>(a) Number of Notifications (charges)</p></td><td><p>(b) Number of Convictions</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>29</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>49</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>37</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>78</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><ol><li>Under the Offender Rehabilitation Act (ORA) 2014 offenders serving short prison sentences are now released on licence. As a direct and predicted result, there has been an increase in the number of SFO notifications as a result of ORA. This does not mean that a greater proportion of offenders under statutory probation supervision are being charged with SFOs. The increase plateaued in 2017.</li><li>The number of ORA only includes cases those cases that would not have previously fallen in scope of the SFO procedures as mentioned above. Cases that were sentenced to an ORA sentence of less than 12 months, but who were previously and concurrently subject to probation intervention, have not been captured within this figure. For example, the offender was subject to a community order (CO), when he was further sentenced to under 12 month sentence under ORA. If the CO was active at the time of the SFO, it would have qualified regardless of the ORA sentence, so has not been counted in the ORA numbers.</li><li>Data Sources and Quality .We have drawn these figures from administrative IT systems which, as with some large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</li></ol>
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border more like this
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-03-12T17:29:14.337Zmore like thismore than 2019-03-12T17:29:14.337Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this